It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2024 6:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.


The Sox were worse the next year. I don't think the starters were worn out; they just did not have good years in 2006. Contreras got off to a fast start before fizzling, Buehrle had one of his many so-so years, and Vasquez sucked. The middle relief guys (Politte, Cotts) were bad, too. The 2005 starters were also fresh enough to dominate the playoffs. Also, Brian Anderson was a black hole on the 2006 team. Even if they had Thome, Brian Anderson was memorably ineffective.

I get the feeling that you don't believe what you are arguing.



Of couse I believe it. I consider the 2006 team the best WHite Sox team in my lifetime. The pitching simply ran out of gas after being ridden hard the previous season.

Anderson didn't need to hit on that team. They scored plenty of runs. He played elite centerfield defense.

The pitching was the whole issue. The team ERA was a full run higher than it was the year before.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.
As soon as the Sox went back to trying to mash the opposing teams, rather than focus on pitching and defense, they missed the playoffs.

Thanks for noticing I was correct all along. Not sure why it took so long for you to agree with me.

Mark Buerhle had a bad second half in 2006. He was 9-5 with a 3.21 ERA thru June 30th.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.
As soon as the Sox went back to trying to mash the opposing teams, rather than focus on pitching and defense, they missed the playoffs.

Thanks for noticing I was correct all along. Not sure why it took so long for you to agree with me.

Mark Buerhle had a bad second half in 2006. He was 9-5 with a 3.21 ERA thru June 30th.


What are you talking about, "focus on pitching and defense?' Do you think the 2006 team decided to pitch worse and play worse defense?

I know Buehrle had a bad second half. Like I've said multiple times, the pitching ran out of gas. Thanks for admitting I was right.

The 2006 team was a better offensive team than the one that won the World Series. It's not even close.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
868 runs is more than 741 runs.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Irrelevant to the question. I will state that 868 is indeed a higher value than 741.

Now, is 90 wins is better than 99 wins? YES OR NO

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Irrelevant to the question. I will state that 868 is indeed a higher value than 741.

Now, is 90 wins is better than 99 wins? YES OR NO

I think JORR is making a "shit happens" argument and since it's baseball, it isn't entirely off base. Detroit should have won the championship easily, for instance.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.


The Sox were worse the next year. I don't think the starters were worn out; they just did not have good years in 2006. Contreras got off to a fast start before fizzling, Buehrle had one of his many so-so years, and Vasquez sucked. The middle relief guys (Politte, Cotts) were bad, too. The 2005 starters were also fresh enough to dominate the playoffs. Also, Brian Anderson was a black hole on the 2006 team. Even if they had Thome, Brian Anderson was memorably ineffective.

I get the feeling that you don't believe what you are arguing.



Of couse I believe it. I consider the 2006 team the best WHite Sox team in my lifetime. The pitching simply ran out of gas after being ridden hard the previous season.

Anderson didn't need to hit on that team. They scored plenty of runs. He played elite centerfield defense.

The pitching was the whole issue. The team ERA was a full run higher than it was the year before.


I really thought that teh White Sox were headed toward a dynasty after they won in 2005. They had a better team in 2006 as you stated but their pitching ran into a wall. We should have known better to trust Reinsdorf to understand how he had a chance for the White Sox to take over as the most fan favorite team in Chicago back then. Instead he went back into his miserly owner shell. I really hate this man.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Thomas-Sox-WorldSeries wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Sox pitching was worn out after going deep into the season in 2005 and that cost them in 2006 with what was, at least on paper, a better team than the one that won the World Series. 2006 was really the only bad year in Buehrle's career.


The Sox were worse the next year. I don't think the starters were worn out; they just did not have good years in 2006. Contreras got off to a fast start before fizzling, Buehrle had one of his many so-so years, and Vasquez sucked. The middle relief guys (Politte, Cotts) were bad, too. The 2005 starters were also fresh enough to dominate the playoffs. Also, Brian Anderson was a black hole on the 2006 team. Even if they had Thome, Brian Anderson was memorably ineffective.

I get the feeling that you don't believe what you are arguing.



Of couse I believe it. I consider the 2006 team the best WHite Sox team in my lifetime. The pitching simply ran out of gas after being ridden hard the previous season.

I'm out.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 4:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You can say 'shit happens in the baseball playoffs' and be correct.

You can also say that the 'best team in your lifetime' missed the playoffs while the previous year's team won it all, and be incorrect.

The 1986 Bears were not better than the 1985 Bears.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.


