It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
That's the latest rumor.

Do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I think that would complete the entire Sox roster for figgins rumors over the past 2 years.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
I'm trying to think how this would play out. I assume Figgins would play center and lead off. Quentin would move to RF. I hate this idea but Owens would then play his natural position of LF. Fields starts at third. If he proves himself, great. If not, Figgins moves back to third and you pray that Viciedo proves himself in the minors in RF.

Lineup

CF Figgins
2B Lillibridge/Getz
RF Quentin
DH Thome
1B Konerko
SS Ramirez
C Pierzinski
3B Fields
RF Owens

That looks like a lineup that would work.

I'm deathly afraid of the final two spots in the rotation but they could sign someone with the money saved in the trade.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Why move CQ?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Love it. If this happens I think Lillibridge beats out Owens/Wise as the starting left fielder. I see the lineup looking like this (assuming they don't sign Dunn to play LF or Young to play SS):

3B Figgins
LF Lillibridge
RF Quentin
DH Thome
1B Konerko
SS Ramirez
C AJ
CF Anderson
2B Getz/Nix


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
:lol: Does Kenny only make trades with the Phillies, Rangers, and Angels now?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
This deal seems like a no brainer from the Sox side, but why would the Angels want another OFer? Don't they already have a logjam as it is?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Maybe the Angels have another deal in the works?

Anybody know Figgens' contract situation?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
Figgens becomes a FA next year, so obviously signing him to a multi year would have to be part of the deal.

Would it be worth exploring taking Mathews Jr. off their hands as well. I know he is being payed far above his capabilities, but he is an excellent CF defensively and I think he is only signed for 2 more years. If the Angels ate some salary, his contract would be palatable.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
Keyser Soze wrote:
Love it. If this happens I think Lillibridge beats out Owens/Wise as the starting left fielder. I see the lineup looking like this (assuming they don't sign Dunn to play LF or Young to play SS):

3B Figgins
LF Lillibridge
RF Quentin
DH Thome
1B Konerko
SS Ramirez
C AJ
CF Anderson
2B Getz/Nix


I didn't even think of Lillibridge in the mix in the OF, but that is even better. I don't think Figgins would be the 3B though.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
I would make the deal in a heartbeat, considering Chone's ability to lead off, play third base or second base, and steal once he gets on base...While J.D. would give Anaheim another outfielder, with Mark Teixeira now a Yankee, the Angels want to convert one of their current outfielders to first base & split Vlad Guerrero & Gary Matthews, Jr. as DH. Besides, the Angels aren't exactly thrilled about being used as pawns in negotiations for Manny Ramirez...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Figgins is to the Sox, what Roberts is to the Cubs. The Gm's wet dream!

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Why move CQ?


Quentin has the arm strength to play either corner spot. I don't think they have another player other than Anderson to play right. Owens arm is below average.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
Looking at Figgens, Young and Dye a little more closely, I would not trade the former two for Dye straight up.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
If Brent Lillibridge is one of your starting corner outfielders, then you have some serious problems.

And Tyler Flowers wasnt brought here to sit on the bench or toil in the minors, the guy is a better hitter than half of the Sox lineup right now.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
bigfan wrote:
I think that would complete the entire Sox roster for figgins rumors over the past 2 years.

Figgins is to the Sox as Roberts is to the Cubs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
There is no way in the world Flowers makes the 2009 team. He has work to do in the minors and AJ has another couple of years on his contract.

If it came down to it, I think Viciedo would be the corner OF over Lillibridge. Having seen neither, they are both questionable to me.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
thepoofer wrote:
If Brent Lillibridge is one of your starting corner outfielders, then you have some serious problems.


Why? He's hardly the first player to struggle his first go around in the bigs. He's a better all around ballplayer than Bambie Podsednik. He's a better athlete, a better defender and has a little pop in his bat. I would love to see an outfield of Quentin in Left, Anderson in center and Dye in Right but unfortunately Dye may have to be used to fill some holes in the lineup (3B) and pitching staff (starter).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
poofer, for being "THE (self proclaimed) authority of Chicago sports," you really are a dumbass.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
rogers park bryan wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I think that would complete the entire Sox roster for figgins rumors over the past 2 years.

Figgins is to the Sox as Roberts is to the Cubs


great minds think alike :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
good dolphin wrote:
There is no way in the world Flowers makes the 2009 team. He has work to do in the minors and AJ has another couple of years on his contract.

If it came down to it, I think Viciedo would be the corner OF over Lillibridge. Having seen neither, they are both questionable to me.



What does Flowers have left to prove in the minors?
He was traded because hes ready now, and the Braves had no place for him to play.

