It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 6:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And let me just say this. It's laughable to watch and read people whose entire educational experience was shaped by the abnormality of attending "gender specific" schools pass judgment on what is and is not normal for school aged children


I went to a prom with a girl from Maria. I have no complaints about gender specific schools.


I'm happy for ya but schools which exclude members of the opposite sex aren't exactly ringing endorsements for what is and is not considered "normal".


Yeah, I imagine I would have had fewer distractions if I had sat in a class with only boys.


Yeah, you would have.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And let me just say this. It's laughable to watch and read people whose entire educational experience was shaped by the abnormality of attending "gender specific" schools pass judgment on what is and is not normal for school aged children


I went to a prom with a girl from Maria. I have no complaints about gender specific schools.


I'm happy for ya but schools which exclude members of the opposite sex aren't exactly ringing endorsements for what is and is not considered "normal".


You are an educator so I'm sure you have support for this argument.

Also, I think only two people on this board went to single sex schools.


Nah I'd be willing to be that Uber ride money of my guy Ken that it's much more than that.

But even if that is the case, isn't it ironic that the 2 you reference happen to be the 2 that are the "foremost" at pushing the "grooming" angle? Just Asking A Question


plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
good dolphin wrote:
plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

Students who come from rich families generally outperform students who come from poor families. In other news, water is wet.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
I think we need to make it legal to have all boys businesses too. Sorry, no woman allowed. Create your own business.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


Have you shared everything your nieces or nephews told you with their parents?


I only have one niece and she's 26 years old. It's a little different than keeping secrets with an eight year old.

I do remember visiting my friend out east and hanging out with her kid who was about five or six at the time until my friend got off work. We went out for lunch and I knew my friend never let the kid drink pop. I told him he could have whatever he wanted but not to tell his mother. Then I thought better of it and told him he should never keep secrets from his mom. He could still have whatever he wanted and I'd take the blame. He ordered an RC but the poor kid felt so guilty I don't think he enjoyed it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And let me just say this. It's laughable to watch and read people whose entire educational experience was shaped by the abnormality of attending "gender specific" schools pass judgment on what is and is not normal for school aged children


I went to a prom with a girl from Maria. I have no complaints about gender specific schools.


I'm happy for ya but schools which exclude members of the opposite sex aren't exactly ringing endorsements for what is and is not considered "normal".


You are an educator so I'm sure you have support for this argument.

Also, I think only two people on this board went to single sex schools.


Nah I'd be willing to be that Uber ride money of my guy Ken that it's much more than that.

But even if that is the case, isn't it ironic that the 2 you reference happen to be the 2 that are the "foremost" at pushing the "grooming" angle? Just Asking A Question


plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers


That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:35 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Brick wrote:
I think we need to make it legal to have all boys businesses too. Sorry, no woman allowed. Create your own business.


GOLF

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


No it isn't and if you really listen enough it becomes readily apparent that the people that you should be "concerned" about with respect to "grooming" are those that are always referencing grooming.

Seemingly it appears to be those that have received such a "rich" and "rewarding" Catholic School education. They really do have a fixation on molestation and pedophilia for some strange reason.



Are you a groomer? Because you definitely sound like one.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
This is why a teacher should ask parents at the Kindergarten orientation what their kids preferred pronouns are.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Frank Coztansa wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

Students who come from rich families generally outperform students who come from poor families. In other news, water is wet.


product of mixed school, public education, right there fellas

The studies include countries that have historically provided more gender differentiated, public schooling. However, I would not concede the point that catholic schooling equates to wealthy, especially in the time period when people like Joe or Seacrest were in school. Also, there are approximately 366 single sex, public schools in the US.

other than that, solid post

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:44 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31663
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


No it isn't and if you really listen enough it becomes readily apparent that the people that you should be "concerned" about with respect to "grooming" are those that are always referencing grooming.

Seemingly it appears to be those that have received such a "rich" and "rewarding" Catholic School education. They really do have a fixation on molestation and pedophilia for some strange reason.



Are you a groomer? Because you definitely sound like one.

I'm against murder because I'm a closet murderer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:44 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


Have you shared everything your nieces or nephews told you with their parents?


I only have one niece and she's 26 years old. It's a little different than keeping secrets with an eight year old.

I do remember visiting my friend out east and hanging out with her kid who was about five or six at the time until my friend got off work. We went out for lunch and I knew my friend never let the kid drink pop. I told him he could have whatever he wanted but not to tell his mother. Then I thought better of it and told him he should never keep secrets from his mom. He could still have whatever he wanted and I'd take the blame. He ordered an RC but the poor kid felt so guilty I don't think he enjoyed it.


