It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:55 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
How do you propose to reduce walks and strikeouts - your main beef with baseball in the 2020s, per your first post - without fundamentally transforming the core concept of the sport?


I don't have an issue with rule changes as a concept. At one time you could soak a runner.

If the best strategy for winning games renders watching said games unwatchable, that needs to be addressed.

I don't think Jaw Breaker's solution is too radical if it solves the problem. But I'd start by simply enforcing the existing rulebook strikezone- letters to knees- and see what happens.

Bad. I don't need to wait and see what happens.



What do you think will happen?

Hitters can't even bunt because it's SOOOOO HARD. They can't hit the other way. All they do is zone in on what they can hit and look at every other pitch. Ks will be up, RS will be down. HR will be down. You want to wait 3 years to see what happens, that's a different story.

I'm not against it, just for 3 years institute it everywhere else first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 5:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
How do you propose to reduce walks and strikeouts - your main beef with baseball in the 2020s, per your first post - without fundamentally transforming the core concept of the sport?


I don't have an issue with rule changes as a concept. At one time you could soak a runner.

If the best strategy for winning games renders watching said games unwatchable, that needs to be addressed.

I don't think Jaw Breaker's solution is too radical if it solves the problem. But I'd start by simply enforcing the existing rulebook strikezone- letters to knees- and see what happens.

Bad. I don't need to wait and see what happens.



What do you think will happen?

Hitters can't even bunt because it's SOOOOO HARD. They can't hit the other way. All they do is zone in on what they can hit and look at every other pitch. Ks will be up, RS will be down. HR will be down. You want to wait 3 years to see what happens, that's a different story.

I'm not against it, just for 3 years institute it everywhere else first.


I don't think so. Strikeouts are up because hitters get into bad counts trying to coax walks and because of a cultural imperative to "see" pitches. If you open up the strikezone that will force the batters to get up there and swing.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
How do you propose to reduce walks and strikeouts - your main beef with baseball in the 2020s, per your first post - without fundamentally transforming the core concept of the sport?


I don't have an issue with rule changes as a concept. At one time you could soak a runner.

If the best strategy for winning games renders watching said games unwatchable, that needs to be addressed.

I don't think Jaw Breaker's solution is too radical if it solves the problem. But I'd start by simply enforcing the existing rulebook strikezone- letters to knees- and see what happens.

Bad. I don't need to wait and see what happens.



What do you think will happen?

Hitters can't even bunt because it's SOOOOO HARD. They can't hit the other way. All they do is zone in on what they can hit and look at every other pitch. Ks will be up, RS will be down. HR will be down. You want to wait 3 years to see what happens, that's a different story.

I'm not against it, just for 3 years institute it everywhere else first.


I don't think so. Strikeouts are up because hitters get into bad counts trying to coax walks and because of a cultural imperative to "see" pitches. If you open up the strikezone that will force the batters to get up there and swing.

And they'll fail for quite a while. Years of Lab just doesn't go away with a little spring training. There will be multiple 20 game winners and a record sub 3 ERAs. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, but you have to ease it in. Somehow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Point missed. The structural damage Vegan has pointed out, likely can't be fixed.

The first thing that should be done is knock this drudgery down to 120 games. Less is more. The TV money is drying up as it is, it won't hurt them in that aspect.



The point is, the length of the games isn't the problem for people who actually like baseball.

A 4 hour game is fine. From the little spring training I watched the actual game is more interesting with the faster pace.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Point missed. The structural damage Vegan has pointed out, likely can't be fixed.

The first thing that should be done is knock this drudgery down to 120 games. Less is more. The TV money is drying up as it is, it won't hurt them in that aspect.



The point is, the length of the games isn't the problem for people who actually like baseball.

A 4 hour game is fine. From the little spring training I watched the actual game is more interesting with the faster pace.

