It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16822
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Lions play a 1st place schedule 2024: Bills, @Cowgirls, @Texan/Stroud, @Niners, Rams/Stafford looking for revenge among their games. Also, good chance they have an almost-made-the-super-bowl-but-our-coach-is-a-dumbass hangover from last season.


O'Connell and the Vikings strike out getting a QB in the draft--and maybe even if they draft a QB--do they dial/snapchat/facetime/swipe-right-on-QB-tinder TB12
.
NFC team easiest path back to the Super Bowl for Brady. NFC South easiest division; but he's already been-there, done-that with the Bucs and Falcons/Saints heavily invested in Cousins/Carr.

2 best potential Brady landing-spots in terms of roster/QB need and path-of-least-resistance to SBXI for TB12 are in the NFC North.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 8:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?


We're about 10 days away. What do you think? What are your expectations?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
good dolphin wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.


I don't know. The older safeties can suddenly become big liabilities. Eddie was a pro bowl guy who became said liability did he not? I was hoping for the tight end from Texas in the 3rd rd. He would have been a terrific addition.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
The Hawk wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.


I don't know. The older safeties can suddenly become big liabilities. Eddie was a pro bowl guy who became said liability did he not? I was hoping for the tight end from Texas in the 3rd rd. He would have been a terrific addition.



Eddie was a 4th round draft pick because he came into the league injured. We got everything we could have possibly expected out of of a 4th rounder and then the injuries piled up. It wasn't age that got him.

Byard has pretty much never been injured. However, that guy they took from the packers is pretty good depth if something freakish happens in Byard's career.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
NME wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable


He played in 13 games last year and had 3219 total yards for an average of 247.6 yards/game.

Let's hope Waldron eases Williams into things by incorporating plays and concepts from the USC offense.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable


He played in 13 games last year and had 3219 total yards for an average of 247.6 yards/game.

Let's hope Waldron eases Williams into things by incorporating plays and concepts from the USC offense.


Other than some read option things, I hope he ignores that playbook. Every former professional quarterback who watched it his film was puzzled by the route concepts and the things Alm18ghty Caleb was asked to do.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 10:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 342
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
Lions pass defense when blitzing = last in league

Lions pass defense when not blitzing = top 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 342
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
Before week1 odds to win the division
Lions were the chalk
Green Bay was around +225
Bears were +275
Minnesota was in the 10/1 to 12/1 range

Now after 2 weeks
Detroit -103
Minnesota +290
GreenBay +400
Bears +800


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
ShortTimeLurker wrote:
Before week1 odds to win the division
Lions were the chalk
Green Bay was around +225
Bears were +275
Minnesota was in the 10/1 to 12/1 range

Now after 2 weeks
Detroit -103
Minnesota +290
GreenBay +400
Bears +800

A good marker game to see where the Vikings are at. It appears that maybe possibly Darnold's light bulb went on after his time in SF last year? This is a great game to find out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 342
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
I heard Gannon say that Minnesota has been able to get Darnold to "stay in his lane"
I guess that means no "hero ball"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
ShortTimeLurker wrote:
I heard Gannon say that Minnesota has been able to get Darnold to "stay in his lane"
I guess that means no "hero ball"

No QB in history gets away with never playing hero ball. It's in the job description.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 342
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
Gannon had "the talk" with Darnold about protecting the ball.

https://www.purpleinsider.football/p/ca ... -next-rich


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Bears offense can be a tough out for anyone if they stick to this formula. Run the ball, let Caleb manage the game and be patient for opportunities to open up the pass as the game goes on. Let the defense and special teams do their thing.


Still sticking with them being a 9 win team (roughly) but I like what I’ve seen these last two weeks. Calebs slowly starting to let things come to him and relying on his check downs and what the defense gives him early.


There’s still going to be some bumps in the road as the holes on this team are still there (looking at you O-line).. and Caleb is still going to have rookie moments.. but we’re seeing nice progress where there needs to be progress

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
NME wrote:
Bears offense can be a tough out for anyone if they stick to this formula. Run the ball, let Caleb manage the game and be patient for opportunities to open up the pass as the game goes on. Let the defense and special teams do their thing.


Still sticking with them being a 9 win team (roughly) but I like what I’ve seen these last two weeks. Calebs slowly starting to let things come to him and relying on his check downs and what the defense gives him early.


There’s still going to be some bumps in the road as the holes on this team are still there (looking at you O-line).. and Caleb is still going to have rookie moments.. but we’re seeing nice progress where there needs to be progress

300 yards as a game manager is pretty good.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears offense can be a tough out for anyone if they stick to this formula. Run the ball, let Caleb manage the game and be patient for opportunities to open up the pass as the game goes on. Let the defense and special teams do their thing.


Still sticking with them being a 9 win team (roughly) but I like what I’ve seen these last two weeks. Calebs slowly starting to let things come to him and relying on his check downs and what the defense gives him early.


There’s still going to be some bumps in the road as the holes on this team are still there (looking at you O-line).. and Caleb is still going to have rookie moments.. but we’re seeing nice progress where there needs to be progress

300 yards as a game manager is pretty good.




I didn’t say ‘game manager’ -I said manage the game meaning let it come to you.


A lot of check downs and dump offs early lead to bigger things later. That’s how most good offenses with good/great QB’s seem to operate. For some reason Waldron tried to get more downfield stuff right out of the gate in the 1st few games. His game plans made little sense for a rookie QB early on.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
NME wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears offense can be a tough out for anyone if they stick to this formula. Run the ball, let Caleb manage the game and be patient for opportunities to open up the pass as the game goes on. Let the defense and special teams do their thing.


Still sticking with them being a 9 win team (roughly) but I like what I’ve seen these last two weeks. Calebs slowly starting to let things come to him and relying on his check downs and what the defense gives him early.


There’s still going to be some bumps in the road as the holes on this team are still there (looking at you O-line).. and Caleb is still going to have rookie moments.. but we’re seeing nice progress where there needs to be progress

300 yards as a game manager is pretty good.




I didn’t say ‘game manager’ -I said manage the game meaning let it come to you.


A lot of check downs and dump offs early lead to bigger things later. That’s how most good offenses with good/great QB’s seem to operate. For some reason Waldron tried to get more downfield stuff right out of the gate in the 1st few games. His game plans made little sense for a rookie QB early on.

Something to watch…Caleb may be elite in the screen game. He fits the ball into short, tight windows and sells it very well.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2024 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30320
Well the Bears should be comfortable in the division standings now.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1140
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Nardi wrote:
ShortTimeLurker wrote:
I heard Gannon say that Minnesota has been able to get Darnold to "stay in his lane"
I guess that means no "hero ball"

No QB in history gets away with never playing hero ball. It's in the job description.

Sure they do. Russell Wilson and Peyton Manning (in Denver) both got rings being carried by insanely good rosters that made things easy for them. It’s a replicable strategy, but nobody except San Francisco league-wide seems interested in replicating it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juiced wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Phil Leotardo wrote:
Green Bay under 10.5 is the best bet. Recency bias makes that total way too high. People forget how average they were the first half of the season.

Maybe they were going thru growing pains.

yeah thats a dumb take by phil. its pretty easy to explain how the youngest team in the NFL got better as the season progressed.


Pretty sure a healthy Aaron Jones contributed to their second half success. GB going to suck without him.

good call dumbass :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7181
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Hawg Ass wrote:
Well the Bears should be comfortable in the division standings now.


:lol:

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 6:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
It may be harder to win the North than it is to win the Super Bowl.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Has a 4-2 team ever been in last place?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 342
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
Bears adjusted win total 6.5 under -50 @ DK


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group