Really? So 200 homeruns and 741 runs scored is better than 236 homeruns and 868 runs scored?
So 90 wins is better than 99 wins?



The offense wasn't the problem.
As soon as the Sox went back to trying to mash the opposing teams, rather than focus on pitching and defense, they missed the playoffs.

Thanks for noticing I was correct all along. Not sure why it took so long for you to agree with me.

Mark Buerhle had a bad second half in 2006. He was 9-5 with a 3.21 ERA thru June 30th.


What are you talking about, "focus on pitching and defense?' Do you think the 2006 team decided to pitch worse and play worse defense?

I know Buehrle had a bad second half. Like I've said multiple times, the pitching ran out of gas. Thanks for admitting I was right.

The 2006 team was a better offensive team than the one that won the World Series. It's not even close.

A friend of mine agrees with you, JORR and we were just talking about this the other day.
No argument the pitching ran out of gas in the 2nd half.
DH with Thome in 2006 was an upgrade.
Podsednik and Uribe regressed a little in 2006.
Anderson was offensive less productive than Rowand, but I agree he was an outstanding defender.

2 holes in the lineup with Uribe and Anderson and a less productive Podsednik....I don't think that compensates for the Thome upgrade. If anything we could stretch and call the offense a draw.

The pitching staff running out of gas is likely (as you said) the biggest issue with 2006. Still a very good team.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Jose Valintin was also a perennial 20 home run guy...and a 20 error guy.

2005 Sox were clearly going to be built around pitching and defense. As soon as they went back to trying to mash the opposing teams-- a mere one season later-- they missed the playoffs.

Frank....I don't believe for one second Kenny Williams was TRYING to improve the defense. Yes on the pitching, but I believe the defensive upgrade was by total accident. I'm glad it happened, as they don't win the World Series without that defense.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2498
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Irrelevant to the question. I will state that 868 is indeed a higher value than 741.

Now, is 90 wins is better than 99 wins? YES OR NO

I think JORR is making a "shit happens" argument and since it's baseball, it isn't entirely off base. Detroit should have won the championship easily, for instance.


It's just an odd argument coming from him. He's usually more of a results based guy (see his argument on why the win is the most important stat in pitching) than a stats based guy.

Also, I'd put the 93 team ahead of the 06 team. It had probably the most even balance between pitching and hitting of any good White Sox team in my lifetime.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Warren Newson wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Irrelevant to the question. I will state that 868 is indeed a higher value than 741.

Now, is 90 wins is better than 99 wins? YES OR NO

I think JORR is making a "shit happens" argument and since it's baseball, it isn't entirely off base. Detroit should have won the championship easily, for instance.


It's just an odd argument coming from him. He's usually more of a results based guy (see his argument on why the win is the most important stat in pitching) than a stats based guy.

Also, I'd put the 93 team ahead of the 06 team. It had probably the most even balance between pitching and hitting of any good White Sox team in my lifetime.

2006, they had 2 horrible stretches that sunk them. You can have one horrible stretch, but you can't have two. Not with Detroit that year. And you definitely can't go to Oakland and get swept, which is kind of a thing with this franchise over the years.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Warren Newson wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Irrelevant to the question. I will state that 868 is indeed a higher value than 741.

Now, is 90 wins is better than 99 wins? YES OR NO

I think JORR is making a "shit happens" argument and since it's baseball, it isn't entirely off base. Detroit should have won the championship easily, for instance.


It's just an odd argument coming from him. He's usually more of a results based guy (see his argument on why the win is the most important stat in pitching) than a stats based guy.

Also, I'd put the 93 team ahead of the 06 team. It had probably the most even balance between pitching and hitting of any good White Sox team in my lifetime.


I completely agree with you about the 1993 team.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Warren Newson wrote:
Also, I'd put the 93 team ahead of the 06 team. It had probably the most even balance between pitching and hitting of any good White Sox team in my lifetime.

83 always has hurt but for some reason 93 REALLY hurt. They were probably the team that was set up best to have a sustained run too. They were extremely talented and still young for the most part.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Missing Link wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Also, I'd put the 93 team ahead of the 06 team. It had probably the most even balance between pitching and hitting of any good White Sox team in my lifetime.

83 always has hurt but for some reason 93 REALLY hurt. They were probably the team that was set up best to have a sustained run too. They were extremely talented and still young for the most part.


