It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2024 11:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 ... 146  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38459
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
vitoscotti wrote:
Mitch vs Fields as starters would be an interesting matchup.

The Fields Cult would never admit to Mitch being just as good ( as well as their casual racism) because Fields “ looks the part” better.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 3:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The screen plays last week were all on Fields. He checked to them.

https://youtu.be/syK_baC1uNY?si=4nU0aLPwGwaUa_Ip

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3943
pizza_Place: Lino's
The most disturbing thing about Mitch is that he has never been able to learn how to read defenses despite playing for numerous coaching staffs, Fields shows many of the same traits, it seems no matter what you do you cannot coach guys up, they are who they are.

The question is will Maye or Willams be able to come in and process the fact that the dude standing 10 yards away wide open is the best option against the coverage he is seeing or will he try to force the ball like Mitch, or hold the ball and take a sack like Fields.

That said, the Jets, Giants, Pats, Steelers, Panthers, and Browns would all love to have Fields right now. He would seem to be able to garner a second round pick given the dearth of QB talent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1378
pizza_Place: Pequods
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I think the value of a good QB on a “rookie deal” forces the move to trade Fields and draft a new one. While Williams may not be the next Mahommes, at worst he’s on par with Fields and you buy yourself some cap space.

I actually think the best thing for Fields himself is to move on to a new city where he’d have renewed support. If he gets a big contract here and is mediocre, the fans will turn on him. He’d be the Bear’s version of Jayson Heyward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56713
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I don't see how Poles can risk being the GM to pass on Stroud and another potential franchise QB. He has to use a pick to take a top QB

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56713
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I don't see how Poles can risk being the GM to pass on Stroud and another potential franchise QB. He has to use a pick to take a top QB

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 10:04 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Bears rookie quarterback will have far better offensive talent than Fields or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky inherited. The coach and OC are the most important ingredient to his success.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3943
pizza_Place: Lino's
Adding a WR like Harrison, a quality center and LT almost QB proofs this offense.

The Niners are a great example of how an average QB can thrive when he has talent around him.

Interesting how the book on Mitch and Fields are similar, make them read zone coverages and see guys settling into open areas in zones, neither guy can do this and everyone knows it, so you really limit what you can do, both guys seem to give up when the first read is not there and start getting happy feet in the pocket which creates late and inaccurate throws because they do not reset their feet.

Great example this season of a guy who could see where the ball should go, but lacked an NFL arm in Bagent and a guy with an NFL arm who could make the throw, but cannot see where the ball should go in Fields.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14805
pizza_Place: Grazianos
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I don't see how Poles can risk being the GM to pass on Stroud and another potential franchise QB. He has to use a pick to take a top QB


The key word, though, is POTENTIAL. There is no quarterback in college right now who is anywhere near a sure thing to become a "franchise quarterback". We know right now a lot more about Field's ability than we do about the rookie qb class next season and beyond. right? I think that at minimum he will be an average quarterback and if coached correctly and set up with an offense that can support his ability,can be a good quarterback. I'd say that they should do the samrt thing and take the sure thing rather than set themselves up for another long delay in getting into the play-offs.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14805
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nas wrote:
The Bears rookie quarterback will have far better offensive talent than Fields or (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky inherited. The coach and OC are the most important ingredient to his success.



That is very true.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56713
The Hawk wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I don't see how Poles can risk being the GM to pass on Stroud and another potential franchise QB. He has to use a pick to take a top QB


The key word, though, is POTENTIAL. There is no quarterback in college right now who is anywhere near a sure thing to become a "franchise quarterback". We know right now a lot more about Field's ability than we do about the rookie qb class next season and beyond. right? I think that at minimum he will be an average quarterback and if coached correctly and set up with an offense that can support his ability,can be a good quarterback. I'd say that they should do the samrt thing and take the sure thing rather than set themselves up for another long delay in getting into the play-offs.

Well thankfully you are not the one making decisions at Halas hall.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
The Hawk wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Is there anything Fields can do that would make you keep him, now that the top pick is becoming a reality?

I'm still a Fields guy, but I don't think so. It's just too unique an opportunity and Poles already passed on a class of what is looking like some pretty good QB.

I don't see how Poles can risk being the GM to pass on Stroud and another potential franchise QB. He has to use a pick to take a top QB


The key word, though, is POTENTIAL. There is no quarterback in college right now who is anywhere near a sure thing to become a "franchise quarterback". We know right now a lot more about Field's ability than we do about the rookie qb class next season and beyond. right? I think that at minimum he will be an average quarterback and if coached correctly and set up with an offense that can support his ability,can be a good quarterback. I'd say that they should do the samrt thing and take the sure thing rather than set themselves up for another long delay in getting into the play-offs.


