It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 6:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6585
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I think they need to do a few things:

Try to get the average game to 3hrs or under consistently.

Get the younger fans engaged more. Not sure how that is going to look.

Open up batting practice to the public. I am pretty sure it is limited at the moment. Maybe allow the hitters to use aluminum bats during it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I would install a ring of fire on the mound and in the batter's box that expands inward ever so slightly. The more time an at-bat takes the closer the fire gets to engulfing the pitcher and batter. Now they can stop wandering all over the mound or taking time outs to play with their bat and just get down to business. Or die.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
veganfan21 wrote:
I would install a ring of fire on the mound and in the batter's box that expands inward ever so slightly. The more time an at-bat takes the closer the fire gets to engulfing the pitcher and batter. Now they can stop wandering all over the mound or taking time outs to play with their bat and just get down to business. Or die.

That's an intriguing idea, but it's probably not realistic, what with the price of gas and everything. Plus, unless you are in the Astrodome, all teams will in a drizzle.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80219
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
If it wasn't for records, 120 would be plenty. No reason to pretend it wouldn't be. Baseball is being played for 7 months. 8+ if you count ST.



There was a time when I would have been more concerned about the "integrity" of the records, but with the steroid era, fucking around with the ball, etc., I don't think that should be a primary concern anymore.

Incidentally, I didn't see any discussion of the "pick your baseball" scam MLB ran last season wherein premier television games e.g. Yankees/Boston Sunday night, would often feature the more lively ball while "lesser" games e.g. Royals/White Sox Wednesday afternoon, used the new deader ball that they supposedly switch to. Talk about the integrity of the records! We can't even be sure who had the best actual power numbers within a season anymore.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4129
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
I really think MLB should limit each team to 4/5 pitchers per game. This would force pitchers to focus less on K’s and more on efficiency.


I think that's a good idea too.

Relax. Don’t try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they’re fascist. Throw some ground balls. It’s more democratic.

I'm not sure I like those artificial rules, but these four-inning starters have to go. I know the game changes, but starting pitching has pretty much been the backbone of the sport. It's killing their bodies, too. If you could have Burhrle or deGrom for ten years, who would you choose? I'm gonna have to say #56, despite deGrom being insanely good.



Right Burhrle was a guy who almost distained K's. If you want to guys to pitch more like Burhrle and less like Pete Fairbanks, you've got to incentivize that. Right now there is zero incentive to be anything other than a max effort guy who sells out for Ks. You can only use 4 pitchers in a game and you'll see a fuck ton of pitchers pitching into the 7th inning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25208
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Not commenting specifically on anybody in this thread, but a lot of the solutions to what ails baseball seemed designed by people who don’t like/never will like baseball.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Not commenting specifically on anybody in this thread, but a lot of the solutions to what ails baseball seemed designed by people who don’t like/never will like baseball.


Such as?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16689
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I suggested a while back that a called strike should count as two strikes...that would really push batters to swing at strikes and not take so many borderline pitches. But I would also predicate that on having an automated strike zone.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80219
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Not commenting specifically on anybody in this thread, but a lot of the solutions to what ails baseball seemed designed by people who don’t like/never will like baseball.



I'm not assuming your talking about me, but if you are, I'm certainly not clamoring for some of those changes for myself personally. The length of the games isn't really a problem for me. In fact, I can remember as a kid hoping games would get tied so they could go extra innings. But the game is losing entire generations. If we want it to survive as more than a niche sport, changes probably need to be made.

As far as the strikeout/walk/home run game that has been created due to the examination of statistics, that isn't really the baseball I grew up loving. We have a very unbalanced game right now and it isn't good.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56536
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Freddie makes some good points here, as he always does, but every now and then with him, the mask slips and you remember that he always wanted to be accepted by the Gawker in-crowd but they didn't let him in. Hence, balancing off fair criticisms of baseball with honking off to the NBA as if they have no problems of their own.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57614
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I suggested a while back that a called strike should count as two strikes...that would really push batters to swing at strikes and not take so many borderline pitches. But I would also predicate that on having an automated strike zone.

:lol: what in the world, that sounds like something Hawaii would suggest

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25208
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Not commenting specifically on anybody in this thread, but a lot of the solutions to what ails baseball seemed designed by people who don’t like/never will like baseball.


Such as?

