It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18190
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Never got into the Star Trek stuff. Can one take this movie in
without knowing much about it and still enjoy it? Sounds like
maybe this might work for me since I don't have all that other
Star Trek stuff clogging up my mind. Thinking about maybe
doing a movie this weekend and didn't want to waste the time
or money on this one if you need to know something about
the series. If this is going to be the first of a new
wave of Star Trek's maybe I will be ok.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
T-Bone wrote:
Never got into the Star Trek stuff. Can one take this movie in
without knowing much about it and still enjoy it? Sounds like
maybe this might work for me since I don't have all that other
Star Trek stuff clogging up my mind. Thinking about maybe
doing a movie this weekend and didn't want to waste the time
or money on this one if you need to know something about
the series. If this is going to be the first of a new
wave of Star Trek's maybe I will be ok.



It is better the less you know about what came before.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
chaspoppcap wrote:
It is better the less you know about what came before.


I think that may be true.

There were definitely some cool moments for Star Trek fans, like the character intros and the Kobayashi Maru test. But, on the whole, you don't need to know anything about the series to enjoy it.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18190
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Ok, if I can convince the wife to go to a Sci-Fi flick
I will check this out. Thanks for the info.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I think that may be true.

There were definitely some cool moments for Star Trek fans, like the character intros and the Kobayashi Maru test. But, on the whole, you don't need to know anything about the series to enjoy it.

Plus there's a Tribble.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
KDdidit wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I think that may be true.

There were definitely some cool moments for Star Trek fans, like the character intros and the Kobayashi Maru test. But, on the whole, you don't need to know anything about the series to enjoy it.

Plus there's a Tribble.


Really? I missed that.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
There's one hanging in a cage by Scotty's desk on the ice planet.

There's a different angle where it's clearer, but this is all I could find, circled.
Attachment:
Trib2.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
There's an interview with the writers where they discuss that they did have a scene for Shatner they had written and went back and forth over. Obviously they decided against it, but hearing them explain it, the scene wasn't completely ridiculous, although surely unnecessary.

http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/12/shatner ... e-tidbits/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7156
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Saw it last night. Both sons liked it and they are definitely non-trekkies. Mrs. retard, while somewhat familiar with Star Trek, normally does not enjoy action movies. However she also gave this one an enthusiastic two thumbs up. And I as an old school trekkie really enjoyed this one too. Plenty of references, humorous and otherwise, to previous shows and movies while at the same time a new energy that the franchise really needed.

One part, however, that I did not understand: How could Scottie have had less hair as a youngster than he did as an old guy beaming whales aboard the klingon warbird? At first I thought maybe at some point on the Star Trek time line they solved male baldness but then that does not explain Picard. 8)

All in all it was two hours very well spent.

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23759
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Some additional info about plot devices taken from a Q+A with the writers

Quote:
http://darthmojo.wordpress.com/2009...ints-addressed/

Note that while I will do my best to remember the juiciest details, you can download a podcast of the entire Q&A here on iTunes.

WHY TIME TRAVEL?

Many (including myself) have wondered what the point was of going to such great lengths to reconcile existing Star Trek cannon with a new story. Why bother with all this alternate-timeline hooey? If you’re rebooting the franchise and starting over, then just start over! The problem with that, according to Kurtzman & Orci, is that audiences might have assumed this new movie was simply an attempt to tell a story about Kirk & Spock from back before the original series, and everything that happened in Trek lore is still destined to happen. Where’s the fun in watching this crew take on the galaxy if we know Kirk will eventually be killed by Soren, Spock will become an ambassador to Romulus and everyone else lives? By history being altered, nothing has yet been written – Kirk really could die on the next mission and Khan might end up selling shoes. With a whole new timeline, stories are no longer beholden to “established” history and while everything we know and love is still there, how it plays out is no longer written. If you’ll pardon the cliche, essentially it means that everything old is new again!

THE CORVETTE

A deleted scene established that Kirk’s stepdad is a real bad mofo, and he forces young Kirk to wax & polish the car. He threatens that if he finds even one spec of dirt, he’s going to beat the kid senseless (I still think it’s a dumb scene, but at least this provides a lot more motivation for it). Other tidbits about this scene: The Beastie Boys song may be a blatant attempt to make Star Trek seem more hip, but if you look closely at the dashboard, the station playing it is listed as ”oldies.” Also, what the hell is a cliff like this doing in famously flat Iowa? Again, sharp eyes will see that the sign Kirk blows through reads “quarry” (i.e. a man-made pit). Another scene of 10 year old Kirk that didn’t make the final cut (I’m not sure if it was filmed or not) also involved a young Carol Marcus! Props to the boys for diving so deeply into the Trek mythos (they both admit to being Wrath of Khan junkies).

FAMILIES ON BOARD?

A fan asked why George Kirk’s pregnant wife was on board the USS Kelvin, since families weren’t supposed to be brought on board until the Next Gen days. “Because she’s a Starfleet officer” explained the dynamic duo. This is also alluded to in another line about Kirk’s mother being off-world.

