It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

If you could go back and pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with pick 3 or Cade McNown at his pick or Curtis Enis at his pick or Kevin White at his pick then you easily choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over them.

and he'd still be a bust

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Any first round pick who isn't there after his rookie contract is a bust, but many never did anything good.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

If you could go back and pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with pick 3 or Cade McNown at his pick or Curtis Enis at his pick or Kevin White at his pick then you easily choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over them.

Exactly.

You're really stretching for reasons to make (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky the biggest bust if you think he's a bigger bust than McNown. It's not debatable imo. Cade was 10x worse and they weren't drafted far apart at all.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

Yes it is.

Nobody forced him to drive a '97 Camry.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

Yes it is.

Nobody forced him to drive a '97 Camry.

Pace probably didn't even know anything about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He was so secretive about the process he didn't even talk to any of the players.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Brick wrote:
He was so secretive about the process he didn't even talk to any of the players.


no remember, he only talked to the white players


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
BigW72 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
But to answer the only honest part of your post: Jay Williams and Cade McNown are bigger busts than Mitch and it's not even debatable.

Jay Williams is comparable.
Cade was not a bigger bust. They didn't give up the house in draft picks to get Cade and Cade wasn't drafted 2 overall.

You're my guy, FF, but you're way off on Cade being comparable. Now if you want to argue Cade was a worse QB than Mitch...yes, I'll agree.

I think Rick's point is a good one. If you HAD to take Mitch at 2 or Cade at 12, you're taking Mitch at 2 and it's an easy decision. Thus, Cade is clearly the bigger bust.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13258
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

If you could go back and pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with pick 3 or Cade McNown at his pick or Curtis Enis at his pick or Kevin White at his pick then you easily choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over them.

It doesn't matter that it wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's fault that they traded up. That shows Pace is an idiot but it's irrelevant to the bust argument. The fact is they gave up a 3rd and 4th to move up one spot and Mitch was, in fact, the 2nd pick of the draft. McCown was an unlikeable douchebag as well as a lousy QB so he definitely belongs in the conversation. However he was the 12th pick and the 5th QB selected. Further, the Bears traded back from 7 to 12 and picked up two 3rds, a 4th and a 5th to do so - that's quite a difference in value and expectations.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

If you could go back and pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with pick 3 or Cade McNown at his pick or Curtis Enis at his pick or Kevin White at his pick then you easily choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over them.

It doesn't matter that it wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's fault that they traded up. That shows Pace is an idiot but it's irrelevant to the bust argument. The fact is they gave up a 3rd and 4th to move up one spot and Mitch was, in fact, the 2nd pick of the draft. McCown was an unlikeable douchebag as well as a lousy QB so he definitely belongs in the conversation. However he was the 12th pick and the 5th QB selected. Further, the Bears traded back from 7 to 12 and picked up two 3rds, a 4th and a 5th to do so - that's quite a difference in value and expectations.
You said it's irrelevant to the bust argument and then seemingly made the value judgement based on trades around it.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 2(or 3) is a much better pick than McNown at 12 or Curtis Enis at 5 or Kevin White at 7.

You got one really good year with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and the team was good too. You can't say that about any of them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
FavreFan wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
But to answer the only honest part of your post: Jay Williams and Cade McNown are bigger busts than Mitch and it's not even debatable.

Jay Williams is comparable.
Cade was not a bigger bust. They didn't give up the house in draft picks to get Cade and Cade wasn't drafted 2 overall.

You're my guy, FF, but you're way off on Cade being comparable. Now if you want to argue Cade was a worse QB than Mitch...yes, I'll agree.

I think Rick's point is a good one. If you HAD to take Mitch at 2 or Cade at 12, you're taking Mitch at 2 and it's an easy decision. Thus, Cade is clearly the bigger bust.

We're both in agreement that Cade, Kevin White, and Curtis (P)Enis are significantly worse at their respective positions than Mitch. They were all really, really awful. Mitch is really awful.
Carry on.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Brick wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

Yes it is.

Nobody forced him to drive a '97 Camry.

Pace probably didn't even know anything about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He was so secretive about the process he didn't even talk to any of the players.

