It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
JORR...you and I both married a second time around and If I'm not mistaken, children were not a factor for you?
In my case....we both had kids from prior marriages, but they were all at or near emancipation. My wife and got married because we got to the point where it seemed awkward NOT being married. Again....our kids were a factor of zero.


Right. In the case of my wife and me, neither of us ever wanted to have kids. But I'm not talking about this on a personal level or about specific marriages. I think the discussion is about what the general purpose of the institution of marriage is.

Of course, my viewpoint is informed to some degree by my Catholic upbringing. How could it not be? Advertising works. But that raises the larger question about the foundations of our society and the crucial role Christianity plays in it.

It's odd that it was only a few short years ago that a progressive scion like Barack Obama didn't see the need for gay marriage, yet now that position is seen as outre and "hateful." Obama abandoned his position, likely for political reasons.

When you make those kind of changes to something as elemental to society as marriage, you are going to radically change that society. You may not notice it right away but it's happening right under your nose.


And now there are less marriages than ever. Because marriage doesn't really mean anything. Or it means whatever you want it to mean which is to say nothing at all.


Our country is constantly evolving. Not long ago my kids and Crest kids couldn't get married even if they loved one another and wanted to have 30 kids. Then radical change happened, and it became legal. Why do you want to relitigate something that was decided years ago?


We're having a philosophical conversation. Personally, I don't care one way or another. I'm almost 60 years old and I have no kids. Make whatever world you want.

But I certainly don't think that the definition of marriage that has been used since the time of the Bible can just be tossed aside without consequences. Not every change is positive.


What are the consequences? Are straights going to stop getting married bc sodomites get to too?


Looks like they already have. Lot kids born out of wedlock.

It's bad for business!

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Are you blaming gays and lesbians for the 60 year decline in marriages and the uptick in divorce?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Nas wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.

It seemed to have all or most of the main issues, almost like it was a fictionalized discussion made for educational purposes. Matt Walsh usually has a rapid-fire delivery when he's on someone's show, but he struggled to respond to Rogan (which is odd, because Rogan didn't say anything necessarily new or unexpected, though he was really clear).

Walsh is an easy target, but his arguments about marriage and children are similar to those who criticize how we have become more consumers than anything else.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19196
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
JORR...you and I both married a second time around and If I'm not mistaken, children were not a factor for you?
In my case....we both had kids from prior marriages, but they were all at or near emancipation. My wife and got married because we got to the point where it seemed awkward NOT being married. Again....our kids were a factor of zero.


Right. In the case of my wife and me, neither of us ever wanted to have kids. But I'm not talking about this on a personal level or about specific marriages. I think the discussion is about what the general purpose of the institution of marriage is.

Of course, my viewpoint is informed to some degree by my Catholic upbringing. How could it not be? Advertising works. But that raises the larger question about the foundations of our society and the crucial role Christianity plays in it.

It's odd that it was only a few short years ago that a progressive scion like Barack Obama didn't see the need for gay marriage, yet now that position is seen as outre and "hateful." Obama abandoned his position, likely for political reasons.

When you make those kind of changes to something as elemental to society as marriage, you are going to radically change that society. You may not notice it right away but it's happening right under your nose.


And now there are less marriages than ever. Because marriage doesn't really mean anything. Or it means whatever you want it to mean which is to say nothing at all.


Our country is constantly evolving. Not long ago my kids and Crest kids couldn't get married even if they loved one another and wanted to have 30 kids. Then radical change happened, and it became legal. Why do you want to relitigate something that was decided years ago?


We're having a philosophical conversation. Personally, I don't care one way or another. I'm almost 60 years old and I have no kids. Make whatever world you want.

But I certainly don't think that the definition of marriage that has been used since the time of the Bible can just be tossed aside without consequences. Not every change is positive.


What are the consequences? Are straights going to stop getting married bc sodomites get to too?


Looks like they already have. Lot kids born out of wedlock.

It's bad for business!


Could it be that more and more atheists are deciding marriage is for the birds? Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Seacrest wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The point of marriage is religious


The Mesopotamians would disagree with you Ike.


are you comparing evangelical marriage to sexually enslaving women?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.


I don't really have a position. And I'm not particularly a fan of either guy. Though I do find Walsh's deadpan act amusing.

And I do understand Walsh's point. You can keep shrugging off traditions and changing standards. But it is going to change society.

I get that people don't want to judge. I'm a live and let live guy myself. But morals and laws are all about judgment.

And I certainly don't think marriage is just a financial arrangement. If that's the case, the gays could form an LLC.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
brass tax.. america needs more soldiers. the planet needs less people. solution? breed and enlist as many americans as possible to reduce the populations of other countries.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13434
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.


I don't really have a position. And I'm not particularly a fan of either guy. Though I do find Walsh's deadpan act amusing.

And I do understand Walsh's point. You can keep shrugging off traditions and changing standards. But it is going to change society.

I get that people don't want to judge. I'm a live and let live guy myself. But morals and laws are all about judgment.

