It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
I have made my mind about him. I believe Poles has as well. We don't agree.

He's almost definitely going to win more games next year than this year so they will continue to cite progress as the reason to keep him. You cannot have him as a lame duck, so they will extend him (if he doesn't already have a five year contract).

Enjoy your zone coverage and lack of preparation Bears fans.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 3:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb


Why do you think he likes to delay decisions? What decisions has he delayed

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb


Why do you think he likes to delay decisions? What decisions has he delayed


He chose not to spend last year in FA in areas that were both of critical need and could be filled reasonably. He punted on the #1 pick. He fiddled around with the decision to trade the pick. All of these bought him coverage from criticism in year 2 as they were not ready.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31667
pizza_Place: What??
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb


Why do you think he likes to delay decisions? What decisions has he delayed

Have you ever left no stone unturned? Believe me, it takes a while.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.


but the team will be better and I think much better. Depending on what happens this off season, I could see them winning 10 games next year with that schedule. No way there is a hot seat for a GM that went from 3-7-10 and performed some brilliant moves along the way

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.


but the team will be better and I think much better. Depending on what happens this off season, I could see them winning 10 games next year with that schedule. No way there is a hot seat for a GM that went from 3-7-10 and performed some brilliant moves along the way

I know the schedule next year is very favorable, but if Justin Fields is the starting QB for the 2024 Bears, they will not see 10 wins.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.

They won't see the #1 pick again and bypassing the rare chance at the best QB available is very risky. If CW looks like a star and Fields continues with the sub-200 yd games, Poles will feel the heat.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
That's why you take Williams and keep fields too

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
next year, they'll be bumslayingly good. Year after that, eberflus' zone d will get picked apart by the good teams but by then he'll have his extension

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.


but the team will be better and I think much better. Depending on what happens this off season, I could see them winning 10 games next year with that schedule. No way there is a hot seat for a GM that went from 3-7-10 and performed some brilliant moves along the way


If Fields stays and they make the playoffs with the easy schedule and other weapons, Poles probably survives.
If Fields stays and they don’t make the playoffs, Poles has to be gone. The only scenario that saves him is if Caleb Williams and Maye look like busts.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb


Why do you think he likes to delay decisions? What decisions has he delayed


He chose not to spend last year in FA in areas that were both of critical need and could be filled reasonably. He punted on the #1 pick. He fiddled around with the decision to trade the pick. All of these bought him coverage from criticism in year 2 as they were not ready.


Okay. I think we see these differently and Poles explicitly touched on one of them yesterday.

Poles appears that be very disciplined. He wasn't going to empty the clip in free agency last year. He targeted guys, and didn't panic when he didn't get them. Center appears to be the only position that was "ignored" last year. You would probably say the 3T, but I believe he wanted to go to the draft after he failed to land the guy from Denver. I think Dexter may ultimately be better and more reliable than Carter.

I'm not sure why you believe he "fiddled" around with the decision? He was very open that the pick was for sale and sold it more than a month before the draft. He said he valued the assets more than the pick because he knew the Bears had a lot of holes to fill.

I see why you may believe he's sticking with Fields. I think differently for a lot of reasons. I also think Poles believes the roster will be good enough to carry any quarterback he goes with. The same thing wouldn't have been true last year. I also think there is far more risk passing on a quarterback in this draft.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Extend his dumbass into Lake Michigan and hire Vrabel


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb


Why do you think he likes to delay decisions? What decisions has he delayed

Have you ever left no stone unturned? Believe me, it takes a while.


I get it. I think he's been doing that since he was hired. Giving Fields another look was the biggest example.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.


but the team will be better and I think much better. Depending on what happens this off season, I could see them winning 10 games next year with that schedule. No way there is a hot seat for a GM that went from 3-7-10 and performed some brilliant moves along the way


This reads like a Fields Cult thought. Retaining Fields wouldn't buy Poles any additional time UNLESS he becomes the stud that you and others believe he can be. Unlike last year, when there was a lot of uncertainty about the quarterbacks, and Poles could look one year ahead and see a rich QB draft, he doesn't have that luxury this year. There will be at least one superstar quarterback in this draft, and a QB with an 82 rating won't make fans forgive you for passing on him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
If we're lucky Fields QBR may skyrocket from 2023's 46.3 to a towering 47.8 in 2024.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
If we're lucky Fields QBR may skyrocket from 2023's 46.3 to a towering 47.8 in 2024.


And there aren’t any projected studs in next year's draft. You don't have sustained success without a really good to great quarterback.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24087
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
If we're lucky Fields QBR may skyrocket from 2023's 46.3 to a towering 47.8 in 2024.


And there aren’t any projected studs in next year's draft. You don't have sustained success without a really good to great quarterback.

Understated point right there.

The QB class next year looks pretty weak. If Fields leads the team to a third consecutive top 10 pick, they enter the FA veteran QB hellscape for 2025.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
If we're lucky Fields QBR may skyrocket from 2023's 46.3 to a towering 47.8 in 2024.


And there aren’t any projected studs in next year's draft. You don't have sustained success without a really good to great quarterback.

Understated point right there.

The QB class next year looks pretty weak. If Fields leads the team to a third consecutive top 10 pick, they enter the FA veteran QB hellscape for 2025.


We want H1M
Don't trade H1M

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

I didn’t think I could love you more but we might be there.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

I didn’t think I could love you more but we might be there.


I come cheap

That's all I'm saying

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
The guy who is the next offensive coordinator will also be the next head coach of the bears. Book it.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:32 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
The guy who is the next offensive coordinator will also be the next head coach of the bears. Book it.


I believe this too. If he's good

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2024 10:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I also think they are keeping Fields.

There is nothing Poles likes more than to delay a decision. It's kind of smart as it buys him more time. A GM almost always gets a second coach and qb

Keeping Fields only shortens Poles time as GM. I'll disagree with this one.


He trades #1 this year for at least another first next year, which gives him strong ammunition should he finally choose to draft a qb. However, when he keeps Fields this year, it would be illogical not to invoke his 5th year option. So Poles won't draft "his" QB until 2026. He won't be accountable until then, which will get him to a second contract.

The Bears and Fields will both show improvement next year with the additional talent they bring in and the last place schedule, so Poles won't feel pressure in 24.

If Poles keeps Fields this year and he ends up the bust most of us know he is, Fields becomes a Poles pick whether he likes it or not. This is the last chance Poles has to walk away from Fields and not be attached to him.



When Poles keeps Fields next year and he ends up being in the pro bowl, he will sign him to a deserving contract and the BEARS will go to the Super Bowl.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2024 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 789
pizza_Place: Marie's
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The guy who is the next offensive coordinator will also be the next head coach of the bears. Book it.


I believe this too. If he's good


If he's actually good the Bears would win enough games for Flus to get an extension.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group