It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 2:47 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1030 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 35  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
:lol: The Doctor Of Caveats.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
It's also hilarious that he happened to choose the Bears offense of the last 8 games. I wonder why 9 and 10 aren't included.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
:lol: The Doctor Of Caveats.


So now you are willing to say that 3rd and 4th Quarters don't count? OK let's do it.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Bears were not 4-4 and did not put up 25ppg in his last 8 games.


Yes they did. He was hurt in the first half of one of those games and didn't finish. That doesn't count. His last 8 full games as a Bear they avg 25 ppg. And went 5-3

Caleb's last 8 games they are 0-8 and avg 14 ppg and you're fallaciously claiming that he is still the better QB? Based on what? Your hatred of Justin Fields? Going to need a little more than that to go off of here

You’re just trying to shoehorn the Washington game in, while ignoring the Vikings game for some reason. He got injured while trailing in the 2nd half so whatever he did the rest of the way wouldn’t have counted anyway.

Scroll back through the posts and you’ll see I wanted Fields to do well. You on the other hand, have an irrational hatred of the Bears QB because you’re so deep into cult life you can’t see straight.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
It's also hilarious that he happened to choose the Bears offense of the last 8 games. I wonder why 9 and 10 aren't included.


We can count all of them and Fields still wins. The Bears offense was decidedly better with him as QB even when they tanked. At some point all of your trolling efforts just fall flat.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Bears were not 4-4 and did not put up 25ppg in his last 8 games.


Yes they did. He was hurt in the first half of one of those games and didn't finish. That doesn't count. His last 8 full games as a Bear they avg 25 ppg. And went 5-3

Caleb's last 8 games they are 0-8 and avg 14 ppg and you're fallaciously claiming that he is still the better QB? Based on what? Your hatred of Justin Fields? Going to need a little more than that to go off of here

You’re just trying to shoehorn the Washington game in, while ignoring the Vikings game for some reason. He got injured while trailing in the 2nd half so whatever he did the rest of the way wouldn’t have counted anyway.

Scroll back through the posts and you’ll see I wanted Fields to do well. You on the other hand, have an irrational hatred of the Bears QB because you’re so deep into cult life you can’t see straight.


Hold on for a second. Aren't you the same dude who repeatedly claims that it's wrong to ONLY count half the game when it comes to Caleb's4th QTR garbage time numbers? ONLY to now count less than HALF THE GAME? WYC

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
Scroll back through the posts and you’ll see I wanted Fields to do well. You on the other hand, have an irrational hatred of the Bears QB because you’re so deep into cult life you can’t see straight.


Does Chase Daniel hate him too? Because just the other day he flipped on him and said that he hasn't played very well this year.
I have to question the sanity of anyone who bucks for a dude that has played as bad as he has. I don't "hate" the guy. I just don't think he's particularly good and never bought into the hype. So far I've been correct in that assumption.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Nardi wrote:
On September 1st, there was guarded optimism for Caleb. There still is. I have guarded pessimism because of the organization. I have guarded pessimism over accuracy and an unwillingness to get rid of the football. He has to risk the interception because you can't learn where the line is until you cross it now and then. He needed to do it this year but he's refused. Why? is what I want to know.


Because he prefers to chase Stats as opposed to try and place his team in a position to win. He doesn't want the int stat on his stat line. It's the same thing NBA guys do when they refuse to Chuck the 60 foot heave at the end of qtrs because they don't want it to impact their shooting %

They don't refuse to chuck it. They just make sure the red light's on. The other open secret is the grenade tossed to the shitty teammate with 2 seconds on the shot clock.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It's also hilarious that he happened to choose the Bears offense of the last 8 games. I wonder why 9 and 10 aren't included.


We can count all of them and Fields still wins. The Bears offense was decidedly better with him as QB even when they tanked. At some point all of your trolling efforts just fall flat.

I would happily count full seasons. Which one are we counting again?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Bears were not 4-4 and did not put up 25ppg in his last 8 games.


Yes they did. He was hurt in the first half of one of those games and didn't finish. That doesn't count. His last 8 full games as a Bear they avg 25 ppg. And went 5-3

Caleb's last 8 games they are 0-8 and avg 14 ppg and you're fallaciously claiming that he is still the better QB? Based on what? Your hatred of Justin Fields? Going to need a little more than that to go off of here

You’re just trying to shoehorn the Washington game in, while ignoring the Vikings game for some reason. He got injured while trailing in the 2nd half so whatever he did the rest of the way wouldn’t have counted anyway.

Scroll back through the posts and you’ll see I wanted Fields to do well. You on the other hand, have an irrational hatred of the Bears QB because you’re so deep into cult life you can’t see straight.


Hold on for a second. Aren't you the same dude who repeatedly claims that it's wrong to ONLY count half the game when it comes to Caleb's4th QTR garbage time numbers? ONLY to now count less than HALF THE GAME? WYC

Yes it’s obviously wrong to ignore comeback performances. It’s a ridiculous line of thought.

But I’m arguing with the guy who insists second half stats don’t count so I’m trying to make sure we’re all following the rules.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
I don't "hate" the guy.