Well now I’m forced to comment on specifics, so I’ll modify the original to note the changes are designed to please people who don’t like the sport (rather than by those who don’t like it) such as:

- less baseball…fewer games, shorter games, etc.
- worse baseball…expand rosters (diluting talent), capping the number of people who can enter the game at certain positions, executing pitchers or batters mid-AB with fire irrespective of talent level
- longer baseball…scheduled double headers tend to have at least one game played by a bunch of minor leaguers and are a slog for the fans (unless you shorten them, which goes back to point 1)

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16689
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
RFDC wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I suggested a while back that a called strike should count as two strikes...that would really push batters to swing at strikes and not take so many borderline pitches. But I would also predicate that on having an automated strike zone.

:lol: what in the world, that sounds like something Hawaii would suggest


:lol: I know, it's radical. But it would speed things up and remove the biggest issue -- too many takes.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56536
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
:lol: I know, it's radical. But it would speed things up and remove the biggest issue -- too many takes.

That's a problem here, too.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10872
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- less baseball…fewer games, shorter games, etc.
- worse baseball…expand rosters (diluting talent), capping the number of people who can enter the game at certain positions, executing pitchers or batters mid-AB with fire irrespective of talent level
- longer baseball…scheduled double headers tend to have at least one game played by a bunch of minor leaguers and are a slog for the fans (unless you shorten them, which goes back to point 1)

ok, I'll address since some of these I'm FOR.

Baseball is and always has been #1 for me....and I still watch a lot of baseball.
- Less games. April and October games suck. For most of the country, the weather is utter shit and the seats are empty in April.
- Worse baseball. I don't want expanding the playoffs or expansion teams. We will get exactly as you state....diluted product and worse baseball. I don't have a problem with expanded rosters to allow teams to rest players and work around schedules. If anything...that contributes to BETTER baseball.

Rule changes MLB has tried have been laughable (runner on 2nd in extra innings, replay, 7 innings on Double header. I don't like any of those.

I love baseball. My biggest gripe is the overuse of bullpen small strike zones, and the the time wasted on replay.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56536
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I have no issue with 162 games. The issue isn't the length of season, it's the pace of play, and I don't know how we unring that bell. Enforce a pitch clock, don't grant time, that can help, but turning baseball into trying to get a 15-pitch walk or striking out, I don't know how we unteach that, and knocking 42 games off the year doesn't fix that.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24656
pizza_Place: It's gone
162 is fine. just make the games shorter. I liked the double header 7 innings and also the extra runner in extra innings. i thought id' hate both but they worked fine.

get these fucking games done in 3 hours at the most. not 3.5 or 4.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
HawaiiYou wrote:
I liked the double header 7 innings and also the extra runner in extra innings.
Right, because you're a dunce.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25208
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Robot plate umps with consistent strike zones would help.

The grip rule from last year may help if enforced.

I’d get rid of the infield shift, which doesn’t do anything for Ks/BBs but is very annoying.

I’m ok with the 3 batter rule, provided there’s no other help to get teams through games if they decide to waste a full bullpen in one game (e.g., expanded rosters).

Stop fucking around with young guys’ service time. People will happily watch prospects suck rather than guys like Adam Eaton they know are hopeless.

Don’t promote nationally; put all your marketing dollars into supporting regional advertising for teams. Baseball fandom is more team driven than player driven (if that makes sense). I don’t care enough to watch Angels games when I can see Mike Trout’s full game in a 10 second highlight. I do care enough to watch the team I like, go to their games, buy their overpriced merch, etc.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Nas wrote:
I don't think the 40 and older crowd really has a problem with the game. If the game doesn't find a way to appeal to the youth, it will be dead in about 30 years.


I know what you are saying in terms of viewership but I see more families plunking down way more money for kids to play baseball than in my youth. Warehouses are being converted to indoor facilities across the suburbs and its difficult to find an open field from May-July

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:25 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19562
Nas wrote:
I don't think the 40 and older crowd really has a problem with the game. If the game doesn't find a way to appeal to the youth, it will be dead in about 30 years.


15 years ago I noticed almost no one in junior high cared about baseball and that hasn't changed. Those kids from 15 years ago are now starting to have kids who will also not care about baseball. Gambling is what has saved the NFL and what MLB needs on a higher level for long term survival.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13442
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d get rid of the infield shift, which doesn’t do anything for Ks/BBs but is very annoying.
I don't see how you can dictate where players set up defensively. Seems to me the answer is to teach hitters to take advantage of the situation. The fact that they rarely do has always baffled me.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19562
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't think the 40 and older crowd really has a problem with the game. If the game doesn't find a way to appeal to the youth, it will be dead in about 30 years.


