It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 6:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.


Yeah it seems a bit odd. Baseball is what it is and has slightly changed over more than 100 years. But let’s let the talking heads tell us how it sucks, the players are indentured servants and the owners are craven.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25208
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.

It’s my favorite political recurrence, wherein one party doesn’t understand why the other party won’t nominate the candidate most appealing to the opposition party who’d never actually vote for that candidate.

I’ve still got a few cases of Jim Webb 2016 merch that I just cannot unload.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
When I watched baseball the most from the mid 90s to the late 00s there wasn’t heavy shifting, or 99% of players subscribed to the 3 outcome.

Limiting the shift isn’t so much about attracting new fans.

ImO it’s more about putting a stop to the fan hemorrhaging, and bringing fed up fans back.

Maybe I’m just speaking for myself, but it seems MANY don’t like the product anymore.

Also, all professional sports modify rules every year right?

Sometimes for competition.

Sometimes to make the product more appealing.

Sometimes for both.

Why is baseball so sacred?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32563
pizza_Place: What??
Jbi11s wrote:
Why is baseball so sacred?

Because I said so. Now shutup about the shift and go jackhammer Mother Earth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2575
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Jbi11s wrote:
When I watched baseball the most from the mid 90s to the late 00s there wasn’t heavy shifting, or 99% of players subscribed to the 3 outcome.

Limiting the shift isn’t so much about attracting new fans.

ImO it’s more about putting a stop to the fan hemorrhaging, and bringing fed up fans back.

Maybe I’m just speaking for myself, but it seems MANY don’t like the product anymore.

Also, all professional sports modify rules every year right?

Sometimes for competition.

Sometimes to make the product more appealing.

Sometimes for both.

Why is baseball so sacred?


The prevailing theory is that hitting the occasional homerun with some walks scattered in for good measure is more advantageous than hitting for average. You can eliminate the shift, and that won't change. You're still going to be left with the same boring game.

The only thing that's possibly going to change that practice is a lot more teams like the '15 Royals winning the World Series.


Last edited by Warren Newson on Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nardi wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Why is baseball so sacred?

Because I said so. Now shutup about the shift and go jackhammer Mother Earth.


I do need to sleep, but on a side note the one thing all these green energy enthusiasts really miss when criticizing the fracking industry is just how much water is used.

I’m talking like 2 million barrels of fresh water in the Bakken for 3 or 4 Frac pads in a little over a month.

There’s at least 10-15 Frac sites happening right now in the Bakken.

Probably more.

That’s simply unsustainable.

At least down in the Permian they use a lot of production water.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10248
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Warren Newson wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
When I watched baseball the most from the mid 90s to the late 00s there wasn’t heavy shifting, or 99% of players subscribed to the 3 outcome.

Limiting the shift isn’t so much about attracting new fans.

ImO it’s more about putting a stop to the fan hemorrhaging, and bringing fed up fans back.

Maybe I’m just speaking for myself, but it seems MANY don’t like the product anymore.

Also, all professional sports modify rules every year right?

Sometimes for competition.

Sometimes to make the product more appealing.

Sometimes for both.

Why is baseball so sacred?


The prevailing theory is that hitting the occasional homerun with some walks scattered in for good measure is more advantageous than hitting for average. You can eliminate the shift, and that won't change. You're still going to be left with same boring game.

The only thing that's possibly going to change that practice is a lot more teams like the '15 Royals winning the World Series.


In golf, they lengthen the courses, and do other nasty stuff to them for the majors.

In baseball, they really should be moving the foul poles back a bit, but that eats up seating when it can even be physically done. The Orioles decided to do it in left field this offseason, moved it back about 25 feet and raised the fence up to 13 feet. But they can't do that in RF because of the warehouse.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2575
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
When I watched baseball the most from the mid 90s to the late 00s there wasn’t heavy shifting, or 99% of players subscribed to the 3 outcome.

Limiting the shift isn’t so much about attracting new fans.

ImO it’s more about putting a stop to the fan hemorrhaging, and bringing fed up fans back.

