It is currently Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 6774
The jockey has the Cubs projected lineup in the Trib today, with Miles leading off and Gathright in the 2 hole, doesn't sound good to me.

_________________
Fuck Edwards and Zobrist


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 pm
Posts: 4051
Location: logan squiz
pizza_Place: art of pizza
yikes

_________________
Douchebag wrote:
This thread is probably going to make Tim Raines want to do cocaine again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
I am ok with giving Miles a shot at leading off and playing 2B.

I just dont see Gathright being the starter. If they sign Bradley and he plays RF, I think you will see Fukudome and Reed Johnson platoon in CF with Gathright being a late inning replacement and sub for all the OF spots.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Ridiculous to project a lineup on January 1st. Trades/signings will still alter the lineup between now and opening day. Gathwright will NOT be a starter. Miles may well be a back-up. I still hold out hope that some of the pitchers aquired in the DeRosa deal, will be used along with Fontenot, in a deal for Roberts, who would leadoff. In any case, this current roster will not be the roster that starts the 2009 Chamionship season. There will most definitely be more changes and to project a lineup now is silly.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Ridiculous to project a lineup on January 1st. Trades/signings will still alter the lineup between now and opening day. Gathwright will NOT be a starter.

Its just as ridiculous to predict a lineup today as it is to say that "Gathwright will NOT be a starter".

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Ridiculous to project a lineup on January 1st. Trades/signings will still alter the lineup between now and opening day. Gathwright will NOT be a starter.

Its just as ridiculous to predict a lineup today as it is to say that "Gathwright will NOT be a starter".


current roster as it is, it isnt a stretch that he could possibly start. as is, fukudome is still the right fielder with soriano in left and gathwright/pie/johnson the other 3 outfielders. against righties, gathwright likely would start, unless pie went crazy all of a sudden.

if they get bradley or another decent hitting right fielder, no way gathwright starts. (barring injury).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Bradley is a done deal. He's the right fielder. Fukadome and Reed Johnson splitting center and Soriano in left. Gathwright is a late inning defensive replacement, a pinch runner and OCCASIONAL starter-just to give guys a day off once a week or so. You will see, in the next 2 weeks Bradley will be signed. I'm not super happy about it. He probably has the most upside and reasonable salary of the free agents available. But he's a ticking bomb, so I'm less than over the top about the choice. But he will be signed in the next 2 weeks.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Gathwright is a late inning defensive replacement, a pinch runner and OCCASIONAL starter-just to give guys a day off once a week or so.

He's your left fielder when Soriano hits the DL.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
There will most definitely be more changes and to project a lineup now is silly.

Silly like winning 182 games in two years but no playoff games?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Who play right when Bradley is on the DL?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:40 am 
Keyser Soze wrote:
Who play right when Bradley is on the DL?



Mark Dero... oh wait:?


I'm expecting Fuk to have a bit of a better year this year. Somewhere around 280avg and with the amount of walks he'll hopefully continue to draw that's more than servicable down in the 7/8spot on the lineup


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Keyser Soze wrote:
Who play right when Bradley is on the DL?

fukudome, clearly. that is an easy scenario. he is the best right fielder they have, even with bradley. bradley goes down, fuk plays right, soriano plays left, and gathraight/johnson platoon in center. the trouble is when soriano goes down along WITH bradley. then you got issues. that is one reason why i think i prefer dunn over bradley. yes i know he is a lousy outfielder, but he is dependable, he doesnt get hurt, and he is a massive power stick in the middle of the lineup. if your right fielder is going to be either bradley or dunn, defensively it is a lose-lose situation! neither is a good fielder (bradley career .967 in right, dunn career .963). why not take the guy who doesnt get hurt and produces power consistently at the plate?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:51 am 
man of few opinions wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Who play right when Bradley is on the DL?

fukudome, clearly. that is an easy scenario. he is the best right fielder they have, even with bradley. bradley goes down, fuk plays right, soriano plays left, and gathraight/johnson platoon in center. the trouble is when soriano goes down along WITH bradley. then you got issues. that is one reason why i think i prefer dunn over bradley. yes i know he is a lousy outfielder, but he is dependable, he doesnt get hurt, and he is a massive power stick in the middle of the lineup. if your right fielder is going to be either bradley or dunn, defensively it is a lose-lose situation! neither is a good fielder (bradley career .967 in right, dunn career .963). why not take the guy who doesnt get hurt and produces power consistently at the plate?