I don't think the age matters. We all shake our heads at things small kids say and do. We don't tell everything because we aren't rats who want to get kids in trouble. I also think parents would hate a teacher or relative who told everything their children did or said.

That's what friends, uncles, aunts, and grandparents do. We break the parents rules. It's done out of love. You were the cool "uncle".

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


No it isn't and if you really listen enough it becomes readily apparent that the people that you should be "concerned" about with respect to "grooming" are those that are always referencing grooming.

Seemingly it appears to be those that have received such a "rich" and "rewarding" Catholic School education. They really do have a fixation on molestation and pedophilia for some strange reason.



Are you a groomer? Because you definitely sound like one.


Actually its you that does. You have a "perverted" fascination with children and sex for some odd reason.

I have worked in schools for over 2 decades and have never had a discussion with any child about their sex life. And the entirety of my great career has been spent at the high school level. I have taught MANY students that were in fact pregnant and still never discussed what they did with their bodies. I don't know MANY other educators that have either. Why? Because it's creepy as shit.

For some strange reason you have no problem with being fixated on young children and sex, which is creepy. You can't use the old lie about "being concerned about my own child" that people with your inclinations often use because you don't have any children. Which begs the question as to why you are so fixated on "grooming"? seeing as it really won't ever "touch" you as a parent?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

Students who come from rich families generally outperform students who come from poor families. In other news, water is wet.


product of mixed school, public education, right there fellas

The studies include countries that have historically provided more gender differentiated, public schooling. However, I would not concede the point that catholic schooling equates to wealthy, especially in the time period when people like Joe or Seacrest were in school. Also, there are approximately 366 single sex, public schools in the US.

other than that, solid post



The remark about single sex schools is really just another personal attack from a guy who traffics in personal attacks. He's trying to disguise it as a social question but he's not smart enough to do so effectively.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


Have you shared everything your nieces or nephews told you with their parents?


I only have one niece and she's 26 years old. It's a little different than keeping secrets with an eight year old.

I do remember visiting my friend out east and hanging out with her kid who was about five or six at the time until my friend got off work. We went out for lunch and I knew my friend never let the kid drink pop. I told him he could have whatever he wanted but not to tell his mother. Then I thought better of it and told him he should never keep secrets from his mom. He could still have whatever he wanted and I'd take the blame. He ordered an RC but the poor kid felt so guilty I don't think he enjoyed it.


I don't think the age matters.


Of course it does. My 26 year old niece is a grown woman on track for the C-suite at a major insurance company. Keeping her confidences is in no way similar to keeping secrets with a seven year old.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

Students who come from rich families generally outperform students who come from poor families. In other news, water is wet.


product of mixed school, public education, right there fellas

The studies include countries that have historically provided more gender differentiated, public schooling. However, I would not concede the point that catholic schooling equates to wealthy, especially in the time period when people like Joe or Seacrest were in school. Also, there are approximately 366 single sex, public schools in the US.

other than that, solid post



The remark about single sex schools is really just another personal attack from a guy who traffics in personal attacks. He's trying to disguise it as a social question but he's not smart enough to do so effectively.


Comment a little too deep for ya aye? It's a little tough for ya whenever you have to move past Twitter soundbites isn't it?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:57 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


Have you shared everything your nieces or nephews told you with their parents?


I only have one niece and she's 26 years old. It's a little different than keeping secrets with an eight year old.

I do remember visiting my friend out east and hanging out with her kid who was about five or six at the time until my friend got off work. We went out for lunch and I knew my friend never let the kid drink pop. I told him he could have whatever he wanted but not to tell his mother. Then I thought better of it and told him he should never keep secrets from his mom. He could still have whatever he wanted and I'd take the blame. He ordered an RC but the poor kid felt so guilty I don't think he enjoyed it.


I don't think the age matters.


Of course it does. My 26 year old niece is a grown woman on track for the C-suite at a major insurance company. Keeping her confidences is in no way similar to keeping secrets with a seven year old.


Age doesn't matter. Telling everything you hear and see is telling everything you hear and see. I seriously doubt you've told everything you heard and saw when your niece was a small child.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
plenty of studies out there concluding attendees of single sex secondary schools outperform their mixed school peers

Students who come from rich families generally outperform students who come from poor families. In other news, water is wet.


product of mixed school, public education, right there fellas

The studies include countries that have historically provided more gender differentiated, public schooling. However, I would not concede the point that catholic schooling equates to wealthy, especially in the time period when people like Joe or Seacrest were in school. Also, there are approximately 366 single sex, public schools in the US.

other than that, solid post



The remark about single sex schools is really just another personal attack from a guy who traffics in personal attacks. He's trying to disguise it as a social question but he's not smart enough to do so effectively.


