It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55836
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
TRAP SERIES

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Not a chance. The Nats are a joke. Jim Bowden should have been fired LONG ago. He's decimated this organization. I have no idea why the owners let him handle the signing of top pick Aaron Crow. The kids agent handled the situation badly but they were $900,000 away at the deadline and Bowden refused to budge. Now Crow goes back in the draft and the Nats get a supplemental pick next year. The Nats were lucky to have Crow available at their selection and he would've been the Nats best pitcher, not their best prospect their best pitcher. That's how God awful this organization is. Bowden will more than likely be relieved of his duties this off season because of fraudulent signing bonuses to Latin players but the damage has been done and the Nats won't recover anytime soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
sweep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55836
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
It's Marquis v. Lannan today. Lannan had a perfect game into the 6th against the Cubs back in April, and Marquis isn't very good. My hope is that the Cubs stop sleepwalking and just unleash against these guys.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Curious Hair wrote:
It's Marquis v. Lannan today. Lannan had a perfect game into the 6th against the Cubs back in April, and Marquis isn't very good. My hope is that the Cubs stop sleepwalking and just unleash against these guys.

Stop sleepwalking? winning their last 7 series is sleepwalking?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: West Quahog, R.I.
pizza_Place: Duneland Pizza
Just think what the Cubs could do if they were wide awake. :wink:

_________________
President of Blake Shetlon fan club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Keyser Soze wrote:
Not a chance. The Nats are a joke. Jim Bowden should have been fired LONG ago. He's decimated this organization. I have no idea why the owners let him handle the signing of top pick Aaron Crow. The kids agent handled the situation badly but they were $900,000 away at the deadline and Bowden refused to budge. Now Crow goes back in the draft and the Nats get a supplemental pick next year. The Nats were lucky to have Crow available at their selection and he would've been the Nats best pitcher, not their best prospect their best pitcher. That's how God awful this organization is. Bowden will more than likely be relieved of his duties this off season because of fraudulent signing bonuses to Latin players but the damage has been done and the Nats won't recover anytime soon.


Hello, RELAX...
anyone going on Saturday besides me?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Does anyone own the Nationals yet?
No owner in baseball wants to compete against a team they collectively own.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Cub were kinda sorta sleepwalknig against the Reds. They were not playing very good baseball.

However, the Cub are a good team, and in not playing very good baseball, they should still be able to take 2 of 3 from the Nats, justl ike the Reds

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Cub were kinda sorta sleepwalknig against the Reds. They were not playing very good baseball.

However, the Cub are a good team, and in not playing very good baseball, they should still be able to take 2 of 3 from the Nats, justl ike the Reds

But Frank isn't a fan.
Come on over to the Blue Frank. We'll welcome you with open arms. Admit to yourself that you want to wear CUBBIE BLUE!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
see...I don't go posting in the Sox section 9 times out of 10 because I only know say, 3 guys on their roster? I know more people on the Orioles roster than the Sox. But if it gives Frank pleasure to post here because the Sox boards are too boring or what-have-you, suits me...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I know, right. Far be it for anybody to have a lucid thought about a team outside of thier rooting interest. :roll:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Franklin C. is just alright with me.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Ted Lerner bought the Nationals in 2006.

You're letting me down Shark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
Does anyone own the Nationals yet?
No owner in baseball wants to compete against a team they collectively own.


EVERY team wants to play the Nationals-what are you talking about??? Who wouldn't want to have 3 games against a 45-83 team? It's a chance for pitchers to lower their ERA's, hitters to pad their stats and the manager to rest a couple guys. They should easily take their 8th straight series, with Dempster and Harden following Marquis. Lannan did pitch the Cubs tough his last time out, but that was the first time they had faced him. I'm guessing this time there may be a different story.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:37 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
I am glad the Nats broke their losing streak last night. Now the Cub can start another one.
Two of three would disappoint me. Then Nats are bad, bad, bad.....

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Steve. Re-read my post.
maybe a couple times if it takes a few tries to sink in.

BTW, yes, Nats apparently have an owner now. Who knew.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Yeah-I re-read it and it's still stupid! First off, the team as pointed out to you, has had an owner for some time(Ted Lerner-2006!!!). Secondly, anyone would want to have a series against this sad sack team. It was just a dumb post from all angles. Factually incorrect and stupid.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
I am glad the Nats broke their losing streak last night. Now the Cub can start another one.
Two of three would disappoint me. Then Nats are bad, bad, bad.....

