It is currently Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 195 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 840
pizza_Place: Positano's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Good riddens...the sooner, the better.

Riddens?

That's Kujoesque. :wink:

_________________
Raoh: At this moment, I'm more powerful than you ever were. I am fist of the north star.
Ryûken: I don't agree and I never shall. Go and do what you must Raoh, but never set foot in this dojo again!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 6774
3 team deal being discussed. Bradley to the Blue Jays, Overbay to the Mets, and Luis Castillo to the Cubs.

_________________
Fuck Edwards and Zobrist


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 am
Posts: 6682
Location: sw burbs
pizza_Place: home run inn
Bradley Being Discussed In Three-Way Deal
By Howard Megdal [November 9 at 5:55pm CST]
A very interesting idea is being reported by Ken Rosenthal: a three-way deal, with Milton Bradley going to the Blue Jays, Luis Castillo to the Cubs, and Lyle Overbay to the Mets. Rosenthal said "The teams indeed have discussed the framework of such a deal, though not in direct fashion, according to major-league sources."

Breaking it down, the trade makes the most sense for the Mets, who would clear second base for long-coveted Orlando Hudson, a free agent. Overbay has also mashed righties for his entire career - .847 OPS career, .905 in 2009 - and could be paired with Daniel Murphy or Nick Evans for a high-reward platoon.

Castillo does block the movement of Ryan Theriot to second base when Starlin Castro arrives, but adding Castillo's on-base percentage would be a boon to the top of Chicago's lineup.

As for the Blue Jays, the deal would open up first base for Adam Lind, with Bradley slotting in as designated hitter. The question is: Overbay slugged .466 in 2009, while Bradley slugged just .397 - so is this an upgrade?

_________________
“Be Who You Are and Say What You Feel Because Those Who Mind Don't Matter and Those Who Matter Don't Mind.” ~ Dr. Suess


Nice Guys Finish Last

Thank you,and have a nice day !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Bradley isn't going anywhere via trade. The Cubs CAN'T bring him back. Teams know this. They'll let the Cubs twist in the wind til they give Bradley his unconditional release and some team will get Bradley for the league minimum while the Cubs pay him $10 million a season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 am
Posts: 6682
Location: sw burbs
pizza_Place: home run inn
9:01pm: The Chicago Tribune's Paul Sullivan is reporting that Toronto "wants no part of Milton Bradley." Meanwhile, Cubs GM Jim Hendry said that Chicago hasn't given up on Bradley, according to MLB.com's Scott Merkin. Of course, Hendry has to say that until the moment Bradley is traded

_________________
“Be Who You Are and Say What You Feel Because Those Who Mind Don't Matter and Those Who Matter Don't Mind.” ~ Dr. Suess


Nice Guys Finish Last

Thank you,and have a nice day !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:10 pm
Posts: 3093
Location: Gone
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Bradley will be in the Cubs opening day roster, mark my word.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
... except the night I dropped my pants and then loudly proclaimed I was the Whore of Babylon and demanded more wine, but that's another story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37806
Location: ...
he *always* plays with a chip on his shoulder.

he will not hit .280 while he's here. i don't care what he says or what his "clubhouse" attitude is; he clearly cannot handle the pressure here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
W_Z wrote:
he clearly cannot handle the pressure here.


he proved this by hitting sub-.230 in both his stints in montreal, another fanatical baseball town.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1564
W_Z wrote:
he *always* plays with a chip on his shoulder.

he will not hit .280 while he's here. i don't care what he says or what his "clubhouse" attitude is; he clearly cannot handle the pressure here.


He is also not a RBI guy, clearly miscast as a #5 hitter. He is not a middle of the order run producer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 am
Posts: 6682
Location: sw burbs
pizza_Place: home run inn
rangers offering bradley for millwood....

_________________
“Be Who You Are and Say What You Feel Because Those Who Mind Don't Matter and Those Who Matter Don't Mind.” ~ Dr. Suess


Nice Guys Finish Last

Thank you,and have a nice day !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
kujoe_7 wrote:
rangers offering bradley for millwood....

Done. Do that yesterday.