I disagree. Four hours is ridiculous for virtually everything imo. Watching a Buerhle pitched game was glorious. Watching a Cleveland game managed by the Human Rain Delay could be horrible, even with all their talent.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Regular Reader wrote:
I disagree. Four hours is ridiculous for virtually everything imo. Watching a Buerhle pitched game was glorious. Watching a Cleveland game managed by the Human Rain Delay could be horrible, even with all their talent.
4 hours can seem fast if the pacing of the action is right. Waiting 50 seconds for a pitch which then gets fouled off and they do it again is a grind.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Brick wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I disagree. Four hours is ridiculous for virtually everything imo. Watching a Buerhle pitched game was glorious. Watching a Cleveland game managed by the Human Rain Delay could be horrible, even with all their talent.
4 hours can seem fast if the pacing of the action is right. Waiting 50 seconds for a pitch which then gets fouled off and they do it again is a grind.

It can, but overwhelmingly does not. As almost a rule four hours is too much for anything. Games, movies, concerts or even three star dinners.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Regular Reader wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Point missed. The structural damage Vegan has pointed out, likely can't be fixed.

The first thing that should be done is knock this drudgery down to 120 games. Less is more. The TV money is drying up as it is, it won't hurt them in that aspect.



The point is, the length of the games isn't the problem for people who actually like baseball.

A 4 hour game is fine. From the little spring training I watched the actual game is more interesting with the faster pace.

I disagree. Four hours is ridiculous for virtually everything imo. Watching a Buerhle pitched game was glorious. Watching a Cleveland game managed by the Human Rain Delay could be horrible, even with all their talent.

Even a hypothetical game of James Baldwin v. Yu Darvish wouldn't take 4 hours. The problem is a combination of increased bullpen substitutions, TV commercials, and replay. The twitter post is valid, though....they're not gong to bring in new fans with the proposed changes. What they are doing is pissing off the people that actually like baseball.
Pitch clock is fine. Call the legit strike zone....that would be a huge improvement. Shit-can replay / challenges and limit bullpen substitutions and the game will move into a reasonable pace.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
All periphery fixes. Time, bases, shifts. Ball on bat is the fix. Early and often. Pitch to contact and see how good the defense is. That was the essence of baseball from the gitgo. The strike out artist was a treat, not a generality. The Home run was a treat, maybe even essential for some teams, but not all 30 of them. No diversity of play. All cookie cutter baseball. If you don't play cookie cutter, you get whomped. That's where we're at.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nardi wrote:
All periphery fixes. Time, bases, shifts. Ball on bat is the fix. Early and often. Pitch to contact and see how good the defense is. That was the essence of baseball from the gitgo. The strike out artist was a treat, not a generality. The Home run was a treat, maybe even essential for some teams, but not all 30 of them. No diversity of play. All cookie cutter baseball. If you don't play cookie cutter, you get whomped. That's where we're at.

Nardi...I do agree with you that bat on ball is the answer, but there is no way to "ease" that in. The strike zone enforcement needs to happen. It will take time for teams to adjust and evolve to it, but it just needs to happen. Strike outs are fine...the game is still moving. The real problem is the dead time. That's what is killing the game. I'm sure everyone is different, but the ridiculous bullpen changes is what gets me to find something else to do.

Replay has been a failure in just about every sport using it. There's no way to do it quickly...that also has to go. It's just not worth the wasted time.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
BigW72 wrote:
Nardi wrote:
All periphery fixes. Time, bases, shifts. Ball on bat is the fix. Early and often. Pitch to contact and see how good the defense is. That was the essence of baseball from the gitgo. The strike out artist was a treat, not a generality. The Home run was a treat, maybe even essential for some teams, but not all 30 of them. No diversity of play. All cookie cutter baseball. If you don't play cookie cutter, you get whomped. That's where we're at.

Nardi...I do agree with you that bat on ball is the answer, but there is no way to "ease" that in. The strike zone enforcement needs to happen. It will take time for teams to adjust and evolve to it, but it just needs to happen. Strike outs are fine...the game is still moving. The real problem is the dead time. That's what is killing the game. I'm sure everyone is different, but the ridiculous bullpen changes is what gets me to find something else to do.

