It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Juiced wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.


I have no issues with Fields holding others to a higher standard. They probably ran that play all week and St. Brown dogged it on that play to lose the game.


I do when he isn't holding himself to that standard.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.


He was incredibly slow in breaking back to the ball, which consequently would have been intercepted regardless of what Fields was doing. Is there video showing Fields "stare down" of St. Brown?

I am interested in hearing Dilfers grade/thoughts on this play

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
Tall Midget wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


I'm not debating the irrelevancy of the Tampa-2 Bob. I'm saying it's being used because it is seen by the current staff as the best way NOT to get torched worse than they have been based on the talent pool.


Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
RFDC wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.


He was incredibly slow in breaking back to the ball, which consequently would have been intercepted regardless of what Fields was doing. Is there video showing Fields "stare down" of St. Brown?

I am interested in hearing Dilfers grade/thoughts on this play


He's a bit busy right now...

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
Harvard Dan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.


He was incredibly slow in breaking back to the ball, which consequently would have been intercepted regardless of what Fields was doing. Is there video showing Fields "stare down" of St. Brown?

I am interested in hearing Dilfers grade/thoughts on this play


He's a bit busy right now...


Ah somehow I missed that. Got himself a college gig.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Harvard Dan wrote:
there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.
genius Bob will always find something to be outraged over that is for certain. When the Bears win the Super Bowl, he'll complain about the parade route or something silly like that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


I'm not debating the irrelevancy of the Tampa-2 Bob. I'm saying it's being used because it is seen by the current staff as the best way NOT to get torched worse than they have been based on the talent pool.


Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


They're in Cover 2 less than 50% of the time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


That was a zone defense that kept Rodgers on his heels for 3 quarters.

Playing with a 3rd string slot corner

A 3rd string slot corner

And a 3rd string free safety.

I'm not sold on Alan Williams, but it's hard to evaluate a guy when he has no pass rush to scheme with.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Maybe Poles will FLEX on Eberlose and force him to shitcan Williams kinda like Angelo forced Lovie to hire Ron Riveria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


That was a zone defense that kept Rodgers on his heels for 3 quarters.

Playing with a 3rd string slot corner

A 3rd string slot corner

And a 3rd string free safety.

I'm not sold on Alan Williams, but it's hard to evaluate a guy when he has no pass rush to scheme with.


I thought the Bears were going to get the doors blown off yesterday. I'm not sold on him either, but that was a great job of coaching.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


That was a zone defense that kept Rodgers on his heels for 3 quarters.

Playing with a 3rd string slot corner

A 3rd string slot corner

And a 3rd string free safety.

I'm not sold on Alan Williams, but it's hard to evaluate a guy when he has no pass rush to scheme with.


I thought the Bears were going to get the doors blown off yesterday. I'm not sold on him either, but that was a great job of coaching.


They gave up 28 points to a crippled, geriatric QB. Your definition of great is odd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


That was a zone defense that kept Rodgers on his heels for 3 quarters.

Playing with a 3rd string slot corner

A 3rd string slot corner

And a 3rd string free safety.

I'm not sold on Alan Williams, but it's hard to evaluate a guy when he has no pass rush to scheme with.


I thought the Bears were going to get the doors blown off yesterday. I'm not sold on him either, but that was a great job of coaching.

By who?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.


Be that as it may...

but seriously then, there may be merit to Bob's outrage in this case.


That was a zone defense that kept Rodgers on his heels for 3 quarters.

Playing with a 3rd string slot corner

A 3rd string slot corner

And a 3rd string free safety.

I'm not sold on Alan Williams, but it's hard to evaluate a guy when he has no pass rush to scheme with.


I thought the Bears were going to get the doors blown off yesterday. I'm not sold on him either, but that was a great job of coaching.

By who?


Rodgers has destroyed far better Bears defenses. He looked clueless yesterday. If the Bears had Georgia's front 4, he would have been sacked 10 times.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Have you been watching him play all year? It hasn't been much different I assure you.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Have you been watching him play all year? It hasn't been much different I assure you.


I've followed him. I ASSuMEd facing the Bears, and their practice squad secondary, would lead to an offensive explosion.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Have you been watching him play all year? It hasn't been much different I assure you.


I've followed him. I ASSuMEd facing the Bears, and their practice squad secondary, would lead to an offensive explosion.

Nicely played. 8)

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31668
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.

Brady would chop that fucker into pieces and bury him in his backyard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.

Brady would chop that fucker into pieces and bury him in his backyard


Tom Terrific has earned that right.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
RFDC wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.


He was incredibly slow in breaking back to the ball, which consequently would have been intercepted regardless of what Fields was doing. Is there video showing Fields "stare down" of St. Brown?

I am interested in hearing Dilfers grade/thoughts on this play


He's a bit busy right now...


Ah somehow I missed that. Got himself a college gig.


He had quite an announcement speech. Impressive.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


Yeah, he coached them up to allowing a "meager" 28 points.

Must be the second coming of Buddy Ryan!

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nas wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.


I have no issues with Fields holding others to a higher standard. They probably ran that play all week and St. Brown dogged it on that play to lose the game.


I do when he isn't holding himself to that standard.


I'd say when he stood up in front of a roomful of reporters and apologized to his teammates for losing the Jets game. He also showed up to play in that game when many people wanted him to sit out the game and TANK IT for the season. He showed a lot of leadership already in this season and wanting his teammates to show up and do their own job I think is warranted.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
Bears fans should feel somewhat optimistic I can assure you the Raiders don't have a clue what they're doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKunLqOQSgc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
MongoMuller wrote:
Bears fans should feel somewhat optimistic I can assure you the Raiders don't have a clue what they're doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKunLqOQSgc


We may only need a center. That's a lot more money to fill others needs.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
MongoMuller wrote:
Bears fans should feel somewhat optimistic I can assure you the Raiders don't have a clue what they're doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKunLqOQSgc


We may only need a center. That's a lot more money to fill others needs.


I'd say center, left guard, and right tackle are definite needs on the offensive line.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Tall Midget wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


Yeah, he coached them up to allowing a "meager" 28 points.

Must be the second coming of Buddy Ryan!
Reading is a skill.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
MongoMuller wrote:
Bears fans should feel somewhat optimistic I can assure you the Raiders don't have a clue what they're doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKunLqOQSgc


We may only need a center. That's a lot more money to fill others needs.


I'd say center, left guard, and right tackle are definite needs on the offensive line.


You want to move on from Whitehair next season? I'm saying that based on the video. If Leatherwood continues to make progress, that would free up a significant free agent investment.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group