It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 331 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
:lol: What? I don't bring up anyone's sports-playing history. And I don't care that your high school let you carry the water, Radio, that doesn't trump the photographic evidence earlier in the thread that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.


Your "photographic" evidence only validated just how much of a miraculous catch it would have needed to be dumbass!

It wouldn't have been a "miraculous catch" for a receiver to hold onto a thrown ball that he was able to get the palm of his hand around the ball. You're delusional, Radio.


One handed catches are "miraculous" you stupid motherfucker

So we've gone from you arguing that the ball hit Allen on the "fingertips" to you conceding that, yes, the ball hit him in the palm, but only of one hand, and he would have needed to make a one-handed catch. Can we just skip forward to where you concede that if he turned his other hand over he could have easily had the completion, please?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.


Just to reiterate. Golf is his primary sport.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24087
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Very good game from Caleb. Sure he fucked it on the sack in OT, but still. Very solid.

The D looks fully cooked. They need about three more pass rushers and a surgeon to remove Johnson’s head from his ass.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
NME wrote:
Well, another deserved loss tbh.



Flus just calls essentially prevent style soft zone all the way down the damn field, refuses to send extra pressure and allows a great receiving core all kinds of time to sit in huge zone holes giving up big plays


Brown called a great game today and Caleb played great overall but.. Caleb fucks up bad taking that sack in OT and there goes your best opportunity to nail it shut


All around losing football at the end of the game there.




Also, Bears fuck up by passing on taking 3 earlier in the game and going for 2 when they didn’t have too so coaching still costing games.


Bright side is Eberlose gets another loss that should push him closer to being out the door. Still it hurts to lose like this to a rival. No two ways about it.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
:lol: What? I don't bring up anyone's sports-playing history. And I don't care that your high school let you carry the water, Radio, that doesn't trump the photographic evidence earlier in the thread that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.


Your "photographic" evidence only validated just how much of a miraculous catch it would have needed to be dumbass!

It wouldn't have been a "miraculous catch" for a receiver to hold onto a thrown ball that he was able to get the palm of his hand around the ball. You're delusional, Radio.


One handed catches are "miraculous" you stupid motherfucker

So we've gone from you arguing that the ball hit Allen on the "fingertips" to you conceding that, yes, the ball hit him in the palm, but only of one hand, and he would have needed to make a one-handed catch. Can we just skip forward to where you concede that if he turned his other hand over he could have easily had the completion, please?

Hey Dumbass do you not realize that if Keenan Allen has to extend just to get a hand on it that it was a "bad throw"? Which is what I originally stated. You agreed with the dude who claimed that it was "in his hands" and then proceeded to provide a picture which demonstrated that it was not.
At what point will your stupid ass give it up?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Maybe the football wizards smile on the Bears and somehow the 9ers let Shanny loose after 8 years of not getting over the hump.. and the Bears snag him up



I can dream right?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT




They were still mixing man and zone and sending extra rushers on the Bears last couple of drives in regulation.. not sure what you’re talking about here

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24087
pizza_Place: Pizanos
NME wrote:
NME wrote:
Well, another deserved loss tbh.



Flus just calls essentially prevent style soft zone all the way down the damn field, refuses to send extra pressure and allows a great receiving core all kinds of time to sit in huge zone holes giving up big plays


Brown called a great game today and Caleb played great overall but.. Caleb fucks up bad taking that sack in OT and there goes your best opportunity to nail it shut


All around losing football at the end of the game there.




Also, Bears fuck up by passing on taking 3 earlier in the game and going for 2 when they didn’t have too so coaching still costing games.


Bright side is Eberlose gets another loss that should push him closer to being out the door. Still it hurts to lose like this to a rival. No two ways about it.

I don’t think you can go back like that and assume everything else remains the same. They lucked into the onside recovery. The 2pt strategy played out almost exactly by-the-book.

I want Flus gone but I actually thought he wasn’t coaching from a place of fear for the first time maybe ever.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.

This thought process has simply never led to success. Not even trying to goad you or shit in your cheerios, but it doesn’t work. It never has worked, and the Bears will not be the first it works for.

See, this is bait to compare Caleb Williams to QBs we know turned out to be great who struggled in their rookie seasons, so you can reductio ad absurdum at the fact that I put Caleb Williams and Peyton Manning in the same sentence. But the reality is that plenty of rookie QBs have gone out and struggled only to achieve success later, or even be average or slightly above. And here we have a rookie QB who has seemingly overcome mid-season struggles to again perform at a high level despite his head coach losing games for him.

