It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 9:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2021 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82199
If you are really going with the butterfly effect, without Grandal they would have preemptively bought out Mccan's last year of arbitration with probably a three year deal with easy terms, something like 15-20 million.

Moncada would have probably been moved to RF. If you remember at the time, he was not a particularly good defensive 2B. He ended up flourishing defensively at 3B but there were concerns about him handling the position. Madrigal was already drafted and quickly rising. He was considered gold glove level defensively as a prospect.

So, Manny would be at 3B, Madrigal at 2B, Mccann at C and Moncada in RF. Even with Manny's contract, the money saved on RF and C contracts still would have put money in JR pocket.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2021 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10785
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
If you are really going with the butterfly effect, without Grandal they would have preemptively bought out Mccan's last year of arbitration with probably a three year deal with easy terms, something like 15-20 million.

Moncada would have probably been moved to RF. If you remember at the time, he was not a particularly good defensive 2B. He ended up flourishing defensively at 3B but there were concerns about him handling the position. Madrigal was already drafted and quickly rising. He was considered gold glove level defensively as a prospect.

So, Manny would be at 3B, Madrigal at 2B, Mccann at C and Moncada in RF. Even with Manny's contract, the money saved on RF and C contracts still would have put money in JR pocket.

You can't factor in Machado. The offer by the Sox was the max they would go....regardless of Grandal. It ended up being a good non-contract.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2021 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31600
pizza_Place: What??
good dolphin wrote:
If you are really going with the butterfly effect, without Grandal they would have preemptively bought out Mccan's last year of arbitration with probably a three year deal with easy terms, something like 15-20 million.

Moncada would have probably been moved to RF. If you remember at the time, he was not a particularly good defensive 2B. He ended up flourishing defensively at 3B but there were concerns about him handling the position. Madrigal was already drafted and quickly rising. He was considered gold glove level defensively as a prospect.

So, Manny would be at 3B, Madrigal at 2B, Mccann at C and Moncada in RF. Even with Manny's contract, the money saved on RF and C contracts still would have put money in JR pocket.

I don't recall any talk of RF for Moncada.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2021 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2500
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
good dolphin wrote:
If you are really going with the butterfly effect, without Grandal they would have preemptively bought out Mccan's last year of arbitration with probably a three year deal with easy terms, something like 15-20 million.

Moncada would have probably been moved to RF. If you remember at the time, he was not a particularly good defensive 2B. He ended up flourishing defensively at 3B but there were concerns about him handling the position. Madrigal was already drafted and quickly rising. He was considered gold glove level defensively as a prospect.

So, Manny would be at 3B, Madrigal at 2B, Mccann at C and Moncada in RF. Even with Manny's contract, the money saved on RF and C contracts still would have put money in JR pocket.


I know you were ticked off when they didn't sign Machado, but I don't see how singing him would have saved them money. He got $300 million from the Padres. To bring him to the Southside, it would have taken probably somewhere around $320 million. Grandal's contract is $73 million and Eaton's contract is $7 million this year with a club option for next year. It would have taken a lot of years of Moncada providing a low cost option in right field for that money to balance out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Madden pretty much threw Pujols under the bus yesterday on some podcast. Made it clear that Pujols couldn't comprehend that he was much worse than the Walsh kid, much less Ohtani. Albert expected to start five days a week because he was Albert Pujols, damnit.

At some point it's a sunk cost and you just say hasta la vista...

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 8:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6299
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe commenting on any controversy is pure gold. On the release, " Then you have to maybe absorb people that don't understand it, or weren't there with boots on the ground."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
vitoscotti wrote:
Joe commenting on any controversy is pure gold. On the release, " Then you have to maybe absorb people that don't understand it, or weren't there with boots on the ground."

