It is currently Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:50 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 7
  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Caller Bob
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Jay Novackeck, all pro
Michael Irvin , HOF
Alvin Harper, pro bowler

Beyond loaded!!! Lol


LOL Alvin Harper. what an all-time great, you should have stopped at Irvin. I’m pretty sure Novacek isn’t going in the hall of fame any time soon either. He had a nice run with Dallas, no doubt, but he hardly propped up Troy Aikman. Those cowboys teams were great and were loaded with HOF talent, don’t contaminate it by dropping those names.

Novackeck made 5 pro bowls and 1 all pro tean. That's borderline HOF. They basically had all pros at every position
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


No one said he sucked. I simply said he was overrated. There is no question that the talent around him propped him up. You could insert Stan Humphries or a league average quarterback in that lineup, and they still win multiple championships.

Someone specifically said Aikman sucked earlier in the thread, and he is the one my remarks are pointed at.


I missed that. My bad. Phil Simms or Troy Aikman? Jim Kelly or Troy Aikman? Vinny Testaverde or Troy Aikman? Jeff George or Troy Aikman?




I’d put Troy and Phil on pretty equal footing, with the slight edge to Troy because he’s more accurate. Kelly might be a little more talented but he fell apart in some big moments so that’s a toss up imo.. Troy was flat out better than Jeff and Vinny tho.. George had a more ‘talented’ arm (one if the best ever imo).. but he could never put it all together.

Statistically, George had some great years. As flawed as he was, he would easily be the best Bears quarterback ever.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Jay Novackeck, all pro
Michael Irvin , HOF
Alvin Harper, pro bowler

Beyond loaded!!! Lol


LOL Alvin Harper. what an all-time great, you should have stopped at Irvin. I’m pretty sure Novacek isn’t going in the hall of fame any time soon either. He had a nice run with Dallas, no doubt, but he hardly propped up Troy Aikman. Those cowboys teams were great and were loaded with HOF talent, don’t contaminate it by dropping those names.

Novackeck made 5 pro bowls and 1 all pro tean. That's borderline HOF. They basically had all pros at every position

Hey I’d love to spend a week looking at all the HOF busts at the HOF jay novecek gets in to. And I’m not shitting on those Dallas teams, they were great.
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I’m a fucking GIANTS fan and anyone who says he and Troy Aikman are on equal footing career-wise is insane. But some guys, even if they aren’t HOF-worthy, are just right for certain teams. Parcells and Simms were a perfect match.
Top
 Profile  
 
Seacrest
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38232
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Jay Novackeck, all pro
Michael Irvin , HOF
Alvin Harper, pro bowler

Beyond loaded!!! Lol


LOL Alvin Harper. what an all-time great, you should have stopped at Irvin. I’m pretty sure Novacek isn’t going in the hall of fame any time soon either. He had a nice run with Dallas, no doubt, but he hardly propped up Troy Aikman. Those cowboys teams were great and were loaded with HOF talent, don’t contaminate it by dropping those names.

Novackeck made 5 pro bowls and 1 all pro tean. That's borderline HOF. They basically had all pros at every position

Hey I’d love to spend a week looking at all the HOF busts at the HOF jay novecek gets in to. And I’m not shitting on those Dallas teams, they were great.


Naperville's own Owen Daniels, has superior individual stats to Novacek who was an Ok TE, on a team full of superstars.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.



Emmit Smith wasn't even a top 25 back.. that's what I'm saying about T.A. everybody looks better with that line and talent all over the field.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
man of few opinions wrote:
I’m a fucking GIANTS fan and anyone who says he and Troy Aikman are on equal footing career-wise is insane. But some guys, even if they aren’t HOF-worthy, are just right for certain teams. Parcells and Simms were a perfect match.


I'd take Eli's bum ass over Aikman

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I’m a fucking GIANTS fan and anyone who says he and Troy Aikman are on equal footing career-wise is insane. But some guys, even if they aren’t HOF-worthy, are just right for certain teams. Parcells and Simms were a perfect match.


I'd take Eli's bum ass over Aikman

Now there is something we can agree on.
Top
 Profile  
 
badrogue17
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38665
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
man of few opinions wrote:
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I’m a fucking GIANTS fan and anyone who says he and Troy Aikman are on equal footing career-wise is insane. But some guys, even if they aren’t HOF-worthy, are just right for certain teams. Parcells and Simms were a perfect match.


I'd take Eli's bum ass over Aikman

Now there is something we can agree on.

Thats a bad take .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
it was said tongue and cheek since I am a giants fan. I should have used an emoji or something to indicate that.
Top
 Profile  
 
BigW72
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10762
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.



Emmit Smith wasn't even a top 25 back.. that's what I'm saying about T.A. everybody looks better with that line and talent all over the field.

I completely agree with you on Aikman was the beneficiary of an amazing supporting cast. My problem with that argument is then you also have to apply it to Joe Montana.
By the numbers, Montana beats Aikman in most categories. He was clearly better, but man...Montana had an awful lot of help in all his years.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:43 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
BigW72 wrote:
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.



Emmit Smith wasn't even a top 25 back.. that's what I'm saying about T.A. everybody looks better with that line and talent all over the field.

I completely agree with you on Aikman was the beneficiary of an amazing supporting cast. My problem with that argument is then you also have to apply it to Joe Montana.
By the numbers, Montana beats Aikman in most categories. He was clearly better, but man...Montana had an awful lot of help in all his years.


