It is currently Sat Jan 18, 2025 6:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 924 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 31  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24294
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
TriColoredPastas wrote:
NME wrote:
Brady imo hasn’t done anything with Allen that Allen hasn’t already done. Brady is just better than the previous guy they had. This is why I’d want to see multiple years of Brady getting the job done rather than just this year. Ben Johnson has 3 years in a row of creating an elite offense under his belt and he’s proven to be a fantastic play caller too. He’s also learned how to run a team under Campbell who seems to have a good grip on that part of the job.


With this approach you can easily vault Coen into the upper tier with what he has done with bakey.


Only doing it with one quarterback isn't a red flag or anything, but it's something that needs to be weighed appropriately.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5377
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
TriColoredPastas wrote:
NME wrote:
Brady imo hasn’t done anything with Allen that Allen hasn’t already done. Brady is just better than the previous guy they had. This is why I’d want to see multiple years of Brady getting the job done rather than just this year. Ben Johnson has 3 years in a row of creating an elite offense under his belt and he’s proven to be a fantastic play caller too. He’s also learned how to run a team under Campbell who seems to have a good grip on that part of the job.


With this approach you can easily vault Coen into the upper tier with what he has done with bakey.




Johnson’s been in the NFL in some capacity since 2012.. Coen is much greener than that. I also like what I’ve seen from Ben Johnson much more from a play calling and play design standpoint -he’s proven to be one of the most creative play designers in the game now for several years. So I don’t agree with you on this.


I’d add that ‘the approach’ on my end isn’t limited to what I said in the post you quoted. Just that specific topic of Brady Vs Johnson in regards to Allen Vs Goff

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5377
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Btw I’m not saying Coen can’t be successful, just that I like Ben Johnson the most from what I’ve seen in regards to the ‘hot new coordinator’ thing

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23252
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I'll take the guy who took an above average QB and forced him into the discussion of (actual, realistic) Top 5 NFL QBs based on production alone, over the guy who happens to be the coordinator for or QB coach of an already-established elite talent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 664
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
NME wrote:
TriColoredPastas wrote:
NME wrote:
Brady imo hasn’t done anything with Allen that Allen hasn’t already done. Brady is just better than the previous guy they had. This is why I’d want to see multiple years of Brady getting the job done rather than just this year. Ben Johnson has 3 years in a row of creating an elite offense under his belt and he’s proven to be a fantastic play caller too. He’s also learned how to run a team under Campbell who seems to have a good grip on that part of the job.


With this approach you can easily vault Coen into the upper tier with what he has done with bakey.




Johnson’s been in the NFL in some capacity since 2012.. Coen is much greener than that. I also like what I’ve seen from Ben Johnson much more from a play calling and play design standpoint -he’s proven to be one of the most creative play designers in the game now for several years. So I don’t agree with you on this.


I’d add that ‘the approach’ on my end isn’t limited to what I said in the post you quoted. Just that specific topic of Brady Vs Johnson in regards to Allen Vs Goff

I want Johnson as much as you do, but by the way the bears are going about this you have to start looking at the second tier. Liam is the clear cut choice in the second tier.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
There isn't won major decision that the CFMB Football Guru's have advocated that hasn't turned out to be a damn flop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24963
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Idk, it doesn’t seem like you want Johnson that bad.

You say you’d love Johnson. You want Johnson as much as a person can desire Johnson and yet…you don’t seem desperate for Johnson. Having alternatives to Johnson in your head suggests you’re not focused on Johnson.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 664
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
I don't want Johnson, I NEED Johnson. I crave Johnson deperately, but the bears will not provide Johnson.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
There isn't won major decision that the CFMB Football Guru's have advocated that hasn't turned out to be a damn flop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16666
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Chico Rivera, come on down!

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7036
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Chico Rivera, come on down!


Image

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 1:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56450
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Vrabel to the Pats sounds just about locked in.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18271
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Curious Hair wrote:
Vrabel to the Pats sounds just about locked in.


Confirmed this morning.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4252
pizza_Place: Lino's
T-Bone wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Vrabel to the Pats sounds just about locked in.


Confirmed this morning.


No way Vrabel would want to waste time in meetings with Poles and Warren, too much of a red ass for George. Would want to do things the "Patriots Way".

Poles is supposedly afraid of Ben Johnson, so that likely is out as well.

Thought originally, they would lose out on the top 2-3 candidates and as usual, have to settle for whatever is left, that is the "Bears Way".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56450
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93011
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Carroll is a terrible choice. We only want Presidents that old.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16666
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Brick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Carroll is a terrible choice. We only want Presidents that old.