Your personal ideological beliefs are clouding your judgment, as evidenced by your constant referencing of DEI when it comes to Williams specifically. If you think you've covered up that tick sufficiently you're wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1219
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Passing up the field goal to go for it on 4th & 4 because the crowd boo’d him was very bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1219
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.

This thought process has simply never led to success. Not even trying to goad you or shit in your cheerios, but it doesn’t work. It never has worked, and the Bears will not be the first it works for.

See, this is bait to compare Caleb Williams to QBs we know turned out to be great who struggled in their rookie seasons, so you can reductio ad absurdum at the fact that I put Caleb Williams and Peyton Manning in the same sentence. But the reality is that plenty of rookie QBs have gone out and struggled only to achieve success later, or even be average or slightly above. And here we have a rookie QB who has seemingly overcome mid-season struggles to again perform at a high level despite his head coach losing games for him.

Your personal ideological beliefs are clouding your judgment, as evidenced by your constant referencing of DEI when it comes to Williams specifically. If you think you've covered up that tick sufficiently you're wrong.

He’s not Peyton Manning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.


Just to reiterate. Golf is his primary sport.

:lol: Got him. Do you remember posting the same thing about Justin Fields late in his 2nd year in the league?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.

This thought process has simply never led to success. Not even trying to goad you or shit in your cheerios, but it doesn’t work. It never has worked, and the Bears will not be the first it works for.

See, this is bait to compare Caleb Williams to QBs we know turned out to be great who struggled in their rookie seasons, so you can reductio ad absurdum at the fact that I put Caleb Williams and Peyton Manning in the same sentence. But the reality is that plenty of rookie QBs have gone out and struggled only to achieve success later, or even be average or slightly above. And here we have a rookie QB who has seemingly overcome mid-season struggles to again perform at a high level despite his head coach losing games for him.

Your personal ideological beliefs are clouding your judgment, as evidenced by your constant referencing of DEI when it comes to Williams specifically. If you think you've covered up that tick sufficiently you're wrong.

He’s not Peyton Manning.

You did the thing I literally said you were going to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT




They were still mixing man and zone and sending extra rushers on the Bears last couple of drives in regulation.. not sure what you’re talking about here


Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.


Just to reiterate. Golf is his primary sport.

:lol: Got him. Do you remember posting the same thing about Justin Fields late in his 2nd year in the league?


Justin Fields 2nd year team was obviously tanking you stupid motherfucker. They were literally playing for draft positioning dumbass. Or are you just that stupid that you do not understand this? I was quite comfortable with that because they didn't have anything to play for other than that.
This team is quite different..Or are you too stupid to understand the difference in the "construction" of the 2 teams? Or what tanking constitutes?
Just Asking A Question

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1219
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.

This thought process has simply never led to success. Not even trying to goad you or shit in your cheerios, but it doesn’t work. It never has worked, and the Bears will not be the first it works for.

See, this is bait to compare Caleb Williams to QBs we know turned out to be great who struggled in their rookie seasons, so you can reductio ad absurdum at the fact that I put Caleb Williams and Peyton Manning in the same sentence. But the reality is that plenty of rookie QBs have gone out and struggled only to achieve success later, or even be average or slightly above. And here we have a rookie QB who has seemingly overcome mid-season struggles to again perform at a high level despite his head coach losing games for him.

Your personal ideological beliefs are clouding your judgment, as evidenced by your constant referencing of DEI when it comes to Williams specifically. If you think you've covered up that tick sufficiently you're wrong.

He’s not Peyton Manning.

You did the thing I literally said you were going to do.

You can’t just play this little rhetorical trick of “If I get out in front of saying something isn’t absurd then I can say whatever absurd shit I want” like I’m too stupid to know what exactly it is you are doing.

Caleb Williams got thoroughly outplayed by Sam Darnold today. You cannot take that outcome and extrapolate Peyton Manning onto it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.





Without rewatching I can’t say for certain what the % of the calls were but the point is they absolutely brought extra pressure and manned up at times late in the game.


Unlike the Bears who did absolutely none of that on the final OT drive.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.





Without rewatching I can’t say for certain what the % of the calls were but the point is they absolutely brought extra pressure and manned up at times late in the game.


Unlike the Bears who did absolutely none of that on the final OT drive.


Sweat got a sack on that last drive. WYC?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.


Just to reiterate. Golf is his primary sport.

:lol: Got him. Do you remember posting the same thing about Justin Fields late in his 2nd year in the league?


Hey dumbass. You've spent the entirety of today whining about the Defense. Have you ever conceived that the Bears had the worst defense in the league during his 2nd year in the league

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 789
pizza_Place: Marie's
Keep blaming Eberflus. Ownership is a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.

This thought process has simply never led to success. Not even trying to goad you or shit in your cheerios, but it doesn’t work. It never has worked, and the Bears will not be the first it works for.

