Hussra wrote:
Frequent short-list mentions:
Seattle, Vegas, Kansas City (probably the best market for the NBA among the candidate cities, other than adding another LA/NY/Chicago/Bay Area franchise), Louisville, Nashville, Vancouver, California cities (from San Diego up through Anaheim to northern California and even the Bay area)
San Diego doesn't have a new arena, but if they announce plans for one, I think they could jump Las Vegas and pick up locals who feel burned by the Chargers moving north. Kansas City has a new-ish arena, but the city has said that they don't want a major tenant to come in and parasitically demand all the ancillary arena revenue that had been going to the city, so the city won't cut that deal. That's why the Penguins and Islanders never wound up there. Vancouver is tricky because the Raptors are owned by MLSE, which in turn is owned by both sides of Canada's telecommunications duopoly, which means the Raptors have a fully national schedule split between both networks and would probably like to keep it that way. Louisville has a new arena, but if people don't like going to Indianapolis and wouldn't like going to Cincinnati, why would they like Louisville?
_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.