It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
https://www.bleachernation.com/bulls/20 ... N1IweCMfHY


WE SHALL SEE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Caller Bob wrote:
https://www.bleachernation.com/bulls/2020/01/09/david-kaplan-has-heard-there-will-finally-be-massive-changes-coming-to-bulls-organization/?fbclid=IwAR3D-DQdnttXh1sph2JYN5irPqhypK5aMXCIdvpIdUT9uLQhSN1IweCMfHY


WE SHALL SEE


Moving Gar to head of scouting. Problem solved.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6302
pizza_Place: Frozen
I doubt Bernstein and Julie have sources as they claim. I would think Kap does.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Caller Bob wrote:
https://www.bleachernation.com/bulls/2020/01/09/david-kaplan-has-heard-there-will-finally-be-massive-changes-coming-to-bulls-organization/?fbclid=IwAR3D-DQdnttXh1sph2JYN5irPqhypK5aMXCIdvpIdUT9uLQhSN1IweCMfHY


WE SHALL SEE


New coach, GM, scouting, etc. except for Paxson. Paxson should be moved to a Sr. advisor/ambassador role at this point; seems like the job is destroying his health.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
vitoscotti wrote:
I doubt Bernstein and Julie have sources as they claim. I would think Kap does.
Unless his "League source" is one of the Reinsdorfs, who would have that kind of knowledge? Maybe St. Louis Bull man, but other than that it seems fishy.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Paxson recently sold his Pulte-like house. Not sure if he has another one here. Might be related.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th

I'm sure having the opportunity to report to a completely unaccountable Paxson will certainly produce some amazing candidates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Everything is on the table....well except for real change. We will just keep basically the same set up

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


this. don't forget the horrific free ajent signings like Jabari.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


this. don't forget the horrific free ajent signings like Jabari.


John Paxson's draft record is much better than Gar's.
Derrick Rose
Ben Gordon
Joakim Noah
Luol Deng
Kirk Hinrich

Jimmy Butler is the only player of note during the Gar Era and Gar has been running drafts for a much longer period of time. They also never won a playoff series with Butler as the best man and haven't surpassed .500 with players that weren't part of the Paxson core with Gar at the helm.

I agree that both have to go at this point but Paxson was damn good when he ran the show. He built that team from nothing and had them in the playoffs a year or two after taking over. No one knows for sure when Gar's team will make it there.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
The NBA 20 years ago is like the difference between a Model T and a Tesla.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
The NBA 20 years ago is like the difference between a Model T and a Tesla.


Basketball is basketball. Paxson's teams were much more competitive. Gar's teams are searching for a new identity each and every season.

He is clueless. I say this knowing that both need to go by the way.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I suspect Gar has been pretty much sidelined for the past couple of years anyway, but I'm not sure.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
I suspect Gar has been pretty much sidelined for the past couple of years anyway, but I'm not sure.


Its hard to really tell who happens to be calling the shots with the Bulls these days. I'm sure that is the way Paxson wants to play it. It was easier about 6-7 years ago. THere were certain players (Snell, McDermott) who you just knew were Gar type of players. Now it is not as easy. The drafts have been bad but the inability to identify NBA caliber talent has been worse. How do you let Dinwiddie get away? There are a number of guys floating around the league that the Bulls could have got for little or nothing and didn't.

That is the most maddening thing for me. More than the bad drafts, lack of free agent signings etc. THat is squarely on the Front Office. There are no excuses for that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


The Butler pick was Paxson's work. It fit what he had done the years before. Look at all of the picks that followed. Outside of the Tyrus Thomas reach, Paxson did a great job drafting.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
I suspect Gar has been pretty much sidelined for the past couple of years anyway, but I'm not sure.


Its hard to really tell who happens to be calling the shots with the Bulls these days. I'm sure that is the way Paxson wants to play it. It was easier about 6-7 years ago. THere were certain players (Snell, McDermott) who you just knew were Gar type of players. Now it is not as easy. The drafts have been bad but the inability to identify NBA caliber talent has been worse. How do you let Dinwiddie get away? There are a number of guys floating around the league that the Bulls could have got for little or nothing and didn't.

That is the most maddening thing for me. More than the bad drafts, lack of free agent signings etc. THat is squarely on the Front Office. There are no excuses for that.

Yeah this is why I'm basically hesitant to recognize a concrete break between eras, as doing so seems only to absolve Paxson of blame he should fully take. He at bare minimum co-signed all the stuff that was Gar's call or simply didn't care enough to stop him. After 2016 he declared he'd be taking a more active role in the Bulls' day-to-day operations, and then when they got bounced in the playoffs, he declared in 2017 he'd be taking on a more active role. By all accounts Gar was knocked down the totem pole ages ago, but even before that point, Paxson had the final call on pretty much everything anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


The Butler pick was Paxson's work. It fit what he had done the years before. Look at all of the picks that followed. Outside of the Tyrus Thomas reach, Paxson did a great job drafting.

We've been over this before but it's mighty convenient to credit non-GM Paxson for the best pick the Bulls have made in the last 20 years, especially right after declaring that the picks immediately went down in quality when he was no longer GM. I see no reason whatsoever to give Paxson the credit for that one over Gar or Matt Lloyd unless one is wed to the narrative that all the good things about the last 17 years of the Bulls should be credited to Pax and all the bad things to Gar.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


The Butler pick was Paxson's work. It fit what he had done the years before. Look at all of the picks that followed. Outside of the Tyrus Thomas reach, Paxson did a great job drafting.

