It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 12:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92195
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
what are the institutional advantages Creighton, Providence, St. John's, etc. have over Depaul?
Creighton is the only game in town and they have very rich donors. The only competition they have is Nebraska basketball. Providence is the same way. St. John's gets to play in MSG and NYC is actually less fractured in terms of fan bases. The Big Ten teams + Notre Dame have a stranglehold on Chicago. I'm guessing there are more Michigan fans in Chicago than there are DePaul fans. Plus, the East Coast schools get a far better travel schedule given where most Big East teams exist along with far more important long term rivalries.

Everyone thinks DePaul's location is an advantage. It really isn't. The bigger schools take whoever they want from Chicago and the suburbs and now with NIL they will have no problem doing it whenever they want. So DePaul is already recruiting at a mid major level in their home area.

Now maybe if DePaul had been good recently it would be different but Butler seems to be showing that even that didn't really matter. Butler joining the Big East has been a big mistake so far. Creighton has done better than I have thought though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13278
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
what are the institutional advantages Creighton, Providence, St. John's, etc. have over Depaul?
Creighton is the only game in town and they have very rich donors. The only competition they have is Nebraska basketball. Providence is the same way. St. John's gets to play in MSG and NYC is actually less fractured in terms of fan bases. The Big Ten teams + Notre Dame have a stranglehold on Chicago. I'm guessing there are more Michigan fans in Chicago than there are DePaul fans. Plus, the East Coast schools get a far better travel schedule given where most Big East teams exist along with far more important long term rivalries.

Everyone thinks DePaul's location is an advantage. It really isn't. The bigger schools take whoever they want from Chicago and the suburbs and now with NIL they will have no problem doing it whenever they want. So DePaul is already recruiting at a mid major level in their home area.

Now maybe if DePaul had been good recently it would be different but Butler seems to be showing that even that didn't really matter. Butler joining the Big East has been a big mistake so far. Creighton has done better than I have thought though.

I think the "being good" part is the key. When Ray Meyer was running things they were by far the biggest show in town - bigger than the Bulls or any Big-10 team. Then Joey took over and the recruiting started to slide. A series of mid-tier coaches with little local name recognition followed and doomed them to 3rd-rate players. If they hit on the right coach I think it could change. JORR mentioned Aguirre, which is an interesting name if he were actually interested. I'm not sure what kind of budget DePaul has for coaching but what about other local legends like Doc Rivers or Tim Hardaway? Is Maurice Cheeks still on the Bulls staff?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Last edited by Zippy-The-Pinhead on Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Brick wrote:
They need to drop down a level. No chance they can compete in modern big time college basketball. They are at a disadvantage to every other Big East team and those teams are almost all at a disadvantage to any team in the P4 football conferences. Butler has every advantage over DePaul and Butler still can't handle the Big East either and should also drop down too.

DePaul likely has the worst NIL situation in the conference. There is not going to be any local fanbase for DePaul given how pretty much everyone in Chicago already has a college team. You aren't going to sell recruits on staying home when most games are against teams from the East Coast and one from Nebraska. Even if you get good, Illinois, Michigan, and other Big Ten schools are going to take your players unless you have enough rich alumni to fund $500k+ NIL deals.


A Big East team has won the NCAA Tournament three times since 2016. The conference doesn't appear to be at a disadvantage, especially when you consider that a Big 10 Team hasn't won the Tournament since 2000.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
In terms of DePaul's failures, I attribute them to the following:

1. The snowball effect of repeated losing;
2. The lack of an interesting or energizing environment at home games. They're not going to build an on-campus arena in Lincoln Park anytime soon, but they should consider playing more games at McGrath Arena (where the women play); and
3. It's harder to make noise in Chicago. As others have said, a good college basketball team in Milwaukee, Omaha, or Providence is going to capture more local attention than a good college basketball team in Chicago. It wasn't that long ago that Loyola was in the Final Four, but they've already sunk back into obscurity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13278
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Warren Newson wrote:
In terms of DePaul's failures, I attribute them to the following:

1. The snowball effect of repeated losing;
2. The lack of an interesting or energizing environment at home games. They're not going to build an on-campus arena in Lincoln Park anytime soon, but they should consider playing more games at McGrath Arena (where the women play); and
3. It's harder to make noise in Chicago. As others have said, a good college basketball team in Milwaukee, Omaha, or Providence is going to capture more local attention than a good college basketball team in Chicago. It wasn't that long ago that Loyola was in the Final Four, but they've already sunk back into obscurity.