Adam Dunn and his 163 strike outs last year makes me not want him. He's too feast or famine and the feasts he produces do not outweight the famine ala Ryan Howard.

Neither Bradley or Dunn give me a happy feeling, but I think the potential upside with Bradley is far greater than Dunns.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
bradleys potential? he has been in the league 9 years. i think potential is a word that is in his rear-view mirror. he has never - NEVER - stayed healthy for a full year. he has only 1 season with 500 AB's, and 1 other with 400. you cant count on him to play every day.

dunn struck out 164 times in 527 AB's. bradley struck out 112 times himself in 113 fewer ABs. yeah, its a better, but he strikes out his fair share. you dont bring dunn in to hit singles and slap balls around. you bat him 4th, break up the righties, let him be patient, get his pitch, and kill it. if he walks, the cubs lineup is strong enough to really make the opposition pay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
There will most definitely be more changes and to project a lineup now is silly.

Silly like winning 182 games in two years but no playoff games?


Thats not silly, thats tragic and at the very least unfortunate.

I love how so many people predict all these injuries to Soriano and Bradley.t's probably a reasonable prediction, given their stints on the DL the past couple years. Did you know that prior to signing with the Cubs, that Soriano had NEVER been on the DL?? So it's also reasonable to think he might have a year free of injuries too. Bradley is another story. He always seems to have at least a month off with some kind of injury. But he also produces pretty well when he is healthy ( mind and body). Having Reed Johnson and Joey Gathwright as back-ups, gives them adequate protection.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Thats not silly, thats tragic and at the very least unfortunate.


Tragic? Are you fucking kidding me?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37815
Location: ...
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
W_Z wrote:
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.


Well, it was certainly dissapointing, and maybe that's how he was using the word, but when I think tragic, the outcomes of sporting events never comes to mind...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 11:13 am
Posts: 2146
Location: Aurora, The City of (Flash) Lights
W_Z wrote:
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.


Yep. Zack's right.

Any chance we could wait until Spring Training starts before we launch into a lineup debate?

_________________
Seriously?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37815
Location: ...
lipidquadcab wrote:
when I think tragic, the outcomes of sporting events never comes to mind...


what the hell kind of fan are you?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65743
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
lipidquadcab wrote:
W_Z wrote:
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.


Well, it was certainly dissapointing, and maybe that's how he was using the word, but when I think tragic, the outcomes of sporting events never comes to mind...

And after reading enough of your posts, the outcome of sporting events won't come to my mind either.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Darkside wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
W_Z wrote:
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.


Well, it was certainly dissapointing, and maybe that's how he was using the word, but when I think tragic, the outcomes of sporting events never comes to mind...

And after reading enough of your posts, the outcome of sporting events won't come to my mind either.


ok...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Yep. 2003 hurt. But silly me figured that They would win Game 7 with Kerry Wood pitching...... :roll:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Yes, Steve. It was so tragic that mere hours after the Cubs season ended, you started a thread boasting about what a great year it was on the Northside.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I still feel very strongly that was the case. It WAS a tremendous season, with a tragic post-season. There is no contradiction here. I thoroughly enjoyed 2008 and will remember it as one of the better seasons to date. It just concluded in a very bitterly disappointing conclusion in the playoffs.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23775
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
I don't really buy into the idea you need a different kind of hitter in the post-season than in the regular season to win, but if I did, Adam Dunn would be a fine example of someone better suited for regular season wins. Bradley is at least a career .318 hitter in the playoffs with 42 AB's. Sure, if he's hurt it won't matter, but at least it's something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Projected lineup
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
W_Z wrote:
2003 was tragic. '07 and '08 were annoying.

yes

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group