It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:40 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1030 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
I can't keep banging my head against this wall. A game that goes to OT doesn't contain empty stats. I'm not starting a discussion against an absurd thought like that.


You keep singling out one game as if that constitutes the totality of it. It's more than just the Minnesota game Brick. Same occurred during a few other games as well.
He has thrown 5 Tds when the Bears are down 3 scores or more. How is that not an example of him providing "empty stats"?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32562
pizza_Place: What??
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

I dunno man. He's an adjustment or 2 away from being great. I'm all over the Eagles but Love is a WC. Like Baker, if he gets a hot hand, he's big trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65994
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Some people might call throwing touchdowns when down to bring the game into reach "clutch".

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32562
pizza_Place: What??
Darkside wrote:
Some people might call throwing touchdowns when down to bring the game into reach "clutch".

Whoa, easy there Sparky.

https://youtu.be/BSM2audQcJ4?t=860


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Nardi wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

I dunno man. He's an adjustment or 2 away from being great. I'm all over the Eagles but Love is a WC. Like Baker, if he gets a hot hand, he's big trouble.


He's, essentially, the same qb he was in his last year of college, so it would be foolish to bank on his progression in year 6

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

stockholm syndrome

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
good dolphin wrote:
Nardi wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

I dunno man. He's an adjustment or 2 away from being great. I'm all over the Eagles but Love is a WC. Like Baker, if he gets a hot hand, he's big trouble.


He's, essentially, the same qb he was in his last year of college, so it would be foolish to bank on his progression in year 6

5th highest QBR this year.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nardi wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.

I dunno man. He's an adjustment or 2 away from being great. I'm all over the Eagles but Love is a WC. Like Baker, if he gets a hot hand, he's big trouble.


He's, essentially, the same qb he was in his last year of college, so it would be foolish to bank on his progression in year 6

5th highest QBR this year.


I think there is a discussion about qbr somewhere on the board that I don't enter

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7073
good dolphin wrote:
I remain perfectly happy with Love as the long term qb of the packers.


I'm with you GD. We've seen greatness in Green Bay and he aint it.

Nice QB for sure, but not a world beater. Prime K.Cousins level good.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2042
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Teams with a lot worse than Jordan Love have had pretty successful seasons. He’s certainly good enough to keep the Bears in the basement until 2030.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I can't keep banging my head against this wall. A game that goes to OT doesn't contain empty stats. I'm not starting a discussion against an absurd thought like that.


You keep singling out one game as if that constitutes the totality of it. It's more than just the Minnesota game Brick. Same occurred during a few other games as well.
He has thrown 5 Tds when the Bears are down 3 scores or more. How is that not an example of him providing "empty stats"?

We can discuss that. A small amount of his overall touchdowns were "empty stats" though most quarterbacks probably have some of those too.

But the fact that you are unrelenting in calling a game that went to OT as "empty stats" means your argument is so wrong that there is nothing that can even start a real discussion. It's like if I was arguing that Caleb Williams was the MVP of the league this year and then forcing you to prove he wasn't and then when you make an undeniably correct argument that he wasn't the MVP I still just push forward with the same indefensible argument.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
We can discuss that. A small amount of his overall touchdowns were "empty stats" though most quarterbacks probably have some of those too.

:lol: 25% of his Tds were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more.

60% were thrown when The Bears were down 2 scores or more.

0 were thrown when the Bears were down 7 points or less. 0 were thrown when the game was tied.

Empty Stats

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

Notice how Brick keeps ducking the fact that a Quarter of his TDs were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more? Tough to "Brick it up" with your bullshit when it comes to that one huh?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23361
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

Notice how Brick keeps ducking the fact that a Quarter of his TDs were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more? Tough to "Brick it up" with your bullshit when it comes to that one huh?

This is how dishonest you are: One of the "down 3 or more" TDs came in the Detroit game that was ultimately lost by Matt Eberflus, and the rest came in games where the defense was getting their collective brains beaten in and giving up 30+ points.

If there is such a thing as "garbage time" in the NFL, and I still contend it is a much narrower definition that you give, the Bears defense caused it for the bulk of what you label as Caleb's "meaningless" touchdowns. And the fact that the defense can cause TDs to be meaningless just highlights how absurd it is to discount TDs because of time and score.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

Notice how Brick keeps ducking the fact that a Quarter of his TDs were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more? Tough to "Brick it up" with your bullshit when it comes to that one huh?