I disagree on that last point. The issue is consistency. In the late 70's & early 80's they were the toast of the town. Also, Marquette is well below the Packers, Bucks and Brewers in terms of interest.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92195
Location: To the left of my post
Warren Newson wrote:
A Big East team has won the NCAA Tournament three times since 2016. The conference doesn't appear to be at a disadvantage, especially when you consider that a Big 10 Team hasn't won the Tournament since 2000.
NIL is a fairly recent development though Connecticut basketball is strong enough to not only handle it but probably thrive. Just like Gonzaga, a conference is more than just the one dominant team.

I think Jay Wright saw the writing on the wall and retired relatively early.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92195
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
what are the institutional advantages Creighton, Providence, St. John's, etc. have over Depaul?
Creighton is the only game in town and they have very rich donors. The only competition they have is Nebraska basketball. Providence is the same way. St. John's gets to play in MSG and NYC is actually less fractured in terms of fan bases. The Big Ten teams + Notre Dame have a stranglehold on Chicago. I'm guessing there are more Michigan fans in Chicago than there are DePaul fans. Plus, the East Coast schools get a far better travel schedule given where most Big East teams exist along with far more important long term rivalries.

Everyone thinks DePaul's location is an advantage. It really isn't. The bigger schools take whoever they want from Chicago and the suburbs and now with NIL they will have no problem doing it whenever they want. So DePaul is already recruiting at a mid major level in their home area.

Now maybe if DePaul had been good recently it would be different but Butler seems to be showing that even that didn't really matter. Butler joining the Big East has been a big mistake so far. Creighton has done better than I have thought though.

I think the "being good" part is the key. When Ray Meyer was running things they were by far the biggest show in town - bigger than the Bulls or any Big-10 team. Then Joey took over and the recruiting started to slide. A series of mid-tier coaches with little local name recognition followed and doomed them to 3rd-rate players. If they hit on the right coach I think it could change. JORR mentioned Aguirre, which is an interesting name if he were actually interested. I'm not sure what kind of budget DePaul has for coaching but what about other local legends like Doc Rivers or Tim Hardaway? Is Maurice Cheeks still on the Bulls staff?

I mean, assuming we aren't talking about a hypothetical DePaul that was a winner the past 30 years, it isn't going to happen even if they are good. At best, they'll be a second favorite team of Northwestern and Iowa fans who live in Chicago similar to the Loyola bandwagon fans. When it comes to the NIL donations that are vital to win in college basketball now they aren't going to be getting them. When Coleman Hawkins can make as high as $500k a year where is DePaul going to be on that?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23892
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Maybe Lawrence can set up some lucrative NIL deals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79637
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
what are the institutional advantages Creighton, Providence, St. John's, etc. have over Depaul?
Creighton is the only game in town and they have very rich donors. The only competition they have is Nebraska basketball. Providence is the same way. St. John's gets to play in MSG and NYC is actually less fractured in terms of fan bases. The Big Ten teams + Notre Dame have a stranglehold on Chicago. I'm guessing there are more Michigan fans in Chicago than there are DePaul fans. Plus, the East Coast schools get a far better travel schedule given where most Big East teams exist along with far more important long term rivalries.

Everyone thinks DePaul's location is an advantage. It really isn't. The bigger schools take whoever they want from Chicago and the suburbs and now with NIL they will have no problem doing it whenever they want. So DePaul is already recruiting at a mid major level in their home area.

Now maybe if DePaul had been good recently it would be different but Butler seems to be showing that even that didn't really matter. Butler joining the Big East has been a big mistake so far. Creighton has done better than I have thought though.

I think the "being good" part is the key. When Ray Meyer was running things they were by far the biggest show in town - bigger than the Bulls or any Big-10 team. Then Joey took over and the recruiting started to slide. A series of mid-tier coaches with little local name recognition followed and doomed them to 3rd-rate players. If they hit on the right coach I think it could change. JORR mentioned Aguirre, which is an interesting name if he were actually interested. I'm not sure what kind of budget DePaul has for coaching but what about other local legends like Doc Rivers or Tim Hardaway? Is Maurice Cheeks still on the Bulls staff?

I mean, assuming we aren't talking about a hypothetical DePaul that was a winner the past 30 years, it isn't going to happen even if they are good. At best, they'll be a second favorite team of Northwestern and Iowa fans who live in Chicago similar to the Loyola bandwagon fans. When it comes to the NIL donations that are vital to win in college basketball now they aren't going to be getting them. When Coleman Hawkins can make as high as $500k a year where is DePaul going to be on that?