:lol: No. Pace asked him to drive it from NC to IL for training camp.


_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

Yes it is.

Nobody forced him to drive a '97 Camry.

Pace probably didn't even know anything about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He was so secretive about the process he didn't even talk to any of the players.

:lol: No. Pace asked him to drive it from NC to IL for training camp.


That's not "Aaron Rodgers taking his backup qb to a frat party and pretending to be frat brothers with them" weird but it's still pretty weird.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13258
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

If you could go back and pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with pick 3 or Cade McNown at his pick or Curtis Enis at his pick or Kevin White at his pick then you easily choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over them.

It doesn't matter that it wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's fault that they traded up. That shows Pace is an idiot but it's irrelevant to the bust argument. The fact is they gave up a 3rd and 4th to move up one spot and Mitch was, in fact, the 2nd pick of the draft. McCown was an unlikeable douchebag as well as a lousy QB so he definitely belongs in the conversation. However he was the 12th pick and the 5th QB selected. Further, the Bears traded back from 7 to 12 and picked up two 3rds, a 4th and a 5th to do so - that's quite a difference in value and expectations.
You said it's irrelevant to the bust argument and then seemingly made the value judgement based on trades around it.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 2(or 3) is a much better pick than McNown at 12 or Curtis Enis at 5 or Kevin White at 7.

You got one really good year with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and the team was good too. You can't say that about any of them.

My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.
I'll make it simple.

You can either have Cade McCown with the 12th pick of the 2020 NFL draft or you can have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with the 2nd pick of the 2020 NFL draft. Which do you choose knowing what their careers would turn out to be. I actually think the White and Enis picks are worse than the McCown pick, but I'll still go with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky even if it only gives me 1 good year rather than 0 good years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:50 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Rick Mirer was worse than any Bears quarterback mentioned here so far.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
The Bears have really had a lot of suck at the QB position, this we can all agree on.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.
I'll make it simple.

You can either have Cade McCown with the 12th pick of the 2020 NFL draft or you can have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with the 2nd pick of the 2020 NFL draft. Which do you choose knowing what their careers would turn out to be. I actually think the White and Enis picks are worse than the McCown pick, but I'll still go with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky even if it only gives me 1 good year rather than 0 good years.


You're setting up a false equivalence. The question is not that expired milk is better than dog urine, therefore, whoever picked dog urine got the worse of the two options. No one wants either so it doesn't make any sense. The point is when you pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 you're stating he's the best QB overall in the draft, and quite possibly the best player in the draft. None of that ever came remotely close to being true. It was a total flop of a pick. With McNown, as the 5th QB taken and the #12 overall pick. no one is forecasting greatness here like you do with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2. There's no question the expectations of greatness are more for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than McNown. Hence, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is the bigger letdown of the two

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.
I'll make it simple.

You can either have Cade McCown with the 12th pick of the 2020 NFL draft or you can have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with the 2nd pick of the 2020 NFL draft. Which do you choose knowing what their careers would turn out to be. I actually think the White and Enis picks are worse than the McCown pick, but I'll still go with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky even if it only gives me 1 good year rather than 0 good years.


You're setting up a false equivalence. The question is not that expired milk is better than dog urine, therefore, whoever picked dog urine got the worse of the two options. No one wants either so it doesn't make any sense. The point is when you pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 you're stating he's the best QB overall in the draft, and quite possibly the best player in the draft. None of that ever came remotely close to being true. It was a total flop of a pick. With McNown, as the 5th QB taken and the #12 overall pick. no one is forecasting greatness here like you do with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2. There's no question the expectations of greatness are more for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than McNown.

You'd be a pretty bad GM to use the 12th pick on the draft and not expect him to be an elite quarterback. I'm just imaging the Bears when they drafted Cade McCown saying "Well, he was the fifth qb taken so if he sucks that's fine".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.
I'll make it simple.

You can either have Cade McCown with the 12th pick of the 2020 NFL draft or you can have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with the 2nd pick of the 2020 NFL draft. Which do you choose knowing what their careers would turn out to be. I actually think the White and Enis picks are worse than the McCown pick, but I'll still go with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky even if it only gives me 1 good year rather than 0 good years.