A bigger lie has never been told.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Yes it’s obviously wrong to ignore comeback performances. It’s a ridiculous line of thought.
.

It's silly to plac more value in his 4th qtr comebacks than it is the fact that in 8 of his games the Bears have scored 3 points or less in the 1st half. Or that they a avg a league worst 1 point in the 1st Quarter.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
I don't "hate" the guy.

A bigger lie has never been told.


I'm wondering why you profess the sort of love for someone who is the person chiefly responsible for the team performing as abysmally as it has performed

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
I don't "hate" the guy.

A bigger lie has never been told.


Edit

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Yes it’s obviously wrong to ignore comeback performances. It’s a ridiculous line of thought.
.

It's silly to place much more value on 4th comebacks that occur ONLY when games are essentially over and have yet to result in one win than it is the fact that in 8 of his games the Bears have scored 3 points or less in the 1st half. Or that they a avg a league worst 1 point in the 1st Quarter.

But the beauty of my view - and you’ll like this part - is that bad first half play is included in full game stats.

So look at a complete performance and you’ll get good & bad. Refuse to acknowledge good 2nd half results and you end up arguing that a game Justin Fields didn’t finish shouldn’t count in his stats because he got hurt in the 3rd quarter.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
[
Scroll back through the posts and you’ll see I wanted Fields to do well. You on the other hand, have an irrational hatred of the Bears QB because you’re so deep into cult life you can’t see straight.

I'm a Bears fan first and foremost. And my support of Justin Fields has to do with the belief that they would have been a much better team with him as QB than they are with "Generational Talent" Caleb. And there is nothing irrational about point out that the team is worse off with him as QB when they are in fact worse off. It's actually "irritational" to continually suggest otherwise. Which is what you constantly do on here.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Yes it’s obviously wrong to ignore comeback performances. It’s a ridiculous line of thought.
.

It's silly to place much more value on 4th comebacks that occur ONLY when games are essentially over and have yet to result in one win than it is the fact that in 8 of his games the Bears have scored 3 points or less in the 1st half. Or that they a avg a league worst 1 point in the 1st Quarter.

Not to put down comebacks, but the tire meets the road by what happens after the comeback. You have to give him credit in the GB & Wash game. You give him the blame in the Min & Det game.

So it's a mixed bag in those particular games. Now the other games. First 3 games-bad. Next 3 games-good. The other 4 games not mentioned above-bad.

So, two of the comeback games he screwed the pooch and then 7 complete pooches. And yes, it's not all his fault. He had Hitler for an OC and Mr Accountability for a HC.

The fact remains he has played poorly. More poorly than anticipated. And he has more fundamental problems than what we were lead to believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Nardi wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Yes it’s obviously wrong to ignore comeback performances. It’s a ridiculous line of thought.
.

It's silly to place much more value on 4th comebacks that occur ONLY when games are essentially over and have yet to result in one win than it is the fact that in 8 of his games the Bears have scored 3 points or less in the 1st half. Or that they a avg a league worst 1 point in the 1st Quarter.

Not to put down comebacks, but the tire meets the road by what happens after the comeback. You have to give him credit in the GB & Wash game. You give him the blame in the Min & Det game.

So it's a mixed bag in those particular games. Now the other games. First 3 games-bad. Next 3 games-good. The other 4 games not mentioned above-bad.

So, two of the comeback games he screwed the pooch and then 7 complete pooches. And yes, it's not all his fault. He had Hitler for an OC and Mr Accountability for a HC.

The fact remains he has played poorly. More poorly than anticipated. And he has more fundamental problems than what we were lead to believe.


Yep and no matter what any of his flock happens to say, none of them expected this. They were predicting a 9 or 10 win season this year and it looks as if they won't even half right.
Which is why it's oh so necessary for them to blast EVERYONE but Caleb foe the team's failures. EVEN guys with pedigrees that run much deeper than his.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
I don't "hate" the guy.

A bigger lie has never been told.


I'm wondering why you profess the sort of love for someone who is the person chiefly responsible for the team performing as abysmally as it has performed

That coming from a Fields Cultist is objectively hilarious.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

You thought Yards per game were more "meaningful" than points allowed Caddyshack. Now you're arguing that yards per game are more "meaningful" than points scored. Which renders you to be nothing more than an idiot.

And "the "He's Just A Rookie Thus it's cool for him to suck ass" is also a rather dubious position to take as well but then it is you we're talking about here.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7073
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
McCareins_Fan wrote:
And yet you keep coming back for more. :drunken:

If a guy is good or sucks or is ok or is fine…doesn’t matter how many months older/younger he is than his peers.

OK. If you truly believe this then let's stop with the 4th Year Justin Fields vs Rookie Caleb Garbage. I only started to hear this when Caleb started sucking as bad as he does. Before that all I heard was that he'd be better from the moment he laced em up as a Rookie at mini camp

I don’t know what you mean with “let’s stop…”

I’ve said repeatedly that Williams is better than Fields right now. He was better when he walked into camp and he’ll end the year with numbers Fields is incapable of putting up.


