It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 245 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.

Watson was the consensus best pick. Mitch was the reach/project. This isn’t hindsight.


Some moron had Kizer as the top pick.

Imagine being that asshole, especially when trying to dunk on Pace.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.

Watson was the consensus best pick. Mitch was the reach/project. This isn’t hindsight.


Some moron had Kizer as the top pick.

Imagine being that asshole, especially when trying to dunk on Pace.

:lol: was that me? I hope not. I remember being pro Watson and anti Mitch that draft. Had no opinion on Mahomes.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:

Some moron had Kizer as the top pick.

Imagine being that asshole, especially when trying to dunk on Pace.

:lol: was that me? I hope not. I remember being pro Watson and anti Mitch that draft. Had no opinion on Mahomes.


:lol:

I don't think so.

Dan Durkin is the guy I'm talking about.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:

Some moron had Kizer as the top pick.

Imagine being that asshole, especially when trying to dunk on Pace.

:lol: was that me? I hope not. I remember being pro Watson and anti Mitch that draft. Had no opinion on Mahomes.


:lol:

I don't think so.

Dan Durkin is the guy I'm talking about.

Could be worse. An nfl writer famously said Nathan Peterman was the best QB from that draft.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
The Ravens have a great running back at quarterback that’s for sure.

One who led the league in TD passes from the pocket this year and led the league overall in TD passes. Pretty good for a running back.


The Ravens were 1st in rushing offense and 27th in passing offense. They won by running. When forced to throw he lost to the 6th seed at home. Great athlete. Gimmicky passer.

Wrong as usual.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamoff/2019


Yards per game. Not some cherry picked stat. I like Lamar and was rooting for him. He succeeds when he runs. He’s not Mahomes. That’s all. Back to your virtue signaling.

Yards per game is a cherry picked stat you dolt. And a bad one.

We’re talking about the youngest MVP winner in history who led the league in passing TDs while finishing 6th in rushing and playing only 15 games. When I say he’s great and you say it’s virtue signaling it once again says more about you than it does me champ.


Great argument. The standard NFL stats are cherry picked. Gotcha. See you next time I order something online.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: it’s not the standard and I doubt that since I’m quite sure I have a better job than you based on our last conversation in person ya fucking coward.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.

Watson was the consensus best pick. Mitch was the reach/project. This isn’t hindsight.


This is a false narrative. NFL.com has (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky no 1

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... ite-talent

Si had Watson 1 and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 4
https://www.si.com/2017-nfl-draft-quarterback-rankings

Fox sports had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 1 and Mahomes 8.

https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/n ... 011917-011

Pff had it like this: (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, Watson, Mahomes.https://www.pff.com/news/ranking-the-to ... -prospects

So like I said there was no clear consensus and the more you dig the more you'll find that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky eclipsed Watson in the rankings. You didn't provide a source when you stated Watson was the "consensus" top pick. He wasn't.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
He was. You’re cherry picking sources. Watch the draft. Everyone was surprised by the pick. Watson just came off an incredible college career that included beating Alabama in the title game. He was the consensus top pick.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.


He liked (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Mahomes. He worked out both and interviewed both. They were the top 2 players on his board. He drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. I don't know how it's possible to see both of those guys perform and select (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. This coming from someone who doesn't hate (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:

He wasn’t. He was the same Stafford as always. You seem to take the wrong conclusions from looking at the wrong stats with small sample sizes. If you’re gonna go all in on analytics you should use them better.



What is wrong with using a players entire season as a sample size? I think I'm fine with the way I use data. You're the guy who backs up your support of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky by saying "he threw some nice passes". There's rarely anything I say that I can't objectively support.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
The only question about Watson was his health.

Mitch rose up after he was done actually playing games.

Height and whether he was a system QB were the knocks on Mahomes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
He was. You’re cherry picking sources. Watch the draft. Everyone was surprised by the pick. Watson just came off an incredible college career that included beating Alabama in the title game. He was the consensus top pick.


You're gonna have to define what you mean by consensus. I just linked to some of the most well known publications in the football world demonstrating that scouts and personnel people differed on who was the best prospect. One of the sources I linked to said Watson was the best pick. I can't be cherry picking if I pick something that potentially undermines my own argument. That's not cherry picking. That's called being intellectually honest.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

He wasn’t. He was the same Stafford as always. You seem to take the wrong conclusions from looking at the wrong stats with small sample sizes. If you’re gonna go all in on analytics you should use them better.



What is wrong with using a players entire season as a sample size? I think I'm fine with the way I use data. You're the guy who backs up your support of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky by saying "he threw some nice passes". There's rarely anything I say that I can't objectively support.

:lol: I don’t support (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. I’ve been pretty consistent in my opinion about him.

What’s wrong with the way you use data in this context is you’re ignoring a 10 year career in favor of smaller sample sizes, you’re using a clickbait grading system as “data” when it’s not, and you’re ignoring the context of the league in which nobody who watched would have ever considered Stafford a top 6 QB at any point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

He wasn’t. He was the same Stafford as always. You seem to take the wrong conclusions from looking at the wrong stats with small sample sizes. If you’re gonna go all in on analytics you should use them better.



What is wrong with using a players entire season as a sample size? I think I'm fine with the way I use data. You're the guy who backs up your support of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky by saying "he threw some nice passes". There's rarely anything I say that I can't objectively support.

:lol: I don’t support (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. I’ve been pretty consistent in my opinion about him.

What’s wrong with the way you use data in this context is you’re ignoring a 10 year career in favor of smaller sample sizes, you’re using a clickbait grading system as “data” when it’s not, and you’re ignoring the context of the league in which nobody who watched would have ever considered Stafford a top 6 QB at any point.