Seems very unrealistic though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
kujoe_7 wrote:
rangers offering bradley for millwood....

Done. Do that yesterday.

Seems very unrealistic though

Why? Do we want an aging (35 at start of the season) starting pitcher that's starting his decline? How would this make the Cubs more competitive than Milton Bradley?
This is the type of thinking that tanks this team year after year.

13-10 with a 3.67 ERA pitching in Texas

Milton Bradley at his best is less valuable than that. Also Milton will be 32 at the start of the season and I think he's aging as well (ill have to check that)

You dont know what youre talking about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
13-10 with a 3.67 ERA pitching in Texas

Milton Bradley at his best is less valuable than that.

You dont know what youre talking about.

Career over 4 ERA. Had a good year last year but his last 3 were ERA's over 5. The trend is a middle of the road starting pitcher. I DO like his durability. He approaches 200 innings. He's not real walkey. But what is his value over who he's replacing? Cubs don't find as much value in another semi solid starting pitcher as they would find in a lefty hitter. Even at last years stats I believe that that player adds more value as the cubs don't have anything to replace Bradley with. Since the need at the two positions is not the same, you cannot simply compare their last year's stats. That's you not knowing what you are talking about.

Thats just wrong. Plain and simple.
They can replace Bradley with any number of defensive specialists and it would be a HUGE upgrade over last year.
You realize he had 40 RBI in 124 games right?


Bottom Line
Durable Pitcher > Shitty OF


Troowiddit wrote:
This is the type of thinking that tanks this team year after year.


You make this pompous statement and your reasoning is the Cubs need a 32 year old RF that has played over 100 games 4 times in his career and has never had more than 77 RBI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Thats just wrong. Plain and simple.
They can replace Bradley with any number of defensive specialists and it would be a HUGE upgrade over last year.
You realize he had 40 RBI in 124 games right?


Bottom Line
Durable Pitcher > Shitty OF

Ok. Who do you think that the Cubs can realistically replace Milton with.
Look man, in the last 7 seasons Milwood has sub 4 ERA twice. He's 35 and for a starting pitcher, that's a lot older than an outfielder at 32. Hitters prime at 29-35. Pitchers, with some very notable exceptions, trend down after 35.
Bradley had a bad season last year. I won't deny that. I don't think next year he has as down a year. he's done that before, the shitty season, at least twice, but he can hit. And he can hit from both sides. Who do you replace him with? How much more do you expect to see than Bradley is actually capable of?
Milwood might be a nice luxury, but the Cubs don't need a middle to late rotation starter (unless he's a fuckin lefty). They need frickin batters, lefty batters.


I believe MOST of's in baseball can pass Miltons production. Especially last years production.

Miltons Career year in texas: 22 Hrs 77 RBI...and the offense was ridiculous so the RBI chances were there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You make this pompous statement and your reasoning is the Cubs need a 32 year old RF that has played over 100 games 4 times in his career and has never had more than 77 RBI

What is with the hard on for RBI? That is a statistic that requires a good team around him.
Again, let's not dismiss the fact that the Cubs just don't need a righty starter right now.
You don't want Bradley fine, trade him for someone you can use in the outfield. Cause with this trade you still have a massive hole in the lineup and the outfield, and you got an extra starting pitcher. You still gotta go get that power corner outfielder. That's why Bradley's value is higher than Milwoods is.

I strongly value starting Pitching Depth

He HAD the team around him in texas and still came thru with a whopping 77

He's never been good. He's always been overrated. Jack of all trades master of none


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You make this pompous statement and your reasoning is the Cubs need a 32 year old RF that has played over 100 games 4 times in his career and has never had more than 77 RBI

What is with the hard on for RBI? That is a statistic that requires a good team around him.
Again, let's not dismiss the fact that the Cubs just don't need a righty starter right now.
You don't want Bradley fine, trade him for someone you can use in the outfield. Cause with this trade you still have a massive hole in the lineup and the outfield, and you got an extra starting pitcher. You still gotta go get that power corner outfielder. That's why Bradley's value is higher than Milwoods is.


Soriano in LF is also a massive hole. New ownership should say to Hendry:" You have 2 months to unload these 2 clowns or else your gone!"