Maybe I’m just speaking for myself, but it seems MANY don’t like the product anymore.

Also, all professional sports modify rules every year right?

Sometimes for competition.

Sometimes to make the product more appealing.

Sometimes for both.

Why is baseball so sacred?


The prevailing theory is that hitting the occasional homerun with some walks scattered in for good measure is more advantageous than hitting for average. You can eliminate the shift, and that won't change. You're still going to be left with same boring game.

The only thing that's possibly going to change that practice is a lot more teams like the '15 Royals winning the World Series.


In golf, they lengthen the courses, and do other nasty stuff to them for the majors.

In baseball, they really should be moving the foul poles back a bit, but that eats up seating when it can even be physically done. The Orioles decided to do it in left field this offseason, moved it back about 25 feet and raised the fence up to 13 feet. But they can't do that in RF because of the warehouse.


It would be cool to see that happen. I wish the Tigers would have stuck to their guns and kept the original dimensions of Comerica.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13442
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Warren Newson wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
When I watched baseball the most from the mid 90s to the late 00s there wasn’t heavy shifting, or 99% of players subscribed to the 3 outcome.

Limiting the shift isn’t so much about attracting new fans.

ImO it’s more about putting a stop to the fan hemorrhaging, and bringing fed up fans back.

Maybe I’m just speaking for myself, but it seems MANY don’t like the product anymore.

Also, all professional sports modify rules every year right?

Sometimes for competition.

Sometimes to make the product more appealing.

Sometimes for both.

Why is baseball so sacred?


The prevailing theory is that hitting the occasional homerun with some walks scattered in for good measure is more advantageous than hitting for average. You can eliminate the shift, and that won't change. You're still going to be left with same boring game.

The only thing that's possibly going to change that practice is a lot more teams like the '15 Royals winning the World Series.


In golf, they lengthen the courses, and do other nasty stuff to them for the majors.

In baseball, they really should be moving the foul poles back a bit, but that eats up seating when it can even be physically done. The Orioles decided to do it in left field this offseason, moved it back about 25 feet and raised the fence up to 13 feet. But they can't do that in RF because of the warehouse.


It would be cool to see that happen. I wish the Tigers would have stuck to their guns and kept the original dimensions of Comerica.
We know they can change the baseball - which can have the same effect if that’s the desired goal. I don’t think that’s what they want though.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57614
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7936
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
They could deaden the ball and call the actual strike zone and you are probably looking at 80's style baseball. Is that good? For me I would like that but I'm not sure the average fan really wants the hit and run and guys with 100 stolen bases (That might be almost impossible even if stealing was encouraged with the increase In velocity and the switch to everyone on the slid step and pop rates and all that jazz).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
They could deaden the ball and call the actual strike zone and you are probably looking at 80's style baseball. Is that good? For me I would like that but I'm not sure the average fan really wants the hit and run and guys with 100 stolen bases (That might be almost impossible even if stealing was encouraged with the increase In velocity and the switch to everyone on the slid step and pop rates and all that jazz).


I'd love it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.
I tried to like baseball. I bought the mlb.tv season pass at least 5 times mostly because I'm a sucker for live sports during the day on in the background while I mostly post on here and do a little work waiting for ltg to respond.

The game is slow even for that. Now, the players greed is cancelling games for the second season in three years all the while Jerry sits at home hoping he gets to bring Chicago the 8th title of his illustrious career all while people debate whether more bunting can make baseball more interesting.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80219
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
They could deaden the ball and call the actual strike zone and you are probably looking at 80's style baseball. Is that good? For me I would like that but I'm not sure the average fan really wants the hit and run and guys with 100 stolen bases (That might be almost impossible even if stealing was encouraged with the increase In velocity and the switch to everyone on the slid step and pop rates and all that jazz).


I'd love it.



Me too.

I don't think random goofs should just be able to throw up 50+ home run seasons and nobody really cares or notices. There was a time not that long ago when I could name every guy who had hit 50 or more off the top of my head.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6382
pizza_Place: Frozen
You can't arm twist to get somebody to like something.

