It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, 40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came while down 2 scores or more....


Oh man now there is an "equivalency" if ever I saw one Hartgrove!

That's your measuring stick, not mine. No need to get upset when it's used against you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, 40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came while down 2 scores or more....


Oh man now there is an "equivalency" if ever I saw one Hartgrove!

That's your measuring stick, not mine. No need to get upset when it's used against you.


Justin Fields finished 10th in MVP voting shortly after this comment was made Hartgrove. He also produced 25 Tds in 15 games. While you celebrated Caleb' merely producing 20. The essence of Derangement

The Missing Link wrote:
Justin Fields is growing up right before our eyes. I was excited about the Bears when they traded for Cutler (didn't work out as planned, and wanted to be about (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but this kid looks like he will be good-great once they get a few weapons around him.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, 40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came while down 2 scores or more....


Oh man now there is an "equivalency" if ever I saw one Hartgrove!

That's your measuring stick, not mine. No need to get upset when it's used against you.


Justin Fields finished 10th in MVP voting shortly after this comment was made Hartgrove. He also produced 25 Tds in 15 games. While you celebrated Caleb' merely producing 20. The essence of Derangement

The Missing Link wrote:
Justin Fields is growing up right before our eyes. I was excited about the Bears when they traded for Cutler (didn't work out as planned, and wanted to be about (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but this kid looks like he will be good-great once they get a few weapons around him.


40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came in what you define as "garbage time". Does that not matter to you when assessing how good Justin Fields was?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, 40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came while down 2 scores or more....


Oh man now there is an "equivalency" if ever I saw one Hartgrove!

That's your measuring stick, not mine. No need to get upset when it's used against you.


Justin Fields finished 10th in MVP voting shortly after this comment was made Hartgrove. He also produced 25 Tds in 15 games. While you celebrated Caleb' merely producing 20. The essence of Derangement

The Missing Link wrote:
Justin Fields is growing up right before our eyes. I was excited about the Bears when they traded for Cutler (didn't work out as planned, and wanted to be about (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but this kid looks like he will be good-great once they get a few weapons around him.


40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came in what you define as "garbage time". Does that not matter to you when assessing how good Justin Fields was?


40% is the new 60%. Who knew? Those Goalposts sure are a moving aren't they Hartgrove?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, 40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came while down 2 scores or more....


Oh man now there is an "equivalency" if ever I saw one Hartgrove!

That's your measuring stick, not mine. No need to get upset when it's used against you.


Justin Fields finished 10th in MVP voting shortly after this comment was made Hartgrove. He also produced 25 Tds in 15 games. While you celebrated Caleb' merely producing 20. The essence of Derangement

The Missing Link wrote:
Justin Fields is growing up right before our eyes. I was excited about the Bears when they traded for Cutler (didn't work out as planned, and wanted to be about (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but this kid looks like he will be good-great once they get a few weapons around him.


40% of Justin's TDs in 2022 came in what you define as "garbage time". Does that not matter to you when assessing how good Justin Fields was?


40% is the new 60%. Who knew? Those Goalposts sure are a moving aren't they Hartgrove?

40% of TDs in "garbage time" (again, your criteria, not mine) is a lot. That's 10 TDs, meaning only 15 of Justin's 2022 TD total actually "counts". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate and someone worth building a franchise around when a rookie can come in, play poorly for a good chunk of the season, and still out-perform Justin's 2022 by a pretty wide margin in other statistical categories aside from "meaningful Touchdowns"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
It's a coping mechanism.

Williams good: "I'm a Bears fan and I'm happy he is doing well".
Williams bad: "Should have kept Fields even as he bounces around the league being below average".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2042
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Except “Williams good” has never really happened and he’s not even in the top six of ROY voting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
USA wrote:
Except “Williams good” has never really happened and he’s not even in the top six of ROY voting.

Well, I didn't add the "Complain about DEI" exception for you.

Even most Williams haters can acknowledge he had some good games. You and Dr. Style are the exceptions.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

MVP voter. As in 1 person. That person put him 5th.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Justin Fields got as many MVP votes as the guy who saved Damar Hamlin's life in 2022.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Duh? Because I fully understand the concept of tanking and how it works while you don't. Perhaps Peepshow, Brick or Moist will care to elaborate for ya Hartgrove?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Duh? Because I fully understand the concept of tanking and how it works while you don't. Perhaps Peepshow, Brick or Moist will care to elaborate for ya Hartgrove?

