It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:56 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
We lucked out with pitching match ups.

Santana pitched yesterday; we won't face him. Weaver got some weird injury. He's scratched from todays game. Angels are calling up a rookie to pitch today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Beardown wrote:
Angels are calling up a rookie to pitch today.

I'm not sure if that's lucking out. Sure we're back home, but you know how the Sox typically do against these guys they've never seen before.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
We still get Saunders and Lackey though so this will not be easy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
BD wrote:
We still get Saunders and Lackey though so this will not be easy.


Yeah. I wish we could have got Garland. But I'm happy we got this rookie tonight instead of Weaver. This guy is 1-3 with a 7.20 ERA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:51 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:50 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Montgomery
I'll be there Sun, I'll try not to Mush them.

_________________
Paws Up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
It's not a question of will they clinch the American League West but when. The Anaheim Angels can actually clinch the division this weekend at "The Cell" if they sweep the Southsiders and the soon to be former World Champion Boston Red Sox can officially finish the Texas Rangers off at The Ballpark in Arlington. As it stands now, the Angels' magic number is 6. You are looking at the new World Champions, whether we like it or not. I believe the Garth Brooks-looking Mike Scioscia & the ANAHEIM ANGELS are going to win it all!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:29 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Ok. This Quentin injury sucks. I still expect the Sox to win the division. I'm with Frank. Heard your email on MJH today. Frank basically said it's about pitching anyway. Let's all listen to this and move on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv6lHwWwO3w

Dye is still a top 10 hitter in the AL. Konerko is swinging it well. Thome can get some homers. A.J is a solid hitter. Ramirez is good. Swisher, Griffey, Cabrera and the others have to chip in. It's not over. We can do this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Just an indication of why it's not over.

Here are some bad teams that have ran off winning streaks.

Indians won 10 in a row.

Nationals won 7 in a row.

Astros won 8 in a row.

Sox are better than all of those teams even without Quentin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:54 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Beardown wrote:
BD wrote:
We still get Saunders and Lackey though so this will not be easy.


Yeah. I wish we could have got Garland. But I'm happy we got this rookie tonight instead of Weaver. This guy is 1-3 with a 7.20 ERA.


Have we seen this guy before? Hopefully, we have because we suck (it seems) against guys we see for the first time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I just heard on the Score pre game that this pitcher is the guy that Thome got his 500th homer off last year. So we've seen him.

He must have been in the bullpen. Cuz Thome got him late in the game last year. I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Beardown wrote:
I just heard on the Score pre game that this pitcher is the guy that Thome got his 500th homer off last year. So we've seen him.

He must have been in the bullpen. Cuz Thome got him late in the game last year. I think.


Good news then. I feel much more comfortable about taking the opener then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Yeah. But maybe he was just a bullpen guy and only a few guys faced him last year. I don't know.

Hawk is usually good about giving the stats of Sox players against pitchers. We'll see if he does that today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
DJ just said this pitcher's last start in the minors he allowed 10 runs on 9 hits in only 2 innings.

Ok. No excuse not to win today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Beardown wrote:
Yeah. But maybe he was just a bullpen guy and only a few guys faced him last year. I don't know.

Hawk is usually good about giving the stats of Sox players against pitchers. We'll see if he does that today.


Actually, I think Nick Swisher (.167 in 6 AB and 3 K) and Jim Thome (1 AB, 1 HR) are the only guys who have faced him. Could be a long night, but hopefully they can handle Moseley.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
He's started 16 games in his career. 1 against the Sox last season. They lit him up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:23 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Holy shit. This guy is leaving his change up high. It's right there to kill. Dye missed two of them. Hawk is all over that too.

We're gonna kill this guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Dj just said he's never started against us.

Only two guys have faced him acording to Hawk.

Swisher: 6 times.

Thome: 1 time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Keyser Soze wrote:
He's started 16 games in his career. 1 against the Sox last season. They lit him up.


I believe you are referring to last season's 9-7 loss to the White Sox on September 16th. He didn't get anyone out (0.0 IP), and gave up 2 ER (1 HR to Thome) and 2 Hits. I believe Darin Erstad got the other hit in that game.

He didn't start this game, but was the losing pitcher.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Nice. JR gets the a 2-RBI single.

Maybe he isn't playing today if Quentin is healthy. :lol: See how I can spin things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Yeah I heard Hawk say only Thome and Swish has faced him so I went back to check. I read the stat sheet wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
See, fellas, it doesn't matter if you haven't seen a guy if the guy absolutly sucks.

As soon as I heard this guy gave up 10 runs, in two innings, in a minor league game, I knew we would win. Not to mention the nothing pitches I saw him throw in the first inning. This guy blows.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Oh nooooo!!!! C'mon Mike!!!! Don't take him out. The party just started.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Thome's wife is hot. No doubt she seduced that dumb fuck. She wanted his money.

Hey, you guys notice that DJ does all the interviews with the ass holes promoting stuff during the game. DJ stands off to the side. Hawk wants no part of that happy horse shit.

I know it's for charity. It's a good cause. But DJ does all the stupid interviews.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Juan Uribe!!!!!!!

Give that guy credit. He's come through recently. Defense and offense. After sitting for a long time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It's amazing Konerko and Thome ran on the in-field-fly rule. It's amazing the Angels didn't know the rule either and didn't tag them. They both were safe. Stupid on everybodys part.

Fuck. Alexi gets 2 RBIs cuz of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Looking for help from the Tigers & Rangers? Forget it! The Twins lead the Quitters, I mean Tigers 10-2 in the bottom 8th, while the Red Sox are shutting out the Rangers 7-0 in the top 9th. All this means is Anaheim's magic number for clinching the American League West will drop to 5 with the Rangers losing...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:01 pm
Posts: 914
Location: Finally in the 1000 club
pizza_Place: Deep dish - Giordano's
Regular - Nancys
Terrible base running by Wise - Out at 3rd with 1 out

_________________
I'm like a carpenter building stairs.......Always thinking one step ahead.

Quote:
"Mac" I've heard from Hollywood insiders that Jodie Foster is Asexual

Quote:
"Jurko" A sexual what Mac? ,,,,,,,Dynamo??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:48 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Neither the Cubs nor the Sox are the FOX game today. One of the rare times. Both play night games on Saturday.

So we're gonna get the Twins/Tigers today. Good. Now I can actually watch and root for a Twins loss instead of following it on the internet. That's assuming we get that game. I think we will since it means something to Sox fans. Don't think they'll give us the Dodgers/D-Backs or Phillies/Mets. Those are the other 2 FOX games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox vs Angels
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
Beardown wrote:
Neither the Cubs nor the Sox are the FOX game today. One of the rare times. Both play night games on Saturday.

So we're gonna get the Twins/Tigers today. Good. Now I can actually watch and root for a Twins loss instead of following it on the internet. That's assuming we get that game. I think we will since it means something to Sox fans. Don't think they'll give us the Dodgers/D-Backs or Phillies/Mets. Those are the other 2 FOX games.


I probably won't do more than occasionally check the score, but I don't mind seeing other games than just the Sox/Cubs on the FOX Saturday game, especially in this case where we have a rooting interest.

Go Tigers!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group