Carroll has more energy than most 50 year olds (I know that sounds like something Karine Jean-Pierre would say, but still.)

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:17 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32365
pizza_Place: What??
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Brick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Carroll is a terrible choice. We only want Presidents that old.


Carroll has more energy than most 50 year olds (I know that sounds like something Karine Jean-Pierre would say, but still.)

Carroll comes in puts the adults in charge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7036
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.


I want nothing to do with defensive coaches. Johnson, Brady, Munchin and Coen, Kinsbury in that order.

If they don't get one of those guys it is a failure.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7036
Nardi wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Brick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Carroll is a terrible choice. We only want Presidents that old.


Carroll has more energy than most 50 year olds (I know that sounds like something Karine Jean-Pierre would say, but still.)

Carroll comes in puts the adults in charge.



Like Shane Waldron. No thanks!

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1833
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Remember like six days ago when everyone was saying this was the best job available?

Nobody wants to deal with the McCaskeys and nobody wants to accept responsibility for Caleb Williams. Hard facts. They would rather deal with Mark Davis and the Raiders.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32365
pizza_Place: What??
Juiced wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Brick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
If they strike out on Johnson, Vrabel, and Carroll, a distinct possibility with the Raiders sniffing around Carroll now, it has to be considered a major failure for the Bears simply on public-relations terms. Again, tell us why this enterprise needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.

Carroll is a terrible choice. We only want Presidents that old.


Carroll has more energy than most 50 year olds (I know that sounds like something Karine Jean-Pierre would say, but still.)

Carroll comes in puts the adults in charge.


Like Shane Waldron. No thanks!

I was being facetious. I don't want that old smelly fuck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 477
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
" Word" is the Raiders owner did not want to try doing things the "Patriot way" again which obviously meant Vrabel was toast and they really have their sights set on Johnson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1833
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I love Pete Carroll but I just wonder what his angle is. It doesn’t make much sense for him to be interested.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1833
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
ShortTimeLurker wrote:
" Word" is the Raiders owner did not want to try doing things the "Patriot way" again which obviously meant Vrabel was toast and they really have their sights set on Johnson.

Are the Raiders pitching a structure with Tom Brady as minority owner who also serves as President of Football Ops where Ben Johnson gets to be head coach and handpick a GM to work with Brady? I just don’t see a way the Bears top that. It seems pretty much golden.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 1182
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
USA wrote:
I love Pete Carroll but I just wonder what his angle is. It doesn’t make much sense for him to be interested.


His woke, goth, communist daughter starts attending SAIC in the fall.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 477
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
from SI :

According to Ian Rapoport of NFL Network, the Bears are going to find the Raiders are in this pursuit of Johnson for the long haul if they can't secure Brady's buddy Mike Vrabel. And doing that seems unlikely. Also, it's been reported by NFL Network that Brady is personally recruiting Johnson.

Let's see, George McCaskey or Tom Brady. ... Hmmm. Tough decision.

Apparently Johnson and others just didn't get the memo about how great the Bears job is.

Once again aggressive and forward-thinking teams are stepping up while the Bears are interviewing everyone with a resume and the internet, and including everyone at Halas Hall in the interview process except maybe equipment manager Tony Medlin. The Raiders are threatening to leave the hesitant, slow-moving Bears with secondary options in the coaching hunt and that's usually what they accept.

The Bears could have gained a quick advantage with Vrabel by interviewing him last week, although there's no doubt he eventually could have found his way to New England to interview out of respect to his former team.

On Saturday, it almost seemed like a face-saving measure as word leaked out while Johnson completed his Bears interview that the team will now interview former Bears defensive coordinator and linebacker Ron Rivera.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 1833
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
McCareins_Fan wrote:
USA wrote:
I love Pete Carroll but I just wonder what his angle is. It doesn’t make much sense for him to be interested.


His woke, goth, communist daughter starts attending SAIC in the fall.

CH you know what to do


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37948
Location: ...
Sweet communist, The communist daughter. Standing on the sea-weed water.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 664
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
W_Z wrote:
Sweet communist, The communist daughter. Standing on the sea-weed water.

Go on...

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
There isn't won major decision that the CFMB Football Guru's have advocated that hasn't turned out to be a damn flop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37948
Location: ...
You know the words, sing along…


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56450
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
USA wrote:
McCareins_Fan wrote:
USA wrote:
I love Pete Carroll but I just wonder what his angle is. It doesn’t make much sense for him to be interested.


His woke, goth, communist daughter starts attending SAIC in the fall.

CH you know what to do

We missed the Whit Stillman Q&A last month.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 924 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 31  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group