It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 6:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33732
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65731
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Franky T wrote:
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)

I mean you can see the rover tracks still on the moon in lunar surveyor pics.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
It's an engineering problem. The guys that went to the moon in the 60s were using methods that aren't taught today. Also today, most of the materials available are different, so all of that 'knowledge' doesn't even apply let alone compare at all.

Basically, if you took the engineers from the 60s and told them to run spaceX, they wouldn't be able to.

But also, if you look at what they did back then with the technology they had, it's unbelievable. Engineers today would not be able to get to the moon without their computers they have now. In that sense, yes it's a joke how far backward we went. But I do think we're back on track, that seems obvious.

I also understand the WHY question. My only response to that is why not, because what else are we going to do, give migrants credit cards?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
Darkside wrote:
Franky T wrote:
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)

I mean you can see the rover tracks still on the moon in lunar surveyor pics.

Then why is it so hard to even get a rocket launched and back to earth these days with all the technology we have now, when we went to the moon and back in 1972? Just do it!

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Spaulding wrote:
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33732
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
IkeSouth wrote:
It's an engineering problem. The guys that went to the moon in the 60s were using methods that aren't taught today. Also today, most of the materials available are different, so all of that 'knowledge' doesn't even apply let alone compare at all.

Basically, if you took the engineers from the 60s and told them to run spaceX, they wouldn't be able to.

But also, if you look at what they did back then with the technology they had, it's unbelievable. Engineers today would not be able to get to the moon without their computers they have now. In that sense, yes it's a joke how far backward we went. But I do think we're back on track, that seems obvious.

I also understand the WHY question. My only response to that is why not, because what else are we going to do, give migrants credit cards?


I'd be booking it to MoCaFi or wherever and saying Me llamo Maria. Donde esta mi dinero?

Officials say it will save the city $7.2 million a year. Sure it will.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
Nas wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.

Where are you going to go? They can barely get a rocket up into space these days. I'll go ahead and start the RIP - Nas (2035) thread.
Quote:
God speed, Nas

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33732
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Nas wrote:

I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.


It's not very green and whenever you get to where you are going you are going to have a hell of a time producing clean energy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Spaulding wrote:
Nas wrote:

I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.


It's not very green and whenever you get to where you are going you are going to have a hell of a time producing clean energy.


The point is to conquer and pillage all of the planets

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Franky T wrote:
Nas wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.

Where are you going to go? They can barely get a rocket up into space these days. I'll go ahead and start the RIP - Nas (2035) thread.
Quote:
God speed, Nas


It's not about you or me; it's about advancing the ball ahead so future generations can build on it.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
Nas wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Nas wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.

Where are you going to go? They can barely get a rocket up into space these days. I'll go ahead and start the RIP - Nas (2035) thread.
Quote:
God speed, Nas


It's not about you or me; it's about advancing the ball ahead so future generations can build on it.

I wonder who will get to escape the next mass extinction? I can promise it won't be people like you or me.
Image

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Franky T wrote:
Nas wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Nas wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
I like a lot of the inventions and products we have because of the space exploration program but I think space exploration is stupid as fuck. A waste of time, money, and resources.


I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.

Where are you going to go? They can barely get a rocket up into space these days. I'll go ahead and start the RIP - Nas (2035) thread.
Quote:
God speed, Nas


It's not about you or me; it's about advancing the ball ahead so future generations can build on it.

I wonder who will get to escape the next mass extinction? I can promise it won't be people like you or me.
Image


Maybe our descendants will be unbelievably rich and get a seat on that vehicle. Outside of that, you're right.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It's not linear though. Physics says we are not leaving the sun. Right now, the best I can see, is an AI ship holding embryos for thousands of years until it can reach another planet and then also raise them long enough to fuck and copy. Does that sound feasible?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16439
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It’s amazing that it took all of human history to get to the Wright brothers’ flight, and then less than 70 years after that to get to the moon and back. It is sad that the last 50 years haven’t seen the same rate of progress.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It’s amazing that it took all of human history to get to the Wright brothers’ flight, and then less than 70 years after that to get to the moon and back. It is sad that the last 50 years haven’t seen the same rate of progress.


We've made a lot of significant space advancements since then. We had already kicked the Russians teeth in. It wasn't worth the cost to continue traveling to the moon, apparently. The reduction in government funding set some things back.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It’s amazing that it took all of human history to get to the Wright brothers’ flight, and then less than 70 years after that to get to the moon and back. It is sad that the last 50 years haven’t seen the same rate of progress.


Unmanned space exploration has resulted in far more remarkable discoveries than sending humans to the moon did.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:51 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It’s amazing that it took all of human history to get to the Wright brothers’ flight, and then less than 70 years after that to get to the moon and back. It is sad that the last 50 years haven’t seen the same rate of progress.