Except "tanking" just describes how a team gets to be bad. Recognizing production from a QB on a team trying to be bad is no different than recognizing production from a QB on a team which just happens to be bad, right?

If there is a difference, what is it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Duh? Because I fully understand the concept of tanking and how it works while you don't. Perhaps Peepshow, Brick or Moist will care to elaborate for ya Hartgrove?

Except "tanking" just describes how a team gets to be bad. Recognizing production from a QB on a team trying to be bad is no different than recognizing production from a QB on a team which just happens to be bad, right?

If there is a difference, what is it?


Hey Tee Time. I get that the concept of "tanking" is rather "foreign" to you, but that cannot be my problem. You clearly have no clue as to how it works when a team tanks. Nor do you have a clue as to how "moral victories" fits in either. And to be honest, I have no interest in explaining to ya either. If you need it explained to you how tanking works, then you shouldn't be discussing sports Tee Time. Your ignorance cannot be my battle.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Duh? Because I fully understand the concept of tanking and how it works while you don't. Perhaps Peepshow, Brick or Moist will care to elaborate for ya Hartgrove?

Except "tanking" just describes how a team gets to be bad. Recognizing production from a QB on a team trying to be bad is no different than recognizing production from a QB on a team which just happens to be bad, right?

If there is a difference, what is it?


Hey Tee Time. I get that the concept of "tanking" is rather "foreign" to you, but that cannot be my problem. You clearly have no clue as to how it works when a team tanks. Nor do you have a clue as to how "moral victories" fits in either. And to be honest, I have no interest in explaining to ya either. If you need it explained to you how tanking works, then you shouldn't be discussing sports Tee Time. Your ignorance cannot be my battle.

Ah, you're totally right, despite not being able to find issue with anything I said, but you can't be bothered to explain either how you're right or how I'm wrong. How convenient.

I'm starting to think it is you who doesn't understand what tanking is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7073
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Except Justin was not actually 10th but tied with 5 other guys with 0.2% of the vote. He had one vote for MVP :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
". And you think a guy with 15 "meaningful" TDs is a worthwhile MVP candidate

No MVP voters did. Which is why I cited it Hartgrove.

But he was on a bad team which lost a lot of games, and he lost a lot of games he started. Why would you quote something which ostensibly recognizes QB production from a losing QB on a bad team, unless it is possible to recognize production from the position despite won-loss record?


Except Justin was not actually 10th but tied with 5 other guys with 0.2% of the vote. He had one vote for MVP :lol: :lol: :lol:


I'd venture to say that the only guys Caleb Williams will be "tied" with are those who don't receive any votes

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2025 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15065
pizza_Place: Grazianos
The reason for the pro Fields/anti-Caleb cult? Realistically? The silliness of Chicago Bear's fans. Its the same mind set which created the illusion of Caleb Williams being the heir apparent to Patrick Mahomes as the best quarterback in MFL history. Bear's fans are fantasy freaks. Hell, if Zeke Bratkowski was drafted number one in all of football, even Nas would demand a statue of him be erected in front of the park eating a kielbasa.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2025 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 1212
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Just as an experiment, let's travel back to November, 2022. Justin Fields finished his rookie campaign 2-8, and after a lackluster start to the 2022 campaign, was 5-13 through his first 18 games as a professional.

Coming to town were the Miami Dolphins, a 5-3 team at the time who would finish just above .500 and squeak their way into the playoffs.

Justin, now in his 19th start as a professional, had a very decent game, combining for a touch over 300 yards from scrimmage and 4 total TDs against a defense that would finish the season 6th-worst in the NFL against the pass.

An anonymous poster had this to say during the game, an ultimately losing effort that put Justin's career record as a starter in the NFL to 5-14:

Quote:
Justin Fields is growing up right before our eyes. I was excited about the Bears when they traded for Cutler (didn't work out as planned, and wanted to be about (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but this kid looks like he will be good-great once they get a few weapons around him.


