It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 10:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 216
Sources: Boozer could go to Chicago
By Marc Stein and Chad Ford
ESPN.com

Another major multi-team trade might be looming in the NBA with the Portland Trail Blazers, Utah Jazz and Chicago Bulls having discussed a deal that would be headlined by Carlos Boozer and Kirk Hinrich, according to NBA front-office sources.

Sources stressed to ESPN.com that no deal was imminent Thursday and that both Portland and Utah are still evaluating multiple trade scenarios. But two sources with knowledge of the three-team proposal confirmed that there have been substantive talks regarding a trade that would land Boozer in Chicago, Hinrich in Portland and Tyrus Thomas in Utah.

A deal featuring those main components would deliver the elite low-post scorer that the Bulls have been chasing for years in Boozer and furnish Portland with a lead guard in Hinrich that the Blazers are known to rate highly as a potential backcourt mate for Brandon Roy. It's possible that other players would be added to balance out the transaction from a salary-cap perspective if the three teams elect to take these talks further.

Yet even if this deal collapses, sources say it is clear that the Jazz are becoming increasingly open to the possibility of moving Boozer now to increase their financial flexibility to re-sign restricted free agent Paul Millsap.

Despite fresh reports Thursday about the Blazers weighing whether to sign Millsap to an offer sheet, Hinrich is the player Portland prefers, according to one source close to the process, after the Blazers came so close last week to landing the versatile Hedo Turkoglu.

Boozer has only one season left at $12.7 million after declining the option in his contract to become an unrestricted free agent July 1. It's believed that the Jazz are determined to keep Millsap but are concerned about the luxury-tax consequences of signing him to a long-term deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Im not sure how I feel about this. The pros are Tyrus is gone and we actually have someone you can give the ball in the post. The con I see is that the Bulls would be a little thin at guard. Now that Gordon is gone, I think you might need to keep Kirk around.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
If this happens and Kirk leaves who is the Bulls first guard off the bench? Pargo? Still it would be nice to see the Bulls have a front court player with a post move and a starting lineup of Rose Salmons Deng Boozer and Miller with Noah coming off the bench wouldnt be half bad. And they wouldnt have to worry about signing Thomas to any type of long term deal.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
I would love this deal. The whole team needs to be built around Rose. Hinrich just doesn't fit with him. I don't even care about next year. I just want contracts gone.

This sounds like a great deal.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:32 pm
Posts: 752
pizza_Place: cheese
Id do this in a heartbeat.

_________________
Jack Bauer wrote:
Superbitch, I'll pay for your tickets and drinks if your little pussy ass shows up. I GUARANTEE you'll leave in an ambulance though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
It would give the Bulls $35-$39M to spend next summer even if the salary cap goes down as projected. That would put them in position to sign 2 full boat guys and some fillers.


So it all comes down to the Bulls signing the right guys to all that money. Do people have faith in Gar and Pax to pull that off?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Supercup wrote:
Id do this in a heartbeat.


Me too!

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Agreed that this would be great for the Bulls. I think it makes them better next year AND gives them a better chance in 2010. If Boozer can return to form, then maybe he becomes a viable option. If not, he can see the door and his big contract can come off the books. Then they don't have to worry about renouncing Tyrus's rights just to afford one max guy. Love this deal. As much as I like Hinrich, they aren't winning a title without doing something big. This enables them to do that.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Bulldog Scott wrote:
Agreed that this would be great for the Bulls. I think it makes them better next year AND gives them a better chance in 2010. If Boozer can return to form, then maybe he becomes a viable option. If not, he can see the door and his big contract can come off the books. Then they don't have to worry about renouncing Tyrus's rights just to afford one max guy. Love this deal. As much as I like Hinrich, they aren't winning a title without doing something big. This enables them to do that.

Plus makes them a better team in the interim.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Um.... we can't get a player of Boozer's calibar for a lot less than his salary? I mean... he's not exactly dominant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Um.... we can't get a player of Boozer's calibar for a lot less than his salary? I mean... he's not exactly dominant.


