Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Phil Jackson WAS one of the best of all time. He hasn't been a good coach since returning to the Lakers. Epitome of the term "Living off reputation" now. I dont think Karl is that good of a coach. He can be, and maybe he's mellowed enough a la Tom Coughlin to have continued success at one place finally. Flip Saunders is a decent coach. I've always thought Rick Carlisle was good. Larry Brown was a great coach, not so sure if he still is. I'm impressed with Eric Spoelstra(sp?) I think he's gonna be a very good coach for a long time.
I never understand all the Phil hate. The guy has been to 12 of the last 19 NBA Finals and won 10 of them. That's means he has gone to the Finals the same amount of times with the Bulls and Lakers. He took 2 different teams to multiple Finals with the Lakers. Coaching is all about results. He is the best coach in the NBA with Popivich being a close second.
It's not hate. I said I think he's one of the best coaches ever, just not anymore. It's not all about results. It's about what you do, as a coach, to get those results. If I coached the Lakers instead of Phil I'm pretty sure they would win more games and go deeper in the playoffs than Miami, but I wouldn't be close to as good a coach as Eric Spoelstra. Phil in the playoffs has repeatedly not taken advantage of matchups favorable to him, forced his team to play an inferior teams tempo(see: Rocket's series last season), and not called timeouts or done anything to prevent leads from escalating to being insurmountable(2006 series against the Suns, Game 7, 2008 Finals, Game 6 Boston, etc.) He simply has not done a great job in important games. He has probably the most talented roster in the league though, and one of the deepest. I wouldn't say he's bad, but he's not great, definitely not the best in the league. He has been outcoached by Rick Adelman and Doc Rivers in memorable series just the last two seasons. He's old, and has clearly lost a bit of his fastball.