It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:49 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox have broken a covenant with their fans. They asked for patience while they lost on purpose for six seasons. Then when they were finally ready to compete they refused to spend the money required to do so. So they're going with hope. They hope everyone will have career years. Maybe they will. The 2004-05 offseason was destructive and terrible and they somehow followed it up with a World Series. But that isn't likely.


This is not the first time I've seen you claim six years of intentional losing. 17, 18, and 19 should definitely be on any list of intentional losing, but what years are you referencing to get to six?


It was really 7 years. They didn't declare it "tanking" until the Sale trade, but if they were trying and winning 78 games at most, that's even worse.

When you're a big market team going to war with guys like Gillaspie and DeAza, I consider that losing on purpose.


I've obviously never had a look at the White Sox' books, but I've never considered them to be a "big market team." At least, they've certainly never behaved as one. This city is split 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 in favor of the Cubs. The actual market size for the Sox is probably something closer to Detroit.

I recall somehow teams revenues got published during a collusion case in like 2003. Sox were a top 10 revenue team. This was before JR was a billionaire. He only pays $1 million a year in rent. He's not responsible for upkeep and gets all parking and concessions. He gets big market money with TV and Radio. Because it's a big market. Also with big market ticket prices. 8th highest. So no, it isn't Detroit.

I've always said they are a small-market team. But it has been the owners who have consistently forced them into this. At least since I have been alive. The owners either lacked money or refused to spend it, and coupled with demographic shifts and godawful management...they became a small-market team.

I think they embrace that anti-hero sort of sentiment, too, but for the wrong reasons (they're cheap and dumb, not hip).

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Do you honestly believe that Milwaukee, Minnesota, Detroit, Cleveland, Arizona, Cincinnati, Kansas City all have more money to spend and that the Pirates have just as much? I understand calling the Sox mid market, but this?

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
I really wish they would institute a floor that teams must spend every year.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82161
I think they earn like a big market team

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Nardi wrote:
Do you honestly believe that Milwaukee, Minnesota, Detroit, Cleveland, Arizona, Cincinnati, Kansas City all have more money to spend and that the Pirates have just as much? I understand calling the Sox mid market, but this?

No, but if you act like a small-market team, then you are a small-market team.

And when they have "won the offseason," they've usually spent stupidly.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox have broken a covenant with their fans. They asked for patience while they lost on purpose for six seasons. Then when they were finally ready to compete they refused to spend the money required to do so. So they're going with hope. They hope everyone will have career years. Maybe they will. The 2004-05 offseason was destructive and terrible and they somehow followed it up with a World Series. But that isn't likely.


This is not the first time I've seen you claim six years of intentional losing. 17, 18, and 19 should definitely be on any list of intentional losing, but what years are you referencing to get to six?



It was really 7 years. They didn't declare it "tanking" until the Sale trade, but if they were trying and winning 78 games at most, that's even worse.

When you're a big market team going to war with guys like Gillaspie and DeAza, I consider that losing on purpose.


I've obviously never had a look at the White Sox' books, but I've never considered them to be a "big market team." At least, they've certainly never behaved as one. This city is split 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 in favor of the Cubs. The actual market size for the Sox is probably something closer to Detroit.


Except the Sox have a free ballpark which gives them a huge advantage.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 2:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The 2004-05 offseason was destructive and terrible


Yeah, it ended up working out, but even if it hadn't, they still got rid of Carlos Lee. That was a plus right there.



Lee is the best left fielder they've had in 25 years (since Albert Belle) unless you count one fluky season by Carlos Quentin.

Doesn't mean he was any good. They get rid of his shitty, not much more than one-dimensional play, and they win the World Series. He was a typical, lazy Sox softball player.

Edit: I realize I am taking the meatball interpretation, but Ozzie was right about C-Lee.



They scapegoated Lee. I don't think he was the problem.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
The 2005 team found themselves (by complete accident) defensively upgraded. Carlos Lee was a butcher in LF. Not Eloy bad, but not good. Podsednik was defensively adequate. Crede, Uribe, Iguchi, Rowand, Dye....all competent defenders. AJ couldn't throw out attempted base stealers, but he could catch and was masterful with the pitching staff.

...and they hit a lot of Home Runs.

....oh yeah...the pitching staff was very good and they all pitched out of their minds when it mattered most.

I liked Carlos Lee, but his HR's were well covered by the others.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2498
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nardi wrote:
Do you honestly believe that Milwaukee, Minnesota, Detroit, Cleveland, Arizona, Cincinnati, Kansas City all have more money to spend and that the Pirates have just as much? I understand calling the Sox mid market, but this?


I don't think Detroit and Arizona should be on your list. I would consider both of those places to be mid market, just like the Sox.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2498
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox have broken a covenant with their fans. They asked for patience while they lost on purpose for six seasons. Then when they were finally ready to compete they refused to spend the money required to do so. So they're going with hope. They hope everyone will have career years. Maybe they will. The 2004-05 offseason was destructive and terrible and they somehow followed it up with a World Series. But that isn't likely.


This is not the first time I've seen you claim six years of intentional losing. 17, 18, and 19 should definitely be on any list of intentional losing, but what years are you referencing to get to six?



It was really 7 years. They didn't declare it "tanking" until the Sale trade, but if they were trying and winning 78 games at most, that's even worse.

When you're a big market team going to war with guys like Gillaspie and DeAza, I consider that losing on purpose.