It is one year, and then you are in a great position for next year's offseason. I really do not see a down side to this deal if it happens.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
I don't think this trade will happen, but, if so, the Bulls better know something that we don't with the free agent class of 2010.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Nas wrote:
Rose pulling a Jay Williams and the Bulls not having a PG or all the big name guys signing extensions this summer

I often wonder what this team would look like now if Jay Williams had not been a dumbass.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Mr. Reason wrote:
Nas wrote:
Rose pulling a Jay Williams and the Bulls not having a PG or all the big name guys signing extensions this summer

I often wonder what this team would look like now if Jay Williams had not been a dumbass.


It would be without Rose more than likely.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Did anyone hear Chad Ford on ESPN1000 say he thought Boozer might take a discount to stay in Chicago if this deal went through? Trying to figure out why he said this (or if he did).

I thought I heard it and went to check the podcast and despite the fact that the description of todays podcast says CJH talked to Chad... his interview isn't on it.


Anyone else hear it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:36 pm
Posts: 707
i am all for this. we have an allstar caliber point gaurd and an elite low post man? isnt that what we have been asking for since scott skiles took the job from cartwright?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
If it means sending Tyrus Thomas out to Utah, I'd make this move for Carlos Boozer...I can almost assure you that Jerry Sloan won't tolerate any B.S. from Tyrus if this trade becomes a reality...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
SHARK wrote:
If it means sending Tyrus Thomas out to Utah, I'd make this move for Carlos Boozer...I can almost assure you that Jerry Sloan won't tolerate any B.S. from Tyrus if this trade becomes a reality...

Sloan may actually be the best thing to happen to Tyrus. He will either live up to his abilities or Sloan will kick his ass. Even pushing 70, Jerry could still beat Thomas' ass.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Mr. Reason wrote:
Sloan may actually be the best thing to happen to Tyrus. He will either live up to his abilities or Sloan will kick his ass. Even pushing 70, Jerry could still beat Thomas' ass.


Agreed.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Did anyone hear Chad Ford on ESPN1000 say he thought Boozer might take a discount to stay in Chicago if this deal went through? Trying to figure out why he said this (or if he did).

I thought I heard it and went to check the podcast and despite the fact that the description of todays podcast says CJH talked to Chad... his interview isn't on it.


Anyone else hear it?


I doubt Boozer would take a discount to play anywhere, considering he snaked his way out of his deal with Cleveland to sign with Utah.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18202
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Great trade for the Bulls if they can make it happen. It does leave
the Bulls a little light on guards but Boozer would be a great addition
and hopefully one of the draft picks pans out to be Tyrus-like or
even better. The key to the deal is getting at least 70 games out of
Boozer, he has had some injury problems the last 3-4 years. If he
would happen to go down for a significant portion of the season you
could kiss the playoffs goodbye. Love the fact that his contract
goes away after one year. If he works out and is willing to work out a
decent contract great, if not say goodbye to him and go shopping.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 2251
pizza_Place: Gino's East - Pepperoni & Garlic Deep Dish
From Rotoworld:

Quote:
ESPN's Ric Bucher said via Twitter that the reported deal that would send Carlos Boozer to the Bulls, Kirk Hinrich to the Blazers and Tyrus Thomas to the Jazz is not going to happen.
Bucher said a person within the Bulls acknowledged the deal had been discussed, but that it "wasn't happening." He also mentions that a Blazers/Jazz/Pistons trade has also been discussed. The Jazz are looking for salary relief more than anything, but will probably keep discussing and fielding offers for Boozer.

_________________
Second City Saint


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Jack Bauer wrote:
From Rotoworld:

Quote:
ESPN's Ric Bucher said via Twitter that the reported deal that would send Carlos Boozer to the Bulls, Kirk Hinrich to the Blazers and Tyrus Thomas to the Jazz is not going to happen.
Bucher said a person within the Bulls acknowledged the deal had been discussed, but that it "wasn't happening." He also mentions that a Blazers/Jazz/Pistons trade has also been discussed. The Jazz are looking for salary relief more than anything, but will probably keep discussing and fielding offers for Boozer.