This is how dishonest you are: One of the "down 3 or more" TDs came in the Detroit game that was ultimately lost by Matt Eberflus, and the rest came in games where the defense was getting their collective brains beaten in and giving up 30+ points.

If there is such a thing as "garbage time" in the NFL, and I still contend it is a much narrower definition that you give, the Bears defense caused it for the bulk of what you label as Caleb's "meaningless" touchdowns. And the fact that the defense can cause TDs to be meaningless just highlights how absurd it is to discount TDs because of time and score.


Brick's Favorite stooge is back to ducking once again.
Remember he doesn't like it when it is pointed out that one of the least "productive" QBs is well, one of the least productive QBs in the league. Ok :lol: :lol:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
What I don't like, I'll grant you, is people like LTG who endeavor to deny his production even when it is obvious, because drafting Caleb meant their little crush (who sucked) had to go, and it seems Brick and I are the only ones willing to call them out on their blatant dishonesty.

You'd never know that the Bears lost 10 in a row given all of the "productivity" that Caleb happened to have provided.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And the fact that the defense can cause TDs to be meaningless just highlights how absurd it is to discount TDs because of time and score.


Ah the internet trolls around here are so VERY proud to hear you say this stupid shit. Peep.Show Darko is probably yelling "You Go Dawg" even as you're proceeding to continuously spew this stupid shit. What "sport" you play again?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23361
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

Notice how Brick keeps ducking the fact that a Quarter of his TDs were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more? Tough to "Brick it up" with your bullshit when it comes to that one huh?

This is how dishonest you are: One of the "down 3 or more" TDs came in the Detroit game that was ultimately lost by Matt Eberflus, and the rest came in games where the defense was getting their collective brains beaten in and giving up 30+ points.

If there is such a thing as "garbage time" in the NFL, and I still contend it is a much narrower definition that you give, the Bears defense caused it for the bulk of what you label as Caleb's "meaningless" touchdowns. And the fact that the defense can cause TDs to be meaningless just highlights how absurd it is to discount TDs because of time and score.


Brick's Favorite stooge is back to ducking once again.
Remember he doesn't like it when it is pointed out that one of the least "productive" QBs is well, one of the least productive QBs in the league. Ok :lol: :lol:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
What I don't like, I'll grant you, is people like LTG who endeavor to deny his production even when it is obvious, because drafting Caleb meant their little crush (who sucked) had to go, and it seems Brick and I are the only ones willing to call them out on their blatant dishonesty.

You'd never know that the Bears lost 10 in a row given all of the "productivity" that Caleb happened to have provided.

As usual you can't argue with the post, so just argue about the poster. Again if there is such a thing as "garbage time", the fact that the defense has influence on whether any given TD scored by the offense is "meaningless" means the whole exercise of deciding which TDs to count and which others to discredit is just patently stupid. Then again, you yourself are patented stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
As I said, that includes a game that went to OT. If you can't acknowledge that the OT game was not empty stats it just isn't a discussion that can be meaningful. I think that's your goal though.

Notice how Brick keeps ducking the fact that a Quarter of his TDs were thrown when the Bears were down 3 scores or more? Tough to "Brick it up" with your bullshit when it comes to that one huh?

I'm guessing most of those came from the 5 out of 20 touchdowns that I do agree were "empty stats".

But this isn't a meaningful discussion so there isn't any reason for me to acknowledge anything about your completely irrational take.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
As usual you can't argue with the post, so just argue about the poster. Again if there is such a thing as "garbage time", the fact that the defense has influence on whether any given TD scored by the offense is "meaningless" means the whole exercise of deciding which TDs to count and which others to discredit is just patently stupid. Then again, you yourself are patented stupid.


When teams are up 2 scores or more in the 4th they tend to relax their defenses in order to run clock and prevent big plays. This is hardly a "revolutionary concept" jackass. Which is the main reason that the Bears attained 59 1st Downs in 4th Quarter but only 25 in the First Quarter.

It's also why they averaged a league worst 1 point during the first quarter yet majestically about 8 points during the 4th.

