It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Bears draft thread 2009
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
With the 18th pick, the Bears select.........

Hopefully defense, considering Angelo has no clue taking offense in the first round.

Now, oh wise CSFMB members, will one of these guys be there at 18?

Taylor Mays?
Road Warrior Animals kid?

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57237
There are several guys I would be happy with in the first round.

Mays, Maclin, Animal's son, Spikes, the USC linebacker, a few of the DEs.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
thepoofer wrote:
With the 18th pick, the Bears select.........

Hopefully defense, considering Angelo has no clue taking offense in the first round.

Now, oh wise CSFMB members, will one of these guys be there at 18?

Taylor Mays?
Road Warrior Animals kid?


I wonder how many good offensive picks there'll have to be before this idea dies. Apparantly Greg Olsen and Matt Forte aren't enough.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
Irish Boy wrote:
thepoofer wrote:
With the 18th pick, the Bears select.........

Hopefully defense, considering Angelo has no clue taking offense in the first round.

Now, oh wise CSFMB members, will one of these guys be there at 18?

Taylor Mays?
Road Warrior Animals kid?


I wonder how many good offensive picks there'll have to be before this idea dies. Apparantly Greg Olsen and Matt Forte aren't enough.


Did he take Forte in the first round?

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
When the memory of Benson, and mishandling of the Grossman era fade. He has also made bad picks by his non picks. He should have drafted a line man or 2 and done something about his WRs but he ignored both.

Metcalf, Bradley,Beekman, Wolfe haven't and won't amount to much. Who knows about Bennett and Williams but it doesn't look good so far.

He has hit on a lot of defensive picks but wiffed on a lot too. My opinion his biggest problem is the bad picks in the early rounds and paying people he shouldn't.

Forte was a 2nd round pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Irish Boy wrote:
I wonder how many good offensive picks there'll have to be before this idea dies. Apparantly Greg Olsen and Matt Forte aren't enough.

Why would they be enough to overshadow all his bad picks?

First-third round offense picks that were good:
Bernard Berrian 2004 (Good, but gone)
Greg Olsen 2007 (I think he's terribly overrated but I'll put him in)
Matt Forte 2008

First-third round offense picks that were bad:
Marc Columbo 2002 (was bad for us at least)
Terrence Metcalf 2002
Ced Benson 2005
Mark Bradley 2005
Garrett Wolfe 2007
Chris Williams 2008
Earl Bennett 2008

Don't care enough to argue whether Grossman was good or bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57237
You cannot put Chris Williams in the bad list yet. He has hardly seen the field.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
RFDC wrote:
You cannot put Chris Williams in the bad list yet. He has hardly seen the field.

Sure I can, he's a first round draft pick that hardly saw the field his first year because of a pre-existing injury the Bears didn't care about. Chris Williams can be a good player, but right now he's a bad pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
All that really shows is that a lot of those picks have had bad injury luck. Columbo has been a productive starter in Dallas. It must be Angelo's fault that he got his knee rolled up. Terrance Metcalf is a servicable NFL backup. And we don't know abut the 2008 picks one way or another.

Of the offensive players taken in the past two years we've seen on the field, they've been good.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I think they should draft a RB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Irish Boy wrote:
All that really shows is that a lot of those picks have had bad injury luck. Columbo has been a productive starter in Dallas. It must be Angelo's fault that he got his knee rolled up. Terrance Metcalf is a servicable NFL backup. And we don't know abut the 2008 picks one way or another.


I don't care about fault and I don't care how these guys perform for other teams. I only care about how they perform for the Bears. Two good picks in 2 years or three good picks in 7 years shouldn't dispel the idea he doesn't draft offense well, it reinforces it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
Irish Boy wrote:
All that really shows is that a lot of those picks have had bad injury luck. Columbo has been a productive starter in Dallas. It must be Angelo's fault that he got his knee rolled up. Terrance Metcalf is a servicable NFL backup. And we don't know abut the 2008 picks one way or another.

Of the offensive players taken in the past two years we've seen on the field, they've been good.


Still looking for proof Forte was drafted in the first round............

And if your trying to defend Angelo's offensive drafting, your rebuttle is falling on deaf ears.


Road Warrior Animals son, has his stock dropped?
Wasnt he a top 5 pick? I swear in that USA today paper that costs 1.75 at JJ Peppers that you only buy when you have the beer shits had him pegged as the third guy taken.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:45 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57237
thepoofer wrote:
Road Warrior Animals son, has his stock dropped?
Wasnt he a top 5 pick? I swear in that USA today paper that costs 1.75 at JJ Peppers that you only buy when you have the beer shits had him pegged as the third guy taken.


I have never seen him listed this high. All the places I have read about have had him listed as a mid 1st round guy.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
KDdidit wrote:
RFDC wrote:
You cannot put Chris Williams in the bad list yet. He has hardly seen the field.

Sure I can, he's a first round draft pick that hardly saw the field his first year because of a pre-existing injury the Bears didn't care about. Chris Williams can be a good player, but right now he's a bad pick.

Guys, the jury is out on Chris Williams, who indeed saw very limited at best action in his rookie season due to a back injury that was revealed a couple days after the Bears signed him in training camp. It wasn't until during the Bears' first preseason game where back issues and the Bears' #1 pick were revealed. Even though the Bears needed to address their offensive line in the draft, I think what raised red flags was that the team didn't seem to do their homework before they drafted Chris and that several NFL teams were scared away concerning what happened at Vanderbilt. It doesn't look good, especially if the back issues flare up again in Bourbonnais next August.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
I'm not making a statement either way but the Forte pick should never be used as a judge of talent evaluation. You could have put all the RB names on a board and thrown a dart at it on draft day resulting in a quality RB with a lot of potential.