Did it mention as to what the sticking point was with this not happening and who was pulling away from the table? I can't imagine it would be the Bulls backing out.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
DegenerateDave wrote:
Did it mention as to what the sticking point was with this not happening and who was pulling away from the table? I can't imagine it would be the Bulls backing out.

I don't know. Over the last 5 years, it always seems like the Bulls think they are sitting on a goldmine with Tyrus, Deng, Hinrich, and Gordon (before he left).

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Douchebag wrote:
DegenerateDave wrote:
Did it mention as to what the sticking point was with this not happening and who was pulling away from the table? I can't imagine it would be the Bulls backing out.

I don't know. Over the last 5 years, it always seems like the Bulls think they are sitting on a goldmine with Tyrus, Deng, Hinrich, and Gordon (before he left).


Exactly - for once do what the Bears did finally and pull the trigger on a fucking deal that will make this team championship worthy going into 2010 to give these free agents SOME reason to sign with us. Tyrus Thomas and Hinrich aren't the incentive that guys like Lebron and Wade need. Boozer is.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
BD wrote:
I don't think this trade will happen, but, if so, the Bulls better know something that we don't with the free agent class of 2010.

I'm not sure I understand you. No one knows what will happen in 2010. There is no crystal ball.

However, we do know what could happen, and it could be an immediate league-wide shift of talent and the Bulls would be in a prime position to strike.

Even if 2010 fails out, it is still the right move. The chance to get a perennial all-star or even hall of famer can't be taken lightly. There is a good chance that 5 or more all-stars will be available and the Bulls will have one of the best positions of any team.

This deal would give the Bulls a chance to get Lebron especially if the Nets don't move to Brooklyn.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:35 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This deal would give the Bulls a chance to get Lebron especially if the Nets don't move to Brooklyn.


That is so ridiculous, I don't even know how to comment.

Anyway, Boozer is at best a 20-10 player who is going to ask for at least $20 million. You mean to tell me we can't get a 16 - 8 guy for far less money?

Does Boozer make up the scoring that we lose from Gordon being gone?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This deal would give the Bulls a chance to get Lebron especially if the Nets don't move to Brooklyn.


That is so ridiculous, I don't even know how to comment.

Anyway, Boozer is at best a 20-10 player who is going to ask for at least $20 million. You mean to tell me we can't get a 16 - 8 guy for far less money?

Does Boozer make up the scoring that we lose from Gordon being gone?

Boozer will only be with the Bulls for one year. We can get a 16 - 8 guy after next season.

For next season, there isn't a 16-8 guy for less money and the Bulls have money to spend anyways.

In the messed up NBA, the biggest value in trades is the expiring contract and this is the most valuable season to have an expiring deal.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Ugie, you have no understanding of the big picture here, don't you have something better to do in the general discussion area? 8) :P

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
BD wrote:
I don't think this trade will happen, but, if so, the Bulls better know something that we don't with the free agent class of 2010.

I'm not sure I understand you. No one knows what will happen in 2010. There is no crystal ball.

However, we do know what could happen, and it could be an immediate league-wide shift of talent and the Bulls would be in a prime position to strike.

Even if 2010 fails out, it is still the right move. The chance to get a perennial all-star or even hall of famer can't be taken lightly. There is a good chance that 5 or more all-stars will be available and the Bulls will have one of the best positions of any team.

This deal would give the Bulls a chance to get Lebron especially if the Nets don't move to Brooklyn.


I think it's worth the risk, but I think most of these guys will end up resigning with their own teams because of the difference in money their own teams can offer. The Bulls aren't the only team doing this so there are going to be some teams that are left holding big bags of cash. I'm sure the Bulls feel that they a realistic chance to land one of these guys, even with the possibility that these guys resign with their own teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group