It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:36 pm
Posts: 793
per WSCR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 267
per WMVP---2 hours ago.

_________________
2009 CSFMB Fantasy Basketball Champion-
2009 CSFMB Pro Football Pick'em Champion-
2011 NAS Replacement League Football-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
the very definition of crap for crap...their crap is less talented though...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 325
How is T. Thomas going to fit in after S. Skiles wouldn't even let him sit on the bench a few years ago?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Linda S. wrote:
How is T. Thomas going to fit in after S. Skiles wouldn't even let him sit on the bench a few years ago?

The difference is the Bulls now have a coach that bad players can walk all over. Skiles didn't take any crap from anyone, which is a major reason the team eventually quit on him.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:44 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 325
Approx. how much money does the L. Hughes for T. Thomas / J. James save the team?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Ok, I took a look at the salaries, and to me, this deal makes sense. James and Thomas together have about the same salary as Hughes: for this season and next season. And like Hughes, both of their contracts expire next year. So, you're still clear for 2010, and you get rid of an extra guard who never plays. Junk for junk, but Pax told Hughes he'd try to get him out of here, and now you don't have to worry about that situation.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Someone should post the draft comments on these 3 players coupled with their career stats

I think it would be funny...but i have too much to do


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 325
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Ok, I took a look at the salaries, and to me, this deal makes sense. James and Thomas together have about the same salary as Hughes: for this season and next season. And like Hughes, both of their contracts expire next year. So, you're still clear for 2010, and you get rid of an extra guard who never plays. Junk for junk, but Pax told Hughes he'd try to get him out of here, and now you don't have to worry about that situation.




But if T. Thomas didn't want to play here a few years ago, what makes you think he's going to be anymore willing to play than L. Hughes?

.... Plus, at the 3 position, the Bull already have L. Deng and J. Salmons. So instead of having a backlog of 2s, we now have too many SFs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Larry Hughes=Tim Thomas=Larry Hughes=Tim Thomas=Loser

Paxson is just moving piles of dog shit. :?:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 325
I would have just assumed traded K. Heinrich and B. Gordon and played L. Hughes for the next two seasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Once, when asked if he was concerned about his former coach Nate McMillan commenting that he has a selfish attitude, replied, "I don't even know what he's talking about, I just worry about Jerome."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
The NBA is just fucked up when it comes to trades & how the talent is treated. These players are the ultimate prima-donna's (sp?)

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Linda S. wrote:
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Ok, I took a look at the salaries, and to me, this deal makes sense. James and Thomas together have about the same salary as Hughes: for this season and next season. And like Hughes, both of their contracts expire next year. So, you're still clear for 2010, and you get rid of an extra guard who never plays. Junk for junk, but Pax told Hughes he'd try to get him out of here, and now you don't have to worry about that situation.




But if T. Thomas didn't want to play here a few years ago, what makes you think he's going to be anymore willing to play than L. Hughes?

.... Plus, at the 3 position, the Bull already have L. Deng and J. Salmons. So instead of having a backlog of 2s, we now have too many SFs.

Thomas didn't play because of Skiles. Hughes isn't playing because of Del Negro. And Salmons can play power forward just fine in a smaller lineup.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
walkrman5 wrote:
The NBA is just fucked up when it comes to trades & how the talent is treated. These players are the ultimate prima-donna's (sp?)

The contracts are fucked up. More than any other league, the NBA would benefit from non-guaranteed contracts. The level of play would be so much better if rosters were staffed with players deemed to be legitimately earning their contract values.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
This Bulls/Knicks' trade appears to be nothing more than garbage for garbage. Look on the bright side though. Stephon Marbury has someone to help count his money if Larry Hughes becomes a malcontent in Gotham...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SHARK wrote:
Stephon Marbury has someone to help count his money if Larry Hughes becomes a malcontent in Gotham...


:lol:

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Krazy Ivan wrote:
SHARK wrote:
Stephon Marbury has someone to help count his money if Larry Hughes becomes a malcontent in Gotham...


:lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
City of Fools wrote:
Linda S. wrote:
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Ok, I took a look at the salaries, and to me, this deal makes sense. James and Thomas together have about the same salary as Hughes: for this season and next season. And like Hughes, both of their contracts expire next year. So, you're still clear for 2010, and you get rid of an extra guard who never plays. Junk for junk, but Pax told Hughes he'd try to get him out of here, and now you don't have to worry about that situation.




But if T. Thomas didn't want to play here a few years ago, what makes you think he's going to be anymore willing to play than L. Hughes?

.... Plus, at the 3 position, the Bull already have L. Deng and J. Salmons. So instead of having a backlog of 2s, we now have too many SFs.

Thomas didn't play because of Skiles. Hughes isn't playing because of Del Negro. And Salmons can play power forward just fine in a smaller lineup.


WHAT? Salmons is a 2/3. Thomas is now a 4 for the Bulls and in a running lineup can sneak into the 5 for short stretches. But no way, no how is Salmons a 4.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:57 am
Posts: 2104
Location: NW side
pizza_Place: Benny's on 26th in Berwyn
City of Fools wrote:
the very definition of crap for crap...their crap is less talented though...


Hey, I heard you use that same description on the B&B show in reference to the trade that went down yesterday, COF...sensing a pattern here...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
WHAT? Salmons is a 2/3. Thomas is now a 4 for the Bulls and in a running lineup can sneak into the 5 for short stretches. But no way, no how is Salmons a 4.[/quote]

Yeah Salmons is generously listed at 6-6....no way hes a 4 in the NBA even in a small lineup.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Apparently James has an injury and there may be an insurance buyout/settlement of his contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
Apparently James has an injury and there may be an insurance buyout/settlement of his contract.

You are correct, and K.C. Johnson has the story online as I type this message. There could be some extra $$$$ available as a result of this news. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/ch ... 9280.story


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
CoF, Tim Thomas is not less talented than Larry Hughes and Salmons is definitely not a 4. Tim Thomas can basically replace Noc even when unmotivated. I dont see how this can possibly be construed as a bad trade, although its not a great one by any means.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Personally, I would have kept Nocioni, but the rest was just shuffling piles of shit around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Nas wrote:
I don't get this move. Larry Hughes wanted to play but didn't realize he isn't the same player the Cavs signed to a big contract. Thomas and James are thieves. They couldn't care less about playing basketball. All they want is to sit on the bench or at home and cash a check.

I think that's the idea. If you have $12M budgeted for a shitty player who will get no play-time, you might as well fill the spot with people who don't want to play. Plus, Pax told Hughes he'd try to move him somewhere where he could play.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Nas wrote:
I don't get this move. Larry Hughes wanted to play but didn't realize he isn't the same player the Cavs signed to a big contract. Thomas and James are thieves. They couldn't care less about playing basketball. All they want is to sit on the bench or at home and cash a check. Besides getting the first round pick I really don't have a clue what Paxson was doing. That's not surprising because I haven't had a clue about his moves for some time.

Hughes was done here. Plain and simple. Thomas is talented and didn't fit the Skiles system a few years back because he's not a hard nosed defender. He was averaging 9 a game with the Knicks and can give some O off the bench. James will get a buyout. He ruptured his Achilles and may never play again and he also gives you a 5M bogey next year in an expiring contract move (as long as he don't retire)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group