It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 7:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
Well, we hear a lot about Shakespeare, but not a lot about Ben Jonson. Unfortunately that's the way things work out...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10755
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Warren Newson wrote:
W_Z wrote:
Brick wrote:
W_Z wrote:
Well that’s the point, Brick. The band you’re referring to is the Beatles clone that was spawned by the Beatles. Even before they were the Beatles they were doing the same kind of boundary pushing as the Quarrymen.

What is the point? The Beatles were heavily influenced by others. They were then heavy influences on others. That's how it has worked for the history of humanity.

They were a great band who came around at the perfect time. That's why I used the Vince Lombardi example. He was a great coach who came around at the perfect time. That doesn't mean that it was impossible for him ever to be supplanted as the greatest coach.


They started the British Invasion. It’s likely we don’t get the Kinks, the Who or The Rolling Stones without Beatlemania coming across the pond.

You can argue all you want about how you like or dislike the music. But their impact is historic. Timing is everything, but so is having that sound.


My gripe with the way they're rated, is that they're treated as existing in a class of their own. They're not in a class of their own. They're firmly within that upper tier of bands (Stones, Led Zeppelin, etc.).

In terms of influencing bands decades on later, they are in a class of their own. The vocal melodies and harmonies of the Beatles is one of the biggest aspects of making them the top of that class. They continued to evolve and create along the way.

I hate that I'm sitting here defending the Beatles cause like many...I don't ever need to hear them again in my lifetime. Still....they're treated and rated just as they should be. We can take the others like Animals, Stones, Dave Clark Five, Moody Blues, Manfred Mann, and the Kinks....they just don't have the body of work and impact as the Beatles did. The Stones MIGHT be close and I prefer them to the Beatles, but it's a really tough sale arguing they influenced more bands than the Beatles.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55774
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm not angry. I don't have to be angry. I consider the matter of the Beatles' greatness to be pretty firmly settled. And besides, I've never been crazy about the Stones, so I get it.


It's like when I get shit because, while I can acknowledge how important the Beatles are to music, I get shit on for essentially saying I never want to hear anything they wrote again...and Hey Jude is the 5th biggest piece of shit in music history.


It's absolutely unlistenable.

:thumleft:

Now I'm going to wait for the McCartney worshippers to come with their pitchforks and torches.

That would be going Boyd on Boyd and I know better than that.

A big step in being a huge fan of a musician is understanding how what you love about them can inspire hatred in equal measure. Of course Paul is, on some level, a cornball who would have been perfectly comfortable writing hokey vaudeville music in a previous generation. But sometimes those cornball fundamentals (band names thread) get focused into great music. And I don't have to go into the inherent divisiveness of Frank Zappa or Lou Reed or John Darnielle or Kate Bush. I just hope I can someday have as wide-ranging an album library as Brick.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
He’s eclectic enough to not only own every year of Now That’s What I Call Music, but every Now That’s category out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
W_Z wrote:
They started the British Invasion. It’s likely we don’t get the Kinks, the Who or The Rolling Stones without Beatlemania coming across the pond.
So all those guys just instead sell insurance or something?

That's a perfect example of overstating their importance and acting like no British band would exist if they hadn't flown across the ocean and played in America for 2 weeks.

Of course The Beatles were influential. They were the most notable of a very big British music scene at the time. If they hadn't existed there would have been another group to play in America for 2 weeks instead from Britain.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
they would've probably been selling out in europe and the UK. but they got their shot here *because* of the beatles. that's just a fact, as i said. whether you think any of those other bands could've started the british invasion is just retcon fiction.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
W_Z wrote:
they would've probably been selling out in europe and the UK. but they got their shot here *because* of the beatles. that's just a fact, as i said. whether you think any of those other bands could've started the british invasion is just retcon fiction.

So the Rolling Stones and The Who weren't good enough to even get noticed in America? However, a two week visit by another band gave them decades of success here?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
It is always interesting to me as a Beatles fan how the timeline of 60s rock went. There is not a lot of time from the start of Beatles and Beach Boys to Stones/Who/Kinks to Doors/Deep Purple/Led Zep. It happened really fast and nearly all synched up.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 9:57 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
Brick wrote:
Of course The Beatles were influential. They were the most notable of a very big British music scene at the time. If they hadn't existed there would have been another group to play in America for 2 weeks instead from Britain.

The Beatles were massive because they had the look but more importantly they had the songs. They were already #1 before they even came over. I think you are minimizing how difficult it is to write great songs. Nobody could touch Lennon and McCartney and then later Harrison who also contributed some bangers. Their output from '63 to '69 will never be matched.

