It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Scouting vs. Statistics
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55836
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Turned on the radio at 10:30 today to hear Laurence dramatically realize that you really can use sabermetrics and subjective evaluation together after all. Okay, great, but isn't that what everyone thinks? Only the dumbest meatball jocks think numbers don't work, and only Microsoft Excel thinks that scouting has no merit. Oh well.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:56 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
This has only been around since the 1970s. Most GMs adopted it 10-15 years ago. Billy Bean led the way. He wrote a book. But I guess it's not valid unless Larry discovers it.

Next Larry will tell us that the Penicillin discovery was really, really, really important.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Beardown wrote:
This has only been around since the 1970s. Most GMs adopted it 10-15 years ago. Billy Bean led the way. He wrote a book. But I guess it's not valid unless Larry discovers it..

Billy Beane did not write a book. He contributed to MoneyBall.
He also did not lead the way in SABRmetrics Bill James did.


But I digest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I know Bill James invented SABRmetrics. That was in the 1970s

I was just saying Billy Beane was the first GM to totally apply it. You got me on the book. He didn't write it. He just contributed to Moneyball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Beardown wrote:
I know Bill James invented it. That was in the 1970s

I was just saying Billy Beane was the first GM to totally apply it. You got me on the book. He didn't write it. He just contributed.

Thats ok Beardown...Its just that MoneyBall gets misrepresented on a regular basis so its one of my things.

Anyways next time I see you...hooker's on me


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 pm
Posts: 4051
Location: logan squiz
pizza_Place: art of pizza
Beardown has a little Joe Morgan in him :lol:

_________________
Douchebag wrote:
This thread is probably going to make Tim Raines want to do cocaine again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I think Larry got this revelation by listening to Bernsie. Bernsie always has an emailer provide him with SABRmetric stuff on players. The emailer gave Bernsie +/- win total stats on players yesterday.

Larry heard this and all of the sudden came up with this dramatic realization that Stats and Scouting are important. That's what I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55836
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I can't believe he needed a "baseball executive" to tell him that statistics and scouting are used in conjunction. I could've told him that.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:19 pm
Posts: 2114
Location: North 'Burbs
Glad to see some other people reacted as I did to this segment. Lar teased it by saying he had this "eloquently written" e-mail from a "highly-placed baseball executive" who had some great revelatons on the scouting vs. statistics argument. So, like the fool that I am, I said, OK, I'll leave the radio on a little longer and hear this. As others have pointed out, the great revelation turned out to be that you can use both in evaluating a player just like you can enjoy pizza and beer together. WTF???!!! No shit!!!

You know, I have nothing personal againt Larry Holmes and in all fairness, I've heard worse radio hosts (unfortunately, one of them is his partner), but it's shit like this that just turns me off. He builds up the most mundane, ordinary crap as great stuff that you absolutely have to hear and when you do hear it, prepare to have your world rocked! When I work at home, I tend to leave the Score on when M&H end and see if LoHo's got anything for me. He never does. Listening experiment over. I gave it way too long as it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55836
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Based on the pizza and beer simile, the executive was probably Jim Hendry. lulz.

To add my own input to this topic, I think that there are a lot of great sabermetric statistics, but I object to the "replacement player" statistics because you're comparing a real player to a fictitious one, and that has no validity to me. Compare players to their peers; how much better or worse Reed Johnson or Juan Uribe or whoever is than this hypothetical "replacement player" is irrelevant to me. Stuff like valuing on-base percentage is so rudimentary that only the dumbest of the dumb can't do it, though.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It's just insulting and patronizing when Larry does these dramatic rants about simple and obvious observations.

It can only be one of two things: He either knows he's doing it and has to cuz he doesn't have anything interesting or original to say. Or he's dumb and doesn't know he's stating the obvious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I could just see Larry at a party...

Larry - It has been my experience from the many parties I have attended that a bunch of cube-like objects, made from water, that are frozen, come in handy to keep drinks cold.

Party host - Larry, are you saying we need more ice?

Larry - That's another way of saying it.

Party host - This is the last time I invite you to anyting, Larry. Just letting you know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.
Maybe he can subcontract Jesse Rogers to come up with topics. Tch.

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group