I'm not sure, but DePaul is a pretty big school. Richard Dreihaus is dead though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56037
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Also, Marquette is well below the Packers, Bucks and Brewers in terms of interest.


It's not fair to mention any team in relation to the Packers. They're so far and away #1. But Marquette has had a strong following for as long as I can remember. I think they benefited from the rising tide of Madison and Milwaukee both having decent basketball programs around the same time. I can assure you, people went years without caring one bit about the Bucks. They were the basketball Blackhawks.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24213
pizza_Place: Pizanos

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2024 6:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2024 10:28 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57287
:lol: that looks like a scene from a middle school girls basketball game

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19397

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
conns7901 wrote:


I'll take non-committal reporting for $500 Alex. All kidding aside, I would like to be excited by this news, but it sounds like it's in keeping with the DePaul tradition of the last quarter century of hiring tired old men.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
what are the institutional advantages Creighton, Providence, St. John's, etc. have over Depaul?
Creighton is the only game in town and they have very rich donors. The only competition they have is Nebraska basketball. Providence is the same way. St. John's gets to play in MSG and NYC is actually less fractured in terms of fan bases. The Big Ten teams + Notre Dame have a stranglehold on Chicago. I'm guessing there are more Michigan fans in Chicago than there are DePaul fans. Plus, the East Coast schools get a far better travel schedule given where most Big East teams exist along with far more important long term rivalries.

Everyone thinks DePaul's location is an advantage. It really isn't. The bigger schools take whoever they want from Chicago and the suburbs and now with NIL they will have no problem doing it whenever they want. So DePaul is already recruiting at a mid major level in their home area.

Now maybe if DePaul had been good recently it would be different but Butler seems to be showing that even that didn't really matter. Butler joining the Big East has been a big mistake so far. Creighton has done better than I have thought though.

I think the "being good" part is the key. When Ray Meyer was running things they were by far the biggest show in town - bigger than the Bulls or any Big-10 team. Then Joey took over and the recruiting started to slide. A series of mid-tier coaches with little local name recognition followed and doomed them to 3rd-rate players. If they hit on the right coach I think it could change. JORR mentioned Aguirre, which is an interesting name if he were actually interested. I'm not sure what kind of budget DePaul has for coaching but what about other local legends like Doc Rivers or Tim Hardaway? Is Maurice Cheeks still on the Bulls staff?

I mean, assuming we aren't talking about a hypothetical DePaul that was a winner the past 30 years, it isn't going to happen even if they are good. At best, they'll be a second favorite team of Northwestern and Iowa fans who live in Chicago similar to the Loyola bandwagon fans. When it comes to the NIL donations that are vital to win in college basketball now they aren't going to be getting them. When Coleman Hawkins can make as high as $500k a year where is DePaul going to be on that?


I'm not sure, but DePaul is a pretty big school. Richard Dreihaus is dead though.


Was there any truth that allegations of Pat Kennedy's bad recruiting practices caused Ponsetto and the administration to avoid big-name coaches? I remember hearing that a few time from people connected to the school.

When I worked at the Allstate Arena and later attended DePaul in the 90's, most of the fanbase consisted of older alumni still pining for the past. On campus, basketball never felt hyped in any way, even though they had Quentin Richardson at the time. There also seemed to be a million reasons why the school couldn't compete. Games were played an hour away from the campus. The school had too many commuters with no connection to activities outside of classes. There wasn't a football team to bring in additional revenue. The administration didn't want to spend money on a new stadium near Cabrini back in the 90's. Joey Meyer had broken the relationship with CPS coaches. DePaul coaches were from out of state and couldn't recruit the Chicago schools. The eligibility standards were too strict to get more talented players. Chicago is too cold in the winter so it hurt recruiting. The campus nightlife wasn't great outside a stretch near Lincoln and Halsted. The list goes on.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82292
conns7901 wrote:


Is Moser being pushed out at OU?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79637
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
When I worked at the Allstate Arena and later attended DePaul in the 90's, most of the fanbase consisted of older alumni still pining for the past.


The biggest mistake they ever made was moving the games to Rosemont.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
When I worked at the Allstate Arena and later attended DePaul in the 90's, most of the fanbase consisted of older alumni still pining for the past.


The biggest mistake they ever made was moving the games to Rosemont.


What % of DePaul students are commuters?