Yeah-they got their win for the week out of the way, so hopefully Marquis can win today and start a sweep.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The only stupid post Darkside has in this thread is the one about me hopping on to the big blue train.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The only stupid post Darkside has in this thread is the one about me hopping on to the big blue train.

You're on the train, you're just pretending you're not. You clearly love the Cubs, talking Cubs, watching Cubs, you love going to the rooftops... man you are in Cubbie denial.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Yeah-I re-read it and it's still stupid! First off, the team as pointed out to you, has had an owner for some time(Ted Lerner-2006!!!). Secondly, anyone would want to have a series against this sad sack team. It was just a dumb post from all angles. Factually incorrect and stupid.


Pot, meet Kettle...Pot you appear to be much blacker...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
I am glad the Nats broke their losing streak last night. Now the Cub can start another one.
Two of three would disappoint me. Then Nats are bad, bad, bad.....

Yeah-they got their win for the week out of the way, so hopefully Marquis can win today and start a sweep.


nope...he's due for a loss...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Yeah-I re-read it and it's still stupid! First off, the team as pointed out to you, has had an owner for some time(Ted Lerner-2006!!!). Secondly, anyone would want to have a series against this sad sack team. It was just a dumb post from all angles. Factually incorrect and stupid.

You are kind of a dumb fuck.
I was asking if the Nats had an owner yet. I don't keep my finger on the Natty pulse.
So what I was inferring was that the other teams owners, at one time each partial owners of this team, would get rid of the NATIONALS BEST PLAYERS, so that the other teams would not have to compete against a team that they collectively owned. Which was the case up until late in the season in 06.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Mr. Reason wrote:
I am glad the Nats broke their losing streak last night. Now the Cub can start another one.
Two of three would disappoint me. Then Nats are bad, bad, bad.....


Mr. Reason, you have the best tagline of anyone on this board. I'm having a Marx Bros. party at my house tonight.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Kind of?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
City of Fools wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Not a chance. The Nats are a joke. Jim Bowden should have been fired LONG ago. He's decimated this organization. I have no idea why the owners let him handle the signing of top pick Aaron Crow. The kids agent handled the situation badly but they were $900,000 away at the deadline and Bowden refused to budge. Now Crow goes back in the draft and the Nats get a supplemental pick next year. The Nats were lucky to have Crow available at their selection and he would've been the Nats best pitcher, not their best prospect their best pitcher. That's how God awful this organization is. Bowden will more than likely be relieved of his duties this off season because of fraudulent signing bonuses to Latin players but the damage has been done and the Nats won't recover anytime soon.

Hello, RELAX...
anyone going on Saturday besides me?

I'm going. Friend has bleacher seats.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:02 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: Wyoming, MI
pizza_Place: Viccinos Pizza in Downtown Glenview.
MattInTheCrown wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Not a chance. The Nats are a joke. Jim Bowden should have been fired LONG ago. He's decimated this organization. I have no idea why the owners let him handle the signing of top pick Aaron Crow. The kids agent handled the situation badly but they were $900,000 away at the deadline and Bowden refused to budge. Now Crow goes back in the draft and the Nats get a supplemental pick next year. The Nats were lucky to have Crow available at their selection and he would've been the Nats best pitcher, not their best prospect their best pitcher. That's how God awful this organization is. Bowden will more than likely be relieved of his duties this off season because of fraudulent signing bonuses to Latin players but the damage has been done and the Nats won't recover anytime soon.

Hello, RELAX...
anyone going on Saturday besides me?

I'm going. Friend has bleacher seats.


I'm going, I have bleacher seats.

_________________
... In my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Cool. Maybe I'll run into you there.. I'll be the guy in the Cubs hat. :lol:

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs v. Nats
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Yeah-I re-read it and it's still stupid! First off, the team as pointed out to you, has had an owner for some time(Ted Lerner-2006!!!). Secondly, anyone would want to have a series against this sad sack team. It was just a dumb post from all angles. Factually incorrect and stupid.

You are kind of a dumb fuck.
I was asking if the Nats had an owner yet. I don't keep my finger on the Natty pulse.
So what I was inferring was that the other teams owners, at one time each partial owners of this team, would get rid of the NATIONALS BEST PLAYERS, so that the other teams would not have to compete against a team that they collectively owned. Which was the case up until late in the season in 06.

If the owners chose to collectively conspire to get rid of the Nationals best players, why would they NOT want to play them??? If they are devoid of top notch talent, they are easier to beat, which makes them a very desireable team to play, and YOU the DUMBFUCK!!!

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group