Comment a little too deep for ya aye? It's a little tough for ya whenever you have to move past Twitter soundbites isn't it?


Frank, catalogue this one for your next argument with LTG. He thinks you are deep.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
good dolphin wrote:
Frank, catalogue this one for your next argument with LTG. He thinks you are deep.

:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Frank, catalogue this one for your next argument with LTG. He thinks you are deep.

:lol:

:lol: :lol:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


How were you not aware that is what he meant? Normal doesn't necessarily mean better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


How were you not aware that is what he meant? Normal doesn't necessarily mean better.


because in other discussions he has rejected normal as meaning "that which occurs most frequently". I have taken LTG idea of normal to mean something like "that which occurs frequently enough for it to not to be shocking", which I think is an interesting observation and has swayed me a bit

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:13 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31663
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
The city’s hottest club is “Re: Does Pete Davidson make you want to buy…anything?”

This club has everything: trannies, groomers, COVID grievances!





These people get so furious at being called "groomers" yet the very basis of grooming is keeping secrets with a child from said child's parents.


Have you shared everything your nieces or nephews told you with their parents?


I only have one niece and she's 26 years old. It's a little different than keeping secrets with an eight year old.

I do remember visiting my friend out east and hanging out with her kid who was about five or six at the time until my friend got off work. We went out for lunch and I knew my friend never let the kid drink pop. I told him he could have whatever he wanted but not to tell his mother. Then I thought better of it and told him he should never keep secrets from his mom. He could still have whatever he wanted and I'd take the blame. He ordered an RC but the poor kid felt so guilty I don't think he enjoyed it.


I don't think the age matters. We all shake our heads at things small kids say and do. We don't tell everything because we aren't rats who want to get kids in trouble. I also think parents would hate a teacher or relative who told everything their children did or said.

That's what friends, uncles, aunts, and grandparents do. We break the parents rules. It's done out of love. You were the cool "uncle".

It's part of parenting that you DON'T want to know every thing. You have to make room for error, and that's one of the things you do to create some form of independence. My job is to be a guide and always have their back, it's not to micromanage. But I gotta tell you, if my 14 yr old boy comes home in a dress, I did something drastically wrong. I don't see the point of lying to yourself, and I would throw away all that shit I said above. Because my child just made a decision to make his life 100X harder. The countless sleepless nights I'd have, thinking about suicides and mental illness, I'm just not that strong. That's real life, it isn't some abstract or some fucking social experiment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Age doesn't matter. Telling everything you hear and see is telling everything you hear and see. I seriously doubt you've told everything you heard and saw when your niece was a small child.


There was really nothing to tell. And if my 26 year old niece had a heroin habit I would probably tell her parents.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


It's painfully obvious what was meant by "normal". How can it be considered "normal" for anyone to attend a school where the opposite sex is excluded? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


How were you not aware that is what he meant? Normal doesn't necessarily mean better.


because in other discussions he has rejected normal as meaning "that which occurs most frequently". I have taken LTG idea of normal to mean something like "that which occurs frequently enough for it to not to be shocking", which I think is an interesting observation and has swayed me a bit


By "normal" I mean the exclusion of students of the opposite sex. How is that "normal" for the social development of a child? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


It's painfully obvious what was meant by "normal". How can it be considered "normal" for anyone to attend a school where the opposite sex is excluded? Just Asking A Question


That’s the original, historical and most frequently offered form in the history of the world. Just Giving Answers

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


It's painfully obvious what was meant by "normal". How can it be considered "normal" for anyone to attend a school where the opposite sex is excluded? Just Asking A Question



Although I attended a same sex school for four years, I'm not a proponent of such schools. I wouldn't send a kid to one.

But what's painfully obvious is that you're trying to imply some deviant sexuality in such schools and attempting to impugn the Catholic Church.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with "normalized" social interactions though. If we are going to scream about what is and is not normal, then shouldn't we start with the premise that it might not be all that "normal" for children to attend school exclusively with children of their own "sex"? Just Asking A Question.


I wouldn't start with the premise when the weight of information doesn't support you, unless by normal you simply mean that there are more blended sex schools in the US than single sex.


It's painfully obvious what was meant by "normal". How can it be considered "normal" for anyone to attend a school where the opposite sex is excluded? Just Asking A Question



Although I attended a same sex school for four years, I'm not a proponent of such schools. I wouldn't send a kid to one.

But what's painfully obvious is that you're trying to imply some deviant sexuality in such schools and attempting to impugn the Catholic Church.


Once again you reference sex, children and education where no such thing was mentioned. Shocking that this would be the case given your "previous" history.

My point has nothing to do with sex. But yours surely does.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group