It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 2:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
The Diamondbacks and free agent right-hander Jon Garland have agreed to terms on a one-year deal with an option for 2010, according to major league sources.

It appears the contract is similar to one of the proposals the sides discussed two weeks ago, in which the deal would include an option that could be exercised by either the player or team. The value of the buyout would change depending on which side declines the option.

The specifics of the deal are not known, but Garland's guaranteed money is believed to be in the $6 million to $8 million range.
The deal is pending a physical.

That Garland is available at a price that’s manageable for the Diamondbacks is likely a result of the sluggish economy a down year in 2008 for Garland. Last season with the Los Angeles Angels -- his first year away from the Chicago White Sox -- he posted a 4.90 ERA and saw an increase in base runners allowed and a decrease in his strikeout rate.

Given that, his decision to decline arbitration from the Angels was viewed as a surprise in the industry. In arbitration, he only would have received a one-year contract, but it would have been worth more than the $12 million he made in 2008.

Still, Garland is viewed as a dependable innings-eater. He has thrown at least 191 innings in each of the past seven seasons, ranking eighth in games started and 12th in innings pitched since 2002. He has spent his entire career in the American League, posting a 4.47 ERA in nine seasons.

Garland is a Type B free agent, meaning it will not cost the Diamondbacks a pick to sign him.

Though their repertoires are different, think of Garland as something of a right-handed Doug Davis. He isn’t overpowering and gives up his share of base runners, but he always has taken the ball and provided innings -- a valuable service, particularly at the back of a rotation.

Slotting in behind Brandon Webb and Dan Haren, Garland’s presence will help lessen the club’s reliance on young right-hander Max Scherzer, whose workload the Diamondbacks will try to limit.

The innings he is expected to provide also should help in keeping fresh a bullpen that isn’t as deep following the free-agent departures of Brandon Lyon and Juan Cruz.

Garland, who is 6-foot-6, is a sinkerball pitcher, but his career ground ball/fly ball ratio (1.29) skews only slightly toward keeping the ball on the ground. Last season, he had a ratio of 1.79.

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 pm
Posts: 4051
Location: logan squiz
pizza_Place: art of pizza
What does KW have to do with this?

_________________
Douchebag wrote:
This thread is probably going to make Tim Raines want to do cocaine again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
suckers playground wrote:
What does KW have to do with this?


Nothing! Nothing at all. No offer nothing. I will start the COUNT Wins by Garland Wins By the fat greasy over the hill Colon that Ken did sign.

Image

This is what you need to get!

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Merrionette Park
pizza_Place: Nick&Vito's
Of course no offer from the whitesox. You can expect the team to remain the same it is today. let's hope kenny has made the right choices. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Kenny took a no risk flyer on Colon. If colon doesn't make the team, they pay nothing. As for the 5th spot, they have plenty of options now with Poreda, Broadway, Richard and now Colon. Bringing Garland in to be a 5th starter at nearly 8M doesn't seem like a smart use of the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
It's only no risk if he's not being relied upon but they have him penciled in as the 4th starter so it's a massive risk. If Colon can't make it out of spring training the Sox are breaking camp with 2 rookies in the rotation. I find it hard to believe Kenny isn't adding a reliable veteran to replace Javy's starts (33) and innings (208).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The one in the middle carried the 2005 Sox offense in April and May.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Merrionette Park
pizza_Place: Nick&Vito's
When did Terry Crewes play for the Redsox? 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group