This may appear rather foreign to someone as stupid as you but this sort of thing has existed in sports since the beginning of time.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1018
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:


This tells me the scripted plays (when they finally started) organized by the (truly) offensive coordinators were really bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23361
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
As usual you can't argue with the post, so just argue about the poster. Again if there is such a thing as "garbage time", the fact that the defense has influence on whether any given TD scored by the offense is "meaningless" means the whole exercise of deciding which TDs to count and which others to discredit is just patently stupid. Then again, you yourself are patented stupid.


When teams are up 2 scores or more in the 4th they tend to relax their defenses in order to run clock and prevent big plays. This is hardly a "revolutionary concept" jackass. Which is the main reason that the Bears attained 59 1st Downs in 4th Quarter but only 25 in the First Quarter.

It's also why they averaged a league worst 1 point during the first quarter yet majestically about 8 points during the 4th.

This may appear rather foreign to someone as stupid as you but this sort of thing has existed in sports since the beginning of time.

Except in the cases of Minnesota and Detroit, where one was saved by OT and the other by coaching ineptitude. Those "prevent" defenses did a great job preventing Caleb from giving his team a chance to win.

The fact that you refuse to engage on how a team's defense can put it's offense in your ever-shifting definition of "garbage time" tells me all I need to know about how honest you are being here, Radio.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Peter Puck wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:


This tells me the scripted plays (when they finally started) organized by the (truly) offensive coordinators were really bad.


Caleb can only be productive when the defense is playing "soft zone" coverage. That much has been apparent since the preseason.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Peter Puck wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:


This tells me the scripted plays (when they finally started) organized by the (truly) offensive coordinators were really bad.
The strange thing is that Swift ran for 3.03 yards per carry in the first half. 4.68 yards per carry in the second half. It's by far the worst average in the league for someone that got at least 100 carries in the first half. Only one guy got more than 40 carries in the first half and had a worse yards per carry and that was Nick Chubb with 60 carries and a 2.85 yards per carry average.

Williams was also bad in the first half but it's hard to put the blame on him for that large of a difference in rushing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11714
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Except in the cases of Minnesota and Detroit, where one was saved by OT and the other by coaching ineptitude. Those "prevent" defenses did a great job preventing Caleb from giving his team a chance to win.

The fact that you refuse to engage on how a team's defense can put it's offense in your ever-shifting definition of "garbage time" tells me all I need to know about how honest you are being here, Radio.

The Bears Average more points during the 4th Quarter than they do for the 1st half this season. Definitely Garbage Time Stats

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1018
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:


This tells me the scripted plays (when they finally started) organized by the (truly) offensive coordinators were really bad.


Caleb can only be productive when the defense is playing "soft zone" coverage. That much has been apparent since the preseason.


But the whole offense was terrible in the first quarter. Can blame him for some things, obviously, but not all of the things that consistently went wrong in the first quarter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1018
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
Brick wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
More evidence of "Generational Caleb's" bumslaying tendencies.
2024 1st Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense :25
2024 4th Quarter First Downs for the Bears Offense: 59

But hey just don't ever suggest that he is producing "Empty Stats" :lol: :lol:


This tells me the scripted plays (when they finally started) organized by the (truly) offensive coordinators were really bad.
The strange thing is that Swift ran for 3.03 yards per carry in the first half. 4.68 yards per carry in the second half. It's by far the worst average in the league for someone that got at least 100 carries in the first half. Only one guy got more than 40 carries in the first half and had a worse yards per carry and that was Nick Chubb with 60 carries and a 2.85 yards per carry average.

Williams was also bad in the first half but it's hard to put the blame on him for that large of a difference in rushing.


I often wondered during games if the Bears even got through the "scripted plays" before halftime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32562
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I can't keep banging my head against this wall. A game that goes to OT doesn't contain empty stats. I'm not starting a discussion against an absurd thought like that.


You keep singling out one game as if that constitutes the totality of it. It's more than just the Minnesota game Brick. Same occurred during a few other games as well.
He has thrown 5 Tds when the Bears are down 3 scores or more. How is that not an example of him providing "empty stats"?

We can discuss that. A small amount of his overall touchdowns were "empty stats" though most quarterbacks probably have some of those too.

But the fact that you are unrelenting in calling a game that went to OT as "empty stats" means your argument is so wrong that there is nothing that can even start a real discussion. It's like if I was arguing that Caleb Williams was the MVP of the league this year and then forcing you to prove he wasn't and then when you make an undeniably correct argument that he wasn't the MVP I still just push forward with the same indefensible argument.

The signature "It's like" and it never disappoints


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1030 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group