It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:30 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Dr. Ken wrote:
They say they are/want to be great but the defensive philosophy as I understand it is - don't give up big plays, yards don't matter, if you make the offense work long enough they will make a mistake and turn the ball over.


Ok, now I understand. And I agree, that is a horrible philosophy to operate from, but this is essentially how we percieve it. Furthermore, how does this "philosophy" differ from 80% of NFL teams?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I don't think that is how we perceive it. I think that is what it is - by their own admission.

And I think we rely on it more than 80% of the NFL because Lovie puts a greater emphasis on turnovers and defensive scoring than everybody else. I'm not saying other teams don't try for turnovers. I'm saying other teams aren't counting on them as much as Lovie.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
He went 0-16, according to Parcells you are what your record is. Furthermore he is 10-38 overall, including 1-23 to end his tenure. He is without a doubt a terrible coach.


i get your point, but if i recall correctly, bill belichick got run out of cleveland for being a terrible coach. they hated him, and couldnt wait to get rid of him. his record was nowhere near as terrible as marinellis, but it was lousy. sometimes a coach is in a tough situation with little or no talent, and a guy like belichick lands in new england, starts rough and then things turn around, and ends up looking like a great coach (albeit not a very popular one for variety of reasons).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:42 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I don't think that is how we perceive it. I think that is what it is - by their own admission.

And I think we rely on it more than 80% of the NFL because Lovie puts a greater emphasis on turnovers and defensive scoring than everybody else. I'm not saying other teams don't try for turnovers. I'm saying other teams aren't counting on them as much as Lovie.


I agree, and Lovie has gone on record stating that they want to score on defense every time. However I don't think the defense had a "bend don't break" scheme this season. Weren't we all talking about their "new-look" blitz packages early in the year, with all the linebackers lining up in the gaps to start?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
They had to do that because the D works best when there is pressure on the QB to force interceptions because the secondary will get picked apart. The D line doesn't get that push now like they used to and so they had to blitz like crazy this year but they suck at blitzing because they don't have any good blitzing LBs. Their best blitzers are DBs, like Manning or Brown.

They're good against the run but don't have any pass rushers unless A.Brown is playing a backup NY Giants tackle. So, they don't always get the picks and have to rely on the strip like so many bored and frustrated husbands out there.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
I guess I'm just not following what you feel the actual issue here is with the defense.

You say that they have a "bend don't break" philosophy, however you then agree that they "blitz like crazy" too? Are they too aggressive then? Or are they not aggressive enough?

Here's a thought: maybe they're just bad, and it has nothing to do with philosophies?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
They've equipped themselves with people that cannot execute what they want to do very well, either because they are old or bad or Babitch isn't calling the right D at the right time. And I don't agree with what they are trying to do in the first place. But, they're still out there trying to do it.

However, because they aren't executing, they are attempting to blitz to compensate for their inability to get a frontline push - which is ineffective because that's isn't what Urlacher and Briggs are good at because they are there to do something else. So, in summary, they suck.

And even if they could do what they want, they still wouldn't beat great, playoff teams because those teams would pick them apart as they did in 2006.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
They've equipped themselves with people that cannot execute what they want to do very well, either because they are old or bad or Babitch isn't calling the right D at the right time. And I don't agree with what they are trying to do in the first place. But, they're still out there trying to do it.

However, because they aren't executing, they are attempting to blitz to compensate for their inability to get a frontline push - which is ineffective because that's isn't what Urlacher and Briggs are good at because they are there to do something else. So, in summary, they suck.

And even if they could do what they want, they still wouldn't beat great, playoff teams because those teams would pick them apart as they did in 2006.


Agreed. They are no longer the great defense they were a couple years ago, and they simply need new players. Unfortunately for this team, they also need high-profile players on the offensive side of the ball as well, and probably don't have enough room in the salary cap to account for all of it. Therefore, they will end up needing to trade Briggs, Hester, or anyone else of worth in order to get what they need.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Meatball Fan wrote:
This season was a complete failure! The entire staff should be fired and salaries should be cut for all offensive and defensive starters. Former bears should be brought in to coach this team back to greatness. If Ditka won't come back, then I think Doug Buffone and Ed O'Bradovich are my two choices to lead this team back to the super bowl. They have the fire and the passion and won't allow these bums to nap like they have under Lovie. All indoor practices should also be eliminated. These guys need to toughen up and play old school, bear weather football. These sally's have it too good with their million dollar deals and heated practice domes. This team could have won 5 super bowls by now if Lovie wasn't here.

It is time for Caleb Hanie to get his shot. The guy proved in the preseason that he will be an elite quarterback for many years to come. Lovie and his lackies were just too dumb to see it. We need to see some direct snaps to Devin Hester also. The guy can run and create plays. It's in his blood.


No Chris Zorcih mention? maybe Will Furer...Get the TE more involved...run some trick plays for garret wolfe


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
No mention of Mike Haas or playing Zorich at linebacker?

You are barely a Loose-Meat Sandwich Fan.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
What about that Aaron Rowand guy?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
I predicted the Bears to have a terrible record, so they performed beyond my expectations. However, any non-playoff season from the Belittled is a disappointment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Darkside it's hard for me to understand how you view this season as a disappointment. I haven't had a chance to look at your predictions for the season but I don't recall you being one of the guys that thought they would win 10+ games. The way I see it is Lovie has had one disappointing season since he has been here. Also he hasn't had an NFL offense the entire time he has been here. We all saw how great an explosive offense can make Lovie's defense look at the start of the 2006 season. That's been missing since then. A good offense can make a good defense appear great.

Nas, finishing the season in 2nd place to the Vikings (whom we should have beaten both times we played them) is disappointing regardless of whatever I may have predicted. I don't even understand how a prediction of a poor season is even relevant in this discussion. did they beat my expectations? Yup. Were they STILL disappointing? YUP.
Hasn't had an NFL offense? That's terrible. I don't see how he didn't have an NFL offense any year he was here.

Which year are you referring to as the disappointing one?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Darkside it's hard for me to understand how you view this season as a disappointment. I haven't had a chance to look at your predictions for the season but I don't recall you being one of the guys that thought they would win 10+ games. The way I see it is Lovie has had one disappointing season since he has been here. Also he hasn't had an NFL offense the entire time he has been here. We all saw how great an explosive offense can make Lovie's defense look at the start of the 2006 season. That's been missing since then. A good offense can make a good defense appear great.

Nas, finishing the season in 2nd place to the Vikings (whom we should have beaten both times we played them) is disappointing regardless of whatever I may have predicted. I don't even understand how a prediction of a poor season is even relevant in this discussion. did they beat my expectations? Yup. Were they STILL disappointing? YUP.
Hasn't had an NFL offense? That's terrible. I don't see how he didn't have an NFL offense any year he was here.

Which year are you referring to as the disappointing one?


199allofthem


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RFDC and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group