I clearly said this year for Stafford.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.


He liked (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Mahomes. He worked out both and interviewed both. They were the top 2 players on his board. He drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. I don't know how it's possible to see both of those guys perform and select (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. This coming from someone who doesn't hate (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


I didn't like it because he came from the ACC, he didn't beat out the starter when he first got there, and he didn't have a lot of games played. And the trade just made it worse.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

He wasn’t. He was the same Stafford as always. You seem to take the wrong conclusions from looking at the wrong stats with small sample sizes. If you’re gonna go all in on analytics you should use them better.



What is wrong with using a players entire season as a sample size? I think I'm fine with the way I use data. You're the guy who backs up your support of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky by saying "he threw some nice passes". There's rarely anything I say that I can't objectively support.

:lol: I don’t support (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. I’ve been pretty consistent in my opinion about him.

What’s wrong with the way you use data in this context is you’re ignoring a 10 year career in favor of smaller sample sizes, you’re using a clickbait grading system as “data” when it’s not, and you’re ignoring the context of the league in which nobody who watched would have ever considered Stafford a top 6 QB at any point.


I clearly said this year for Stafford.

And I clearly said you were wrong and explained why. Nobody in their right mind is taking Stafford 6th overall at QB right now. This is where your box score analysis clearly betrays you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
He was. You’re cherry picking sources. Watch the draft. Everyone was surprised by the pick. Watson just came off an incredible college career that included beating Alabama in the title game. He was the consensus top pick.

People were surprised by the trade. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was rated as well as any of them. Of course some liked others better. Some people liked Ryan Leaf better than Eli's brother.

Citing winning the national title as a quarterback would get you laughed out of the draft coverage room.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11115
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Whatever one's thoughts are on Mahomes vs Watson, can we please agree that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath?


How else can you make the point of "can you believe someone drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over these guys"?

Vegan thinks the draft is all luck so I don’t think he blames Pace for taking Mitch over Mahomes and Watson.


ahh the old hindsight play here even though you don't think it's hindsight. Let's assume Pace took (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 3 instead of trading up to 2. There was no clear consensus on the best prospect between the three. Explain what Pace did wrong on that day and what you would have done instead.

Watson was the consensus best pick. Mitch was the reach/project. This isn’t hindsight.


Some moron had Kizer as the top pick.

Imagine being that asshole, especially when trying to dunk on Pace.


a lot of people liked kizer a lot but yes dan durkin should not be one of the twitter experts dunking on pace considering he did have kizer as the best QB in that draft


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He was. You’re cherry picking sources. Watch the draft. Everyone was surprised by the pick. Watson just came off an incredible college career that included beating Alabama in the title game. He was the consensus top pick.

People were surprised by the trade. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was rated as well as any of them. Of course some liked others better. Some people liked Ryan Leaf better than Eli's brother.

Citing winning the national title as a quarterback would get you laughed out of the draft coverage room.

That’s wrong. His play in big games, especially that one, was often cited as a positive when talking about him as a prospect. Unlike Mitch we actually saw him do it on the field against the best team in the country.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He was. You’re cherry picking sources. Watch the draft. Everyone was surprised by the pick. Watson just came off an incredible college career that included beating Alabama in the title game. He was the consensus top pick.

People were surprised by the trade. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was rated as well as any of them. Of course some liked others better. Some people liked Ryan Leaf better than Eli's brother.

Citing winning the national title as a quarterback would get you laughed out of the draft coverage room.

That’s wrong. His play in big games, especially that one, was often cited as a positive when talking about him as a prospect. Unlike Mitch we actually saw him do it on the field against the best team in the country.

Look at the list of national championship winning quarterbacks. Tell me how that is worth mentioning.

Trubiskty, Watson, and Mahomes were similarly rated. That's why the trade was so dumb. You can see it in the draft thread here.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
It's not just that he won it, it's how he played in the game and other big games against the best competition.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
It's not just that he won it, it's how he played in the game and other big games against the best competition.



If Watson didn't have the knee injuries..he's #1 on every board. I can't blame teams for being cautious..I wouldn't touch Tua.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:50 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not just that he won it, it's how he played in the game and other big games against the best competition.



If Watson didn't have the knee injuries..he's #1 on every board. I can't blame teams for being cautious..I wouldn't touch Tua.


Agreed! I'm more bothered by any team who works out (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Mahomes and walks away believing that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33214
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
The trade up was dumb. That aside, you can see why the Bears liked Mitch. He has the legs and the arm strength. He seems to have enough leadership abilities. But what he lacks is an ability to read defenses and questionable accuracy. Of course his limited college career made him a bigger wild card.

I don’t touch Watson given the injury.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
It's not just that he won it, it's how he played in the game and other big games against the best competition.
I liked Watson coming out of school but virtually no other elite quarterback in the NFL right now has that on their resume.

If you are holding (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's team strength against him then Mahomes shouldn't have been drafted. Mahomes couldn't even give his team a winning record his last year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I don't touch Watson now. That style of play won't last long. He takes a beating because he's reckless.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
denisdman wrote:
The trade up was dumb. That aside, you can see why the Bears liked Mitch. He has the legs and the arm strength. He seems to have enough leadership abilities. But what he lacks is an ability to read defenses and questionable accuracy. Of course his limited college career made him a bigger wild card.

I don’t touch Watson given the injury.



Mitch doesn't have a strong arm

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
312player wrote:
[
Mitch doesn't have a strong arm


It's NFL caliber. Good enough.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lamar Jackson
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11115
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:


mitchell would have just held his hands over his ears waiting for matt nagy to tell him what target to throw at because that's how the bears offense works


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 245 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group