25 YEAR WAIT

After the incident with the USS Kelvin, did Nero and his crew really just hang around the black hole for 25 years, playing Fizbin and waiting for Spock to emerge? Couldn’t they have used that time to, say, help Romulus avert eventual disaster? Turns out a major cut scene explains what happened during that time frame. After being rammed by the Kelvin, Nero’s ship was crippled; a convoy of Klingon Warbirds captured the crew and held them in a prison camp for all those years. Eventually the Romulans escaped, reclaimed their ship, blew up 47 Klingon vessels and returned to their mission (some of this is discussed in dialog which remains in the film). The good news is that these scenes were completed and there is hope they may surface on the DVD.

COINCIDENCE ON HOTH

The motherlode of the film’s many handy coincidences involves the banished Kirk conveniently running into Spock Prime (as the writers coined him early on) in his cave on Delta Vega. Much to my surprise and delight, even this jaw-dropping moment has an explanation! In the minds of the creators, the focus of the plot is that Nero’s destruction of the timeline has altered history to the point that the all important friendship of Kirk and Spock is now threatened. If these two don’t come together, the fabric of space and time itself is endangered (as we have witnessed by the universe itself being saved countless times over the last 40 years). Kirk “coincidentally” running into Spock Prime is an example of fate itself trying to bring these two together. That’s how important it is. In fact a line about this was included during Spock Prime’s mind-meld speech, but was removed at the last minute (the writers said this particular speech was labored over more than any other section of the script and they now regret not including the line about fate). While this doesn’t completely forgive a very hackneyed sequence, it does address the most egregious moment in the film and I appreciate that an attempt was made to explain it. In the wake of criticism over this scene, perhaps the line will be restored for the DVD release. It would make a world of difference.

NEXT ON JERRY SPRINGER

A lot of people found themselves scratching their heads over the unlikely romantic pairing of Spock and Uhura. The inspiration for this came from the original series, where apparently there are scenes of these two flirting (if anyone reading this remembers which episodes they’re talking about, please fill us in). Since the rough-and-tumble badboy is always the one to get the girl, the writers wanted to pair Uhura up with the less obvious choice. Besides, since Uhura is a smart, mature woman, they felt that she would probably gravitate towards the more interesting, intellectually mature man.

GREEN GIRL BLUES

There was a lot more material further explaining Kirk’s relationship with the hot green chick. Since she worked in the computer lab, Kirk was essentially sleeping with her to gain access to the simulation computer so he could cheat on the Kobyashi Maru. In a cut scene, Kirk tells her that if she gets an email from him while he’s taking the test, she should open it; she does, and it launches a virus which installs his cheat-patch.

SPOCK, MEET SPOCK

Why didn’t the universe explode when Spock Prime met New Spock? What about all the time-honored SF theories that going back in time and meeting yourself will lead to anti matter explosions, tears in the fabric of space/time and dogs and cats living together? In doing their research on the latest fringe science theories, the current thinking is that events which create huge paradoxes (like going back in time and killing your grandfather) no longer will result in cataclysm, but the instant creation of an alternate universe which allows for the new reality (and I’ll back them up on this, since I’ve read material on the subject that basically says the same thing).

ALL BLOWED UP

Why did Kirk feel the need to fire all weapons at a doomed ship? After all, Nero’s vessel was mere seconds away from being crushed inside the black hole. Not true, said the Trek scribes – Nero’s ship was built to travel through black holes, so if Kirk hadn’t done anything, the bad guys would have slipped away and emerged god knows where (and when) ready to do more evil.

LENS FLARES: THE MOVIE

Why on Earth did JJ Abrams turn Star Trek into a two-hour commercial for lens flare plugins? I have to admit, upon my second viewing of the film I found this visual motif to be highly distracting and irritating. Flares, reflections and luminous ghosts simply appear everywhere, even without any obvious sources. The reason? JJ wanted a visual metaphor that stated “we have a bright future ahead of us.” No, I’m not making this up.

EXPLOSION SURFING

Would creating a big explosion on the event horizon of a black hole really create a shockwave that the Enterprise could surf to safety? No. But the explosion would alter the nature of the event horizon and create a space-time ripple that would… do something. Ok, my memory of this answer is a little shaky, but the pair did impress the crowd with a well researched solution that did make sense – you’ll have to listen to the podcast for the details.


Some of these still sound odd but some of them make sense. The stuff about the green chick adds a lot. The explanation of the coincidences that Spock and Kirk just happened to be marooned on the same planet as Scottie also has some sort of Trek foundation. You'd have to an extreme nerd to know this, but there's a TNG book called Q-Squared that postulates the Universe "wants" things to happen. Kinda a naturalistic viewpoint. Nero's time travel alters things and the Universe does what it can to set things right. It wants the Enterprise crew together. It gets the original helmsman sick so Sulu can take over, it has the chief engineer die on the first mining platform so when Scotty gets back to the ship he can be the engineer, it has a communications officer that doesn't know Romulan so that Uhura has to replace him, etc...