You're setting up a false equivalence. The question is not that expired milk is better than dog urine, therefore, whoever picked dog urine got the worse of the two options. No one wants either so it doesn't make any sense. The point is when you pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 you're stating he's the best QB overall in the draft, and quite possibly the best player in the draft. None of that ever came remotely close to being true. It was a total flop of a pick. With McNown, as the 5th QB taken and the #12 overall pick. no one is forecasting greatness here like you do with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2. There's no question the expectations of greatness are more for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than McNown. Hence, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is the bigger letdown of the two

This is quite silly, of course. You're simply wrong if you think the expectations for the #12 pick in the draft and the #2 pick in the draft are drastically different. They aren't. If you draft a QB in either spot the expectation for both is that they become a franchise QB.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
My point was Mitch was the 2nd pick of the draft regardless of how that came to be. He was also the 1st QB chosen. The expectations associated with that selection are significantly higher than with a 12 that was also the 5th QB picked. The trades have to factor into the bust scoring as well. Ricky Williams is considered an all-time bust in NO almost entirely due to what Ditka gave up to get him.
I'll make it simple.

You can either have Cade McCown with the 12th pick of the 2020 NFL draft or you can have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky with the 2nd pick of the 2020 NFL draft. Which do you choose knowing what their careers would turn out to be. I actually think the White and Enis picks are worse than the McCown pick, but I'll still go with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky even if it only gives me 1 good year rather than 0 good years.


You're setting up a false equivalence. The question is not that expired milk is better than dog urine, therefore, whoever picked dog urine got the worse of the two options. No one wants either so it doesn't make any sense. The point is when you pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 you're stating he's the best QB overall in the draft, and quite possibly the best player in the draft. None of that ever came remotely close to being true. It was a total flop of a pick. With McNown, as the 5th QB taken and the #12 overall pick. no one is forecasting greatness here like you do with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2. There's no question the expectations of greatness are more for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than McNown.

You'd be a pretty bad GM to use the 12th pick on the draft and not expect him to be an elite quarterback. I'm just imaging the Bears when they drafted Cade McCown saying "Well, he was the fifth qb taken so if he sucks that's fine".


Again, that's not the scenario. At 12 with five to seven QBs to pick from, chances are you're not grabbing the most elite one. That knowledge is baked into the draft process. You'd be really dumb to think your chances of striking gold at 12 are the same as they are at 2, which is what you're doing. False equivalence. I can't believe I have to inform you that when you get picked at #2 there are higher expectations for you than if you were picked at 12 and on top of that four of your peers were picked before you.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Last edited by veganfan21 on Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Brick wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's not Trubiskys fault that a dumb trade was made to move up one spot for him.

Yes it is.

Nobody forced him to drive a '97 Camry.

Pace probably didn't even know anything about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He was so secretive about the process he didn't even talk to any of the players.

:lol: No. Pace asked him to drive it from NC to IL for training camp.


That's not "Aaron Rodgers taking his backup qb to a frat party and pretending to be frat brothers with them" weird but it's still pretty weird.

:lol:

Quote:
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky’s car was a focal point of his and Pace’s pre-draft dinner conversation, where Pace made it a point to tell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to keep his car, no matter how old it is.


Infatuated GM moving up one spot and giving up two 3rd round picks and a 4th rounder is lunacy. Rodgers is simply eccentric.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Again, that's not the scenario. At 12 with five to seven QBs to pick from, chances are you're not grabbing the most elite one. That knowledge is baked into the draft process. You'd be really dumb to think your chances of striking gold at 12 are the same as they are at 2, which is what you're doing. False equivalence. I can't believe I have to inform you that when you get picked at #2 there are higher expectations for you than if you were picked at 12 and on top of that four of your peers were picked before you.

There are higher expectations for #2 than there is for #12, but in this case the pick at #2 was significantly better than the one picked at #12.

