It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
That line seems light. Vegas likes the Bears this week.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24052
pizza_Place: Pizanos
conns7901 wrote:
That line seems light. Vegas likes the Bears this week.

At least a touchdown seems appropriate.

What’s happened in the last 4 weeks that would make anybody think it’ll be closer than last game?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Pack haven't laid an egg in awhile. They're due

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24052
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
Pack haven't laid an egg in awhile. They're due

No, no, no...don’t lower expectations.

Build them up as high as possible so if the packers win, it’ll be joyless and expected. And if the bears somehow win, it’ll be that much more depressing.

I’d say pack by 15.5.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16475
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
That is the line I would've expected if the Packers were resting everyone.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
I'm seeing -6 right now


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
billypootons wrote:
I'm seeing -6 right now


https://www.scoresandodds.com/nfl?week=2020-reg-17

Seeing 4.5 to 6 now. People pounding the Packers already.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
as someone else said, oddsmakers sure seem to want Packer money

I think the game will be similar to what the Packers did to the Titans but people who do this for a living know more than me.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 2:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Pack haven't laid an egg in awhile. They're due
Neither team will do so. This is likely to be a pretty close game. My heart says Bears by 6, but my head says Packers win by a field goal. Hopefully my heart is right.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
bears are gonna lose by at least 17.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
IkeSouth wrote:
bears are gonna lose by at least 17.


yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
The Pack will win by at least two touchdowns and represent the NFC in the Super Bowl.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
This game has a lot of red flags for it to not be a Packers blowout. For one it's not a must win for Green Bay. I know that they get the bye, but it's not the same. This alone makes gives it a lot of potential for look past them/trap game.

The Bears offense has been looking much better too. In particular the running game, which is Green Bay's weakness. And the Bears need this game. They have more to play for. Maybe Green Bay still romps, but it seems like there is a lot of potential for a closer than expected game.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I don't think it will be a GB blowout but I very much disagree with the premise they don't have a lot to play for. That extra bye week is extremely significant. Gotta think their mindset is this is a must win game just like it is for the Bears.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
I don't think it will be a GB blowout but I very much disagree with the premise they don't have a lot to play for. That extra bye week is extremely significant. Gotta think their mindset is this is a must win game just like it is for the Bears.


I think it's a lot to play for, but it's not a win or you are done game. I don't have a read on this one. I would think Green Bay will win easily, but the low opening line seems to confirm that this is a strange spot for the Packers.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7181
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
BetRivers app Packers -5.5

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I don't think it will be a GB blowout but I very much disagree with the premise they don't have a lot to play for. That extra bye week is extremely significant. Gotta think their mindset is this is a must win game just like it is for the Bears.


I think it's a lot to play for, but it's not a win or you are done game. I don't have a read on this one. I would think Green Bay will win easily, but the low opening line seems to confirm that this is a strange spot for the Packers.


they got the line totally wrong last time the bears played the packers

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
GB 29
Chicago 20

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
IkeSouth wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I don't think it will be a GB blowout but I very much disagree with the premise they don't have a lot to play for. That extra bye week is extremely significant. Gotta think their mindset is this is a must win game just like it is for the Bears.


I think it's a lot to play for, but it's not a win or you are done game. I don't have a read on this one. I would think Green Bay will win easily, but the low opening line seems to confirm that this is a strange spot for the Packers.


they got the line totally wrong last time the bears played the packers


The purpose of the line is to make money. But a single outlier line doesn’t mean that the oddsmakers seems to know what they are doing.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

The purpose of the line is to make money. But a single outlier line doesn’t mean that the oddsmakers seems to know what they are doing.


whats your point

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
312player wrote:
GB 29
Chicago 20


17 garbage 4th qtr points for mitch ?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 12:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 786
pizza_Place: Marie's
IkeSouth wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

The purpose of the line is to make money. But a single outlier line doesn’t mean that the oddsmakers seems to know what they are doing.


whats your point


He doesnt know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6283
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
The Score is really milking the "Mitch comeback" angle right now. Sunday night they will be a non playoff team and it will be back to "he sucks".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
they beat 3 shitty teams in a row and some are conveniently forgetting that mitch is still the same flawed QB? prior to this 3 game winning streak they had 2 bad home losses to shit teams too. i mean how the hell do you lose to the lions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
billypootons wrote:
they beat 3 shitty teams in a row and some are conveniently forgetting that mitch is still the same flawed QB? prior to this 3 game winning streak they had 2 bad home losses to shit teams too. i mean how the hell do you lose to the lions?


no kidding... i don't get the media either. last week i watched "hottest offense in the league is chicago!"

what a fucking joke. he was getting destroyed in the first half... and did they not see that interception? That was worse than anything ive ever seen from a bears QB

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Phil Leotardo wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

The purpose of the line is to make money. But a single outlier line doesn’t mean that the oddsmakers seems to know what they are doing.


whats your point


He doesnt know.


The point is that the line in the first game doesn't mean anything. It's pointing out that in aggregate the point spread is a good tool. Also, Phil Leotardo is a complete idiot.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
When you see a team scored 40 points without a defensive TD you expect to see a QB who threw for upper 300s in yards. Mitch is in the mid 200s.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2021 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6283
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
:lol:

Rodgers is going to pick apart the Bears secondary

Bears injury report...

OUT
Jaylon Johnson
Buster Skrine

It’ll be rookie Kindle Vildor and 2019 sixth-rounder Duke Shelley at corner against Aaron Rodgers, Davante Adams and the Packers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2021 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16475
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Lots of Bears money coming in...I could actually cash out my DraftKings money line bet right now for more than I wagered a few days ago.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
blackhawksfan wrote:
:lol:

Rodgers is going to pick apart the Bears secondary

Bears injury report...

OUT
Jaylon Johnson
Buster Skrine

It’ll be rookie Kindle Vildor and 2019 sixth-rounder Duke Shelley at corner against Aaron Rodgers, Davante Adams and the Packers.


The guy who had several shoulder injuries and surgery at Utah is out with shoulder injury..shocking.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Chicagoan and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group