Now it's surely giving the writers too much credit for things that are just too convenient. But there ways you can suspend your disbelief a little longer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
thanks for that but it still leaves too much B.S> in there for me to love it.
No Sam Kirk, going from Cadet to Captain of a Cruiser??? that is 5 count them 5 officer grades up and no experience to run the Flagship of the fleet? Them talking about Spock and Uhura flirting is in one episode , the mirror universe one but she was acting like a cat in heat in that one.

Sorry , like I said it is a terrible Trek movie but a good movie if you are not a Trek nerd like me. The Trek
Lists I am on most of the people say the same thing as me. Will I go see the next one, probably but just so you know Angels beat the crap out of it this weekend , let us see what next weekend looks like. I am also nerd enough to be praying that Capt America turns out well and not have Will Smith as Steve Rogers. I am going to stick it looks like to all my old fiction and RPG where things make sense in some strange fashion. A universe that in order to become Captain requires years of hard work and dedication, not 3 years in The Academy. Hell in this timeline We will have Wesley Crusher as captain at 15 years old.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37810
Location: ...
time travel is a convoluted plot device that gives any writer the ability to deux ex machina the shit out of whatever they want. the clever part is how they use it. i thought they did a good job in "star trek" because it still held true to the characters and allowed the plot to take a back seat.

i'm also going to point out...that while i didn't mind time travel in this film, i thought it was ridiculous in "lost", which is also of course by abrams.

the problems with that are obvious: time travel wasn't instituted until other plot elements were already established (and...re...established); therefore, if you were going to reshape the time continuum, then there should have been something set up in the first two seasons, and there wasn't. the french chick would've recognized jin, for example.

another good example of time travel in a film that is used more as a character device is "donnie darko"; and one that will just fuck your brains out is "primer".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
what about Time Cop? or Voyagers?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
Saw ST and was glad I did. Grew up a Star Wars kid who never got into ST. So I was surprised I enjoyed the movie. Actually walked out hoping for a sequel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18190
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
I saw this was out on DVD so I picked it up last weekend. Amazing how fast these
summer movies come out now. I remember waiting so long when they were on VHS....
Anyhow, I really liked it for what it was. I am aware of the characters of Star Trek
and from reading this thread, knew a little bit about what to expect, but I look at it as a new
Sci-Fi series I can look forward to catching the next installation of. Didn't like the Star
Wars prequels for the most part so this was in a way, a chance for me to reconnect
with something of the sci-fi ilk that I could enjoy. It was a couple of pretty fun filled
hours watching and trying to figure things out. Worth a rental if you haven't seen it
yet in my opinion.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:19 pm
Posts: 6516
pizza_Place: Kaiser's - Kenosha
Yeah, we rented it on Friday night. We enjoyed it, but those lens flares were out of control.

_________________
Just chillin' like Garret Quillin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Star Trek
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37810
Location: ...
Exclamation Moint wrote:
Agreed that time travel is greatly overused. But I think the destruction of Vulcan was a clever way to create an "alternate reality" and reinvent the timeline. It was overdue, really. Reboot, retcon, whatever. Yes, Kirk's ascension to Captain was far-fetched but plotted well. I think it was no worse than the 4th best Star Trek movie. Definitely the best visually. By a lot.


Saw it twice in the theatres, and the second time I saw it on IMAX. completely agree. looked fantastic.

Quote:
And good to see a Trek film that had good first class special effects. JJ Abrams was in a complete trap: please the diehards or attract a new audience who's never seen Trek before. I can't name anyone who would've handled it better. Raimi? Cameron? Singer? Gilliam? Soderbergh? Bay? McG? Even Lucas? No fucking way. Remember freshmen in high school weren't even alive when TNG wrapped up. I doubt they watched Voyager or Enterprise. Time to start over. The ST brand was becoming irrelevant. No one's destroying the old series or movies. They'll always be there. Sulu will always be gay.


Again, spot on. I think Abrams did as good a job as you could with redefining the series. It needed a jolt. You can still appreciate the classics and not think that it's been tarnished. You'll never satisfy the fanboys. Ever.

Quote:
So much of Star Trek does not hold up - the Next Generation episodes look almost as dated as the original series, though for the most part they're pretty well written. Patrick Stewart was the only good actor of the group and he had to speak a lot of lines of shitty dialogue, especially in the last 2 TNG movies. With the exception of Nimoy no one could act on the Original Series. Not a one of them. Zachary Quinto is the 3rd best actor in Trek history. And now you've got Simon Pegg, too. I can't name any actor who's done significant work from DS9 + the other two series since they ended.


Exactly. TNG has turned out, to me, to be even more dated than the original series. I don't know how that happened. Maybe it was the 80's. But my God...it's really horrible to watch at times. While the show has always been about ideas, and TNG continued that tradition, some of the language they invented was just horrendous. I suggest watching AVGN's Top Ten Star Trek Technobabbles to prove my point:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGAahDeceHI

I just watched ST11 again last night, and I'm convinced it's the most fun I've had at a Star Trek film since Voyage Home.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group