Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Antarctica was an interesting poster who had good stories and was witty. He liked to go over the top with rhetoric, but I really don't see how he's worse than Reader or LTG. It's Crest's board though, and he has prior relationships with some of these guys.
I will say Nas and IMU have been complete fucking backstabbing losers during this, which isn't surprising. If you personally know someone, but come here to trash them you have zero class.
It's not my board alone. And you know that already, so don't let your relationship with JORR cloud how you respond to how the board is being moderated.
I didn't read Antartica much, but I never found him interesting. The days of your Bears thoughts keeping him here are officially over.
He struck me as a rich kid, living off his parents money and trying to find some meaning to his life. I never thought he actually believed what he posted here.
He was just an attention whore that was deeply confused philosophically as Tall Midget clearly pointed out to him a few times over the last month or so.
He had been all over the world, and he knew about things that I never had heard about. He was certainly an attention whore, and I can understand getting tired of him. My other comments were about Nas and IMU attacking you publicly as if they were just random posters, and not people who knew you. I found it to be a petty low character move is all.
nd there was never a comment of his tbat didn't involve a generalization or stereotype of some sort.
If you find that to be "witty" then you truly are rather sad.
Let's make this simple.
You should be able to readily find five or six examples of this.
Please post them before you continue just repeating the same things for two more pages.
Then provide all of us with your list of confirmed bigots here. (No need to back that up)
And then instead of you doing this across multiple threads going forward, we can simply refer to your list.
Not to play the "victim" card (rather tired of that bullshit too) but I wasn't the person that introduced myself into the discussion as a way of protecting a fellow bigot.
WFR was. Its what he and his fellow bigots always do but you are always too ignorant or ambivalent to ever notice. That's why FF and others created the thread and walked in the first place.
Now you are recalibrating the argument again in order to defend them.
When I post the shit all you are going to do is delete it and pretend that it was never there in the first place which again smacks of protecting bigots.
There was no need for WFR to reference me as I haven't commented on here in about a week prior to last night, but he did it in order to change the narrative.
And once again you are protecting he along with all of the other bigots on here. You act as if they are being falsely accused when they aren't.
There is plenty of evidence (in fact I have already cited 3 instances of it in this thread). When I cite the other ones you are going hurriedly delete them and claim that they never existed.
Just as Zippy stated yesterday. How do I know this? Because you have done exactly the same thing to me. That's why.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