I've obviously never had a look at the White Sox' books, but I've never considered them to be a "big market team." At least, they've certainly never behaved as one. This city is split 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 in favor of the Cubs. The actual market size for the Sox is probably something closer to Detroit.


Except the Sox have a free ballpark which gives them a huge advantage.


Don't most of these owners have sweetheart deals from their municipalities? The Sox deal is an advantage, but probably not a huge one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2022 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2498
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The 2004-05 offseason was destructive and terrible


Yeah, it ended up working out, but even if it hadn't, they still got rid of Carlos Lee. That was a plus right there.



Lee is the best left fielder they've had in 25 years (since Albert Belle) unless you count one fluky season by Carlos Quentin.

Doesn't mean he was any good. They get rid of his shitty, not much more than one-dimensional play, and they win the World Series. He was a typical, lazy Sox softball player.

Edit: I realize I am taking the meatball interpretation, but Ozzie was right about C-Lee.



They scapegoated Lee. I don't think he was the problem.


They had four big sluggers on that team: Thomas, Ordonez, Konerko, and Lee. Lee was the worst of the four. I was not sorry to see him go. Ordonez on the other hand....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 2:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Mags sealed his own fate after he went to Vienna or whatever to have his knee operation. IIRC he also turned down a contract offer that at the time was the largest in Sox history which was still on the table until the Sox found out about his surgery. Great hitter, but Mags was anything by a team first guy.

Jose Valintin was also a perennial 20 home run guy...and a 20 error guy.

2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14918
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Until Reinsdorf dies and new ownership come in, the White Sox are done. The last three years have finally convinced me finally.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82161
I think they have an excellent chance to win the division next year.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23964
pizza_Place: Pizanos
good dolphin wrote:
I think they have an excellent chance to win the division next year.

They’re largely the same team we thought would dominate the Central. I’ll guess 92 wins.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14918
pizza_Place: Grazianos
good dolphin wrote:
I think they have an excellent chance to win the division next year.


Nope. They lost their best player. They have the worst defense in baseball. They lost their best defensive outfielder which isn't saying much. They have only four proven major league hitters in their entire line-up. They have no future. What they should do is to give their young kids a chance, Burger, Sheets, and every prospect in their minor league system and give them away to some team which has a future.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14918
pizza_Place: Grazianos
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I think they have an excellent chance to win the division next year.

They’re largely the same team we thought would dominate the Central. I’ll guess 92 wins.


Abreu is gone. Their best player and the team leader. 75-87. Last place in division.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
The Hawk wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I think they have an excellent chance to win the division next year.

They’re largely the same team we thought would dominate the Central. I’ll guess 92 wins.


Abreu is gone. Their best player and the team leader. 75-87. Last place in division.


But LaRussa is gone. That's an instant 10 win improvement


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Mags sealed his own fate after he went to Vienna or whatever to have his knee operation. IIRC he also turned down a contract offer that at the time was the largest in Sox history which was still on the table until the Sox found out about his surgery. Great hitter, but Mags was anything by a team first guy.

Jose Valintin was also a perennial 20 home run guy...and a 20 error guy.

2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.

And Buehrle sucked.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82161
can we stop with Abreu's leadership?

He was supposed to be the cuban whisperer and they were the biggest underperformers.

He did set a good example.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 6:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 7:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 9:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
The Sox made Reddit's frontpage simply by doing nothing!

Image

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40623
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Jorr I hardly remember any of those guys. That is the point I guess?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 8:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.

You're right in that pitching and defense (not to mention timely hitting) were the real reasons why the Sox won that year.

You're wrong, though, to say their offense wasn't the problem. It was. The Sox were feast or famine, and everyone hated those teams. Some days, they just could not hit. Coupled with bad pitching, if the Sox were down 4-0 after four innings, the game was over. Could not win close games, either.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 12:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.

You're right in that pitching and defense (not to mention timely hitting) were the real reasons why the Sox won that year.

You're wrong, though, to say their offense wasn't the problem. It was. The Sox were feast or famine, and everyone hated those teams. Some days, they just could not hit. Coupled with bad pitching, if the Sox were down 4-0 after four innings, the game was over. Could not win close games, either.


It's not like the 2006 White Sox were scoring ten and zero with nothing in between. They had a powerhouse offense that was better than that of the previous year's team. A homerun is better than a single and a stolen base. It just is.

The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 1:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 9:23 pm
Posts: 869
pizza_Place: Baraccos
B
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.

You're right in that pitching and defense (not to mention timely hitting) were the real reasons why the Sox won that year.

You're wrong, though, to say their offense wasn't the problem. It was. The Sox were feast or famine, and everyone hated those teams. Some days, they just could not hit. Coupled with bad pitching, if the Sox were down 4-0 after four innings, the game was over. Could not win close games, either.


It's not like the 2006 White Sox were scoring ten and zero with nothing in between. They had a powerhouse offense that was better than that of the previous year's team. A homerun is better than a single and a stolen base. It just is.

The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.


The entire staff was mediocre at best. Went from 1st in ERA in 2005 to 10th in 2006.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.


The Sox were worse the next year. I don't think the starters were worn out; they just did not have good years in 2006. Contreras got off to a fast start before fizzling, Buehrle had one of his many so-so years, and Vasquez sucked. The middle relief guys (Politte, Cotts) were bad, too. The 2005 starters were also fresh enough to dominate the playoffs. Also, Brian Anderson was a black hole on the 2006 team. Even if they had Thome, Brian Anderson was memorably ineffective.

I get the feeling that you don't believe what you are arguing.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group