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

I believe MOST of's in baseball can pass Miltons production. Especially last years production.

Miltons Career year in texas: 22 Hrs 77 RBI...and the offense was ridiculous so the RBI chances were there.

Who? Who is available that the Cubs can sign (and pay for knowing that they're eating Milton's salary) .

If theyre dealing for Milwood. They wont be eating Milton's salary.

There are surely of in the cubs system that can produce a 775 ops
Garret Anderson (38) - Type B
Marlon Anderson (36)
Jason Bay (31) - Type A

Marlon Byrd (32) - Type B
Johnny Damon (36) - Type A
David Dellucci (36)

Joey Gathright (28)
Matt Holliday (30) - Type A
Reed Johnson (33)

Wily Mo Pena (28)
Manny Ramirez (38) - $20MM player option - Type A
Dave Roberts (38)

Marcus Thames (33)
Randy Winn (36) - Type


Any of those guys would be fine


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
I heard on B & B yesterday that the Red Sox aren't in love with Bay. If the Cubs could get Bay I'd like to see it. I just don't see how they can take on the salary given what Ricketts has said.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If theyre dealing for Milwood. They wont be eating Milton's salary.

That is not what I'm hearing. It sounds from what Levine said on the SW show that it sounds like the Cubs eat Miltons salary and pick up a bad contract as well.
A bunch of these guys on your list are past their prime.You're willing to settle for decent, anybody but Bradley. This isn't how you win games, divisions, leagues and WS.

And theyre still better. Please post Milton's Prime numbers.

You dont win divsions, leagues, or World series with Milton Bradley on your roster.

I would not make the Milwood deal if they have to pay both contracts.


Decent> Bradley

In OPS he ranked 40th in the NL

Why do you think he's so good?
He's not. Never has been.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Hey Trow,
Thanks for being so elecunt in support of my opinion (and yours)! Take that BigFan!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Troowiddit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why do you think he's so good?
He's not. Never has been.

Career averages here..
.277 average (better than "decent")
.371 OBP (decent to me is mid 350's, so better than decent)
.450 SLG (not bad at all really)
.821 OPS (pretty good)
He'll average 20 HR...
He will average 150 hits.
he averages 76 RBI which is right on with the current FA lists.
(and you should really check out his post season stats...only 11 games but not bad at all.)
Look I get that he's an asshole, I won't deny that, but to so blindly call him hot garbage is to simply regurgitate the bullshit you hear from sports radio, consistantly populated with meatball twerps, and what you get from the Mouthpiece of the Cubs, the Tribune. He's not hot garbage. he can play. And, he's a prick. Fine. We don't need guys we can fucking spoon with on this team, we need guys who can hit, and hit from the left, and that can be Milton bradley.

First of all your numbers are based on 162 games played and he's never come close to that. So right there your argument fails.

You have him averaging 20 home runs. He has reached 20 exactly ONCE :lol: You have him averaging 150 hits HIS CAREER HIGH IS 138 :lol:

You and I value different statistics. I dont even listen to sports radio anymore. I have watched Bradley for years and he's not good. He's average overall and good at talking pitches. Thats it.
Average overall/good at taking pitches + WAY Injury Prone= Average at best.


I understand not wanting to regurgitate sports radio talking points. But you really need to delve deeper into the stats. Youll see Bradley is average and always has been.


That he's an asshole matters not to me.
That he sucks does matter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Troowiddit wrote:
we need guys who can hit, and hit from the left, and that can be Milton bradley.



This is one of the places your argument is falling a bit short. He's average, at best, hitting from the left side. His numbers last year hitting lefty against a right handed pitcher(no stats on baseball reference hitting lefty vs. a lefty):

291 At Bats
.234 batting average
.379 OBP
.764 OPS
.286 baBIP

Combine that with the fact that he elevates ass hat to never before seen levels and it's easy to see why he has to go. I'm usually not the biggest chemistry guy, winning creates it etc, but he is the exception to the rule.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Last edited by Northside_Dan on Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Troowiddit wrote:

I believe that I have admitted (or theorized) that last year was a down year. What's his lifetime lefty stats?