Worst case scenario baseball hits harder times. Fringe teams fold up. Player salaries plummet. Baseball will be forced to go back to its roots. Sabermetrics is god and non baseball people gurus will be thinned out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7936
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Yeah. 87 (I think) when Dawson and McGwire hit 49 was a real outlier (I think Cecil went over 50. Couple year later but maybe that is a memory of will help hit 50 vs hitting 50). I get that the homerun is exciting. But a gap double and scoring 1st to home was too. People in motion is more exciting than weaver ball and this isn’t even weaver ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15191
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.

the alternative is to let what is already a generational gap widen in terms of baseball fans.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:23 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
They could deaden the ball and call the actual strike zone and you are probably looking at 80's style baseball. Is that good? For me I would like that but I'm not sure the average fan really wants the hit and run and guys with 100 stolen bases (That might be almost impossible even if stealing was encouraged with the increase In velocity and the switch to everyone on the slid step and pop rates and all that jazz).


I'd love it.
Me too.

I don't think random goofs should just be able to throw up 50+ home run seasons and nobody really cares or notices. There was a time not that long ago when I could name every guy who had hit 50 or more off the top of my head.
Hard not to argue.

You can keep the juiced ball if you want, just call the rule book strike zone. Guys will be down in the count 0-1, 0-2, 1-2, and stop looking for walks. More balls in play. You will still have homers but enforcing the true strike zone will keep that in check as well for the most part.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
The strike zone has always been a bone of contention for me. Tell the umps and players to stfu or the robot caller is coming.

Has the video already rid us of the phantom DP tag at 2nd?

I don’t particularly care about deadening the ball. Simply go back to some point accept a standard and stick to it forever. No other sport fucks with the ball. How is that any different than players juicing?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15191
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
pittmike wrote:

I don’t particularly care about deadening the ball. Simply go back to some point accept a standard and stick to it forever. No other sport fucks with the ball. How is that any different than players juicing?

this is patently false. Are you serious? NFL kickers would like a word with you. As would Tom Brady.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32563
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
People who don't like baseball constantly trying to make baseball more appealing to other people who don't like baseball probably isn't the best strategy.
I tried to like baseball. I bought the mlb.tv season pass at least 5 times mostly because I'm a sucker for live sports during the day on in the background while I mostly post on here and do a little work waiting for ltg to respond.

The game is slow even for that. Now, the players greed is cancelling games for the second season in three years all the while Jerry sits at home hoping he gets to bring Chicago the 8th title of his illustrious career all while people debate whether more bunting can make baseball more interesting.

Between your whacking off times, can you possibly suggest something useful?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6382
pizza_Place: Frozen
Didn't the players negotiate, then vote to accept the past agreement they now consider unfair?

I'm now hoping there aren't games until the beginning of July to break the players. Have a 3 month regular season, followed by the postseason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25208
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I just hope one side buckles asap. Players seem to be proposing no added revenue plus increased spending, so maybe they’re confident they can handle a longer lockout.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
City of Fools wrote:
pittmike wrote:

I don’t particularly care about deadening the ball. Simply go back to some point accept a standard and stick to it forever. No other sport fucks with the ball. How is that any different than players juicing?

this is patently false. Are you serious? NFL kickers would like a word with you. As would Tom Brady.


That’s not the NFL doing it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
vitoscotti wrote:
Didn't the players negotiate, then vote to accept the past agreement they now consider unfair?

I'm now hoping there aren't games until the beginning of July to break the players. Have a 3 month regular season, followed by the postseason.


Yes for a collection of players beholden to guaranteed contracts they sure hate shit they agreed to.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24656
pizza_Place: It's gone
rumors that an agreement is close, maybe tomorrow. lets see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
What was the international thing they agreed to which had Bernsie all excited today. I missed part of it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2970
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
was an international draft, wasnt it?

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Local radio in Detroit reporting an agreement has been reached?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group