Only he isn't better right now however. The Bears offense was better the year they were tanking than it is now. Which says all you need to know about Caleb and his garbage time "numbers"


The Bears were not tanking last season. Fields sucked and couldn't take the next step. Stop with all this tanking excuse. Bears Defense was ranked 12th last year.

https://www.foxsports.com/articles/nfl/2023-nfl-defense-rankings-team-pass-and-rush-stats

Bears this year are ranked 24th and getting worse every game.

https://www.foxsports.com/articles/nfl/2024-nfl-defense-rankings-team-pass-and-rush-stats

Last year was Field's prove it year and he proved he was not the man to move forward with. MANY teams agreed and he ended up a back up in PITT.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

You thought Yards per game were more "meaningful" than points allowed Caddyshack. Now you're arguing that yards per game are more "meaningful" than points scored. Which renders you to be nothing more than an idiot.

Uh, yes, when comparing QBs I think it's important to compare and contrast the things QBs have more direct influence over like passing statistics rather than things that can be influenced by the running back, defense, and even special teams.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And "the "He's Just A Rookie Thus it's cool for him to suck ass" is also a rather dubious position to take as well but then it is you we're talking about here.


You made the same argument, remember, about a QB in his second year in the league:

Quote:
It looks as if the Bears now have a QB that they can build around. This season is all about his development. Rack up a ton of "moral victories" til the end of season and lock up a high draft pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:

The Bears were not tanking last season. Fields sucked and couldn't take the next step. Stop with all this tanking excuse. Bears Defense was ranked 12th last year.

https://www.foxsports.com/articles/nfl/2023-nfl-defense-rankings-team-pass-and-rush-stats

Bears this year are ranked 24th and getting worse every game.

https://www.foxsports.com/articles/nfl/2024-nfl-defense-rankings-team-pass-and-rush-stats

Last year was Field's prove it year and he proved he was not the man to move forward with. MANY teams agreed and he ended up a back up in PITT.


Yeah behind a Hall Of Famer who'd be starting over Caleb if he were on the Bears.

And if you are so sure that Justin Fields is nothing but a backup then throw the bread up which says you believe it. We know you won't do that now will ya?

Fact is the Fields is 9-5:in his last 14 games as a starter while Generational Talent Caleb is 4-10.
And while Caleb apologists such as yourself want to tag everyone (now it's the defense) the fact is that the 4-10 record is mostly due to his ineptitude as a QB

No team is going to win MANY games when their QB only throws TDs in 2 out 14 games during the 1st half. As Generational Caleb has.

Or avg 7 points per game during the first half. As Caleb's

And the fact is that the Bears offense last season (with fewer weapons than this year's) was simply better. Thus the "Justin Sucks" thing sounds silly.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

You thought Yards per game were more "meaningful" than points allowed Caddyshack. Now you're arguing that yards per game are more "meaningful" than points scored. Which renders you to be nothing more than an idiot.

Uh, yes, when comparing QBs I think it's important to compare and contrast the things QBs have more direct influence over like passing statistics rather than things that can be influenced by the running back, defense, and even special teams.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And "the "He's Just A Rookie Thus it's cool for him to suck ass" is also a rather dubious position to take as well but then it is you we're talking about here.


You made the same argument, remember, about a QB in his second year in the league:

Quote:
It looks as if the Bears now have a QB that they can build around. This season is all about his development. Rack up a ton of "moral victories" til the end of season and lock up a high draft pick.


"YES" It's stupid for anyone to suggest that Yards per game outweighs points when it comes to assessing a team's strength or weakness Caddyshack

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

You thought Yards per game were more "meaningful" than points allowed Caddyshack. Now you're arguing that yards per game are more "meaningful" than points scored. Which renders you to be nothing more than an idiot.

Uh, yes, when comparing QBs I think it's important to compare and contrast the things QBs have more direct influence over like passing statistics rather than things that can be influenced by the running back, defense, and even special teams.

The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And "the "He's Just A Rookie Thus it's cool for him to suck ass" is also a rather dubious position to take as well but then it is you we're talking about here.


You made the same argument, remember, about a QB in his second year in the league:

Quote:
It looks as if the Bears now have a QB that they can build around. This season is all about his development. Rack up a ton of "moral victories" til the end of season and lock up a high draft pick.


Edit

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56540
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

Counterpoint: the existence of golf

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5413
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Curious Hair wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
"I firmly believe that Justin Fields would be better on this team than Caleb Williams, and my proof is that hypothetical 2- and 3-year vet Justin Fields has already been out-performed by rookie Caleb Williams in every meaningful stat category kept for QBs."

Counterpoint: the existence of golf




lmfao

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2046
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Undeterred, LTG takes one of the most easy-mode cases to make in recent NFL history (Caleb Williams is dogshit) and increases its difficult exponentially by introducing this insistence that the Bears would be in the playoffs with nearly-as-bad (or possibly even just-as-bad) Justin Fields.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
During the Bears 8 game losing streak the Bears have avg 4 points per game in the first half. But "we" are constantly told by guys that have been wrong every step of the way that Caleb Williams is playing great. Unbelievable.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1030 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 35  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group