And I certainly don't think marriage is just a financial arrangement. If that's the case, the gays could form an LLC.
How do you feel about sex outside of marriage? Infidelity? Divorce? The list goes on. Standards and attitudes change. Somehow we carry on. I guess same sex marriage is a bridge too far though.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Are you blaming gays and lesbians for the 60 year decline in marriages and the uptick in divorce?


I think there's an entire popular political/social agenda that undermines families.

I'm fine with it if that's what people want. It doesn't affect me too much. Especially at this stage of my life.

But I think it deserves more thought and examination than it's been given.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
as far as modern marriage, total fucking joke. unless 'to death do us part' means i get to beat the living shit out of you if divorce happens

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.


I don't really have a position. And I'm not particularly a fan of either guy. Though I do find Walsh's deadpan act amusing.

And I do understand Walsh's point. You can keep shrugging off traditions and changing standards. But it is going to change society.

I get that people don't want to judge. I'm a live and let live guy myself. But morals and laws are all about judgment.

And I certainly don't think marriage is just a financial arrangement. If that's the case, the gays could form an LLC.
How do you feel about sex outside of marriage? Infidelity? Divorce? The list goes on. Standards and attitudes change. Somehow we carry on. I guess same sex marriage is a bridge too far though.


I don't think those are particularly societal goods. Do you?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Are you blaming gays and lesbians for the 60 year decline in marriages and the uptick in divorce?


I think there's an entire popular political/social agenda that undermines families.

I'm fine with it if that's what people want. It doesn't affect me too much. Especially at this stage of my life.

But I think it deserves more thought and examination than it's been given.


degradation of families is a root problem the past 50 years or whatever. staying in a broken marriage also ruins everything. the solution has nothing to do with marriage and a lot more to do with economic flexibility. most people are fucking poor no matter how nice their iphone or 600 sq ft apartment is, or if theyre single or married.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4125
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


Here is what has been, and will continue to lead to declining birth rates:

1. Urbanization - if you don’t have land, a farm, manual work to do, you need less free child labor in the form of kids.

2. Dual Income Families - if mom and dad both work, it is much more logistically difficult and expensive to have more kids.

3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.

These are the three biggest things that have been, and will continue to impact declining birth rates. All three of those things have the common denominator of a population striving to increase its standard of living. So we can rapidly increase the birth rate if we just find lots of people who want to be really really poor and stay that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0

This is a good conversation.
I'm not a real big Matt Walsh fan, but this definitely was an interesting conversation.


I think the purpose of this exercise was to share a clip from Rogan that MANY of us agree with him on. JORR took the opposite position to fuel the debate.


I don't really have a position. And I'm not particularly a fan of either guy. Though I do find Walsh's deadpan act amusing.

And I do understand Walsh's point. You can keep shrugging off traditions and changing standards. But it is going to change society.


I get that people don't want to judge. I'm a live and let live guy myself. But morals and laws are all about judgment.

And I certainly don't think marriage is just a financial arrangement. If that's the case, the gays could form an LLC.


No one loves traditions more than me. Just ask my kids. A tradition that would exclude consenting adults, because of who they love, should be broken. God or America didn't say that marriage was solely for heterosexual couples who wanted to procreate.

Walsh appeared to be waffling. While he believed, ideally, anyone who got married should strongly consider having kids or adopting, he somewhat acknowledged that marriage would be fine if they chose not to.

For centuries, homosexuality was considered normal. Once the church learned the science of the spread of MANY diseases, they came out strongly against it. You see depictions of homosexuality in centuries old art all over the world.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Are you blaming gays and lesbians for the 60 year decline in marriages and the uptick in divorce?


I think there's an entire popular political/social agenda that undermines families.

I'm fine with it if that's what people want. It doesn't affect me too much. Especially at this stage of my life.

But I think it deserves more thought and examination than it's been given.


I don't disagree

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13434
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


Here is what has been, and will continue to lead to declining birth rates:

1. Urbanization - if you don’t have land, a farm, manual work to do, you need less free child labor in the form of kids.

2. Dual Income Families - if mom and dad both work, it is much more logistically difficult and expensive to have more kids.

3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.

These are the three biggest things that have been, and will continue to impact declining birth rates. All three of those things have the common denominator of a population striving to increase its standard of living. So we can rapidly increase the birth rate if we just find lots of people who want to be really really poor and stay that way.



Whatever the cause, it's a problem. I believe the U.S. is below replacement level.

Tommy touched on some of what you mention above. Are human beings just consumer units? Do families matter at all?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4125
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


Here is what has been, and will continue to lead to declining birth rates:

1. Urbanization - if you don’t have land, a farm, manual work to do, you need less free child labor in the form of kids.

2. Dual Income Families - if mom and dad both work, it is much more logistically difficult and expensive to have more kids.

3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.

These are the three biggest things that have been, and will continue to impact declining birth rates. All three of those things have the common denominator of a population striving to increase its standard of living. So we can rapidly increase the birth rate if we just find lots of people who want to be really really poor and stay that way.



Whatever the cause, it's a problem. I believe the U.S. is below replacement level.