Drafting an RB in 2008 was a failure proof proposition. Mendenhall looks like the biggest bust of the group, and there is no way I'd lable him a future bust.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
18 is a terrible spot...they seemed so much worse than that.

At 18 the best CB QB RB OT WR are all gone but your still paying first round money

2nd tier of the first round sucks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
KDdidit wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
All that really shows is that a lot of those picks have had bad injury luck. Columbo has been a productive starter in Dallas. It must be Angelo's fault that he got his knee rolled up. Terrance Metcalf is a servicable NFL backup. And we don't know abut the 2008 picks one way or another.


I don't care about fault and I don't care how these guys perform for other teams. I only care about how they perform for the Bears. Two good picks in 2 years or three good picks in 7 years shouldn't dispel the idea he doesn't draft offense well, it reinforces it.


I could't agree more with your posts, KD - I'll go as far as saying that this guy is absolutely incompetent as far as drafting offense goes - and even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
rogers park bryan wrote:
18 is a terrible spot...they seemed so much worse than that.

At 18 the best CB QB RB OT WR are all gone but your still paying first round money

2nd tier of the first round sucks


Everything I have read and heard over the past couple of years indicates that drafting in the top 10 after the first couple of picks sucks. You pay top money for players you are only marginally better than the next 10.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
18 is a terrible spot...they seemed so much worse than that.

At 18 the best CB QB RB OT WR are all gone but your still paying first round money

2nd tier of the first round sucks


Everything I have read and heard over the past couple of years indicates that drafting in the top 10 after the first couple of picks sucks. You pay top money for players you are only marginally better than the next 10.

Yeah I guess fro 6-20 The Gms talent evaluation really shows. 1 to 5 are usually set and anything after 20 isnt considered a top pick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:38 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57237
Last year's #18 is doing pretty well. Joe Flacco.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
RFDC wrote:
Last year's #18 is doing pretty well. Joe Flacco.

Yeah but the point is unless its an obvious pick...Angelo will make the wrong decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
If Jeremy Maclin is available and he is not picked I give up on Jerry Angelo.

I don't know if he's a star WR in the league but unless they roll out the cash for TJ HOUSHMAZILI he's the best way to upgrade our biggest position of need.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If Jeremy Maclin is available and he is not picked I give up on Jerry Angelo.

I don't know if he's a star WR in the league but unless they roll out the cash for TJ HOUSHMAZILI he's the best way to upgrade our biggest position of need.


I have a better plan in my Patrick Crayton thread.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
With the Chargers' loss in Pittsburgh yesterday, #18 is indeed where the Bears are scheduled to draft in Round 1 of the NFL Draft this April. As much as I would like to see the Bears upgrade their suddenly aging defensive line, secondary & offensive line, they really need to address their receiving corps & either draft a guy with gamebreaking speed or spend the $$$$ to trade for one in free agency. With Kyle Orton likely to be the starting QB next season from the getgo, they need guys who can break a close game open. The current guys are flat out terrible, and I think it's also time to end the Devin Hester experiment!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
If everyone thinks Angelo's gonna fuck up the 1st round pick anyway, then I'd rather have him pick an offensive lineman every year with that pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
SHARK wrote:
The current guys are flat out terrible, and I think it's also time to end the Devin Hester experiment!


The fuck you talking about? I cannot remember a single time he was thrown to downfield that he had not beaten double coverage. That experiment is working.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
What about trading down for another second and possibly a third?

It is shaping up to be a deep draft, and unless Mays is there Id rather he picks where hes a little more successful, personally

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If Jeremy Maclin is available and he is not picked I give up on Jerry Angelo.

I don't know if he's a star WR in the league but unless they roll out the cash for TJ HOUSHMAZILI he's the best way to upgrade our biggest position of need.


I have a better plan in my Patrick Crayton thread.


I don't think he is a #1. He is one of those complimentary guys that are good to have around when you have a stud WR. The Bears don't have one of those now.


Just read the thread. It's all in there.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
It is a quick and cheap fix. It also allows the Bears to use money/picks to fill other critical needs.

The Bear are most likely not going to find WR who makes an immediate impact in the draft. Not that they can't, just that it does not happen often across the entire league.

I think a guy like Suggs would have a much greater impact on Bear fortunes next year than someone like Houshmanzadeh.

If they can get Boldin, on the other hand, well that is something to talk about.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
That's the thing; only very rarely are rookie WRs productive at all. Besides from QB, it seems to be the steepest learning curve on the field. Bringing in a Maclin or Heyward-Bey or whoever is great, but he's unlikely to help much next year. For the record, I think my guy for the graft is Everette Brown out of FSU, but I'm not 100% on that. I'd rather get a DE. I would entertain the idea of using a #1 for Boldin.

That's also why I'm optimistic for Hester as well. I think he had around 50 catches this year, and by the end of the season he was just about the only WR Orton seemed to trust. 50 catches isn't other worldly, but it isn't awful either, especially for a guy you only really expect to be a number two. Also, it may not seem like it, but WR is really hard, even for guys that played WR in college. Not only are there the plays and motions, but almost all routes in the NFL have options built in, plus you need to key on DBs, plus you need to catch the ball and be athletic enough to do something with it. This was, basically, Hester's second year as a wide receiver, and the first year was just as a gadget player. He's reputed not to be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a lot of smarter guys never pick up WR because the reads and clues are just too hard. Hester was running every route by the end of the year. And running them well enough. I see no reason why he couldn't be a legitimate number 2- the sort of receiver that would be a number 2 on almost any team- next year.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: USA and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group