This morning, Mark Grote insisted the players doing the dry humping are homophobes, dry humping is especially offensive to any homosexuals on the team, and wondered why the dry humpers don't think there are any homosexuals playing college football.

Unless they explicitly said so, I don't know how you would determine if the dry humpers are homophobic.

Are unwanted sexual advances more "offensive" if the person making them is not of the same sexual orientation as the person they are making them to? I would think they would just be unwanted, period, regardless if it were straight/gay, gay/straight, straight/straight, or gay/gay.

If they found the advances to be "offensive", wouldn't that make them homophobic?

It's hard to keep all of this straight. Or gay.

[
So what?

So what?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Should Joe Maddon have been fired for sexualizing Cubs players in those costumes?

It's a sexual assault by the strict interpretation of the definition but at the same time, it's not really a sexual assault.

I couldn't put my finger on it until you posted that, but this is what bothers me. It's being framed as a sexual assault when it isn't that at all. It makes a joke out actual sexual assault.

I like black prostitutes from the 70's

In a sense yeah. A lot of rape claims are not. No penetration no rape correct? Anyway they are all jag offs. Haugh gave Bernsie a lot of pushback today on Bernsie trying to make this bigger than it is too soon. Was nice to hear.

I like black prostitutes from the 70's

In a sense yeah. A lot of rape claims are not. No penetration no rape correct? Anyway they are all jag offs. Haugh gave Bernsie a lot of pushback today on Bernsie trying to make this bigger than it is too soon. Was nice to hear.

I wouldn't say that. But to equate this silly shit to rape is really beyond the pale.

I couldn't put my finger on it until you posted that, but this is what bothers me. It's being framed as a sexual assault when it isn't that at all. It makes a joke out actual sexual assault.

It's kind of like how slapping someone in the face and beating them to an inch of their life are both assault even though one is clearly worse than the other.

If 8 guys got mad at you at a bar and took you into a darkroom and dry humped you would you call the police?

JORR we've watched you make a bill deal out of nearly everything for the past 7 years.

No. Especially if they were my friends fucking around. I wouldn't make a big deal out of it like a Millennial snowflake. Do you need therapy because Caller Bob called you a bad name?

A bad name is fine. Being dry humped by 8 guys in a dark room is more concerning.

Oh yeah, because destroying society and forcing people to inject poison is the equivalent of dry humping a teammate.

That's my point. You don't see your daily rants as overreacting or being a snowflake. In general, you've graduated to the phase of life where you have no interest in understanding views that differ from yours.

And you can have the view that Joe Biden is the greatest president in history but don't expect others to understand it.

I wouldn't call my observations "rants."

I just find it significant that people are foaming at the mouth to fire Fitzgerald while defending those who poisoned the population and ruined the country. The difference in the scale of offense is astounding.

I wouldn't call my observations "rants."

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Yeah, if most people had your views. The overwhelming majority of Americans don't .

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Should Joe Maddon have been fired for sexualizing Cubs players in those costumes?

Why? Was he injured? No. His feelings were hurt.

What costumes? You mean their everyday uniforms?

Well, they're wrong and I'm sorry they took poison right up until they get belligerent about it.