We've made a lot of significant space advancements since then. We had already kicked the Russians teeth in. It wasn't worth the cost to continue traveling to the moon, apparently. The reduction in government funding set some things back.


I know plenty of space scientists/planetary geologists involved with NASA, and they all want to "return to the moon".

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 6:47 am
Posts: 1191
pizza_Place: Bennys
IkeSouth wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
Nas wrote:

I think it's great. I think we should invest more money into it. That investment may play a significant role in helping us prevent or escape the next mass extinction.


It's not very green and whenever you get to where you are going you are going to have a hell of a time producing clean energy.


The point is to conquer and pillage all of the planets

Yes we need to build and mine the moon. Maybe we can drill and frack on the moon. See if we can’t fuck that up so bad it eventually fucks everything up on earth. I think the moon plays a fairly important role for earth, it might be best to leave it alone.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mulli is Howard Stern in his prime compared to Haugh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
IkeSouth wrote:
Nas wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
The argument is valid though. No matter how much we advance, will we ever get out of the solar system? Physics says HAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAGAGA


Look how far we've come over the past 200 years. You can't imagine the growth we'll see in the next 200 years. They'll look at us like we were cavemen.


It's not linear though. Physics says we are not leaving the sun. Right now, the best I can see, is an AI ship holding embryos for thousands of years until it can reach another planet and then also raise them long enough to fuck and copy. Does that sound feasible?

Rumor is traveling great distances is via another dimension.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Franky T wrote:
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)


I dont believe we ever had a man on the moon, til this day nobody has.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
We have a better chance at terraforming mars then finding another suitable planet in another solar system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Franky T wrote:
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)


I'm the right age be fascinated with astronauts. One of my earliest memories was listening to the moon landing on a transistor radio while my family was at a picnic. I loved the space program as a kid. The Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo guys were like modern day cowboys to me.

I once made a girlfriend really mad when we were at the Adler Planetarium and I was trying to express the emotions the Apollo capsule brought out in me. She was a lot younger than I am and I made the mistake of trying to explain the difference between these guys and Space Shuttle riders and I said, "Anyone can do that. They're sending female teachers and guys from NSYNC up on those things."

It absolutely never would have occurred to me that the moon landings were faked. If someone had suggested such I would have scoffed. In fact, years later I was playing chess with two Russian friends who did suggest it and I did scoff. But these guys kept ridiculing me as a credulous fool until I started to think about the stuff you mention.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
In 50 plus years no other country has done it? I call horseshit. A TV weighed 300 lbs and a computer was the size of my garage 50 years ago. The advances in tech would make a man on the moon a simple task today if we truly accomplished it 50 plus years ago.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82060
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Franky T wrote:
First, let me say I am not a conspiracy guy and I haven't read about or watched conspiracy videos about the moon landing being staged. I've just always found it strange that space travel seems so hard now, but in the early 1970's we were able to go to the moon and back.

I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....we barely landed an unmanned spacecraft on the moon today. But we supposedly landed a manned spacecraft there 52 years ago? Why should it be so hard to do it again?

https://frontier.yahoo.com/news/watch-l ... 32673.html

Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers " Californication" (1999)


I'm the right age be fascinated with astronauts. One of my earliest memories was listening to the moon landing on a transistor radio while my family was at a picnic. I loved the space program as a kid. The Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo guys were like modern day cowboys to me.

I once made a girlfriend really mad when we were at the Adler Planetarium and I was trying to express the emotions the Apollo capsule brought out in me. She was a lot younger than I am and I made the mistake of trying to explain the difference between these guys and Space Shuttle riders and I said, "Anyone can do that. They're sending female teachers and guys from NSYNC up on those things."

It absolutely never would have occurred to me that the moon landings were faked. If someone had suggested such I would have scoffed. In fact, years later I was playing chess with two Russian friends who did suggest it and I did scoff. But these guys kept ridiculing me as a credulous fool until I started to think about the stuff you mention.


The Russians THEMSELVES landed on Venus.

It's all so silly.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Spaulding wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
It's an engineering problem. The guys that went to the moon in the 60s were using methods that aren't taught today. Also today, most of the materials available are different, so all of that 'knowledge' doesn't even apply let alone compare at all.

Basically, if you took the engineers from the 60s and told them to run spaceX, they wouldn't be able to.

But also, if you look at what they did back then with the technology they had, it's unbelievable. Engineers today would not be able to get to the moon without their computers they have now. In that sense, yes it's a joke how far backward we went. But I do think we're back on track, that seems obvious.

I also understand the WHY question. My only response to that is why not, because what else are we going to do, give migrants credit cards?


I'd be booking it to MoCaFi or wherever and saying Me llamo Maria. Donde esta mi dinero?

Officials say it will save the city $7.2 million a year. Sure it will.


Yo habla eapanol muy bien!

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon landing
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Thr Russians claimed they landed on Venus, the heat and pressure probably crushed their vessel like a tin can.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group