Flash forward a week, when the Bears lose to the 2-6 Lions, a game that saw Fields again accrue roughly 300 yards from scrimmage against a bad team but failed to crack the 100 Rating mark, and was finished by a 4th quarter drive that saw the Bears QB, more than a full season's worth of starts into his career, go 1/3 for 7 yards with 2 sacks. That same anonymous poster, who is literally anyone's guess at this point, had this to say:

Quote:
It looks as if the Bears now have a QB that they can build around. This season is all about his development. Rack up a ton of "moral victories" til the end of season and lock up a high draft pick.


Another week goes by, and on this particular Sunday in November '22, the Bears lose to the Falcons in Atlanta, a game where Fields has a paltry 153-yard 1 TD 1 INT game against a 4-6 team which sacked him 4 times on the day:

Quote:
The Bears Pocket collapses far too often for anyone to be an effective pocket passer. Fields may not be good at it but it would be hell even if were good at it.


This anonymous poster even responded to someone else about the particularities of Justin's performance that day:

Quote:
Quote:
Fields had about 10+ seconds to throw the ball twice. Guys were open. He's afraid to let the ball go.
And seemingly 8 or 9 seconds of those 10 seconds he is running for dear life.


One more week into the future, and Fields loses his 5th straight start to the Packers, throwing for 254 with no passing TDs and 2 INTs, his record as a starting QB in the NFL now down to 5-17:

Quote:
But this really isn't your argument is it? Just Asking A Question. Or mine for that matter. I'm not saying that you can get his Hall of Fame bust ready right now or that he is a Pro Bowler (moment of silence for that game I believe) but what I am saying is that the kid isn't a bust either. Which is what MANY, including you seemingly were arguing in the beginning of the season. He is obviously a keeper at this point contrary to what I read on here week after week.


So what fuels them, because it certainly isn't logical consistency and an understanding of football.


Sir, this is a Wendy's. My name is Caleb, and I will take your order when you're ready.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2025 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
"Hey, History Rewriter, this is Jaden. I know your passion is unique so can you uniquely get me a Dave's double and a chocolate Frosty? Thanks brother, and say hi to your mom's bosom for me....I murdered like 11 people this week. I murdered like 11 last week too."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.

Maybe next year. Meanwhile....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

Where did I "shit on the performance" of Jayden Daniels, Downs Syndrome Cowboy Curtis?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

Where did I "shit on the performance" of Jayden Daniels, Downs Syndrome Cowboy Curtis?

It's known that you have mental health issues thus it makes no sense to provide evidence to support the assertion. Hint: It's highlighted.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

Where did I "shit on the performance" of Jayden Daniels, Downs Syndrome Cowboy Curtis?

It's known that you have mental health issues thus it makes no sense to provide evidence to support the assertion. Hint: It's highlighted.

:lol: You're telling on yourself, none of what you highlighted disparaged his performance last night. It definitely disparaged the likes of you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

Where did I "shit on the performance" of Jayden Daniels, Downs Syndrome Cowboy Curtis?

It's known that you have mental health issues thus it makes no sense to provide evidence to support the assertion. Hint: It's highlighted.

:lol: You're telling on yourself, none of what you highlighted disparaged his performance last night. It definitely disparaged the likes of you.


Only someone with severe mental health issues would deny that the highlighted statement is not an example of your shitting on that kid's performance.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23362
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine the howling from you doofuses if anyone dared to sing Caleb's praises for his performance in a 45-point win in which he contributed 2 TDs, with 20% of his passing yardage and 50% of his scoring output coming from a screen play.


Keep in mind that Cahokia's Favorite "Flaming" Eagle Mascot was celebratory about the Garbage Time Stats that were accrued by Caleb when the game was essentially over against this very same team.
Now the blithering idiot is shitting on the performance of the dude that actually does win games and improved the performance of his team from last year to this year. Unbelievable!

Where did I "shit on the performance" of Jayden Daniels, Downs Syndrome Cowboy Curtis?

It's known that you have mental health issues thus it makes no sense to provide evidence to support the assertion. Hint: It's highlighted.

:lol: You're telling on yourself, none of what you highlighted disparaged his performance last night. It definitely disparaged the likes of you.


Only someone with severe mental health issues would deny that the highlighted statement is not an example of your shitting on that kid's performance.

Oh my goodness, you really are completely devoid of even a shred of self-awareness or appreciation for irony.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11716
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Oh my goodness, you really are completely devoid of even a shred of self-awareness or appreciation for irony.


"Severe Mental Illness"

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group