It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 10:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 226 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf wants Getz to try to identify scouts who’ve been fired by organizations that prioritize analytics and see if he can find some gems.

Rebuild off to a great start.


So Reinsdorf is hoping that hiring Getz, who knows the organization, will allow the White Sox to quickly turn things around vs. hiring a more qualified candidate who may be slower in making large changes to improve the overall roster.

is that the calculation?

How is Getz supposed to improve the major league team if the minor league system is, being generous, middle of the pack, and the payroll has limitations that will not allow for a fast turnaround?

Glad you asked, Jerry commented on both:

- minors: said Getz had no control over player acquisition but he’s teaching the game better than anybody reinsdorf has seen

- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue
They don't spend a ton, but they do spend. They just spend very poorly.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue
They don't spend a ton, but they do spend. They just spend very poorly.

Why have Machado when you can have 8 minor leagues for less money?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf wants Getz to try to identify scouts who’ve been fired by organizations that prioritize analytics and see if he can find some gems.

Rebuild off to a great start.


So Reinsdorf is hoping that hiring Getz, who knows the organization, will allow the White Sox to quickly turn things around vs. hiring a more qualified candidate who may be slower in making large changes to improve the overall roster.

is that the calculation?

How is Getz supposed to improve the major league team if the minor league system is, being generous, middle of the pack, and the payroll has limitations that will not allow for a fast turnaround?

Glad you asked, Jerry commented on both:

- minors: said Getz had no control over player acquisition but he’s teaching the game better than anybody reinsdorf has seen

- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue


The White Sox do spend enough to have a better result, but, if they don't produce players from the minors (which they haven't), wouldn't they need to spend more (at least short-term) to supplement the MLB roster IF he wants to compete next season?

Assuming Clevinger is not retained, they are at least 3 starters short and most of a bullpen. Offensively, they will probably use the catchers they traded for, but still need to drastically shakeup the offense because it hasn't produced and many of the players can't stay on the field. They may not be able to replace many of them, but they do need to make upgrades to the talent, probably bring in at least another OF, another 3B/SS option who can actually play.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:06 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.


If they won't give long term deals on pitchers, what type of quality are they expecting to have? Especially in the current rotation where Cease, Clevinger (probably won't be back) and Kopech (not dependable) are the only starters they have.

Seems like it will be challenging to say you want to turn things around quickly, but won't spend on the starting rotation.

Also, if you're not willing to spend on starting pitching, Dylan Cease probably needs to be moved this off-season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
There’s no path.

They’d have to get extremely lucky across the entire pitching staff and have a few of the Island Boys play well in the same year. Then TA has to bounce back, they need a catcher, and then they need like 4 more position players.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Jerry on the muscle about those with negative thoughts on TLR. He’s cancer shaming those who’d critique Tony’s performance.

Just straight-up disabusing Bernstein right now.


Bernstein doesn't like TLR because he has different opinions on social/political issues. That makes TLR a horrible person. If he can attack his managing (which was justified) on top of it (or in cover of his dislike of the person), so be it. #21stCenturyJournalism

Spiegel and Shane going in on the same theme.

Paraphrasing here, but spiegel insisted the 2021 team massively underachieved, which is aggressively, aggressively stupid from a baseball guy.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.

I think history has proven that his stance on pitchers is correct though.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
badrogue17 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.

I think history has proven that his stance on pitchers is correct though.

How many teams are legitimately competitive without signing pitchers to big contracts?

The Rays? Maybe the Braves?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
badrogue17 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.

I think history has proven that his stance on pitchers is correct though.


There are exceptions though (recently Scherzer, Verlander, Kershaw, Lester, etc)

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
How many teams are legitimately competitive without signing pitchers to big contracts?

Giants were
Royals were
Cubs outside of Lester but he was great for them the first few years of his deal
Astros
Mariners

Maybe the better question to ask is what teams ARE legitimately competitive after spending $200+ million on a starting pitcher.
The Mets traded theirs and the Yankees are in last place.

