It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:38 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 392 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


The aggressively stupid are full out on this. I’m certain this little patriot was piling on the MAGA hat wearing 16 year old. But this is a bridge too far.

The aggressively stupid are full out on this! And it is a bridge too far! You're learning! Nice!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nah man you're just wanting to be offended. Butthurt much? #triggered


Selective breeding is “retarded”. Doesn’t work cause it’s so “retarded”.


Holy shit. Read the thread and please point out where I said it wouldn't work. I'll drink a gallon of cum on cam if you can find the quote.


What a reward for proving you wrong. Giving you a chance to live out your fetish. It’s “retarded” btw.


I love drinking cum you moron.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Who drank more cum this all star weekend SS or a 24 year old woman staying 10 in a hotel room downtown?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Nas wrote:
Who drank more cum this all star weekend SS or a 24 year old woman staying 10 in a hotel room downtown?


Pete Buttigieg would stab his own mother with his husband's frozen severed penis then choke down an Olympic sized swimming pool of fetid cum if it guaranteed his nomination.

Short answer is me tho.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nas wrote:
Who drank more cum this all star weekend SS or a 24 year old woman staying 10 in a hotel room downtown?


Pete Buttigieg would stab his own mother with his husband's frozen severed penis then choke down an Olympic sized swimming pool of fetid cum if it guaranteed his nomination.

Short answer is me tho.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
Who drank more cum this all star weekend SS or a 24 year old woman staying 10 in a hotel room downtown?


Long Time Urkel

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nah man you're just wanting to be offended. Butthurt much? #triggered


Selective breeding is “retarded”. Doesn’t work cause it’s so “retarded”.


Holy shit. Read the thread and please point out where I said it wouldn't work. I'll drink a gallon of cum on cam if you can find the quote.


What a reward for proving you wrong. Giving you a chance to live out your fetish. It’s “retarded” btw.


I love drinking cum you moron.


Is it “retarded” enough for you? Taking about cum guzzling is smart. Discussing eugenics is “retarded”.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


My God, how embarrassing...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Kirkwood wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


The aggressively stupid are full out on this. I’m certain this little patriot was piling on the MAGA hat wearing 16 year old. But this is a bridge too far.

The aggressively stupid are full out on this! And it is a bridge too far! You're learning! Nice!


Repeating what was said is super smart. What a witty response. If you promise to drink cum then you are really thinking.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


That’s probably not true and you know that. People can’t see that some power (parents or others) had a cause and got this kid involved. Because it’s “off limits” to criticize the kid that advances their cause.


Not irrationally attacking a child only advances the cause of decency. The parents and everyone else are free to attack. Ignore kids and attack adults. That's pretty straightforward and easy.


If you don't want children involved in political debate, your ire should be directed at her parents, not the people who react.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
storkinastorm wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


My God, how embarrassing...


He was certainly as concerned about the age of the kid people wanted to kill for wearing a MAGA hat.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


That’s probably not true and you know that. People can’t see that some power (parents or others) had a cause and got this kid involved. Because it’s “off limits” to criticize the kid that advances their cause.

It's 100% true. There's a huge difference between saying I disagree with the girl's POV/arguments versus the reaction from the board obsessives and other adult creeps (as seen in picture of the loser's truck).


Wait, aren't you the "why do you even care!?" guy? Why do you care what some random person in a truck does? We are supposed to care about him but not the Time Person of the Year recipient?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:33 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nah man you're just wanting to be offended. Butthurt much? #triggered


Selective breeding is “retarded”. Doesn’t work cause it’s so “retarded”.


Holy shit. Read the thread and please point out where I said it wouldn't work. I'll drink a gallon of cum on cam if you can find the quote.


What a reward for proving you wrong. Giving you a chance to live out your fetish. It’s “retarded” btw.


I love drinking cum you moron.


Is it “retarded” enough for you? Taking about cum guzzling is smart. Discussing eugenics is “retarded”.


Would you like to advocate for eugenics? Go right ahead.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
storkinastorm wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.


That’s probably not true and you know that. People can’t see that some power (parents or others) had a cause and got this kid involved. Because it’s “off limits” to criticize the kid that advances their cause.


Not irrationally attacking a child only advances the cause of decency. The parents and everyone else are free to attack. Ignore kids and attack adults. That's pretty straightforward and easy.


If you don't want children involved in political debate, your ire should be directed at her parents, not the people who react.


I'm directing it at adult. That's exactly where we all should direct our ire. Just makes the process smoother.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
If you'd like to dissect the psychology of it all, it would be more accurate to say no one should let another person make them that angry. The age of the target is irrelevant when there are large swaths of people using that person's words as justification to advance a political agenda. Any mention of the person's age is just naive, hysterical, Helen Lovejoy-inspired pearl-clutching. If a child is used as a public figure in a political movement, don't be surprised when others have a visceral reaction toward them.

Her age (and because she's a woman) are probably 99% the reason WFR, brogue and yourself are irrationally angry at her. So it's relevant.

David Hogg received a fair amount of criticism here if I recall. Was anyone who criticized him " irrationally angry " ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Yes, MANY were.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.


Let me be clear. Eugenics would probably work. Should we do it? No.

I thought this argument was settled after WW2.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.


Let me be clear. Eugenics would probably work. Should we do it? No.

I thought this argument was settled after WW2.


If the subject is ever brought up say it’s retarded. And act like discussion is a huge insult. Cause WW2 or something.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:02 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.


Let me be clear. Eugenics would probably work. Should we do it? No.

I thought this argument was settled after WW2.


If the subject is ever brought up say it’s retarded. And act like discussion is a huge insult. Cause WW2 or something.


Dude I have no idea what you're even talking about at this point. Say. What. You. Mean.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
Yes, MANY were.

OK . Can you please quote some posts in this thread where people are " irrationally angry " at Greta Thunberg ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.


Let me be clear. Eugenics would probably work. Should we do it? No.

I thought this argument was settled after WW2.


If the subject is ever brought up say it’s retarded. And act like discussion is a huge insult. Cause WW2 or something.


Dude I have no idea what you're even talking about at this point. Say. What. You. Mean.


You are completely full of shit. You acted insulted that someone discussed eugenics. Then you retreated and plated dumb, while denying what you said.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Was that ever the discussion? It’s about what or who is really “retarded”. Right?

You honestly could not be a bigger liar about the this. It’s like saying we can create an atomic bomb. You want to bomb everything if you say that! Could not be more of a bullshitter.


Let me be clear. Eugenics would probably work. Should we do it? No.

I thought this argument was settled after WW2.


If the subject is ever brought up say it’s retarded. And act like discussion is a huge insult. Cause WW2 or something.


Dude I have no idea what you're even talking about at this point. Say. What. You. Mean.


You are completely full of shit. You acted insulted that someone discussed eugenics. Then you retreated and plated dumb, while denying what you said.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:27 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

Youre actually sounding very irrationally angry over the whole thing. Tsk tsk.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

Youre actually sounding very irrationally angry over the whole thing. Tsk tsk.


Julie just tweeted bro.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

Youre actually sounding very irrationally angry over the whole thing. Tsk tsk.


Julie just tweeted bro.


I’m not dumb. July is. Look at her!!

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.


Eugenics is retarded. Cause I said.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:56 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.


Eugenics is retarded. Cause I said.


I mean.....yeah. I think it's a pretty bad idea. Didn't think that was a controversial take.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

Youre actually sounding very irrationally angry over the whole thing. Tsk tsk.


Julie just tweeted bro.

You fucking liar . I just looked and NO SHE DIDNT !!!!!

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 392 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group