It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.


:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

No recency bias there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24079
pizza_Place: Pizanos
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

Que?
:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.


:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .


Yes he is.

Allen will have to win a SB to supplant him.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

Que?

:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .



A guy winning a regular season game on the road means he’s better than a guy who won a Super Bowl. Also that guy doesn’t have a fruity brother that does TikTok dances (that we know of).

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 6:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 503
The Hawk wrote:
But one thing is clear to me and that is Fields has more natural talent at the quarterback position than anyone I have ever seen on the Bears.:


Said no one, ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
According to Haugh, Jalen Hurts is now the proper comp for Fields.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Jaw Breaker wrote:
According to Haugh, Jalen Hurts is now the proper comp for Fields.

I'm not ready to put Jalen Hurts in Canton, but Fields would be lucky to be comparable to Jalen Hurts :lol:

David Haugh isn't new to being a complete idiot.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I can see where Hurts and Fields could be a comparison on some level, but after watching last nights game it just looks like Hurts is a lot more confident than Fields and I know there are reasons for that regarding talent around him, but there was an air of confidence and leadership around Hurts that I think is hard to teach. I have never been really impressed with Hurts to be honest but last night was the first time Ive seen him play this year and he really seem unquestionably to be the leader on that offense and that impressed me. Maybe Fields can find that, he is pretty young but he seems to be a beat slow with all his decisions and doesn't seem to have the confidence of the team because he doesn't seem to have the confidence in himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.


:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .



Who is?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31651
pizza_Place: What??
BigW72 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
According to Haugh, Jalen Hurts is now the proper comp for Fields.

I'm not ready to put Jalen Hurts in Canton, but Fields would be lucky to be comparable to Jalen Hurts :lol:

David Haugh isn't new to being a complete idiot.

There should be some kind of rule that no Haugh comment should ever be repeated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
man of few opinions wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

No recency bias there.


I don't think it is recency bias. It is tough to compare generations of players. No question about it. I am not saying that Mahomes is the best quarterback of all time. He needs to stay healthy and win a few more championships at least. But I think he does things on a football field that no quarterback in history has ever done. And he really looks like he is toying with the defense with his footwork and arm. Steve Young was a good comp by the way but he was much more experienced when he entered the NFL after his AFL days.

As for recency, I loved to watch Joe Montana play quarterback and he is my all time number two guy. Another guy who was a terrific quarterback who had a limited lifetime in the NFL was Broadway Joe. It's too bad that he got crippled up because he was an amazing runner and as strong an arm as anyone who played the game.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nardi wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
According to Haugh, Jalen Hurts is now the proper comp for Fields.

I'm not ready to put Jalen Hurts in Canton, but Fields would be lucky to be comparable to Jalen Hurts :lol:

David Haugh isn't new to being a complete idiot.

There should be some kind of rule that no Haugh comment should ever be repeated.



Put some receivers and offensive linemen on the team and then lets talk about "comps"

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The Hawk wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .



Who is?

Theres nothing Mahomes does throwing the ball that Allen cant do and Allen is a better runner .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 3:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
badrogue17 wrote:
Theres nothing Mahomes does throwing the ball that Allen cant do and Allen is a better runner .
Then why has Mahomes played in two Super Bowls defeated Allen twice in the playoffs?

Gee....wonder what the main difference between the two guys is ? I mean, other than winning ?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Jenkins says Fields played a nearly flawless game last night: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iHGt5hTj2E.

He gives some pretty good analysis of what the Bears are doing with motions and routes, and how Fields is reading the field.

He doesn't seem concerned about the fumbles.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He's extremely biased. The comment about Fields getting a plus plus, but him never giving Brady one was ridiculous.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Tall Midget wrote:
Jenkins says Fields played a nearly flawless game last night: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iHGt5hTj2E.

He gives some pretty good analysis of what the Bears are doing with motions and routes, and how Fields is reading the field.

He doesn't seem concerned about the fumbles.

:lol: My god how low the bar is set with this guy if that was “ near flawless” .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Kurt Warner and the Mannings are all saying the same thing: get the ball out quicker. I haven't listened to Jenkins and Dilfer this week yet but am interested to compare their insight against that of Warner and the Mannings.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 5:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
veganfan21 wrote:
Kurt Warner and the Mannings are all saying the same thing: get the ball out quicker. I haven't listened to Jenkins and Dilfer this week yet but am interested to compare their insight against that of Warner and the Mannings.


Almost everybody says that on at least some of the plays.

The problem is there are a significant number of "gray area" plays where (due to lack of proper camera angles) it's not clear if Fields is holding the ball too long because no one is open, holding the ball because he wants to make a big play instead of taking the layup, holding the ball because he doesn't sense pressure, or holding the ball because he's not seeing open receivers.

The Mannings and Warner needed to get rid of the ball super quickly because they all had average or below average mobility in the pocket. Fields is obviously more gifted in this area, so coaching him to "get the ball out quicker" on all plays will not necessarily be the best advice.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


I agree with you and Nas. I think Elway is the best ever. I've always said this. Like we all know, stats from the 80s and 90s guys won't compare to the current guys. Rules changes and back then QBs were able to get destroyed by defenses with no penalties. But Elway is the most talented QB ever.