Tommy touched on some of what you mention above. Are human beings just consumer units? Do families matter at all?



I have two children, that is fewer that the 2.1 statistical children I need to maintain the population. I don’t see why my family is less valid or matters less than a family with 2.2 children.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:

Walsh appeared to be waffling. While he believed, ideally, anyone who got married should strongly consider having kids or adopting, he somewhat acknowledged that marriage would be fine if they chose not to.


Yeah, he kind of was. Like W_Z said earlier, he didn't get into his religious faith that clearly drives his beliefs on the subject. Maybe he didn't want to get into that with Rogan. But I haven't listened to the entire podcast.

If you're familiar with Walsh, it was an atypical performance. He is usually full of conviction and ready with an answer/rebuttal.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


Here is what has been, and will continue to lead to declining birth rates:

1. Urbanization - if you don’t have land, a farm, manual work to do, you need less free child labor in the form of kids.

2. Dual Income Families - if mom and dad both work, it is much more logistically difficult and expensive to have more kids.

3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.

These are the three biggest things that have been, and will continue to impact declining birth rates. All three of those things have the common denominator of a population striving to increase its standard of living. So we can rapidly increase the birth rate if we just find lots of people who want to be really really poor and stay that way.



Whatever the cause, it's a problem. I believe the U.S. is below replacement level.

Tommy touched on some of what you mention above. Are human beings just consumer units? Do families matter at all?



I have two children, that is fewer that the 2.1 statistical children I need to maintain the population. I don’t see why my family is less valid or matters less than a family with 2.2 children.



No one said it did.

Plus, it would be pretty hard for you to create .2 of a child. We have Seacrest to pick up the slack.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are human beings just consumer units? Do families matter at all?


welcome to the libertarian party. we love reality.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


Here is what has been, and will continue to lead to declining birth rates:

1. Urbanization - if you don’t have land, a farm, manual work to do, you need less free child labor in the form of kids.

2. Dual Income Families - if mom and dad both work, it is much more logistically difficult and expensive to have more kids.

3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.

These are the three biggest things that have been, and will continue to impact declining birth rates. All three of those things have the common denominator of a population striving to increase its standard of living. So we can rapidly increase the birth rate if we just find lots of people who want to be really really poor and stay that way.



Whatever the cause, it's a problem. I believe the U.S. is below replacement level.

Tommy touched on some of what you mention above. Are human beings just consumer units? Do families matter at all?


There's always been balance. You didn't have 2 kids, but I covered you. The same has always been true until recently. Now, younger folks are choosing to have one child or zero. That trend and the infertility of American whites is leading to a decline in birth rates. I'm not sure that's a bad thing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
its bad in the sense that nothing matters. having kids gives people a lot of purpose in life. i give zero fucks if humanity continues on, but teens who steal cars and fly down residential neighborhoods do so because nothing fucking matters to them. and they might hit me, so the more people who have kids the better for me.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
One Post wrote:
3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.


This is a great example of something that has occurred, the consequences of which haven't really been thought about a whole lot. I'm sure academics study it, but I'm talking about the average person.

It's really only existed for about 50 years. And untethering sex from procreation is a monumental change. It's as world changing as the Gutenberg press or the microchip. Maybe more.

But I don't think people see it that way. They just like the positives without considering possible negatives. I'd say the same thing about social media.

Now I'm starting to sound like the Unabomber.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19196
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Your lifestyle choice is leading to declining birth rates.



No doubt.

Do you think that's a good thing? Should it be encouraged? Rewarded?


I am above such concerns. I simply do not care.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19196
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.


This is a great example of something that has occurred, the consequences of which haven't really been thought about a whole lot. I'm sure academics study it, but I'm talking about the average person.

It's really only existed for about 50 years. And untethering sex from procreation is a monumental change. It's as world changing as the Gutenberg press or the microchip. Maybe more.

But I don't think people see it that way. They just like the positives without considering possible negatives. I'd say the same thing about social media.

Now I'm starting to sound like the Unabomber.


Your position would be less annoying if you were actually an ultra pious Catholic dude. Instead you’re this ultra pious Catholic dude who is also an atheist.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joe Rogan
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80091
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
3. Access to reliable birth control - as fun as it is, the pull out method just is not effective.


This is a great example of something that has occurred, the consequences of which haven't really been thought about a whole lot. I'm sure academics study it, but I'm talking about the average person.

It's really only existed for about 50 years. And untethering sex from procreation is a monumental change. It's as world changing as the Gutenberg press or the microchip. Maybe more.

But I don't think people see it that way. They just like the positives without considering possible negatives. I'd say the same thing about social media.

Now I'm starting to sound like the Unabomber.


Your position would be less annoying if you were actually an ultra pious Catholic dude. Instead you’re this ultra pious Catholic dude who is also an atheist.


:lol:

I'm an atheist who over the past few years has come to see that Christian values form the basis of our free society and that there is no way for you to live the way you want to live without those values as a foundation. I'm somewhat embarrassed that I didn't realize that sooner.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group