I know what you are saying in terms of viewership but I see more families plunking down way more money for kids to play baseball than in my youth. Warehouses are being converted to indoor facilities across the suburbs and its difficult to find an open field from May-July


That is because parents have ruined everything. Instead of house leagues you have travel ball for 7 year olds. Which in turn burns most of these kids out on baseball by high school.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80219
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d get rid of the infield shift, which doesn’t do anything for Ks/BBs but is very annoying.
I don't see how you can dictate where players set up defensively. Seems to me the answer is to teach hitters to take advantage of the situation. The fact that they rarely do has always baffled me.



I believe they are going to go that way. It's a simple rule. Two infielders on each side of second. I don't really agree with it. But the problem has become that instead of "hittin' 'em where they ain't" the answer to the overshifts has been to try to park it in the seats. And that's contributing to the boring game we're seeing.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d get rid of the infield shift, which doesn’t do anything for Ks/BBs but is very annoying.
I don't see how you can dictate where players set up defensively. Seems to me the answer is to teach hitters to take advantage of the situation. The fact that they rarely do has always baffled me.
To me it would seem just like having illegal defense and defensive 3 seconds in basketball.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Curious Hair wrote:
Freddie makes some good points here, as he always does, but every now and then with him, the mask slips and you remember that he always wanted to be accepted by the Gawker in-crowd but they didn't let him in. Hence, balancing off fair criticisms of baseball with honking off to the NBA as if they have no problems of their own.


Yes. The NBA has it’s own Sabermetric problems. Chucking up threes is the NBA’s answer to swinging for the fences. And the regular season doesn’t matter. But there was a LeBron gif so it’s fine.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13442
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d get rid of the infield shift, which doesn’t do anything for Ks/BBs but is very annoying.
I don't see how you can dictate where players set up defensively. Seems to me the answer is to teach hitters to take advantage of the situation. The fact that they rarely do has always baffled me.
To me it would seem just like having illegal defense and defensive 3 seconds in basketball.
My post wasn't clear, but I didn't mean there was literally no way to regulate that (such as JORR noted), rather that I don't feel like baseball benefits from those types of rules. Part of what makes baseball great is that it's not like the other sports in so many ways.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4129
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Not commenting specifically on anybody in this thread, but a lot of the solutions to what ails baseball seemed designed by people who don’t like/never will like baseball.


Such as?

Well now I’m forced to comment on specifics, so I’ll modify the original to note the changes are designed to please people who don’t like the sport (rather than by those who don’t like it) such as:

- less baseball…fewer games, shorter games, etc.
- worse baseball…expand rosters (diluting talent), capping the number of people who can enter the game at certain positions, executing pitchers or batters mid-AB with fire irrespective of talent level
- longer baseball…scheduled double headers tend to have at least one game played by a bunch of minor leaguers and are a slog for the fans (unless you shorten them, which goes back to point 1)


So just because people think something can be improved they can't/don't like that thing? And/or because the changes they might want aren't they changes you might want these people can't/don't like that thing?

Are you this pretentious in real life or is this just a bit for the message board?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Id like to see no more mound visits from pitching coach or manager, the catcher can go out tgere 2x a game..if you wanna make a switch, do it from the dugout.. no warm up pitches, you get loose in the pen. Automatic k zone.. these umps suck anyway and they get hit by a ball once a fame and slow it down.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
BigW72 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- less baseball…fewer games, shorter games, etc.
- worse baseball…expand rosters (diluting talent), capping the number of people who can enter the game at certain positions, executing pitchers or batters mid-AB with fire irrespective of talent level
- longer baseball…scheduled double headers tend to have at least one game played by a bunch of minor leaguers and are a slog for the fans (unless you shorten them, which goes back to point 1)

ok, I'll address since some of these I'm FOR.

Baseball is and always has been #1 for me....and I still watch a lot of baseball.
- Less games. April and October games suck. For most of the country, the weather is utter shit and the seats are empty in April.
- Worse baseball. I don't want expanding the playoffs or expansion teams. We will get exactly as you state....diluted product and worse baseball. I don't have a problem with expanded rosters to allow teams to rest players and work around schedules. If anything...that contributes to BETTER baseball.

Rule changes MLB has tried have been laughable (runner on 2nd in extra innings, replay, 7 innings on Double header. I don't like any of those.

I love baseball. My biggest gripe is the overuse of bullpen small strike zones, and the the time wasted on replay.

148-154 games, real strike zones, pitching clocks and more daytime games wouldn't hurt as well.

Plus letting the kids play like they do in Latin America and Asia would attract the kids. I've said it before, but kids get amped with the music, noise and expressions of joy playing the game.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group