Yep

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Billy Hamilton is back :lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Billy Hamilton is back :lol: :lol:


Minor league deal for him. Perfectly fine with that as long as he's at best the fifth OF.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10096
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
FrankDrebin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Billy Hamilton is back :lol: :lol:


Minor league deal for him. Perfectly fine with that as long as he's at best the fifth OF.

Maybe he just liked Charlotte.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79494
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Warren Newson wrote:
It's just an odd argument coming from him. He's usually more of a results based guy (see his argument on why the win is the most important stat in pitching) than a stats based guy.


In the end, you're correct. The goal is winning the World Series. The 2005 team did that. The 2006 team didn't even make the playoffs. In that sense, it's silly to claim the 2006 team was better.

But the 2006 offense was so far superior to the 2005 team that it can't even be reasonably argued about. And the 2006 starting pitching was exactly the same until about halfway through the season. It seems pretty obvious that all those extra innings in the 2005 postseason caught up with them.

Sure, the complete games in the ALCS are legendary and I'm not sure I would trade that feat for another World Series. And if it hadn't happened, maybe they don't win the first one. It made the 2005 team really special and it's something we'll likely never see again. But it wasn't just that these starters who had all already piled up 200 innings each now had to pitch 12 more high stakes games, but that Ozzie made the decision to ride them hard all the way through.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
It's just an odd argument coming from him. He's usually more of a results based guy (see his argument on why the win is the most important stat in pitching) than a stats based guy.


In the end, you're correct. The goal is winning the World Series. The 2005 team did that. The 2006 team didn't even make the playoffs. In that sense, it's silly to claim the 2006 team was better.

But the 2006 offense was so far superior to the 2005 team that it can't even be reasonably argued about. And the 2006 starting pitching was exactly the same until about halfway through the season. It seems pretty obvious that all those extra innings in the 2005 postseason caught up with them.

Sure, the complete games in the ALCS are legendary and I'm not sure I would trade that feat for another World Series. And if it hadn't happened, maybe they don't win the first one. It made the 2005 team really special and it's something we'll likely never see again. But it wasn't just that these starters who had all already piled up 200 innings each now had to pitch 12 more high stakes games, but that Ozzie made the decision to ride them hard all the way through.

Legit point. I haven't looked it up but it seems to me the offense wasn't what it was the first 3 months either.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 3:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
https://blockclubchicago.org/2022/12/19 ... e-than-5k/
Quote:
SOX PARK — White Sox fan Bennett Karoll doesn’t want to give team owner Jerry Reinsdorf anymore of his money.

Karoll, a lifelong White Sox fan, launched a GoFundMe Wednesday that has now raised more than $5,000 to put up a “Sell The Team, Jerry” billboard just a few blocks from Guaranteed Rate Field. More than 350 people have donated to the effort.

“We want to support the team without buying tickets and hats and that [money] going to Jerry, who won’t spend it on a star player, anyway,” Karoll said.

Karoll only expected “maybe a hundred bucks” when he started the fundraiser, he said. But the campaign has exceeded exceptions to the point Karoll will now buy two billboards, he said.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/mlb/new ... szrxL09xwc

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
RFDC wrote:
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.


Wonder if that means a Hendricks trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82162
RFDC wrote:
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.

Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Cashman wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.


Wonder if that means a Hendricks trade.

Why would that mean a Hendricks trade? I think Reynaldo Lopez/ Garrett Crotchet means a Hendricks trade.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nardi wrote:
Cashman wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.


Wonder if that means a Hendricks trade.

Why would that mean a Hendricks trade? I think Reynaldo Lopez/ Garrett Crotchet means a Hendricks trade.


I was having this discussion with RPB offline. There is no need to move on from Hendriks if you are trying to win. Kopech is the only guy with a closer's mentality, and I'm not putting the guy I consider to be the ace in the bullpen. I like that Lopez finally figured out how to control his stuff.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: White Sox Off-Season
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31575
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Cashman wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Quote:
The White Sox are acquiring reliever Gregory Santos from the Giants, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Santos was recently designated for assignment by the Giants. The White Sox have since announced the deal, with minor league right-hander Kade McClure going the other way.


Wonder if that means a Hendricks trade.

Why would that mean a Hendricks trade? I think Reynaldo Lopez/ Garrett Crotchet means a Hendricks trade.


I was having this discussion with RPB offline. There is no need to move on from Hendriks if you are trying to win. Kopech is the only guy with a closer's mentality, and I'm not putting the guy I consider to be the ace in the bullpen. I like that Lopez finally figured out how to control his stuff.

Agree 100%. I don't think your Uncle and his kid thinks so.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group