I will magnanimously absorb Taylor McGregor when the Cubs start selling off all their decent players and she's left interviewing Eric Sogard and his wife.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 1:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
We've had some lousy signings (Mo Vaughn, Vernon Wells, Josh Hamilton) but Pujols was by far the worst. Nobody on the team will say it but I think everyone is glad he's out of there. Hunter said he was a lousy teammate always with the bad attitude if he wasn't doing well even when the team was winning. He was the most selfish player I ever saw. Instead of going with a pitch the other way he'd still try and pull it and hit a grounder to 3rd. Nobody will touch his record for GIDPs. I'm surprised he was willing to sacrifice his average for home runs. He could still have been close to a .300 hitter if he changed his approach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
MongoMuller wrote:
We've had some lousy signings (Mo Vaughn, Vernon Wells, Josh Hamilton) but Pujols was by far the worst. Nobody on the team will say it but I think everyone is glad he's out of there. Hunter said he was a lousy teammate always with the bad attitude if he wasn't doing well even when the team was winning. He was the most selfish player I ever saw. Instead of going with a pitch the other way he'd still try and pull it and hit a grounder to 3rd. Nobody will touch his record for GIDPs. I'm surprised he was willing to sacrifice his average for home runs. He could still have been close to a .300 hitter if he changed his approach.

Is Walsh the real deal at 1B for the next few years until they have to eventually move Rendon there? Adell reminds me of Byron Buxton, somebody who's going to take a few painful years to get to his potential.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31600
pizza_Place: What??
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
MongoMuller wrote:
We've had some lousy signings (Mo Vaughn, Vernon Wells, Josh Hamilton) but Pujols was by far the worst. Nobody on the team will say it but I think everyone is glad he's out of there. Hunter said he was a lousy teammate always with the bad attitude if he wasn't doing well even when the team was winning. He was the most selfish player I ever saw. Instead of going with a pitch the other way he'd still try and pull it and hit a grounder to 3rd. Nobody will touch his record for GIDPs. I'm surprised he was willing to sacrifice his average for home runs. He could still have been close to a .300 hitter if he changed his approach.

Is Walsh the real deal at 1B for the next few years until they have to eventually move Rendon there? Adell reminds me of Byron Buxton, somebody who's going to take a few painful years to get to his potential.

Who cares? They can't pitch. When they do find a pitcher, he ODs.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 10:12 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Is Walsh the real deal at 1B for the next few years until they have to eventually move Rendon there? Adell reminds me of Byron Buxton, somebody who's going to take a few painful years to get to his potential.

Yeah it looks like Walsh is for real. When Pujols was shut down in September he came in hot and he's been able to carry it thru spring training and April/May. If Adell starts to hit he might be the future at 1st. He's so bad in the field I don't know how they fix that. A lot of guys look lost at the plate when they're called up but watching him in the field was jarring. I think we probably should of moved him for pitching but his performance last season probably hurt his value. I think Brandon Marsh will be the RF of the future (or CF if they move Trout to RF).

We'll have Pujols off the books next season so that money will go to pitching and with the logjam in the outfield I would rather they move Adell than Marsh for more pitching help. I have no idea why the front office was loading up on outfielders and middle infielders in the draft instead of pitching.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57222
I did not realize Mongo was a baseball fan. Nice to see.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16471
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Was just looking at another all-time heinous contract: Miguel Cabrera. Signed a 10-yr, $292m extension in 2014. Got three good years and then it's been a complete disaster:

YEAR SALARY WAR
2014 22m 4.9
2015 22m 5.2
2016 28m 4.9
2017 28m -0.8
2018 30m 0.6
2019 30m 0.0
2020 30m -0.2
2021 30m -0.4
2022 32m
2023 32m

Yikes

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
That one was a little different because Illich was dying and he wanted Cabrera to be a Tiger for both the rest of his life and the rest of Cabrera's career. He didn't care about saving his kids' inheritance, he just wanted to try and be happy.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pujols DFA'd
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16471
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
That one was a little different because Illich was dying and he wanted Cabrera to be a Tiger for both the rest of his life and the rest of Cabrera's career. He didn't care about saving his kids' inheritance, he just wanted to try and be happy.


True, plus Cabrera was actually coming off off his triple crown year so you could say he earned it. But it wasn't like Cabrera was a lifelong Tiger -- he had been with Detroit for six years after five with Florida, and hadn't won, so it was different than Pujols with the Cardinals.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group