See, this is bait to compare Caleb Williams to QBs we know turned out to be great who struggled in their rookie seasons, so you can reductio ad absurdum at the fact that I put Caleb Williams and Peyton Manning in the same sentence. But the reality is that plenty of rookie QBs have gone out and struggled only to achieve success later, or even be average or slightly above. And here we have a rookie QB who has seemingly overcome mid-season struggles to again perform at a high level despite his head coach losing games for him.

Your personal ideological beliefs are clouding your judgment, as evidenced by your constant referencing of DEI when it comes to Williams specifically. If you think you've covered up that tick sufficiently you're wrong.

He’s not Peyton Manning.

You did the thing I literally said you were going to do.

You can’t just play this little rhetorical trick of “If I get out in front of saying something isn’t absurd then I can say whatever absurd shit I want” like I’m too stupid to know what exactly it is you are doing.

Caleb Williams got thoroughly outplayed by Sam Darnold today. You cannot take that outcome and extrapolate Peyton Manning onto it.

I'm not comparing/projecting Caleb Williams with Peyton Manning, I'm saying that history shows that MANY rookie QBs who late find some amount of success can struggle in their rookie seasons, meaning that rookie season struggling is not necessarily indicative of being a poor NFL QB talent. I just merely pointed out that you try to bait people to mention the rookie struggles of famous QBs so you can faint in a chair at the absurdity of mentioning a rookie QB in the same manner as a HoFer or other great QB. It's just a cheap trick. Of course you are also "convinced" (you're not, it's an obvious bit) that through 11 games Williams is worthless, despite his performance today leading TWO improbable comeback drives to force OT against a good team after you argues that he only performed well against bums.

You hate woke DEI and you hate the Bears, but honestly I can't tell which hate is driving this bus of forced stupidity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't really mind the loss all that much. It's clear the Bears have a QB worth building around. This season is all about his development, moral victories and all that.


Just to reiterate. Golf is his primary sport.

:lol: Got him. Do you remember posting the same thing about Justin Fields late in his 2nd year in the league?


Hey dumbass. You've spent the entirety of today whining about the Defense. Have you ever conceived that the Bears had the worst defense in the league during his 2nd year in the league

Is that really the argument you want to make, that Justin Fields was bad in his first few years because the defense performed poorly? Think about that for a second, Radio.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.





Without rewatching I can’t say for certain what the % of the calls were but the point is they absolutely brought extra pressure and manned up at times late in the game.


Unlike the Bears who did absolutely none of that on the final OT drive.


Sweat got a sack on that last drive. WYC?




That’s great. But he’s not an ‘extra’ rusher and the Bears still ran soft zone on that last drive allowing big chunks of yards. Your reply here does not refute my actual point.


They sat back in soft zone and allowed the Queens to work down the field.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT

They were still mixing man and zone and sending extra rushers on the Bears last couple of drives in regulation.. not sure what you’re talking about here


Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.

It's time to remind everyone that this was your spin when Justin Fields was down three scores to the Colts earlier this year:

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
That's why I can comment on his leading 3 consecutive touchdown drives in order to keep them in the game while you have the commentary of Fields haters to go off of


Note the lack of "playing time and score" when talking about the performance of Justin Fields against a defense that was up 3 scores.

You're a hopelessly special football prognosticator, Radio.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT

They were still mixing man and zone and sending extra rushers on the Bears last couple of drives in regulation.. not sure what you’re talking about here


Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.

It's time to remind everyone that this was your spin when Justin Fields was down three scores to the Colts earlier this year:

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
That's why I can comment on his leading 3 consecutive touchdown drives in order to keep them in the game while you have the commentary of Fields haters to go off of


Note the lack of "playing time and score" when talking about the performance of Justin Fields against a defense that was up 3 scores.

You're a hopelessly special football prognosticator, Radio.


Hey Dumbass. You-ve spent the entirety of today complaining about the defense. Have you ever bothered to note that the Bears had the worst defense in the NFL during Fields 2nd year in the league? Just Asking A Question

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1219
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'm not comparing/projecting Caleb Williams with Peyton Manning, I'm saying that history shows that MANY rookie QBs who late find some amount of success can struggle in their rookie seasons, meaning that rookie season struggling is not necessarily indicative of being a poor NFL QB talent. I just merely pointed out that you try to bait people to mention the rookie struggles of famous QBs so you can faint in a chair at the absurdity of mentioning a rookie QB in the same manner as a HoFer or other great QB. It's just a cheap trick. Of course you are also "convinced" (you're not, it's an obvious bit) that through 11 games Williams is worthless, despite his performance today leading TWO improbable comeback drives to force OT against a good team after you argues that he only performed well against bums.

