Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic - Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO CUBS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

Page 2 of 2

[ 33 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

man of few opinions

Post subject: Re: Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:44 pm

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone

NearWessSideHussra wrote:

Alfredo Aceves

2009 Salary: $406,750
2009 Wins: 10
PPW: $40,675

Carlos Zambrano

2009 Salary: $18,750,000
2009 Wins: 9
PPW: $2.1 million (approx)

what does aceves salary and win total have to do with you silva prediction? you should be using silvas numbers:

Carlos Silva

2009 Salary: $12,250,000
2009 Wins: 1
PPW: $12,250,000

using that stupid-ass theory, zambrano will do better than silva.

Top

NearWessSideHussra

Post subject: Re: Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:50 pm

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down

Touchy, touchy.

You think my predictions are off, we'll find out.

In the meantime, don't overdue it with the angry replies

to...PREDICTIONS.

Top

Mr. Hernandez

Post subject: Re: Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:56 pm

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere

NearWessSideHussra wrote:

Big Z's an overpaid wash-out, even more so than Carlos Silva. Silva wins 10 games in 2010 and Z wins 8 or 9, Silva's the better deal for the Cubs in that case.

Zambrano isn't a washout. He just needs a teammate or someone to punch him in his damn face and set his ass straight

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."

Top

Page 2 of 2

[ 33 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Who's more likely to bounce back in 2010?

Who is online