Is (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky a bigger bust than Ryan Leaf? Both were picked at #2, but Leaf was the second quarterback taken.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Again, that's not the scenario. At 12 with five to seven QBs to pick from, chances are you're not grabbing the most elite one. That knowledge is baked into the draft process. You'd be really dumb to think your chances of striking gold at 12 are the same as they are at 2, which is what you're doing. False equivalence. I can't believe I have to inform you that when you get picked at #2 there are higher expectations for you than if you were picked at 12 and on top of that four of your peers were picked before you.

There are higher expectations for #2 than there is for #12, but in this case the pick at #2 was significantly better than the one picked at #12.

Is (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky a bigger bust than Ryan Leaf? Both were picked at #2, but Leaf was the second quarterback taken.


What does significantly better mean? I should tap out here as I consider it a small victory to get you to buy into the concept of a #2 QB having higher expectations on his shoulders than a #12 pick who saw four QBs get drafted before him.

I don't know what Leaf has to do with any of this. If you could go back into time, no one is picking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 (except you, perhaps) and no one is picking Leaf. That you wouldn't touch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky anywhere near #2 in a redraft is further proof of him being a massive bust.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
What does significantly better mean? I should tap out here as I consider it a small victory to get you to buy into the concept of a #2 QB having higher expectations on his shoulders than a #12 pick who saw four QBs get drafted before him.

I don't know what Leaf has to do with any of this. If you could go back into time, no one is picking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 (except you, perhaps) and no one is picking Leaf. That you wouldn't touch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky anywhere near #2 in a redraft is further proof of him being a massive bust.
You are calling the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky pick the biggest bust in Chicago history. I'm at least keeping it to football. I wouldn't pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky again at 2, and I HATED the trade when it happened, but I would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 2 over McCown at 12, or White at 7, or Enis at 5.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24073
pizza_Place: Pizanos
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also has to forever wear the Sam Bowie tag for going ahead of Mahomes. Maybe not fair to him (but certainly fair to Pace).

I don’t know if bust = disappointment in whatever this argument is turning into, but I can’t imagine a more disappointing pick than Tru given the combination of expectations, draft position, traded picks and the guys that went behind him.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
What does significantly better mean? I should tap out here as I consider it a small victory to get you to buy into the concept of a #2 QB having higher expectations on his shoulders than a #12 pick who saw four QBs get drafted before him.

I don't know what Leaf has to do with any of this. If you could go back into time, no one is picking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at #2 (except you, perhaps) and no one is picking Leaf. That you wouldn't touch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky anywhere near #2 in a redraft is further proof of him being a massive bust.
You are calling the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky pick the biggest bust in Chicago history. I'm at least keeping it to football. I wouldn't pick (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky again at 2, and I HATED the trade when it happened, but I would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky at 2 over McCown at 12, or White at 7, or Enis at 5.


I agree those guys are busts but they weren't drafted to fill the most important position on the roster, and no one was drafted as high as (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was. Again, this is the second player overall taken, and the first QB. This means you think he's all world, can't miss, and he was anything but. When I say (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is a bigger bust than those guys it doesn't mean those guys are better than Mitch. It means relative to expectations Mitch was a bigger whiff than those other guys.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
So the biggest bust is basically just the highest quarterback a team drafted that didn't turn into a great player?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
So the biggest bust is basically just the highest quarterback a team drafted that didn't turn into a great player?


We seemed to be doing well, and by that I mean having a decent exchange of viewpoints, until this one. I'll let you try again.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
So the biggest bust is basically just the highest quarterback a team drafted that didn't turn into a great player?


We seemed to be doing well, and by that I mean having a decent exchange of viewpoints, until this one. I'll let you try again.

You said that the pick filled the most important position on the roster. Does that disqualify all non-quarterback picks from being the biggest bust?

Even if we say that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is a bigger bust than Cade McCown, you still can't say he was a bigger bust than Curtis Enis unless it has to be a quarterback. That's not even getting into the Cedric Benson discussion.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also has to forever wear the Sam Bowie tag for going ahead of Mahomes. Maybe not fair to him (but certainly fair to Pace).

I don’t know if bust = disappointment in whatever this argument is turning into, but I can’t imagine a more disappointing pick than Tru given the combination of expectations, draft position, traded picks and the guys that went behind him.

Yup.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: This Ends in Antioch and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group