One of the best things Loyola did for its basketball program (and the entire school more broadly) was to increase its on-campus housing capacity.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:57 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Also, when DePaul basketball was in its heyday, wasn't its popularity amplified more by "subway alums" than actual DePaul students? I remember a bunch of my older relatives--including my great uncle who was a CTA bus driver and my grandmother, who didn't have a high school diploma--being rabid DePaul fans. Working-class Catholics adopted DePaul as their team in the pre-Jordan era.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79637
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
Also, when DePaul basketball was in its heyday, wasn't its popularity amplified more by "subway alums" than actual DePaul students? I remember a bunch of my older relatives--including my great uncle who was a CTA bus driver and my grandmother, who didn't have a high school diploma--being rabid DePaul fans. Working-class Catholics adopted DePaul as their team in the pre-Jordan era.



I believe that. When I attended U of I I was a DePaul fan who hated Illini basketball.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92195
Location: To the left of my post
So it's Chris Holtmann, who is a better choice than Porter Moser anyways.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 789
pizza_Place: Marie's
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:53 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57287
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
RFDC wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.


It's in keeping with hires like Wainwright and Purnell, a guy who is over the age of 50 and who previously took a team to the NCAA Tournament. Those other two promptly failed at DePaul (although Wainwright did go to the NIT) and I expect failure out of this new guy as well.

I would have liked to see them hire an assistant at a good program that's under the age of 40. They haven't really done that since the first Leitao hire.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31723
pizza_Place: What??
Warren Newson wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.


It's in keeping with hires like Wainwright and Purnell, a guy who is over the age of 50 and who previously took a team to the NCAA Tournament. Those other two promptly failed at DePaul (although Wainwright did go to the NIT) and I expect failure out of this new guy as well.

I would have liked to see them hire an assistant at a good program that's under the age of 40. They haven't really done that since the first Leitao hire.

That's also a roll of the dice. Both scenarios kinda suck but that's where Depaul is. They created this clusterfuck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 1945
pizza_Place: Roseangela's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Also, when DePaul basketball was in its heyday, wasn't its popularity amplified more by "subway alums" than actual DePaul students? I remember a bunch of my older relatives--including my great uncle who was a CTA bus driver and my grandmother, who didn't have a high school diploma--being rabid DePaul fans. Working-class Catholics adopted DePaul as their team in the pre-Jordan era.



I believe that. When I attended U of I I was a DePaul fan who hated Illini basketball.

Have said this before....A lot of Southwest Siders passively pulled for them, and when they inevitably lost in the first round, they said, "See, I told ya so. Those (African-Americans) are a bunch of losers." Lots of neighborhood people said the same thing about Illinois; they preferred Indiana. I had to watch the Illini and the Demons on the sly. No joke.

DePaul was also not always the first choice because they played Notre Dame (they were actually decent then) twice a year and because DePaul was on the gay North Side.

Foolishness. They were # 1 for parts of four or five straight seasons. A neighborhood plumber was fixing our sink and my dad asked him what he thought of Terry Cummings leaving early for the NBA. "Good riddance," he said.

_________________
Warren Newson wrote:
I like black prostitutes from the 70's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 789
pizza_Place: Marie's
Warren Newson wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.


It's in keeping with hires like Wainwright and Purnell, a guy who is over the age of 50 and who previously took a team to the NCAA Tournament. Those other two promptly failed at DePaul (although Wainwright did go to the NIT) and I expect failure out of this new guy as well.

I would have liked to see them hire an assistant at a good program that's under the age of 40. They haven't really done that since the first Leitao hire.


Not comparable. Wainwright was a total clown.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.


It's in keeping with hires like Wainwright and Purnell, a guy who is over the age of 50 and who previously took a team to the NCAA Tournament. Those other two promptly failed at DePaul (although Wainwright did go to the NIT) and I expect failure out of this new guy as well.

I would have liked to see them hire an assistant at a good program that's under the age of 40. They haven't really done that since the first Leitao hire.

That's also a roll of the dice. Both scenarios kinda suck but that's where Depaul is. They created this clusterfuck.


True, but the last time they tried it (Leitao I) it worked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: We Are DePaul!
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Given the majority of names that were floated this is a decent hire.

It is a great hire for Depaul considering where they have been.


It's in keeping with hires like Wainwright and Purnell, a guy who is over the age of 50 and who previously took a team to the NCAA Tournament. Those other two promptly failed at DePaul (although Wainwright did go to the NIT) and I expect failure out of this new guy as well.

I would have liked to see them hire an assistant at a good program that's under the age of 40. They haven't really done that since the first Leitao hire.


Not comparable. Wainwright was a total clown.


Wainwright had more success than any of the guys who followed him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group