It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 41  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The players have had a lot of chances to put an end to the service time manipulation and they haven't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Overall pay has shrunk because teams have used analytics that show how quickly players decline into their 30’s. And given service time lock ups, many guys are hitting free agency in their late 20’s. The chance for a second big free agent contract is mostly out the window as teams have gotten smarter about the value of a 33 year old slugger against a cost controlled prospect.

And obviously certain big market teams had to reset the punitive payroll tax.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Sounds like the players plan to file a grievance or MLB would have already announced the start date.

I don't get how people don't blame the players as much as the owners. Sign an agreement for 48 games at full salary and play.


Because I believe that the deal they signed in March had language about playing the "most games" they can play. You can't say that about a 48 game schedule in June.

If the players are going to file a grievance, I think it is bad for them to be saying now, where and when. They look good right now but if they file a grievance and then don't play, they get the bad look again. They have proven a great point going forward in the upcoming negotiations.


They shouldn't take filing a grievance off the table. Every month they don't play costs the players hundreds of millions of dollars in pay. Playing 48 games instead of 80 would do the same.

I am not saying take it off of the table, of course use it as a bargaining chip. I am just not sure I would play that card when the short season is implemented. I just think public perception is heavy on their side currently, you don't want to lose that.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Antarctica wrote:
The players have had a lot of chances to put an end to the service time manipulation and they haven't.


Well now that teams aren't paying many people after they become free agents after 30 maybe they will try to change that.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:52 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
denisdman wrote:
Overall pay has shrunk because teams have used analytics that show how quickly players decline into their 30’s. And given service time lock ups, many guys are hitting free agency in their late 20’s. The chance for a second big free agent contract is mostly out the window as teams have gotten smarter about the value of a 33 year old slugger against a cost controlled prospect.

And obviously certain big market teams had to reset the punitive payroll tax.


Plus the luxury tax acts as a salary cap without a floor. The average MLB career is now under 4 years too by design.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

This is all your fault, you planned the damn White Sox tailgate and sent the whole world spiraling downhill.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

This is all your fault, you planned the damn White Sox tailgate and sent the whole world spiraling downhill.


Yep

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

This is all your fault, you planned the damn White Sox tailgate and sent the whole world spiraling downhill.


Yep

#TerribleAmerican

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Hawg Ass wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

This is all your fault, you planned the damn White Sox tailgate and sent the whole world spiraling downhill.


FAKE NEWS!

Very NASTY!

Very SAD!

LAW & ORDER!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

This is all your fault, you planned the damn White Sox tailgate and sent the whole world spiraling downhill.


FAKE NEWS!

Very NASTY!

Very SAD!

LAW & ORDER!

You have no decency, shame!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
The players would be better with a cap and having a floor. Teams make a ton of money while trying to lose.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31611
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Sounds like the players plan to file a grievance or MLB would have already announced the start date.

I don't get how people don't blame the players as much as the owners. Sign an agreement for 48 games at full salary and play.

We don't know the players will file a grievance until Manfred mandates the season. Why won't he? Up to now, the perception is the owners are to blame. Once he says "Play ball", and the players file a grievance, THEY now are to blame.

So why won't he mandate? Because the owners want as few regular season games as possible. I thought Manfred was going to be a real commissioner, but I was wrong. He's a toady. He actually is going to sit by and watch the destruction of baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
conns7901 wrote:
The players would be better with a cap and having a floor. Teams make a ton of money while trying to lose.


I believe Rick has said this a bunch, but it is revenue sharing. Then both sides just try to grow the pie. The cap hasn’t been much of an issue in the NFL and NBA.

I think fully guaranteed contracts are also an issue, although appearing to benefit the players, it means unproductive and hurt players are getting paid while sucking up a team’s payroll dollars.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Antarctica wrote:
Its absolutely the player's fault. Very nearly 100%. They are trying to leverage this situation to get the owners to open the books and they are killing the game in the process.

The only sliver of responsibility that falls with ownership is that they haven't just opened the books and had a season. Even if it is an unreasonable demand, they should just give in and have baseball.

???

Analytics and MLB itself has destroyed baseball. The players just play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Analytics has made it less entertaining. Same thing in the NBA. I don’t like the hit a homer or shoot a three at any cost approach. But to each his own.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
Analytics and MLB itself has destroyed baseball. The players just play.

Oh, you'll find no disagreement from me there. Just this particular situation is the player's fault.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I have seen a few articles on the Braves financial results since they are publicly disclosed in Liberty Media’s public filings. As I suspected based on financials, I have reviewed for sports teams in the past, there is a lot of non cash charges for depreciation and amortization. For those not familiar with accounting rules, those non cash charges account for money spent previously on fixed assets and acquisitions. They are often discounted by analysts, but they represent real costs that have already been incurred. With that, here is the last three years:

Revenues (in millions)
2019- 476
2018- 442
2017- 386

Pretax income/loss
2019- (39)
2018- 1
2017- (113)

Income before non cash expenses:
2019- 49
2018- 88
2017- 2

So even if you use the broad metric of income, they are not making that much relative to the value of the franchise, i.e. a very low return on investment. The entire value of these franchises is simply the ability to sell them at a higher price. But on an annual cash flow basis, there is not much there at least with the Braves.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31611
pizza_Place: What??
denisdman wrote:
I have seen a few articles on the Braves financial results since they are publicly disclosed in Liberty Media’s public filings. As I suspected based on financials, I have reviewed for sports teams in the past, there is a lot of non cash charges for depreciation and amortization. For those not familiar with accounting rules, those non cash charges account for money spent previously on fixed assets and acquisitions. They are often discounted by analysts, but they represent real costs that have already been incurred. With that, here is the last three years:

Revenues (in millions)
2019- 476
2018- 442
2017- 386

Pretax income/loss
2019- (39)
2018- 1
2017- (113)

Income before non cash expenses:
2019- 49
2018- 88
2017- 2

So even if you use the broad metric of income, they are not making that much relative to the value of the franchise, i.e. a very low return on investment. The entire value of these franchises is simply the ability to sell them at a higher price. But on an annual cash flow basis, there is not much there at least with the Braves.