Sox also have spend a ton of bad money on their bullpen over the years.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
badrogue17 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
BD wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reinsdorf also very giggly while highlighting they’d never be in for a guy like Ohtani. Media chuckled along with him.


Did he say that?

Yes, when challenged on spending.

Everybody knows it’s the case but chuckling about spending efficiently in a presser that has you explaining why you suck is annoying. In the same answer, he reiterated they won’t be signing long term contracts for pitchers.

I think history has proven that his stance on pitchers is correct though.


I don't think it's smart to spend 5, 6, 7 + years on really any player. As much as people like Bernstein want every team to spend like their favorite Democrat, it's not realistic to believe that teams don't have budgets.

As much as the White Sox are probably right, in most cases, that giving long-term contracts w/big money to many of these free agents, you also can't go into a season with a bunch of borderline end-of rotation starters, guys coming off injury or have something to prove. Yes, you can hit on a player like that, but depending on too many of them isn't going to be sustainable. Overall, the White Sox probably hit on Clevinger this season, but I don't think that trying to find 3 similar reclamation type projects while you're also publicly stating that you can turn this around quickly is a consistent message.

If they aren't developing pitchers, they have to get them via trade or free agency.

If they are trying to compete next season, they may actually bring Clevinger back. A rotation with #1 Cease #2 TBD #3 Clevinger #4 Kopech #5 TBD can at least do another 1 year deal on a starter and try (probably trade?) to bring in another legitimate starter.

Perhaps Cease is moved for 3 very good prospects and 2 of them are pitchers who can be expected to contribute in 2024. That's more of a long-shot though if competition is the goal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
How many teams are legitimately competitive without signing pitchers to big contracts?

Giants were
Royals were
Cubs outside of Lester but he was great for them the first few years of his deal
Astros
Mariners

Maybe the better question to ask is what teams ARE legitimately competitive after spending $200+ million on a starting pitcher.
The Mets traded theirs and the Yankees are in last place.

Sox also have spend a ton of bad money on their bullpen over the years.

Giants: Bumgarner, Cueto, Zito and Cain all had long and/or expensive deals
Royals: ok
Astros: Verlander, Greinke
Mariners: not exactly competitive, but Robbie Ray

If the Sox were willing to sign guys to huge money, short term deals, maybe that’d work. But they can’t develop great pitching and refuse to pay the market rate for it.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Great, Chris Getz wants to teach baseball.... But he hasn't.

Fantastic, we want high baseball IQ.... Eddie Stanky and David Eckstein types.....WRONG!!! This is 2023. Talent BY FAR should be the overriding theme. I've been harping all year about terrible baseball throughout MLB. But I'm not stupid. Stanky and Eckstein would get destroyed today.

Which leads me to, Chris Getz wants to teach baseball.....But he hasn't.


Last edited by Nardi on Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Reinsdorf also threatened Sox fans by noting he’d “only” be around for another 10 years.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Nardi wrote:
Talent BY FAR should be the overriding theme.


Agreed. Reinsdorf's axiom that "you win more games by not losing them than by winning them" sounds nice but is not reality.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:04 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Getz may suck but he wouldn’t be the first employee prevented from doing things his way until his bosses were fired.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
There’s no path.

They’d have to get extremely lucky across the entire pitching staff and have a few of the Island Boys play well in the same year. Then TA has to bounce back, they need a catcher, and then they need like 4 more position players.

You are assuming that they exercise TA's option and keep him. I strongly doubt that TA will be on the opening day roster.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
The Sox have had that "no long term contracts for pitchers" rule for decades. I think Buehrle's four year deal might be the longest one they ever handed out. They've actually done a decent job of developing starting pitching through the years and I suspect they plan on continuing to rely on young and controllable pitchers and trades for Lance Lynn or Freddy Garcia type guys they can extend. Also, there's no reason not to bring TA back. You can let him walk for nothing or spend a little bit of money (Grandal and Lynn are off the books) and hope to get something out of him or something for him.