.266 avg
.365 OPB
.796 OPS
.312 baBIP

For sure a down year, but his career numbers aren't what you call a good left handed batter. That was the biggest misconception with him being brought in here and it pissed me off to no end.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Troowiddit wrote:
Definately not "bad at baseball" career stats.



It is bad considering the pretense that he was brought in here as. Lou saw a perceived need for a left handed bat/power bat and then Jim goes and bids against himself and brings this guy in. Even if he hit his exact career averages as a lefty next year, it would not be enough for me to justify keeping him on this team.


Overall as a hitter he's fine. But he's bad at defense and average as a lefty.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Troowiddit wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Soriano in LF is also a massive hole. New ownership should say to Hendry:" You have 2 months to unload these 2 clowns or else your gone!"

This is a good point. With Soriano as bad as he is you need better D in C and RF to make up for it. The Cubs absolutely need outfielders, they're gonna be fine with Starting 4th or 5th guys, but there's OF holes for sure.

Let's look at the cubs starting rotation:

Big Dumbass- Head case whose wins, starts and IP have declined the last 3 years.
Dempster- Innings eater. Decent 3rd starter.
Lilliy- coming off shoulder surgery.
Wells- 27 big league starts
Gorzo- couldn't make it in Pittsburgh
Marshall- 4A starter
Samardzija- 4A starter

You sure they're going to be fine starting 4th or 5th guys?? I think they could use at least 1 more reliable starter. Maybe 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Keyser Soze wrote:

You sure they're going to be fine starting 4th or 5th guys?? I think they could use at least 1 more reliablestarter. Maybe 2.


Agreed with this 100%. I want Shark nowhere near the starting rotation unless he develops another 1-2 pitches. He could potentially be a serviceable 6th/7th inning guy, but at this point his time frame for 'potential' is starting to run out.


Like RPB said, the Bradley for Milwood deal would have been done yesterday.

Z
Lilly
Demp
Milwood
Wells

Not bad at all.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Keyser Soze wrote:
Troowiddit wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Soriano in LF is also a massive hole. New ownership should say to Hendry:" You have 2 months to unload these 2 clowns or else your gone!"

This is a good point. With Soriano as bad as he is you need better D in C and RF to make up for it. The Cubs absolutely need outfielders, they're gonna be fine with Starting 4th or 5th guys, but there's OF holes for sure.

Let's look at the cubs starting rotation:

Big Dumbass- Head case whose wins, starts and IP have declined the last 3 years.
Dempster- Innings eater. Decent 3rd starter.
Lilliy- coming off shoulder surgery.
Wells- 27 big league starts
Gorzo- couldn't make it in Pittsburgh
Marshall- 4A starter
Samardzija- 4A starter

You sure they're going to be fine starting 4th or 5th guys?? I think they could use at least 1 more reliable starter. Maybe 2.


I am with you KS - that's why I thought Bradley for Zito wasn't as horrible as some were making it out to be.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Northside_Dan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:

You sure they're going to be fine starting 4th or 5th guys?? I think they could use at least 1 more reliablestarter. Maybe 2.


Agreed with this 100%. I want Shark nowhere near the starting rotation unless he develops another 1-2 pitches. He could potentially be a serviceable 6th/7th inning guy, but at this point his time frame for 'potential' is starting to run out.


Like RPB said, the Bradley for Milwood deal would have been done yesterday.

Z
Lilly
Demp
Milwood
Wells

Not bad at all.


Hopefully,Gorzelany,Marshall & the ND guy,too!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Northside_Dan wrote:
Agreed with this 100%. I want Shark nowhere near the starting rotation unless he develops another 1-2 pitches.

Agreed. Especially considering the recent slump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moving Milton?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Isn't it time to stop penciling Zambrano in as a number 1 starter?
Cubs starting pitching wasn't bad last year, but they will need help this year for sure. I would rather see a lefty than another righty but honestly, there's nothing on this team that I wouldn't mind seeing replaced, DL being the only real exception. Or would you give up Lee for some prospects?? Thoughts for another thread.
Milton will be gone, don't think otherwise, so this keep Milton shit is nothing more than a pipe dream.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 195 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group