46 QBR hoe

_________________

There are far more stats besides QBR which indicate that Caleb Sucks.

_________________

.

_________________

.

Chst gpt hoe. Get your shinebox. I checked mated your dumb ass back to Englewood.

_________________

_________________

.

46 QBR checkmate bitch. Field's had the same QBR at his/there peak. Dumb ass

_________________

_________________

.

LGBTQ Time Hoe cant cope enough with his/there giant L.

_________________

All You Need Are A Big Pair of Shoes Bozo!


The same suckers with the gab about, killer instincts
But turned bitch and knowing damn well they lack
In this division the connoisseur, crackin' your head with a four by four
Realize sucker, I be the comin' like Noah
Always sending you down, perpetrating facadin' what you consider
A image, to me this is, just a scrimmage

_________________

.

It is. Stop it. He's been very good, but he's not been nearly one of the most elite and productive QBs in the league.



I don't care if QBR says he's 28th in the league, because I don't care what QBR says. More broadly, I don't care where he ranks in the league overall in terms of production because while it would have been really nice for him to come into the league and light it up, that wasn't a realistic expectation for a rookie entering the league with what we now know was one of the worst offensive lines in football. This season is, as LTG put it when he was defending a 23 year old Justin Fields in his 2nd season, about growth as a QB and moral victories, and he's had plenty of both, seemingly overcoming some glaring struggles.

What I don't like, I'll grant you, is people like LTG who endeavor to deny his production even when it is obvious, because drafting Caleb meant their little crush (who sucked) had to go, and it seems Brick and I are the only ones willing to call them out on their blatant dishonesty.

Edit.

_________________

.

Oh but his "production"
The Bears finished last in total offense per game this season
They are 31st in avg passing yardage per game

_________________

.

Haha why did you edit out the part where you said he had a distinct "lack of production" but then said he has "empty stats"? Which is it you boob?

Oh but his "production". Caleb ended the season essentially tied for 2nd worst in avg Td passes per game. Am I "denying" his production by acknowledging this?
Hey stupid how do you reconcile your contention that the extremely productive Caleb is 31st in Passing yardage per game of all QBs numbnuts?

_________________

.

Well either he has no production or empty stats. He can't be unproductive of meaningless statistics. You can't even keep your dishonest criticisms straight.

Agreed.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

On a per play basis he has been. The Packers play at one of the slower paces in the league, and LaFleur has a run heavy scheme like most coaches from mcvay/shanny tree, so his overall counting stats are a bit lower but Love's been great. He also missed 2 games with injury and left early in 2 other games with injury, and was noticeably hobbled the first half of the season. If you want to say he's like 9th best instead of 5th that's fine but he's in that 5-10 range for sure.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

Love is 19th in Y/G, 10th in TD/G, and 31st in Completion%. It's absurd to say he's anywhere near top 5 in the NFL, as QBR does, and realistically he's outside looking in on the top 10.

You think he should be considered Top 5 or Top 10 because of his Yards/Completion, yet you accuse Bears fans of clinging to one statistic to paint Caleb Williams as good?

Yards per game and TDs per game are explained by my above post. Packers wide receivers lead the NFL in drops, which affects his completion percentage a good bit. I never mentioned yards/completion but since you brought it up, his high ADOT and YPA also affect his completion percentage, he's often hunting for big plays, which I consider a positive. Since I never mentioned yards/completion until you brought it up, your last sentence makes no sense, but I've come to find that is standard for you when talking about football.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

So he's Top 5.....IF you consider not his overall production, but his production within the context of the larger offensive scheme put in place by his HC? Yeah that's rational.

And for the "wHY arE YoU TalKING AbT YaRds pER CoMPleTION?1" theater:


You invoked "per play" stats. Y/C is a per play stat. Spare me your self-righteous indignation. You're a hapless homer on top of being a stupid hack.

Yeah on a per play basis he's been great. His overall counting stats are lower because they play at a slow pace and run more than most teams. I can't really dumb it down any further for you to understand so that will have to suffice.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

"Yeah his production is lower because they have a an actual Top 5 running game but Love is still a Top 5 QB!"

Retard.

You don't even understand the concept behind "empty" stats. Thus it makes no sense for you to babble on about "empty stats".

And it's counterintuitive for you to incessantly tout the "production" of one of the least productive QBs in the entire NFL. Particularly so given the fact that you never produce anything besides "yeah guys who don't bother to watch Bears games like Brick support me and my stupid bullshit" as the basis for any sports argument. Each and everyone of your inane arguments are easily refuted by simple statistics. Which renders you to be nothing more than a babbling buffoon.

_________________

.

This is where I point out once again that some of these "empty" stats came from games they lost in the last second by coaching errors, or a game that went to OT.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

You might not understand the concept either, but there are a lot of "stats" that are accrued in this particular fashion. Ever seen Zach Lavine play? Different Sport but the concept never changes.

Minnesota was up 27-16 with a minute and a half to go in the game. They were "comfortably ahead" by 14 during the 4th. It was clear to any and everyone that they took their foot off the gas because they were up 2 scores. It almost came back to haunt them. At times this sort of things happens in sports. Which is why all of the focus and attention paid to Flus for "blowing it" was misguided.. Minnesota's coach is the guy that almost "blew it" because he went into prevent mode early and almost cost his team the game.

_________________

.

You can't have "empty" stats in a game that ends up close. It's impossible. It's completely wrong to argue otherwise.

11 points isn't a blowout.

I'll also point out that it was an 8 point game with 7:22 to go. So, at a minimum that drive to go down 8 wasn't empty stats.

But still, a game that goes to OT does not contain empty stats. It's impossible.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Allllmost got it.

Hey how about you go back to touting the "production" level of one of the least "productive" QBs in the league once again

_________________

.

What is or is not a blowout is open for debate. However it doesn't have to be a "blowout" for a team to implement their prevent defense. Prevent defense is all about score relative to the amount of time left in the game. Most teams will go into "prevent mode" in the 4th if the other team needs 2 scores (particularly so if the other team's need 2 Touchdowns) in order to win the game. That's hardly revelatory Brick.

And why can't Caleb ever seem to do any of these "wonderful offensive things" whenever the Game is actually competitive? Have you seen his 1st quarter numbers? 2nd Quarter Numbers? Bears only can ever seem to look like an "NFL Offense" when they are down 2 scores or more in the 4th when the game really is no longer a game.

_________________

.

I can't keep banging my head against this wall. A game that goes to OT doesn't contain empty stats. I'm not starting a discussion against an absurd thought like that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!