It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
I mean... the stats don't lie, right? They both also have a total of 10 fingers, which is kind of amazing too if you think about it.


_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
The over the top justification for a mediocre QB is really something to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Peoria Matt wrote:
The over the top justification for a mediocre QB is really something to see.


I don’t think it’s justification so much as it is a correction to over the top bashing.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
This line is creeping back down to 4.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
The over the top justification for a mediocre QB is really something to see.


I don’t think it’s justification so much as it is a correction to over the top bashing.

Yup

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
The over the top justification for a mediocre QB is really something to see.


I don’t think it’s justification so much as it is a correction to over the top bashing.

Yup


:lol:

Mitch still makes the same mistakes now that he did 4 years ago even after the offense was finally Mitchproofed. He's just a guy...nothing special. To even put him in the same graphic as Rodgers is ridiculous. The criticism is not over the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The criticism is certainly over the top. People think he literally sucks and isn’t a starter in this league. Not sure what else he has to show to disprove that. Of course he still makes mistakes, he’s not great, but he’s not terrible either and many people seem to wrongly think he is.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mitch isn’t terrible by any means and I’ve long said the coaching is one of the Bears biggest problems but.. comparing Mitch at any point to Rodgers as if it’s a valid comparison is pretty ridiculous. Next to Mahomes, Rodgers is one of the best and most talented QB’s in NFL history and his numbers back all that up. I mean, Rodgers put up numbers his very 1st year as a starter -you knew he was going to be damn good that 1st starting year.


That meme purposely lacks yards, attempts, TD’s, TD to INT ratio and rating.. which really separates them.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6283
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Mitch will never take a team to the Super Bowl. That's all that matters. In fact, Rex Grossman was a better QB when they last went to the SB. Defenses could actually play back then before all the rule changes. Rex could execute a play action pass and complete deep passes.

Bears will put up 13 points after 3 quarters and then they will score 2 garbage time TD's. Packers 41- 27


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
blackhawksfan wrote:
In fact, Rex Grossman was a better QB when they last went to the SB.

Now see what we mean, PM?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
FavreFan wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
In fact, Rex Grossman was a better QB when they last went to the SB.

Now see what we mean, PM?


blackhawksfan wrote:
Mitch will never take a team to the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.


Now see what I mean, FF?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
There are worse quarterbacks than Mitch. We have seen firsthand, because Ryan Pace acquired two of them: Mike Glennon and Nick Foles. Given the right pieces and situations, you can absolutely win with Mitch.

You will very rarely win because of Mitch, which just makes it that much harder to get to a Superbowl let alone win it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Grossman better than Mitch is not correct. But to think it's over the top is wrong. They are closer than you think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Peoria Matt wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
In fact, Rex Grossman was a better QB when they last went to the SB.

Now see what we mean, PM?


blackhawksfan wrote:
Mitch will never take a team to the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.


Now see what I mean, FF?

I don’t, because I put no stock at all into pretend psychics. If blackhawksfan can see into the future he should play the lottery instead of posting bad football thoughts on a message board for a few dozen people to read.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
There are worse quarterbacks than Mitch. We have seen firsthand, because Ryan Pace acquired two of them

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I have to laugh at “Mitch proof” the offense. You mean running an offense that plays to the strengths of your team? How are you going to be the Chiefs with this group of skill players?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6283
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Few things: Record of opposing teams for both Bears QB's.

Foles: 65-55
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky: 42-78

Also this. Mitch and Rex are actually closer than I thought. Difference is teams could win a Superbowl with a strong defense and running game in 2006. In 2020 it's all about the QB. Too many rule changes that now benefit the offense. Farvefan, I seriously doubt if Mitch was on the Packers you would be satisfied with the status quo. No wayyyyyyyyyyyyy.


Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I have to laugh at “Mitch proof” the offense. You mean running an offense that plays to the strengths of your team? How are you going to be the Chiefs with this group of skill players?


That plays to the minimal strengths of your QB.....has nothing to do with the rest of the team. Shorter passes and hand the ball off. Which unfortunately, you could pretty much do with a lot of QB's not drafted #2. The sad thing is it took this "braintrust" 5 years to realize what they had under center.