My favorite band from that period was The Who. I heard someone say The Beatles made me pick up an instrument but it was The Who that made me join a band. I think The Who and also the Stones show how The Beatles were different. With the Who it was Townshend that did the writing and turned up with amazing demos and the Stones would rent a studio for a couple weeks and hope Richards could come up with some riffs. The Beatles were like having peak Tom Petty and Prince in the same band.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
Brick wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've probably been selling out in europe and the UK. but they got their shot here *because* of the beatles. that's just a fact, as i said. whether you think any of those other bands could've started the british invasion is just retcon fiction.

So the Rolling Stones and The Who weren't good enough to even get noticed in America? However, a two week visit by another band gave them decades of success here?


Brick laying the brick again lol.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
W_Z wrote:
Brick wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've probably been selling out in europe and the UK. but they got their shot here *because* of the beatles. that's just a fact, as i said. whether you think any of those other bands could've started the british invasion is just retcon fiction.

So the Rolling Stones and The Who weren't good enough to even get noticed in America? However, a two week visit by another band gave them decades of success here?


Brick laying the brick again lol.
Is that not what you said?

If The Beatles didn't exist, do you think the Rolling Stones or The Who would have ever made it to America?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
It doesn’t matter is what I said. What happened happened. Personally I love all those bands but the fact is they flourished here after the Beatlemania was already started. It’s a moot point.

You’re just doing your Brick thing now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
W_Z wrote:
It doesn’t matter is what I said. What happened happened. Personally I love all those bands but the fact is they flourished here after the Beatlemania was already started. It’s a moot point.

You’re just doing your Brick thing now.

No one doubts that The Beatles came to America first. It just makes no sense that the Rolling Stones and The Who that are also really great bands would have not found a way to America if not for The Beatles. It's like saying that no one human would have ever landed on the moon if Neil Armstrong hadn't done it.

The Beatles would always have been a great band. They were extremely talented. The idea that are unquestionably the greatest band of all time is more about timing than it was something that truly differentiates them from every other great musical group of all time. If The Beatles were all born in the 90s they'd basically be One Direction.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:15 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
W_Z wrote:
It doesn’t matter is what I said. What happened happened. Personally I love all those bands but the fact is they flourished here after the Beatlemania was already started. It’s a moot point.

You’re just doing your Brick thing now.

No one doubts that The Beatles came to America first. It just makes no sense that the Rolling Stones and The Who that are also really great bands would have not found a way to America if not for The Beatles. It's like saying that no one human would have ever landed on the moon if Neil Armstrong hadn't done it.

The Beatles would always have been a great band. They were extremely talented. The idea that are unquestionably the greatest band of all time is more about timing than it was something that truly differentiates them from every other musical group of all time. If The Beatles were all born in the 90s they'd basically be One Direction.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

This legitimately almost made me spit the food out of my mouth. Well done.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
I did mean to say what "differentiates them from every great musical group of all time".

The way I wrote it sounds like timing was the only thing that differentiated them from The Hanson Brothers.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:10 pm
Posts: 29
pizza_Place: ShowBiz
Curious Hair wrote:
cornball fundamentals

I know, I know, such mawkishness.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Brick wrote:
I did mean to say what "differentiates them from every great musical group of all time".

The way I wrote it sounds like timing was the only thing that differentiated them from The Hanson Brothers.

Harry Styles is making great music. Sure, they could be one direction, if one direction made genre defining music after that for another 5-6 years. Some of it is timing....would someone else make Mozart like music if Mozart didn't exist? Probably?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Curious Hair wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Beatles were more about timing than them somehow doing something no one else could have. That's why everyone has to rely on how "influential" they were like music would somehow not exist without them inventing everything besides rap music in the past 70 years in regards to music.

But you don't like music, though.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
When Purdue Rick does, "It's like saying" and "it seems like you're saying", it's a tell that he's a little flustered.

It's a funny game.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
When Purdue Rick does, "It's like saying" and "it seems like you're saying", it's a tell that he's a little flustered.

It's a funny game.

That's a pretty common argument tactic. I'm certainly not flustered in a Beatles argument about whether British music would have ever come to America if not for them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
When Purdue Rick does, "It's like saying" and "it seems like you're saying", it's a tell that he's a little flustered.

It's a funny game.

That's a pretty common argument tactic. I'm certainly not flustered in a Beatles argument about whether British music would have ever come to America if not for them.

Yeah, I heard you the first three times.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55774
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Morrissey wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
cornball fundamentals

I know, I know, such mawkishness.

:lol: this annihilated me

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group