Sell! Many takers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 12:07 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79546
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
I have seen a few articles on the Braves financial results since they are publicly disclosed in Liberty Media’s public filings. As I suspected based on financials, I have reviewed for sports teams in the past, there is a lot of non cash charges for depreciation and amortization. For those not familiar with accounting rules, those non cash charges account for money spent previously on fixed assets and acquisitions. They are often discounted by analysts, but they represent real costs that have already been incurred. With that, here is the last three years:

Revenues (in millions)
2019- 476
2018- 442
2017- 386

Pretax income/loss
2019- (39)
2018- 1
2017- (113)

Income before non cash expenses:
2019- 49
2018- 88
2017- 2

So even if you use the broad metric of income, they are not making that much relative to the value of the franchise, i.e. a very low return on investment. The entire value of these franchises is simply the ability to sell them at a higher price. But on an annual cash flow basis, there is not much there at least with the Braves.


Do they have separate corporate entities that sell the beer and handle the parking, etc.?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
No, it is included in the group results. Here is the disclosure.

Revenue includes amounts generated from Braves Holdings’ baseball and development operations. Baseball revenue is derived from three primary sources: ballpark operations (ticket sales, concessions, corporate sales, retail, suites and premium seat fees), local broadcast rights and national broadcast rights, licensing and other shared Major League Baseball (“MLB”) revenue streams. Development revenue is derived from the mixed-use facilities and primarily includes rental income. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, revenue increased $34 million and $56 million, respectively, as compared to the corresponding prior years. Baseball revenue per game increased in 2019 due to increases in ballpark operations revenue, driven by increases in attendance, and revenue from local and national broadcasting rights. In addition, one additional postseason home game contributed to higher baseball revenue in 2019.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10792
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Let's not over-complicate this....there is no shortage of wealthy elitists that would love to own an MLB team. You show me a franchise for sale, and there will be a line of people interested in buying.

If there wasn't immediate and long-term financial gain to be had.....they wouldn't sell. The rest is just financial gymnastics.

/thread

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

Both are at fault. Why shouldn't the players take a hit for no fans in the stands?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
BigW72 wrote:
Let's not over-complicate this....there is no shortage of wealthy elitists that would love to own an MLB team. You show me a franchise for sale, and there will be a line of people interested in buying.

If there wasn't immediate and long-term financial gain to be had.....they wouldn't sell. The rest is just financial gymnastics.

/thread


Yeah it is like when the Blackhawks were claiming losses during the Stanley Cup years.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I suspect there are some highly levered ownership groups out there that the banks won't give them any more money to. and the partners aren't willing to dig into their own pockets to make payroll. cash flow problems. as is, there's no money coming in but none going out either.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:20 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40647
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nardi wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have seen a few articles on the Braves financial results since they are publicly disclosed in Liberty Media’s public filings. As I suspected based on financials, I have reviewed for sports teams in the past, there is a lot of non cash charges for depreciation and amortization. For those not familiar with accounting rules, those non cash charges account for money spent previously on fixed assets and acquisitions. They are often discounted by analysts, but they represent real costs that have already been incurred. With that, here is the last three years:

Revenues (in millions)
2019- 476
2018- 442
2017- 386

Pretax income/loss
2019- (39)
2018- 1
2017- (113)

Income before non cash expenses:
2019- 49
2018- 88
2017- 2

So even if you use the broad metric of income, they are not making that much relative to the value of the franchise, i.e. a very low return on investment. The entire value of these franchises is simply the ability to sell them at a higher price. But on an annual cash flow basis, there is not much there at least with the Braves.

Sell! Many takers


People buy for the ego. Would you invest a million dollars a year to profit 1,000 per year? No.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

Both are at fault. Why shouldn't the players take a hit for no fans in the stands?

Why shouldn't the players taste the profits when there are MANY fans in the stands? You're arguing for losses to be socialized but profits are OK to be enjoyed primarily by owners.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10103
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

Both are at fault. Why shouldn't the players take a hit for no fans in the stands?

Why shouldn't the players taste the profits when there are MANY fans in the stands? You're arguing for losses to be socialized but profits are OK to be enjoyed primarily by owners.


Thirty years from now, will it be considered quaint that teams in the four major sports were spread out all over the country, and that people bought season tickets?

The NBA and NHL scenarios are going to put this to the test. At what point do we have contraction back down to 16 teams without "homes", but more of an IceCube Big3 type setup where the star players run their own teams, there is a semi-barnstorming approach, and there are measures in place to prevent fixing games?

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

Both are at fault. Why shouldn't the players take a hit for no fans in the stands?


Because they do not get bonuses when revenue goes up more than anticipated.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79546
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
conns7901 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anyone blaming the players is flat out wrong.

Both are at fault. Why shouldn't the players take a hit for no fans in the stands?


Because they do not get bonuses when revenue goes up more than anticipated.



Exactly. The owners didn't split the 100 mil they each got from the app with the players. But they want the players to share the downside. Ridiculous.

And look, I don't feel sorry for the players. Most of them are asswipes too. But the current situation is 100% the fault of the owners.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 41  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group