Hey everyone,

I have been a longtime listener of Carmen & Jurko and really enjoy their dynamic, but lately I've been curious about how others feel regarding their chemistry and the overall format of the show.

It seems like Carmen tends to take a more analytical approach, focusing on stats and breaking down the intricacies of the games, while Jurko brings in the energy, personality, and often, some pretty bold opinions. Personally, I think that balance works well, but sometimes it feels like they stray too far off the main sports topics, which can be both entertaining and a little frustrating depending on my mood.

For example, there are days when I appreciate the random stories or tangents they go on because it gives the show more of a laid-back, conversational feel. But other times, especially after a big game or when there's breaking news in the sports world, I kind of want them to stick to the relevant topics and dive deep into those discussions.

I'm wondering what others think – Need some help for year-end criticsalteryx do you enjoy the mix of sports talk and casual banter, or would you prefer a more structured format? Do you think their chemistry is as strong as it used to be, or has it shifted over the years? Also, are there any particular segments that you think they should bring back or spend more time on?

Looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts!

Thanks!

Even with their flaws better than the woke Score trash.

Ok, who's shitty mult is this?

_________________

Even crappy AI should be able to figure out Carmen is the nerdy guy and Jurko is the dumb jock. It was okay but I don't listen anymore because Jurko is far too right wing for sports radio. Go back to Indiana and stay there!

NSJ's.

Is he still around here stalking Spaulding?

_________________

Anytime they start talking about movies I ptfb

Jurko the goofy comedian can be a rough listen.