I didn't watch the press conference, but based on the posts here, this appears to be the PR stunt (rather than true and meaningful change) that we all feared.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Warren Newson wrote:
The Sox have had that "no long term contracts for pitchers" rule for decades. I think Buehrle's four year deal might be the longest one they ever handed out. They've actually done a decent job of developing starting pitching through the years and I suspect they plan on continuing to rely on young and controllable pitchers and trades for Lance Lynn or Freddy Garcia type guys they can extend. Also, there's no reason not to bring TA back. You can let him walk for nothing or spend a little bit of money (Grandal and Lynn are off the books) and hope to get something out of him or something for him.

I didn't watch the press conference, but based on the posts here, this appears to be the PR stunt (rather than true and meaningful change) that we all feared.

I think they will exercise the option on TA and then trade him. Trading him before the season starts means that the acquiring team can slap a QO on him if he has a good year. And it's not like the White Sox are going to be a playoff team in 2024.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Reinsdorf was just a fan who thought he knew more than the professionals.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
NPC Getz. That's my impression. Full of piss and vinegar, but he didn't say one thing that wasn't canned. Not one original thought. He probably went to the library and checked out the "The Tampa Rays: How we do it".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue
They don't spend a ton, but they do spend. They just spend very poorly.

Why have Machado when you can have 8 minor leagues for less money?


MANNY are wondering that.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
The Sox have had that "no long term contracts for pitchers" rule for decades. I think Buehrle's four year deal might be the longest one they ever handed out. They've actually done a decent job of developing starting pitching through the years and I suspect they plan on continuing to rely on young and controllable pitchers and trades for Lance Lynn or Freddy Garcia type guys they can extend. Also, there's no reason not to bring TA back. You can let him walk for nothing or spend a little bit of money (Grandal and Lynn are off the books) and hope to get something out of him or something for him.

I didn't watch the press conference, but based on the posts here, this appears to be the PR stunt (rather than true and meaningful change) that we all feared.

I think they will exercise the option on TA and then trade him. Trading him before the season starts means that the acquiring team can slap a QO on him if he has a good year. And it's not like the White Sox are going to be a playoff team in 2024.


They would be selling low if they did that. The QO angle is not so attractive that another team would give you more because it has that option. Their best bet is to pick up the option, hope he does well, and then either enjoy his play or flip him at the deadline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24046
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Warren Newson wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
The Sox have had that "no long term contracts for pitchers" rule for decades. I think Buehrle's four year deal might be the longest one they ever handed out. They've actually done a decent job of developing starting pitching through the years and I suspect they plan on continuing to rely on young and controllable pitchers and trades for Lance Lynn or Freddy Garcia type guys they can extend. Also, there's no reason not to bring TA back. You can let him walk for nothing or spend a little bit of money (Grandal and Lynn are off the books) and hope to get something out of him or something for him.

I didn't watch the press conference, but based on the posts here, this appears to be the PR stunt (rather than true and meaningful change) that we all feared.

I think they will exercise the option on TA and then trade him. Trading him before the season starts means that the acquiring team can slap a QO on him if he has a good year. And it's not like the White Sox are going to be a playoff team in 2024.


They would be selling low if they did that. The QO angle is not so attractive that another team would give you more because it has that option. Their best bet is to pick up the option, hope he does well, and then either enjoy his play or flip him at the deadline.

I’d agree with that. He’s been a great hitter most of his career; I wouldn’t dump the guy after a bad year when he’s at a personal/professional low.

That said, trading him may be tough unless he’s willing to move positions. It’s tough to be a good team and have somebody with his defensive limitations playing a premium position.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
denisdman wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue
They don't spend a ton, but they do spend. They just spend very poorly.

Why have Machado when you can have 8 minor leagues for less money?


MANNY are wondering that.


i mean the Padres are killing it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Chris Getz
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 10:32 am
Posts: 208
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Bagels wrote:
denisdman wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
- money: said Sox spend a ton of money and that’s not been an issue
They don't spend a ton, but they do spend. They just spend very poorly.

Why have Machado when you can have 8 minor leagues for less money?


MANNY are wondering that.


i mean the Padres are killing it


Manny Machado, Clubhouse Cancer

_________________
You must act as a man, not a boy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 226 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group