Anyone with half a brain knew this wasn't going to be Chiefs Part 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
blackhawksfan wrote:
Difference is teams could win a Superbowl with a strong defense and running game in 2006. In 2020 it's all about the QB. Too many rule changes that now benefit the offense. Farvefan, I seriously doubt if Mitch was on the Packers you would be satisfied with the status quo. No wayyyyyyyyyyyyy.

This is just nonsense. NE won a SB 13-3 less than two years ago and last year the 49ers were one play away from winning one with Jimmy G.

Football is still football, and a strong defense and run game will always allow you to compete for a championship.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Lamar Jackson won the MVP with an offense built for him. And no one can tell me he’s better at reading defenses or a more accurate passer than Mitch. Failure to have any sort of a run game would doom the majority of quarterbacks in the league especially one with as little experience coming into the league as Mitch.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Peoria Matt wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I have to laugh at “Mitch proof” the offense. You mean running an offense that plays to the strengths of your team? How are you going to be the Chiefs with this group of skill players?


That plays to the minimal strengths of your QB.....has nothing to do with the rest of the team. Shorter passes and hand the ball off. Which unfortunately, you could pretty much do with a lot of QB's not drafted #2. The sad thing is it took this "braintrust" 5 years to realize what they had under center.

Anyone with half a brain knew this wasn't going to be Chiefs Part 2.

They didn’t have to be the Chiefs. If they had the right coach and GM they could have been the Bills. Josh Allen was an abysmal QB his rookie year. Now he’s an MVP candidate.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
:lol:

FF.....please tell me you are not comparing Mitch to Allen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Peoria Matt wrote:
:lol:

FF.....please tell me you are not comparing Mitch to Allen.

Do you think QBs develop independently of coaching? The answer is of course they don’t. If Buffalo had drafted Mitch and the Bears had drafted Josh Allen you would be making the exact same post right now with the opposite meaning.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Here is what you are forgetting, FF: Mitch is football stupid.

Allen has improved every year into MVP discussions this year. Mitch has pretty much moved along the same path, year after year. You could give Mitch Belichick, Sean Payton, Andy Reid or any other coach and he will more than likely be the same guy.

We will agree to disagree on this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yeah we’ll have to disagree here. I think coaching matters for all players, not just the supposedly bright ones. I’ve also seen little evidence Josh Allen is smarter than Mitch in any tangible way. He’s better coached though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Football smarts is one thing, but is Mitch the worst passer in the league past 10 yards? In his 9 games, he's never completed a pass past 36 yards. That ranks him 56th in the league. His throws past 15 yards usually lack accuracy and that's often when he has all the time in the world to throw. That leaves running as his only other skill, but opponents were taking that away from him the past few years. I haven't paid enough attention to Nagy's play calling, but I'll take everyone's word that it has been bad. That said, I think even the greater offensive minds out there can only do so much if Mitch is limited to short passes and runs. He looks better lately down field, but I still think he's a bottom of the league QB until he can prove it for an entire season.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Peoria Matt wrote:
Here is what you are forgetting, FF: Mitch is football stupid.

Allen has improved every year into MVP discussions this year. Mitch has pretty much moved along the same path, year after year. You could give Mitch Belichick, Sean Payton, Andy Reid or any other coach and he will more than likely be the same guy.

We will agree to disagree on this.




Now I flat out disagree with you.. to a point lol


Mitch looks waaaay better with Billy B or Andy Reid coaching him. Where I don’t totally dismiss your analysis is Mitch being ‘after the snap stupid’ (kind of like Cutler). But those other coaches would be light years ahead of what Mitch has now in terms of being coached up and schemes to his strengths. And that would result in him looking a lot better.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah we’ll have to disagree here. I think coaching matters for all players, not just the supposedly bright ones. I’ve also seen little evidence Josh Allen is smarter than Mitch in any tangible way. He’s better coached though.





Allen also has superior arm talent too.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Yeah, Allen is bigger, faster, stronger and smarter than Mitch. He's also got probably the strongest arm in the league.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers -4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6283
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
312player wrote:
Yeah, Allen is bigger, faster, stronger and smarter than Mitch. He's also got probably the strongest arm in the league.


Mitch has the will to win though. (Against non playoff teams)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group