Replay has been a failure in just about every sport using it. There's no way to do it quickly...that also has to go. It's just not worth the wasted time.

Replay is like taxes and the remote control. Once you have it, you never let go. Bullpens are a sweatshop, no doubt. But teams are locked in on protecting their investment in starters. Not to mention their agents. If you knock the season down to 120 games, it's a whole new ballgame in that area.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nardi wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Nardi wrote:
All periphery fixes. Time, bases, shifts. Ball on bat is the fix. Early and often. Pitch to contact and see how good the defense is. That was the essence of baseball from the gitgo. The strike out artist was a treat, not a generality. The Home run was a treat, maybe even essential for some teams, but not all 30 of them. No diversity of play. All cookie cutter baseball. If you don't play cookie cutter, you get whomped. That's where we're at.

Nardi...I do agree with you that bat on ball is the answer, but there is no way to "ease" that in. The strike zone enforcement needs to happen. It will take time for teams to adjust and evolve to it, but it just needs to happen. Strike outs are fine...the game is still moving. The real problem is the dead time. That's what is killing the game. I'm sure everyone is different, but the ridiculous bullpen changes is what gets me to find something else to do.

Replay has been a failure in just about every sport using it. There's no way to do it quickly...that also has to go. It's just not worth the wasted time.

Replay is like taxes and the remote control. Once you have it, you never let go. Bullpens are a sweatshop, no doubt. But teams are locked in on protecting their investment in starters. Not to mention their agents. If you knock the season down to 120 games, it's a whole new ballgame in that area.

I completely agree on 120 games for regular season.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:02 pm
Posts: 2190
Location: What are you, my mother?
pizza_Place: D'Agostino's
Hey JORR, if you like 4 1/2 hour 9 inning games, and I know you like horse racing...you're gonna love this

https://twitter.com/PitchingNinja/status/1127236417900490752?lang=en


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 9:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79549
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
OscarTangoEcho wrote:
Hey JORR, if you like 4 1/2 hour 9 inning games, and I know you like horse racing...you're gonna love this

https://twitter.com/PitchingNinja/status/1127236417900490752?lang=en


:lol:

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
More balls in play would be excellent, but short of eliminating the ability to get an out via the strikeout, I think it's just about impossible to legislate that more balls be put in play. IMHO, the only thing that gets that to change is if one prominent player, or a small group of prominent players, enjoy tremendous success eschewing homeruns and focusing on getting on base and taking as many extra bases as possible.

I disagree with those who argue that true baseball fans don't care if the game goes long. There are 162 of these things. If we get a Buehrleesque game the clocks in at under two and a half hours, everyone can relax, they'll be another game tomorrow. Four hour games are fine for the World Series, I don't need them on a Tuesday in May.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Warren Newson wrote:
More balls in play would be excellent, but short of eliminating the ability to get an out via the strikeout, I think it's just about impossible to legislate that more balls be put in play. IMHO, the only thing that gets that to change is if one prominent player, or a small group of prominent players, enjoy tremendous success eschewing homeruns and focusing on getting on base and taking as many extra bases as possible.

Agree. Baseball is somewhat susceptible to "the next big thing." I wanna see the Big Red Machine or the 90s Braves. Or more teams like the Dodgers (they have purchased a lot of stars, but they also draft and develop players well, despite giving up on PK14) or the small-ball, pitching-rich Indians. Tired of the softball, no-defense, can't-run-the-basepaths, I-own-a-useless-glove teams. Some have suggested that most of this is the result of the infusion of Latin American players, but I doubt it; they can be coached, too.

I keep waiting for another Greg Maddux to come along so they can re-train pitchers to actually pitch and not blow out their arms.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rule Changes
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2023 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6302
pizza_Place: Frozen
On pti Nomar Garciaparra and Mike Hargrove's names came up in reference to the time clock rule. NG '99 - '00 365 426 .601 1.028 155. Hargrove had an amazing career .396 obp over 6694 pa in 12 seasons.




Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group