You can't take it away from Brady. I'd put Elway about 7 or 8. As for most talented ever, I think Mahomes is the best ever.

:lol: Mahomes isnt even the most talented in his conference .



Who is?

Theres nothing Mahomes does throwing the ball that Allen cant do and Allen is a better runner .



I just disagree on both counts. Allen is clearly a stronger football player but he cannot make the throws that Mahomes can make from the standpoint of arm angles and touch. Both have very strong arms. Allen is a stronger runner and a load to bring down, but no quarterback has the footwork that Mahomes has nor the elusiveness.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Really enjoyed Dilfer with Parkins and meat today. I think he does a pretty good job of being balanced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEnfjKevBt4

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
Fetterman better hope that Jenkins reviews his debate performance.

But, in all seriousness....If these guys are going to say that he play well in the first 6 games, I'm not sure there is much to learn from them going forward. If Washington was 'B' performance for example, Fields should get straight A+'s the rest of the way.

_________________
"I give you my word as a Biden"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Tall Midget wrote:
The Mannings and Warner needed to get rid of the ball super quickly because they all had average or below average mobility in the pocket. Fields is obviously more gifted in this area, so coaching him to "get the ball out quicker" on all plays will not necessarily be the best advice.

True, but it's in Fields best interests to get the ball out quicker. Josh Allen has pretty good mobility, but he still prioritizes getting the pass out first.

Overall, I'm taking the gospel of Warner and Mannings over Jenkins and Dilfer.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
BigW72 wrote:
Overall, I'm taking the gospel of Warner and Mannings over Jenkins and Dilfer.
I'll take any of the four over the 2nd grade level musings of Caller Bob and badrouge as well.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 1:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Mannings and Warner needed to get rid of the ball super quickly because they all had average or below average mobility in the pocket. Fields is obviously more gifted in this area, so coaching him to "get the ball out quicker" on all plays will not necessarily be the best advice.

True, but it's in Fields best interests to get the ball out quicker. Josh Allen has pretty good mobility, but he still prioritizes getting the pass out first.

Overall, I'm taking the gospel of Warner and Mannings over Jenkins and Dilfer.


Dilfer is very reasonable when it comes to evaluating Fields. He recognizes that mobility is a huge part of Fields' game whereas I don't think Warner takes that into account at all.

It will take Fields a long time to become a pure pocket passer, assuming that goal is even attainable (or desirable) for him. But he might be able to maximize his potential without becoming a pure pocket passer.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Tall Midget wrote:

It will take Fields a long time to become a pure pocket passer, assuming that goal is even attainable (or desirable) for him. But he might be able to maximize his potential without becoming a pure pocket passer.


Being a running QB might maximize his potential in terms of the team’s success, but he’ll probably figure out it’s not in his financial interest as he’s likely to get hurt and may face a Lamar Jackson situation where he can’t get paid because of concerns over his style.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 1:43 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

It will take Fields a long time to become a pure pocket passer, assuming that goal is even attainable (or desirable) for him. But he might be able to maximize his potential without becoming a pure pocket passer.


Being a running QB might maximize his potential in terms of the team’s success, but he’ll probably figure out it’s not in his financial interest as he’s likely to get hurt and may face a Lamar Jackson situation where he can’t get paid because of concerns over his style.


Can he be a starter without running? As of right now, I'd say the answer is a resounding "no".

He is going to need at least a couple years to sort out his short throwing game and pocket presence issues.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

It will take Fields a long time to become a pure pocket passer, assuming that goal is even attainable (or desirable) for him. But he might be able to maximize his potential without becoming a pure pocket passer.


Being a running QB might maximize his potential in terms of the team’s success, but he’ll probably figure out it’s not in his financial interest as he’s likely to get hurt and may face a Lamar Jackson situation where he can’t get paid because of concerns over his style.


I don't think that they are developing him as a "running quarterback". At least I hope they aren't because he won't last long in the NFL being a "running quarterback." I wouldn't consider Mahomes a "running" Qb. Would you? All runners slow down as they age, right, and considering the contact that they experience, their shelf life as an NFL qb will be short. What I see is Fields being able to use footwork and vision to move around though and escape pressure and being tackled. That is something that older qbs like Rodgers, and guys like Steve Young, Montana,and others kept throughout their career.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Tall Midget wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

It will take Fields a long time to become a pure pocket passer, assuming that goal is even attainable (or desirable) for him. But he might be able to maximize his potential without becoming a pure pocket passer.


Being a running QB might maximize his potential in terms of the team’s success, but he’ll probably figure out it’s not in his financial interest as he’s likely to get hurt and may face a Lamar Jackson situation where he can’t get paid because of concerns over his style.


Can he be a starter without running? As of right now, I'd say the answer is a resounding "no".

He is going to need at least a couple years to sort out his short throwing game and pocket presence issues.


I don't think so. He is already sorting it out. Also, why is it so important for Fields to be a "pure pocket passer"? Seems to me that Montana, Elway, Rodgers, Young, Bradshaw, Rothlesburger, and others were able to extend the plays by leaving the pocket well into their respective careers.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group