As for Viciedo, with rumors of weight problems, his natural position will be either first or DH

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
Frank Coztansa wrote:
poofer, for being "THE (self proclaimed) authority of Chicago sports," you really are a dumbass.


Do explain, considering every topic Ive brought to focus is an honest evaluation.

Lillibridge as a corner just reeks of 2009 being a rebuild year.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
He was in AA last year and really only flowered in the Arizona Fall League. He is supposed to be very raw behind the plate and strikes out too much. He's still young in terms of catcher development.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
good dolphin wrote:
He was in AA last year and really only flowered in the Arizona Fall League. He is supposed to be very raw behind the plate and strikes out too much. He's still young in terms of catcher development.


Then I seriously have to stop reading these porospect handbooks, because they have this guy as one of the top hitting prospects in all of baseball, but a butcher behind the plate.

Honestly Id like this guy on the big team as a backup first baseman/DH kinda guy, but I think that would defeat the pourpose of why they traded for a young catcher.

He can hit, I give him that.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
thepoofer wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
poofer, for being "THE (self proclaimed) authority of Chicago sports," you really are a dumbass.


Do explain, considering every topic Ive brought to focus is an honest evaluation.

Lillibridge as a corner just reeks of 2009 being a rebuild year.


The same way '08 was a rebuilding year with Danks and Floyd in the rotation and Quentin in left and Ramirez at 2b?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
Keyser Soze wrote:
thepoofer wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
poofer, for being "THE (self proclaimed) authority of Chicago sports," you really are a dumbass.


Do explain, considering every topic Ive brought to focus is an honest evaluation.

Lillibridge as a corner just reeks of 2009 being a rebuild year.


The same way '08 was a rebuilding year with Danks and Floyd in the rotation and Quentin in left and Ramirez at 2b?


After the big three in the rotation, what do you have?

Your willing to give up a decent, borderline star in Dye, for prospects who are years away, which, if rumors are reality, and fill that void with Lillibridge, who isnt a top prospect?

And lets not even bring up that Konerko is done, and Thome cant be counted on and both would have been shipped off if they wernt worthless already and yeah, getting rid of Dye, the only player who isnt a question mark, for prospects does mean KW is circling the white flag and rounding the tents.

They are not a better team without him.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
thepoofer wrote:
After the big three in the rotation, what do you have?


I'm sure you said the same thing last off season.

thepoofer wrote:
And lets not even bring up that Konerko is done


He came back from injury to hit 9 home runs in September. I would hardly call that being 'done'.

thepoofer wrote:
Your willing to give up a decent, borderline star in Dye, for prospects who are years away


Who said anything about prospects? The players rumored in these deals are Chone Figgins and Michael Young.

thepoofer wrote:
and fill that void with Lillibridge, who isnt a top prospect?


I saw a recent publication that ranked Lillibridge the 52nd best prospect in all of baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
thepoofer wrote:
And lets not even bring up that Konerko is done, and Thome cant be counted on and both would have been shipped off if they wernt worthless already and yeah, getting rid of Dye, the only player who isnt a question mark, for prospects does mean KW is circling the white flag and rounding the tents.

They are not a better team without him.

Dolphin repeatedly has pointed out how Thome, in a bad year for him, was still among top of the stat lists for DHs. Konerko may indeed be done, but he has a full no trade clause.

If Kenny has shown one thing during his tenure, its that he is most active in Janurary and February. And that he strives to put a competitive team on the field.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82233
Keyser Soze wrote:
thepoofer wrote:
After the big three in the rotation, what do you have?


I'm sure you said the same thing last off season.

.


Keyser, you are a smart baseball man. You know there are obvious differences between the quality of these two sets of pitching prospects.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dye for Figgins
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
How so? Marquez was a 1st round selection (41st overall) by the Yankees so the talent is obviously there. He had a very good '07 season in AA where he went 15-9 with a 3.65 ERA and was considered the Yanks #7 prospect. Baseball America called him a “workhorse groundball machine who fills the No. 3 or No. 4 spot in the rotation.” He battled injuries last season and fell off the radar like only a Yankee prospect can. Coop is teaching him a cutter that they think will compliment the sinker/changeup he already possesses. I'm not saying he's going to come out of the gate and win 17 games like Gavin Floyd but I'm also not ready to say he can't contribute as the teams 5th starter.

As for Clayton Richard, he may not have the overall talent that Floyd, Danks and Marquez have but he showed me a lot last season. I look at the fact that he only walked 13 hitters in 47.2 innings. That kind of confidence to attack hitters is rare in a young pitcher. Again, I'm not expecting 17 wins but I see no reason to think he can't contribute as the teams 4th or 5th starter.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group