We've been over this before but it's mighty convenient to credit non-GM Paxson for the best pick the Bulls have made in the last 20 years, especially right after declaring that the picks immediately went down in quality when he was no longer GM. I see no reason whatsoever to give Paxson the credit for that one over Gar or Matt Lloyd unless one is wed to the narrative that all the good things about the last 17 years of the Bulls should be credited to Pax and all the bad things to Gar.


Trends matter. Paxson had 1 awful pick during his run and the same year he is promoted they drafted Butler. Every year since the Bulls haven't had a good draft. Gar is the problem and Michael is finally going to get rid of him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson was fine as a GM. Draft picks instantly got worse when he was moved.

Incorrect. Butler was a Gar pick and was better than any pick Paxson ever made outside of Rose (and I'd say it's outright far better due to draft position). Regardless I have no idea why anyone would continue to pretend that Paxson's still good or would be acceptable as GM when his fingerprints are all over the current abomination, including the buffoon of a head coach.


The Butler pick was Paxson's work. It fit what he had done the years before. Look at all of the picks that followed. Outside of the Tyrus Thomas reach, Paxson did a great job drafting.

We've been over this before but it's mighty convenient to credit non-GM Paxson for the best pick the Bulls have made in the last 20 years, especially right after declaring that the picks immediately went down in quality when he was no longer GM. I see no reason whatsoever to give Paxson the credit for that one over Gar or Matt Lloyd unless one is wed to the narrative that all the good things about the last 17 years of the Bulls should be credited to Pax and all the bad things to Gar.


Trends matter. Paxson had 1 awful pick during his run and the same year he is promoted they drafted Butler. Every year since the Bulls haven't had a good draft. Gar is the problem and Michael is finally going to get rid of him.

Butler was drafted 2 years after Gar became GM. Practically every source agrees that Gar has already been demoted and even before that point, as a I noted above, Paxson was co-signing all of the moves we're attributing to Gar. Paxson is equally the problem and they both need to go.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
I suspect Gar has been pretty much sidelined for the past couple of years anyway, but I'm not sure.


Its hard to really tell who happens to be calling the shots with the Bulls these days. I'm sure that is the way Paxson wants to play it. It was easier about 6-7 years ago. THere were certain players (Snell, McDermott) who you just knew were Gar type of players. Now it is not as easy. The drafts have been bad but the inability to identify NBA caliber talent has been worse. How do you let Dinwiddie get away? There are a number of guys floating around the league that the Bulls could have got for little or nothing and didn't.

That is the most maddening thing for me. More than the bad drafts, lack of free agent signings etc. THat is squarely on the Front Office. There are no excuses for that.

Yeah this is why I'm basically hesitant to recognize a concrete break between eras, as doing so seems only to absolve Paxson of blame he should fully take. He at bare minimum co-signed all the stuff that was Gar's call or simply didn't care enough to stop him. After 2016 he declared he'd be taking a more active role in the Bulls' day-to-day operations, and then when they got bounced in the playoffs, he declared in 2017 he'd be taking on a more active role. By all accounts Gar was knocked down the totem pole ages ago, but even before that point, Paxson had the final call on pretty much everything anyway.


My main reason for wanting Paxson out now (And you know that I was a big supporter of his for a long time) is two fold.
1. He has been in the job too long.

2. And more importantly it is clear that there is no direction or vision for the franchise. Hiring Boylen is evidence of the that.

They fired Hoiberg and immediately signaled that they wanted to get rid of "pace and space" and become a "power team". Then this season they came in boasting about their commitment to shooting 3 point shots. They do not even know what sort of player that they want to acquire.

They claimed that they were going to upgrade the PG position only to draft an undersized shooting guard and sign a back up point guard. Huh? They have no size at all upfront. Probably not a true center on the roster.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
I'm surprised there is even a debate on this. Both Paxson and Forman need to go.

Paxson has been on the job 16 years and is no closer to a title than when he started. It's comical he's been allowed to keep his job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Peoria Matt wrote:
I'm surprised there is even a debate on this. Both Paxson and Forman need to go.

Paxson has been on the job 16 years and is no closer to a title than when he started. It's comical he's been allowed to keep his job.


Paxson is Kenny Williams without the championship. He's family and he had success in the role. Uncle Jerry will never fire them. Make them do the job if you won't fire them.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Paxson is Reinsdorfs' only connection in the NBA. Can't get rid of him.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hatchetman wrote:
Paxson recently sold his Pulte-like house. Not sure if he has another one here. Might be related.


Wish I had known!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Nas wrote:
Paxson is Kenny Williams without the championship.

Image

I'm pretty sure this is why he's still there and will be there for life.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Nas wrote:
Paxson is Kenny Williams without the championship. He's family and he had success in the role.


Going 16 years without a title is not having success. It's having longevity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Peoria Matt wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson is Kenny Williams without the championship. He's family and he had success in the role.


Going 16 years without a title is not having success. It's having longevity.


When you went nearly 100 years without one it could be seen as success. Reinsdorf is extremely loyal to both men. As long as he's alive both will be executives.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nas wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson is Kenny Williams without the championship. He's family and he had success in the role.


Going 16 years without a title is not having success. It's having longevity.


When you went nearly 100 years without one it could be seen as success. Reinsdorf is extremely loyal to both men. As long as he's alive both will be executives.

I don't think Gar would receive the same loyalty as Pax.

Gar is there to shield Pax. Massive changes stopping at Gar.....it is possible, but I'll believe it when it happens.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group