SpiralStairs wrote:
Don't want to pump it up too much, but IMHO the book does a good job defending poetry but only if the person reading has a more than cursory interest. I could see MANY chapters being used in a classroom setting at the AP or first/second year college level. It is not an overly academic text.
At points it feels as though he's speaking directly to me, but as it turns out MANY have the same fears I do. That's what's been the biggest revelation for me.
Yeah, it's pretty good! I've read up to the politics chapter so far. I've read some other books like this, and out of all of them, this is the most suitable for the classroom, and the most fun to read. It felt like I took this guy's class ten years ago and then ran into him and he was talking to me out loud. I could hear myself talking back. Just a fun book about poetry--and one that makes me think as well.
In high school, I stole a copy of
The Poem as Process from our local liberry. Later, when I was teaching AP Lit, I was trying to explain what poetry was, and I used that book to help me explain. (I emailed the author to explain; he got a kick out of the theft and the fact that someone was using it, thirty years after he had written it.) This would have worked better. He covers much of the "what is poetry?" question by showing what poetry
does. Alas, I think my teaching career (at least in teaching literature) is ovah, but if I ever get the chance again, we'll be reading selections of this.
It was funny to hear him talk about Shklovsky. I loved Shklovsky's little book. Made so much sense. Speaking of Russkies, I am envious that he can read some of those Russians, especially Akhmatova, in the original Russian.
My only real criticism is with his sense of audience. I get the feeling that he thinks he's writing to other sons of attorneys. Oh, and the politics chapter is predictable; I had the feeling he was about to Audre Lorde my world, and then
whammo!! Talk about un-defamiliarized. (Actually, the chapter entitled "Make It Strange" had good political stuff in there.) Those are small criticisms, though.
He had an interesting comment about Baraka and blaming Jews, and I like how he withheld judgment, to an extent. He's in this for the poetry, not the damning people to hell. Yet he also didn't put away his sense of critical analysis. He walked a tightrope there and I think well-adjusted people will say that he did a good job.