Hawk = Jerry Angelo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40340
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I’ve come around to the best thing is to trade Fields and start over. If for no other reason than resetting on a rookie contract.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56713
If they decide to take a QB in the first round then they have to trade Fields.

In regard to using the picks in the 1st they have to decide if they believe one of the QBs is a no brainer at 1.

Or they could take Harrision Jr at 1 and go with the best available QB with the 2nd pick.

I have went back and forth on this. But I think at the end of the day you have to take the biggest swing possible at getting a franchise QB. So that means they take a QB with the 1st pick and then the best overall guy on the board with the 2nd pick.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6719
RFDC wrote:
If they decide to take a QB in the first round then they have to trade Fields.

In regard to using the picks in the 1st they have to decide if they believe one of the QBs is a no brainer at 1.

Or they could take Harrision Jr at 1 and go with the best available QB with the 2nd pick.

I have went back and forth on this. But I think at the end of the day you have to take the biggest swing possible at getting a franchise QB. So that means they take a QB with the 1st pick and then the best overall guy on the board with the 2nd pick.


I want them to trade out of the 1st and take the best available QB between Williams, Maye and Nix that is left.

Do not want them to blow their load at #1, when we have MANY needs to fill. and another high 1st round pick to play with.

You do however need to draft one of the big three at QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38459
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juiced wrote:
RFDC wrote:
If they decide to take a QB in the first round then they have to trade Fields.

In regard to using the picks in the 1st they have to decide if they believe one of the QBs is a no brainer at 1.

Or they could take Harrision Jr at 1 and go with the best available QB with the 2nd pick.

I have went back and forth on this. But I think at the end of the day you have to take the biggest swing possible at getting a franchise QB. So that means they take a QB with the 1st pick and then the best overall guy on the board with the 2nd pick.


I want them to trade out of the 1st and take the best available QB between Williams, Maye and Nix that is left.

Do not want them to blow their load at #1, when we have MANY needs to fill. and another high 1st round pick to play with.

You do however need to draft one of the big three at QB.

You gotta take the foolproof pick at 1. Thats Harrison .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13132
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
RFDC wrote:
If they decide to take a QB in the first round then they have to trade Fields.

In regard to using the picks in the 1st they have to decide if they believe one of the QBs is a no brainer at 1.

Or they could take Harrision Jr at 1 and go with the best available QB with the 2nd pick.

I have went back and forth on this. But I think at the end of the day you have to take the biggest swing possible at getting a franchise QB. So that means they take a QB with the 1st pick and then the best overall guy on the board with the 2nd pick.

I'd be stunned if they went WR then QB. That's a huge risk and they would (deservedly) get killed if they missed on a stud. The difference between the top WR and the 2nd or 3rd best is not significant enough to warrant that kind of move.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32635
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Harrison is the surest thing in the draft. I take him and then grab whatever QB is best with the next pick. None of these QB’s look sure enough to pass on MHJ.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13132
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
denisdman wrote:
Harrison is the surest thing in the draft. I take him and then grab whatever QB is best with the next pick. None of these QB’s look sure enough to pass on MHJ.

Any top 10 WR is pretty much a sure thing. A QB is so much more important and it's the GM's job to figure out which one is the best to lead the franchise. I get why there would be skepticism about that given the Bears history, but getting that right is by far the single biggest factor in becoming a SB contender. There's a reason there have only been 3 Wrs picked that high in the modern era.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Harrison is the surest thing in the draft. I take him and then grab whatever QB is best with the next pick. None of these QB’s look sure enough to pass on MHJ.

Any top 10 WR is pretty much a sure thing. A QB is so much more important and it's the GM's job to figure out which one is the best to lead the franchise. I get why there would be skepticism about that given the Bears history, but getting that right is by far the single biggest factor in becoming a SB contender. There's a reason there have only been 3 Wrs picked that high in the modern era.


We haven't had success drafting the quarterback or the receiver.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Harrison is the surest thing in the draft. I take him and then grab whatever QB is best with the next pick. None of these QB’s look sure enough to pass on MHJ.

Any top 10 WR is pretty much a sure thing.

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13132
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Caller Bob wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Harrison is the surest thing in the draft. I take him and then grab whatever QB is best with the next pick. None of these QB’s look sure enough to pass on MHJ.

Any top 10 WR is pretty much a sure thing.

Image
Image

Of course there have been mistakes...that why I wrote "pretty much". I would still venture that the scouts get WR & O-linemen right in the 1st round at a higher rate than any other position perhaps other than that now rarely selected RB.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
This guy drank more than pittmike!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41287
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 ... 146  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group