You hate woke DEI and you hate the Bears, but honestly I can't tell which hate is driving this bus of forced stupidity.

See, you can’t even admit to yourself that he Sam Darnold looked better than him today. A guy you could’ve had off the scrap heap outplayed your first overall pick and now you’re in another cope spiral pretending that this loss is Actually A Win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
NME wrote:
Bears playing these soft fucking zones

So was Minnesota. Which is precisely how the Bears were able to send it to OT

They were still mixing man and zone and sending extra rushers on the Bears last couple of drives in regulation.. not sure what you’re talking about here


Minnesota was up 2 touchdowns and took their foot off the gas in the 4th. It's clear that they were playing time and score after going up 14 points. They weren't manning up with the Bears all that much. Particularly so unless the Bears got into the Red Zone.

It's time to remind everyone that this was your spin when Justin Fields was down three scores to the Colts earlier this year:

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
That's why I can comment on his leading 3 consecutive touchdown drives in order to keep them in the game while you have the commentary of Fields haters to go off of


Note the lack of "playing time and score" when talking about the performance of Justin Fields against a defense that was up 3 scores.

You're a hopelessly special football prognosticator, Radio.


Hey Dumbass. You-ve spent the entirety of today complaining about the defense. Have you ever bothered to note that the Bears had the worst defense in the NFL during Fields 2nd year in the league? Just Asking A Question

Justin Fields was not impacted by the defense of the 2022 Chicago Bears in Week 4 of the 2024 NFL season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 10051
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
That's why I can comment on his leading 3 consecutive touchdown drives in order to keep them in the game while you have the commentary of Fields haters to go off of


Note the lack of "playing time and score" when talking about the performance of Justin Fields against a defense that was up 3 scores.

You're a hopelessly special football prognosticator, Radio.


Just to reiterate. He plays Golf as his primary sport. The first of Justin Fields TD scoring drives occurred at the 2:53 mark of the 3rd with his team down 17-3 at the time. Which isn't "time and score time" you stupid motherfucker

Quote:
1st Quarter
PIT IND
Indianapolis Colts
TD12:01
Jonathan Taylor 2 Yd Run (Matt Gay Kick)
0 7
Indianapolis Colts
TD2:34
Josh Downs 4 Yd pass from Joe Flacco (Matt Gay Kick)
0 14
2nd Quarter
PIT IND
Indianapolis Colts
FG12:31
Matt Gay 33 Yd Field Goal
0 17
Pittsburgh Steelers
FG0:00
Chris Boswell 50 Yd Field Goal
3 17
3rd Quarter
PIT IND
Pittsburgh Steelers
TD2:53
Justin Fields 5 Yd Run (Chris Boswell Kick)
10 17

4th Quarter
PIT IND
Indianapolis Colts
TD14:43
Drew Ogletree 15 Yd pass from Joe Flacco (Matt Gay Kick)
10 24
Pittsburgh Steelers
TD11:23
Justin Fields 2 Yd Run (Chris Boswell Kick)
17 24

Indianapolis Colts
FG6:03
Matt Gay 35 Yd Field Goal
17 27
Pittsburgh Steelers
TD3:40
Pat Freiermuth 8 Yd pass from Justin Fields (Chris Boswell Kick)
24 27

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vikings @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
USA wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'm not comparing/projecting Caleb Williams with Peyton Manning, I'm saying that history shows that MANY rookie QBs who late find some amount of success can struggle in their rookie seasons, meaning that rookie season struggling is not necessarily indicative of being a poor NFL QB talent. I just merely pointed out that you try to bait people to mention the rookie struggles of famous QBs so you can faint in a chair at the absurdity of mentioning a rookie QB in the same manner as a HoFer or other great QB. It's just a cheap trick. Of course you are also "convinced" (you're not, it's an obvious bit) that through 11 games Williams is worthless, despite his performance today leading TWO improbable comeback drives to force OT against a good team after you argues that he only performed well against bums.

You hate woke DEI and you hate the Bears, but honestly I can't tell which hate is driving this bus of forced stupidity.

See, you can’t even admit to yourself that he Sam Darnold looked better than him today. A guy you could’ve had off the scrap heap outplayed your first overall pick and now you’re in another cope spiral pretending that this loss is Actually A Win.

I don't think Sam Darnold could have done half of what Caleb Williams was tasked with doing today, Caleb's athleticism and arm talent were miles ahead of of his QB competition. Darnold played an overhyped defense coached by a noted idiot, and won with an assist from a poorly coached special teams unit (if you want to be Big Mad about DEI, here's the spot).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 331 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group