It's why I had Elway over Montana.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
BigW72
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10762
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
badrogue17 wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I’m a fucking GIANTS fan and anyone who says he and Troy Aikman are on equal footing career-wise is insane. But some guys, even if they aren’t HOF-worthy, are just right for certain teams. Parcells and Simms were a perfect match.


I'd take Eli's bum ass over Aikman

Now there is something we can agree on.

Thats a bad take .

Nope...Eli beats Aikman in Passer Rating, Total Yards, Total TDs. He had way less to work with and has 2 super bowl rings. I take Eli over Aikman and it's not much of a discussion.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.
Top
 Profile  
 
BigW72
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10762
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nas wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
312player wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.



Emmit Smith wasn't even a top 25 back.. that's what I'm saying about T.A. everybody looks better with that line and talent all over the field.

I completely agree with you on Aikman was the beneficiary of an amazing supporting cast. My problem with that argument is then you also have to apply it to Joe Montana.
By the numbers, Montana beats Aikman in most categories. He was clearly better, but man...Montana had an awful lot of help in all his years.


It's why I had Elway over Montana.

I can't agree with you on this one. Elway was awesome and I loved watching him as a yoot, but any kind of "it" Mojo in the body of John Elway.....Montana had 10x the amount. Elway and Marino had more of deep ball threat than Montana, but Montana was incredibly efficient and accurate.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nardi
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31495
pizza_Place: What??
Eli was clutch. As was Montana and Elway. This should be included in discussions of under and over rated. Who could carry a team to a win when it really counted. If it's the playoffs and you're down by 6 with a minute 30 to go, I'll take Eli over his brother.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?
Top
 Profile  
 
badrogue17
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38665
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nardi wrote:
Eli was clutch. As was Montana and Elway. This should be included in discussions of under and over rated. Who could carry a team to a win when it really counted. If it's the playoffs and you're down by 6 with a minute 30 to go, I'll take Eli over his brother.

Eli was a once in a lifetime catch and a bad throw/ drop away from being a 2 time Super Bowl loser, but I guess that was clutch

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nardi
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31495
pizza_Place: What??
badrogue17 wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Eli was clutch. As was Montana and Elway. This should be included in discussions of under and over rated. Who could carry a team to a win when it really counted. If it's the playoffs and you're down by 6 with a minute 30 to go, I'll take Eli over his brother.

Eli was a once in a lifetime catch and a bad throw/ drop away from being a 2 time Super Bowl loser, but I guess that was clutch

:lol: It shouldn't have BEEN a helmet catch.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?
Top
 Profile  
 
enigma
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1564
Reminds me of the old days at the Score when North would argue that Harbaugh would be as successful as Aikman if Harbaugh were on the Cowboys.
Top
 Profile  
 
Caller Bob
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
enigma wrote:
Reminds me of the old days at the Score when North would argue that Harbaugh would be as successful as Aikman if Harbaugh were on the Cowboys.

That's probably one of his more reasonable takes.
Top
 Profile  
 
BigW72
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10762
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Caller Bob wrote:
enigma wrote:
Reminds me of the old days at the Score when North would argue that Harbaugh would be as successful as Aikman if Harbaugh were on the Cowboys.

That's probably one of his more reasonable takes.

Very reasonable.
As stated before, Kyle Orton would have looked awfully good on those Cowboys teams.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.
Top
 Profile  
 
veganfan21
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 5:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Trent Dilfer probably on today. Fields very basic competency against the Vikings led Dilfer to say something like he can see Fields being the best player on the field. Very interested to see if he's gonna be objective here or just talk up his former pet project.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 6:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91862
Location: To the left of my post
If you need any player in the NFL to make one throw in a game then you have to go with Justin Fields. The problem is that quarterbacks in the NFL are expected to make more than one throw in a game.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
badrogue17
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38665
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Trent Dilfer probably on today. Fields very basic competency against the Vikings led Dilfer to say something like he can see Fields being the best player on the field. Very interested to see if he's gonna be objective here or just talk up his former pet project.


Itll be more of this .

Image

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.
Top
 Profile  
 
veganfan21
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Dilfer mostly positive on Fields per his segment on 670

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY
Top
 Profile  
 
Urlacher's missing neck
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27514
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
badrogue17 wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Trent Dilfer probably on today. Fields very basic competency against the Vikings led Dilfer to say something like he can see Fields being the best player on the field. Very interested to see if he's gonna be objective here or just talk up his former pet project.


Itll be more of this .

Image



The Schrock article after the game.....wow. Some of these guys are about 1 step away from comparing his efforts and sacrifices to his team to being nailed to a cross.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
badrogue17 wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Trent Dilfer probably on today. Fields very basic competency against the Vikings led Dilfer to say something like he can see Fields being the best player on the field. Very interested to see if he's gonna be objective here or just talk up his former pet project.


Itll be more of this .

Image

He did leave a lot of points on the field.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23800
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I’d like to understand what Twitter guy thinks literally means.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants
Top
 Profile  
 
Nardi
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31495
pizza_Place: What??
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d like to understand what Twitter guy thinks literally means.

It means Fields has literally nothing left. I would think that is bad news.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?
Top
 Profile  
 
Beardown
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Hawk
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14910
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 7
  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group